Latest News

The vaulted subject of Bert Stern: Original Mad Man. (www.floridafilmfestival.com)
a, Arts & Entertainment

A portrait of the artist as a cranky old man

Before Don Draper, there was Bert Stern—a man who forever shaped the way we looked at consumer products. Bert Stern: Original Mad Man takes an intimate look at one of the most influential fashion and celebrity photographers of the 20th century. Stern was a pioneer in the field of commercial photography, reimagining advertisements and fashion magazines alike with a modern and minimalistic eye.

The documentary closely examines Stern’s life, but often its story is sequentially unfocused. It shifts from the present day, replete with lawsuits and the travails of old age, to the past, by way of Stern’s memories.

Stern undoubtedly lived an extraordinary life, and is still lively and entertaining at the age of 94. Known primarily for shooting The Last Sitting of Marilyn Monroe six weeks before her death, Stern is a self-professed womanizer, who claims that women are his “favourite thing in the world.”

Starting out as the assistant to an art director at an advertising firm in New York City, Stern eventually moved into the realm of fashion and celebrity photography. This is what he is best known for today, having shot Monroe, Twiggy, Elizabeth Taylor, Richard Burton, and more recently, Kate Moss and Lindsay Lohan—the latter in an infamous recreation of The Last Sitting—throughout his long career.

The movie details Stern’s relationships with many women, but most notably his volatile marriage to American ballet dancer Allegra Kent. The focus on women lends the film an almost misogynistic tone, as it appears that instead of loving women and praising them in his pictures, Stern instead used the medium of photography to dominate and own them. Although Stern is not an unlikeable subject, some of his opinions are dated and sexist, and sit uncomfortably with a modern audience.

Director Shannah Laumeister is a close friend of Stern’s, and sometimes her relationship with the legendary photographer gets in the way of the film’s narrative. For example, the documentary tends to focus on their oddly sexual yet platonic friendship, instead of the more interesting, dynamic aspects of Stern’s life, such as his beginnings in advertising, and his relationship with his family. Removing the sections that feature Laumeister and her relationship with Stern would have created a much more focused and consistent direction for the film.

The director’s close relationship with the subject also allows for a large amount of bias, as more unsavoury (yet important) aspects of Stern’s personality and life are only casually revealed near the end of the documentary, only to be immediately swept away.

One of the most notable examples of this is Stern’s descent into mental illness in the ’70s, which is framed in a bizarre way that undermines the severity of the breakdown. Instead of portraying Stern’s illness as a cautionary tale against heavy drug use, its importance is downplayed.

Similarly, Stern’s estranged relationship with one of his daughters is hinted at near the end of the film, but her absence is given absolutely no explanation from Stern himself—Laumeister simply skims over the surface, instead of exposing any true familial emotion beneath Stern’s tough exterior. Interestingly, Stern’s son is not interviewed in the film, for reasons that also go unacknowledged and unexplained.

Despite the documentary’s subject’s extremely exciting life, Bert Stern: Original Mad Man becomes depressing.

“I shouldn’t have been so happy [when I was young], I should have saved it for now … when I need it,” Stern states in the film.

It seems that even with all of his experiences within the world of celebrity, the lack of close personal relationships in Stern’s life has come back to haunt him. His isolation is a topic which is conspicuously missing from the film, and it might be the cause of his estranged relationship with at least one of his children. It’s unfortunate—although he caught many beautiful moments on film, Bert Stern seems to have neglected to pursue them in his own life outside his studio.

 

Bert Stern: Original Mad Man opens Mar. 29 at Cinema du Parc (3575 Avenue du Parc).

 

McGill’s own Antoine Martel. (Wendy Chen / The McGill Tribune)
a, Arts & Entertainment

McGill student brings Seattle sensibility to the Montreal music scene

It seems that Seattle has delivered yet another gem to the Montreal music scene.

Up-and-coming singer-songwriter and McGill music student Antoine Martel, who hails from the rainy city, recognizes the long line of talent that has arisen from his hometown. Leading a self-named band, Martel laughs as he lists the great number of his musical influences that happen to be from his hometown—Fleet Foxes, Eddie Vedder, and The Head & the Heart, to name just a few.

Martel’s folk rock album, Cough Drops in Autumn, has a calming acoustic sound, with complementing elements of classical and jazz. It is clear that Martel’s extensive musical training has had an impact on his songwriting. His compositions are far from ordinary. They are detail oriented, and clearly musically complex, replete with intricate melodies, woodwind, and fiddle solos, and topped off with his powerful lyricism.

