Last Monday, activist David Suzuki and economist Jeff Rubin shared the stage at McGill for The End of Growth Tour. The two explored the future of environmental sustainability and existing development trends. Suzuki focused primarily on the societal influence of development on the environment, while Rubin analyzed macro growth trends and the nominal price of energy for production to discuss the relationship between growth and sustainability. While each renowned speaker had slightly different interests in sustainability, both stressed the need to reverse recent growth trends and reduce our environmental footprint. What wasn’t directly explored during Monday’s event was our own individual roles in the process of de-growth. In the aggregate, we need to diminish production and growth—but, as individuals, how can we all participate in this shift?
When it comes to sustainability in general, institutions like McGill can play an essential role in community integration, which can better serve our collective ideals.
While personal initiatives in sustainability are hugely beneficial, the radical change that Suzuki and Rubin demand cannot be initiated without larger-scale implementation. McGill has the opportunity to move concepts like de-growth and sustainability beyond individualistic projects and into more mainstream action. In fact, resources exist at McGill already that support the ideas heard on Monday. Students themselves already have access to student initiatives that promote sustainability for the McGill community. In addition to these established projects, the university can, by virtue of its size, be an effective promotion tool for developing sustainable initiatives that move towards reduced consumption. Campus entities such as the Office of Sustainability, or the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU), can very effectively provide access to expansive resources and like-minded individuals.
The overarching concept of de-growth is fundamentally based on the idea that yesterday’s economic expansion and environmental degradation are not feasible for tomorrow. Whether a shift is brought about by conscientious policy-making or by economic necessity, it will bring about stagnation in growth. For the speakers at Monday’s event, this is a good thing. The global economy is heavily dependent on the cheap production of goods and hyper-consumption of materials in a way that cannot be continued indefinitely. A move away from this—as radical as it may seem—is more than feasible with the participation of the larger community.
Institutions like McGill can facilitate this first and essential step for a national and global shift prescribed by the likes of Suzuki and Rubin. As students, we have the opportunity to make use of the available community and access to resources to realize our individual conceptions of de-growth. If we accept Suzuki’s and Rubin’s initial premise as presented at The End of Growth Tour, McGill will prove an essential proponent, and promoter, of change for our sustainable future.
Any idea, in and of itself, is beneficial for the process of de-growth. If more people have the opportunity to discuss sustainability in meaningful ways, the community at large will be more receptive to change.
