Last Wednesday’s Senate meeting featured much discussion on improving teaching and learning at McGill, as well as a report from enrolment services on recruitment and retention.

While the meeting was closed to outside observers other than members of the campus media and incoming senators, the proceedings were made available to the wider university community via a livestream to  the Cyberthèque in the basement of the Redpath Library.

After a vote to approve the closing of the chambers and livestreaming of the proceedings, discussion moved to a question brought forward by science senator Max Luke.

Luke’s question, which pertained to the sustainability of teaching and learning at McGill, asked how the university is facilitating interdisciplinary projects focused on environmental sustainability.

In his response, Provost Anthony Masi pointed to the section of McGill’s Strategic Research Plan pertaining to the environment, which lists, for example, ecology and conservation biology, climate variability, and clean energy systems as priorities for collaboration across faculties, especially among agricultural and environmental sciences, law, science, and engineering. He went on to note that environmental sustainability will continue to play a role in faculty renewal.

Law senator Ian Clarke asked whether McGill’s assessment of its performance includes a comparison of its activities with those of other institutions. In response, Masi mentioned the recent LEED certification of the Bellini Life Sciences Complex, which is an objective certification from an outside group. 

In a special report, Prof. Cynthia Weston and Dr. Laura Winer of Teaching and Learning Services updated the assembly on developments in their department. Their presentation examined attributes of excellence in teaching and learning at all levels of the university, from professors to faculties and departments to the university as a whole.

Weston highlighted innovative strategies used by professors, like graded online discussion boards, in-class clicker questions that prompted peer discussion, and interactive writing assignments, which involved students improving their own work based on feedback as part of the course.

Nigel Roulet, a senator and professor in the department of geography, noted the value he has seen in McGill’s active learning classrooms.

“I have had students say the active learning classrooms were the deepest form of learning they had ever taken,” he said.

Senator Matt Crawford emphasized the key role teaching assistants play in fostering discussion in many classes.

“WebCT is not a direct substitute for discussion mediated by teaching assistants,” he cautioned.

Other senators noted the lack of availability of classroom space, particularly for midterm exams, as a barrier to giving good feedback to students.

Following the Teaching and Learning Services presentation, Deputy Provost (Student Life and Learning) Morton Mendelson spoke on Enrolment Services (ES). The ES department deals with student recruitment and retention, and falls under the portfolio of the deputy provost.

Science senator Annie Ma asked if the university was taking steps to emphasise volunteer and extracurricular involvement as criteria for admission.

“One of the roadblocks to full-file interviews is the time and resources it takes,” Mendelson said.

Mendelson noted that the University of British Columbia has recently announced it will consider more than just grades, and that while he can’t say McGill is moving in that direction, the administration is aware of the issue.

Mendelson also expressed concern over McGill’s yield rate. The proportion of admitted students who accept an offer to attend McGill is one of the lowest among peer universities.

“[We] have been increasing efforts to attract those students,” he said.

Following the discussion on enrolment, Dean of Students Jane Everett brought information to Senate regarding proposed changes to the Code of Student Conduct and Disciplinary Procedures.

The sections on disruptions and demonstrations have been a point of much contention in recent months.

Everett asked Senate to delay discussion of those articles until the release of Dean Manfredi’s report into the university community’s view of the meaning, scope, and protection of free expression and peaceful assembly on campus.

The next steps for the revision will be formal consultation with faculties and student associations via committees, and the production of a draft copy of the revised code, which will eventually be brought to senate for approval.