As a child, Martel’s parents always encouraged him to get involved in the arts. He began classical piano training at age five, and continued for 11 years. Although these lessons gave him an unmatchable musical foundation, his motivation was low at the time.

“I didn’t actually like [piano], which is strange to think back upon now,” he chuckles.

After years of arguments over practicing, his parents made him a deal: he could quit, as long as he promised to pick up another instrument. So Martel finished learning one last piano piece, Gershwin’s Rhapsody in Blue, and made a quick switch to guitar.

Now, five years later, Martel is studying music composition at McGill’s prestigious Schulich School of Music, where he finds himself surrounded by an immense amount of talent.

“My band members are all way better musicians than me,” he humbly admits, saying that he only needs to bring his songs to them once before they are ready to perform. He raves over his band, which consists entirely of McGill musicians: Guillaume Pilote on drums, Alan Mackie on bass, Neil Heaton on piano, Alex Cherney on guitar, Devin LaCasce on flute, and Gareth Dicker on violin. Martel himself leads on guitar and vocals.

Martel draws inspiration from the city of Montreal, and his experiences as a student.

“Montreal has shaped this album in a lot of ways,” he says. Two tracks on his new album, “The Fire” and “How Things Change” were actually inspired by a funny experience he had as a first year student. In March 2011, a fire broke out in New Residence Hall, only a few floors directly above Martel’s dorm room. As a result of the damage, he and 17 other inhabitants were relocated out of residence for a month, and given temporary rooms at the downtown Delta hotel.

“I had this great balcony [at the Delta],” Martel says. “I sat on that balcony, and wrote a lot of tunes.”

He is similarly sanguine when discussing his music writing process.

“It changes … but it usually involves me with my acoustic guitar, around four in the morning, not being able sleep,” Martel says. “That’s where most of the things start happening.” He confesses that writing lyrics is the most difficult step for him, crediting Ben Harper and Alexi Murdoch as two artists he looks to for inspiration.

Though Martel is continuing to write and record, he’s mainly looking to get his music out there.

“You can have it for free, I really don’t care,” he jokes as he talks about his new album.

What’s next for Martel? He continues to enjoy all that Montreal has to offer, including places to perform. It’s evident that his future is bright, as he works to join the ranks of the other brilliant Seattle born musicians before him.

 

Coughdrops in Autumn is available online, pay what you can. Album release show on Mar. 28, 8 p.m., at L’Alize (900 Ontario est). Tickets $5.

a, Arts & Entertainment

Mozart opera production toots its own flute

Mozart meets the Industrial Revolution in Opera McGill’s final production of the 2012-2013 season, The Magic Flute—a joint performance with McGill’s Chamber Orchestra in Pollack Hall, presented on Mar. 21 and 23.

In the celebrated opera, Prince Tamino wanders into a distant land, and is asked by the grief-stricken Queen of Night to rescue her daughter Pamina from the evil Sarastro. Accompanied by the bird catcher Papageno, Tamino begins a fantastical journey, in which he learns about the importance of virtue, brotherhood, and love in this allegory of the Enlightenment.

The performance of the all-student opera company is marked by strong characterization. From the sass of the Queen’s three ladies, to the playful child-spirits, the performers bring considerable enthusiasm and humour to the fairy tale opera. Ginette Grenier’s complex costume design adds a steampunk aesthetic that helps most characters stand out from the bare stage. Only the Masonic priests seem less dignified than their roles require, dressed in Victorian overalls, while the wise King Sarastro barely stands out from the rest of his priests.

Vincent Lefebvre’s set is minimalist, with a very sparse use of props. Rather, images projected onto a large screen behind the orchestra set the scene, displaying different environments as metaphors for the various characters. For example, the Queen of Night’s realm is a frigid snowscape, while Sarastro’s singing brings spring. Although the concept has potential, the execution is shaky. The images projected onto the screen are disappointingly pixelated; obviously looping videos distract from the action on stage. Additionally, the choice of imagery used to portray Sarastro’s Masonic Temple of Reason mostly consists of turning gears, grinding clockwork, and ambiguous shapes, failing to create a sense of location for much of the performance.

