On Jan. 2, the Tribunal administratif du travail certified the Association of McGill Academic Staff of the School of Continuing Studies (AMASCS) as McGill’s fourth faculty union. AMASCS is the first instance of faculty unionization that McGill did not contest in court—a pivotal moment for the unions, who have faced protracted, embattled paths toward certification over the past few years.
In April of last year, the Association of the McGill Professors of Law (AMPL) went on an indefinite strike to protest stalled negotiations over a collective agreement (CA) with McGill that would protect faculty governance, pay, and work conditions. McGill maintained an anti-union stance throughout its legal battle with AMPL and the subsequent strike, delaying the Fall semester, before finally reaching a settlement with the union in October.
The Association of Graduate Students Employed at McGill (AGSEM) faced similar hostility when negotiating with the university for higher wages and a new CA. McGill refused to meet AGSEM’s demands for a wage increase, and its counter-proposal only addressed one of several main demands—allowing one Union Delegate per Hiring Unit to attend their annual meetings—leading to a strike in March that delayed coursework grading and put overwhelming pressure on McGill professors.
While a necessary first step, McGill’s lack of contestation of AMASCS does not make up for the university’s long-standing “bad faith” in union negotiations, its reluctance to adequately meet demands, or, more broadly, its institutional stance towards unions on campus. The acceptance of AMASCS is an important step forward, but it may have more to do with the nature of the faculty itself than a fundamental change in McGill’s attitude. While the academic staff of the School of Continuing Studies are critical workers at McGill, the faculty is relatively small, and its unionization empowers a smaller number of members in relation to the McGill administration compared to larger faculties.
If McGill remains committed to recognizing and respecting faculty unionization, the certification of AMASCS will mark a monumental step toward fostering a true workers-first environment. Continuing to support unionization efforts in other faculties would demonstrate McGill’s dedication to equity, solidarity, and the empowerment of all workers, laying the foundation for a more just and collaborative campus community. However, if McGill chooses to sustain historic hostility towards unionization and union demands, the AMASCS certification will be little more than a token example to which McGill can point when criticized for its anti-union attitude.
Unions are a vital artery in any institution, but especially an educational one. They bring individuals together to act as a collective bargaining unit to protect rights, wages, work conditions, and a salient voice in the administration and its decisions. Unions are a benefit to faculty and students alike; when professors are better paid and better treated, they are able to offer a higher-quality education to their students, thus maintaining the academic prestige McGill proudly advertises.
As unionized workers have gone on strike for their rights at McGill, students and administrators have wrongly misplaced the blame, criticizing striking TAs or Law professors for the inconvenience of overdue grades or delayed semesters, respectively. McGill’s historically anti-union stance has exacerbated this animosity towards strikers—a resentment which should be directed at the administration whose mistreatment made the strike necessary in the first place. Such misdirected anger only adds to the exploitation and disrespect strikers have already endured as victims of administrative mistreatment.
Despite McGill’s institutional attitude towards unions, the aggregated progress of AMPL, AGSEM, and now AMASCS has paved a smoother road for future collectives. In the same way unity within a faculty births political power larger than the sum of its parts, unity between faculties does the same. It proves to both McGill and its non-unionized faculties that unionization is possible and can be won, even against an administration that opposes it.
Where this animosity threatens to pit members of the McGill community against one another, students and faculty alike must remember their solidarity, and strength in numbers. We must acknowledge that unions are a universal good, and remind ourselves that we are all fighting for the same future community. Faculty rights become students’ gains, and students’ gains are McGill’s gains, both as a world-renowned university and as a community of people who have come together to teach, learn, and support one another.