Opera McGill director Patrick Hansen continuously toys with the separation between the audience and the performance, with actors often singing from the centre of the auditorium. Lighting by Serge Filiatrault also plays a role in this breakdown of boundaries, as lights are projected on the sides of the auditorium in addition to the main stage. Perhaps a response to the spatial challenge of sharing the stage with the orchestra, this artistic decision keeps the audience engaged, and even amused, as when one of the three child-spirits tugs playfully at the suit of conductor Boris Brott. Having the orchestra on stage further allows the audience to become more aware of the musicians, and their role in the opera.

Under Brott’s artistic direction, McGill’s Chamber Orchestra executes the acclaimed score flawlessly, without upstaging the talented members of Opera McGill. Papageno (Geoffrey Penar) steals the show with his refreshingly comical performance, all the while executing a challenging score. Rebecca Woodmass also shines as the Queen of Night, impressing the audience with the strength of her delivery of one of the most famous arias of all time. Her thunderous portrayal of the crutch-holding Queen surrounded by bodyguards adds layers of depth to the role.  Aaron Sheppard plays a gentle Tamino, and displays much chemistry with soprano Vanessa Oude-Reimerink’s charming Pamina.

Opera McGill’s rendition of The Magic Flute chooses to emphasize the comedic rather than the philosophical in Mozart’s masterpiece. Although the set leaves much to be desired, the talent on stage carried the performance with humour, and ultimately succeeds at creating a performance as refreshing as its ensemble.

Andrew Searles hopes to break through comedy’s glass ceiling.(myspace.com)
a, Arts & Entertainment

Breakout Montreal comedian aims for baskets of laughter

Comedy is not typically thought of as a strenuous field. Performers go on stage, talk for a few minutes about their lives, and get paid. However, Andrew Searles, the energetic and affable comedian performing a special show called C’est Moi! C’est Chocolat! at Théâtre Sainte Catherine this weekend, does much more than the average performer.

A recent marketing graduate from Concordia University, Searles has always possessed a love for comedy performance. After graduating, he decided to follow this passion, and bravely committed to an attempt to break through the glass ceiling of professional comedy in Canada. Although he admits the decision to deter the acquisition of a “real career” was also strongly influenced by a love for “sleeping until 1 p.m. and then watching Fresh Prince all day,” he has been working tirelessly to stand out in stand-up.

Even so, creating a reputation is “time-consuming and mentally exhausting,” says Searles. Even after several years of surviving purely off his performance, he is frustrated by clubs’ refusal to let him perform his own special show, one dear to his heart. So he personally rented out Théâtre Sainte Catherine, set up the entire weekend, arranged opening acts, and marketed the upcoming event in an attempt to circumvent big business and succeed independently.

His material ranges from his own lifestyle as a visible minority in Canada, to the antics of female “army units” in clubs. During the brief interview, he effortlessly caught this writer out of breath with laughter due to his quick wit and eloquence. However, he explained that being funny is not enough to be a comedian.

“You have to be flexible and adapt to the audience,” says Searles. “If they’re older, don’t talk about Facebook. If they laugh at a dick joke, then keep telling dick jokes. What people don’t realize is that the audience always controls the show.”

Searles can be a goofy guy—to promote his event, he did a photo shoot of women smearing chocolate pudding all over his suit—but his vision is the true cause of his success. He not only created the idea for the shoot, but organized the cameramen, models, rentals, and the distribution of flyers, as well as all other aspects of promotion.

“My marketing education has been instrumental for every step of the process,” he insists.

This upcoming weekend will feature five shows, and every detail of each were completely coordinated by Searles himself.

“This show is my baby, it’s something I’ve had in my head for about three years,” explains Searles, with obvious excitement. His only regret about this show is that he’ll have to miss Bal en Blanc—Montreal’s annual Easter rave party—but he seems confident his performance will be even better than his favourite artist Armin Van Buuren’s.

Searles makes a strong pitch.

“I can guarantee you’ll be laughing,” he says, with regard to his performance as well as those of his two openers, Rodney Ramsey and Guido Cocomello. To entice an Easter weekend audience, everyone will get a free chocolate bunny with admission. But one suspects that the offer of chocolate isn’t necessary to make C’est Moi! C’est Chocolat! a hit with the crowd.

 

Andrew Searles’ C’est Moi! C’est Chocolat! runs Mar. 28 to 30 at Théâtre Sainte Catherine (264 St. Catherine). Tickets $15 advance, $20 door.

The Besnard Lakes: Until In Excess, Imperceptible UFO (Outside Music)
a, Arts & Entertainment, Music

The Besnard Lakes: Until In Excess, Imperceptible UFO

Coming off the heels of their second appearance on the Polaris Prize shortlist, The Besnard Lakes are back with Until In Excess, Imperceptible UFO, another collection of orchestral slow burners.

Husband and wife bandleaders Jace Lasek and Olga Goreas and their bevy of collaborators have created eight dreamy, textured songs that shift and evolve over their many minutes. The songs are formulaic, opening with pulsing drones followed by Lasek and Goreas’ lilting voices alongside drums, guitars, and keys. The instrumentation blossoms into full-blown orchestral grandeur, while the vocals are eventually washed out. While the instrumentation is intricate, several of the tracks fail to make an impact due to the lack of discernable hooks.

The standout track of the album, “And Her Eyes Were Painted Gold,” uses Lasek’s vocals to control the song among the percussion, strings, keyboards, and guitars. While the vocal tracks are usually lost amidst the roaring instruments, this track avoids that pitfall, dodging the potential of being used as mere background music—a fate that unfortunately befalls most of the album’s other songs. Seven-minute album closer “Alamogordo,” for instance, fails to make an impact despite heavy percussion and synthesizers, and has little substance beyond sheer volume.

The album is technically impressive, and the songs are calm and easy to listen to. This is by no means a bad album, just one that occasionally drifts into the background of the mind.

Bonobo: The North Borders (Ninja Tune)
a, Arts & Entertainment, Music

Bonobo: The North Borders

Bonobo is back, and he has evolved. The North Borders, the British producer’s first album of original material since 2010’s Black Sands, boasts a heavily modern UK garage sound with inflections of fellow garage artist Burial.

Simon Green, also known as Bonobo, is the most popular guy on the Ninja Tune label. This album will only further solidify his status as one of the UK’s go-to producers.

The North Borders is exciting and vibrant, and begs to be played over and over again. Fans of the producer will not be disappointed with a track that features Erykah Badu, as well as songs that involve many new voices.

Standout tracks include single “Cirrus” and “Emkay,” the latter featuring a somewhat slouchy, loungey intro that evolves into a fast-paced garage track.

“Cirrus” (presumably named after the type of cloud) reaches lofty heights, transporting the listener to an airy, otherworldly realm with layers of light synths and chimes.

Album closer “Pieces” (with vocals by Cornelia) is a charming ditty, bordering on ballad territory. However, Bonobo maintains a heavy feel with the track—not surrendering completely to the pretty, whimsical sounds of the vocals.

All in all, this entire album is stunning, without even one dud track. It takes a couple of listens to fully get into some of the songs, but once you do, it’s definitely worth it.

Phosphorescent: Muchacho (Dead Oceans)
a, Arts & Entertainment, Music

Phosphorescent: Muchacho

Phosphorescent’s Matthew Houck has hit a career high with the release of his sixth full-length album, Muchacho, which creates the perfect blend of electronica and Americana.

The album opens with bubbling electro synth and harmonized vocals in “Sun, Arise!,” which, along with its sister song “Sun’s Arising,” bookend the album. Don’t be fooled, however—they are a far cry from the eight other songs that come in between.

The remarkable feat Houck has accomplished with this album is managing to balance perfectly arranged instrumentals—creating a lush and monumental sound—with his strained, reedy, and hiccupping vocals. Rather than detracting from the music, Houck’s poignant and passionate voice drips with heartache and lost love, adding a very familiar and relatable human element that resonates with listeners. Even if you’ve never had your heart broken, when Houck croons, “I’ll fix myself up to come and be with you” in “Muchacho’s Tune,” he might as well have been reading a line out of your personal diary.

Muchacho’s breakout track is arguably “Song for Zula.” With its resonant synths and pedal steel guitar, this song contains some of the best lyrics of the album. It is obvious this troubled troubadour has seen some trying times as he sings, “Oh but I know love as a caging thing / Just a killer come to call from some awful dream.”

Nevertheless, Muchacho is not without its upbeat, foot-stomping moments as well. In particular “Ride On, Right On” and “A Charm/A Blade” recall earlier works and speak to Phosphorescent’s versatility, a mastery that seems to have come with time.

Admission’s standards are disappointingly low. (www.wired.com)
a, Arts & Entertainment

Admission: denied

Admission is a film that should probably end up in the “deny” pile. Directed by Peter Weitz (About a Boy) and starring Tina Fey, the film begins in the ivy-embellished halls of Princeton University. Fey plays Portia Nathan, a member of Princeton’s prestigious admissions department, where her job is to decide who, among thousands of applicants, gets in.

The film introduces Fey’s character as an uptight, play-by-the-rules, “boring” career woman, stuck in the same underwhelming job and uninspiring relationship.

As the yang to her yin, Paul Rudd plays John Pressman, a former college classmate of Portia and the over-the-top, free spirited principal of an alternative school out in the country. In John’s world, adventurous outside-of-the-box thinking, suspicion of institutions, and mastery of sustainable living are all intrinsic aspects of a good education. In McGill terms, John’s ideal school would be a mix of Macdonald Campus and Rad Frosh.

These two worlds collide when Portia stumbles upon John’s school on an admissions tour. John introduces her to Jeremiah Balakian (played by the charming Nat Wolf), a student prodigy and self-proclaimed “autodidact” with a shaky academic record, but nevertheless equipped with charisma and quirk. John is convinced that Jeremiah would succeed at a school like Princeton if given the chance, and that he may also be of particular personal interest to Portia.

Admission bravely wants to be a few different things. It definitely wants to be silly and lighthearted—the casting of Rudd and Fey as co-stars tells us that much. It wants to critique the rat-race nature of the U.S. university admissions process, which, as we see in the film, unfortunately degenerates into a game of whose application combines the most tear-jerking story with the best academic record. The irony is driven home without subtlety. In all its attempts at being holistic and all-examining, the U.S. admissions process does end up overlooking the real essence of the students it tosses into the accept or deny piles.

Admission wants to talk about the power of knowledge at a moment when a higher education doesn’t equate to employment, and more and more kids opt to travel and postpone university altogether. And it certainly, at its core, wants to be about that process of self-discovery, of finding oneself, and about believing in the oddball.

Unfortunately Admission’s comedic appendage feels forced, the plot is full of holes, and the characters seem shallow and overridden with cliché prototypes. Rudd, Fey, and newcomer Wolf had endearing moments, but Admission is oversaturated in sap and sweetness without any sustained heart. It does not outright fail in the themes it encounters, but we’ve all come to expect brilliance from Fey and Rudd. Admission should never have been admitted to the screen.

 

Admission is currently playing at Cineplex Banque Scotia (977 Ste-Catherine).

Victoria Dillman (Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune)
a, Opinion

The vicious cycle of protests

Almost a year ago now, I was a prospective student touring McGill for the first time. I remember the excitement, the nerves, and the shock of seeing more than a hundred people protesting outside the Sherbrooke gates. For the dozen students on my tour, it was our first impression of McGill and, to be honest, it was a bit of a deterrent. I recall a parent of another student on the tour inquiring how disruptive the protestors were for classes—it had been a serious concern of theirs and many others. Of course, we were assured that it was not disruptive at all, and that the protests had very little to do with McGill. That alleviated the concern in my mind, but I am sure that it was not the case for others.

In the past few months, I have been receiving emails from friends back home who are currently in their graduating year of high school, and are now attempting to navigate the confusion of choosing a university. While I have gotten the classic questions—“How are the professors?” “What’s the nightlife like?”—the one theme that keeps coming up is the student movement. My friends’ concerns include not only how protests affect classes, but whether they are violent or too intense. I have assured everyone asking the questions that the protests are not an issue; they stay out of McGill’s way, they are not violent, and they do not affect the classrooms. Despite my assurances, many still expressed doubt and declared it would still be a consideration in their decision. These kinds of questions show a consistent perspective that protests are a major deterrent and one that seriously influences students’ choice of school.

In the World Reputation Rankings of 2013, McGill has been ranked in 31st place—a serious drop from the previous year’s 25th. These rankings are subjective, but they seem to accurately show the international opinion of a university’s reputation. Reputation is a serious factor—not only for decisions of attendance, but also job prospects for McGill graduates. If McGill’s reputation continues to fall, the consequences could be serious. Such a fall calls into question what, precisely, led to this slip in rankings and what we can do to help fix it and repair McGill’s reputation.

The continued concerns of potential students may be indicative of this issue. Universities, in part, gain their reputation from the amount of demand from students. If students no longer choose McGill, and would rather attend a university of lower ranking to avoid the complications of protests, it would be surprising for McGill not to experience a fall in rankings. Students are a key resource for a university to prosper, and when they choose to attend other institutions, it becomes an issue the school must address.

Certainly, the protests have a cause; they are not senseless. Looking at the issues at hand, they are not an unreasonable reaction. The unfortunate reality, however, is that these protests are hindering, rather than helping McGill’s situation in the long run. A fall in rankings because of protests can lead to lower interest in enrollment at McGill. This decrease will lead to an even larger fall in rankings, and even less money and resources for McGill and other universities—the precise issue many are currently protesting. It becomes a vicious cycle that should be stopped sooner rather than later. The protests do, of course, combat real issues; but in order to help fix the situation, there needs to be a different, more cooperative way to help repair it. The protests are simply causing more damage than they’re worth.

a, Editorial, Opinion

Communication problems underlie the Leacock space debate

For context, please read “Proposed Leacock reconfiguration incites controversy.”

 

The Mar. 18 Town Hall regarding a proposed reallocation of space in the Leacock building played out in a scene that’s become increasingly familiar—both students and faculty turned up to voice their opposition to a proposal from the administration. The plan in question involves a restructuring of Leacock, in which all administrative officers (AOs) would be grouped together on one floor, and be cross-trained to help students from other departments. While there is merit to the debate itself, this issue comes back to the administration’s lack of communication.

Students’ opposition to the proposal stems mainly from the fear that a group of interdepartmental AOs will lack the specialized knowledge and authority to help them in the same way they are able to now. It is unrealistic to expect AOs to gain the level of expertise in every department that each currently holds in their own—for students, this could mean a decreased quality of service, even if that service is more easily accessible and centralized.

Professors, for their part, take issue with the fact that the reallocation will split up departments across different floors, with chairs potentially being completely separated from their departments. This, they fear, will damage their departmental cultures, fostering a more corporate, impersonal, and disjointed atmosphere. Among the professors who showed up to speak against the plan was Amelia Jones, who claimed to have left the University of Manchester as a result of restructurings similar to these.

As a reaction to McGill’s voluntary retirement policy, which will reduce the number of AOs on staff, and to Bill 100, which will limit the faculty’s ability to hire more in their place, this move makes sense. Spreading out the workload amongst all of the remaining AOs will effectively minimize the impact that a reduced number of administrators will have, ensuring that students always have quick and easy access to somebody who can help them. We are in a period of financial strain, and the university is going to have to undergo numerous cost-cutting measures. Compared to other cuts that could be made, this is far from the worst option for students and professors.

The criticism of the administration’s proposal speaks more to the way that it has handled this process than to the severity of the issues at hand. The matter was apparently initially brought forward in previous faculty meetings, which Manfredi claimed at the Town Hall suffer from notoriously poor attendance. As a result, the faculty members feel that they were not consulted, while the administration claims to have done due diligence. Meanwhile, departmental students’ associations, whose office space stands to be affected by these changes, expressed outrage at not having even received a formal invitation to the Town Hall.

The criticism of the administration’s proposal speaks more to the way that it has handled this process than to the severity of the issues being brought forward.

Clearly, the issue here is communication. The administration seems unwilling to properly inform the community when these issues are at play, and yet, continues to appear genuinely puzzled when students or faculty claim not to have been consulted. The issue is certainly not capacity—we constantly receive emails informing us of on-campus events and initiatives much of which is entirely trivial. We want to see this same level of communicative initiative being used in the planning of these Consultative Fairs and Town Halls. The overwhelming attendance at last Winter’s Arts Undergraduate Society (AUS) General Assembly (GA) proved that when people are given context for the issues at stake and the options available, they will show up. Consultation is only of any use when people know that it’s happening.

Beyond the method of communication, timing is also a critical element. Rather than being held in the Gall, when there could have been a full discussion of options, the Town Hall was only put together once the administration had narrowed its options down to two very similar scenarios. A discussion that takes place once the majority of options have been taken off the table looks very different to one which is unreservedly trying to arrive at the best solution. Once again, this is not true consultation.

There must be a better way to engage the community than we are seeing right now. Town halls should be held as an actual step in the decision-making process, not just a retroactive measure. Raising awareness should be a priority in this process, not as an afterthought. With ongoing uncertainty regarding its budget, McGill is going to have to make a number of unpopular decisions; for these decisions to be informed and respected by the community, the administration should be making every effort to hear what its stakeholders have to say.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue