Latest News

a, Music

PVT: Homosapien

 The title of Australian trio PVT’s fourth effort Homosapien sheds light on the band’s perspective on sound. With its scientific tinge, the title alludes to the electronic infrastructure of the album. The band’s progression from instrumental electronic rock to a more electro synth-pop sound began with their last album, Church with No Magic (2010)—a direction which they pursue more extensively in Homosapien

For the first time, PVT crafts songs with real vocal tracks, albeit with simplistic lyrics. Though not all the vocals are intelligible, such as the mumbling warbles in the psychedelic “New Morning,” they add a human touch to their songs. Layered vocals are chopped up, and digitally processed, as exemplified by the album’s title track, providing a haunting fusion of man and machine. The album opens with the floating “Shiver,” which sounds like a whimsical score for an ’80s video game. The soft beeping noises reappear on the closing track “Ziggaraut.” In between the two plinking bookends, however, a darker, more industrial sound pervades. Typical of this harsher sound is the standout, “Electric,” with its heavy mechanical synth bass, and ominously swelling distorted guitars. A mixture of live and syncopated drum programming creates dynamic percussion, driving the songs along and inducing head-bopping along the way.

As with most experimental music, Homosapien is an idiosyncratic album that becomes more fascinating over multiple listens as the different sonic layers sink in.

a, Arts & Entertainment

Music journalism: you’re doing it wrong

Last week, the New York Times’ credibility was called into question when reporter John Broder’s negative review of the Tesla Model S, an electric car, was challenged by none other than the company’s CEO, Elon Musk. The story caused a stir in the press, simply because the subjects of mainstream critics’ appraisal rarely critique back, or at least not with such vitriol—Musk called the story “fake,” published data logs that contradicted Broder’s account of his test drive, and accused him of changing facts to suit his opinion. In a failed attempt to re-direct the resultant public backlash, the Times’ public editor linked a discussion on Reddit, but its commenters eventually accused Broder of being influenced by oil lobbies.

It’s common, and easy to bash old media these days; and publishers of ‘new media’ are eager to oust their predecessors as the final word in criticism. While there has been a certain democratization of commentary, with Twitter opinions abounding, people still enjoy reading an authoritative take on pop culture. Recognizing this, publishers such as VICE and Pitchfork are willing to pander to the skeptics. VICE co-founder Shane Smith summed up this strategy, recently stating: “I think that its[sic] a changing of the guard in media and its about time … f**k the mainstream media, we can tell our own stories now.”

Unlike car reviews, music criticism doesn’t receive much fact-checking. Alternative cultural journalists get away with a good deal. When weighing in on topics that have been thoroughly digested by the opinionated blogosphere, there is an incentive to write in extremes, or at the very least employ disjointed metaphors to add spice to a review. VICE’s music channel Noisey has recently given up on serious album reviews, and instead, publishes crude, juvenile rants by a guy named The Kid Mero, who was likely hired to shake up a bland catalogue of middling reviews occasionally punctuated by an A plus (for Frank Ocean’s Channel Orange “Finally, an album with the deserved weight to make the music industry cave in on itself”), an F minus, or sometimes both simultaneously (for DJ Khaled’s Kiss The Ring). Pitchfork Media, another influential cultural commentator, has lately been manufacturing its own little controversies by publishing reviews that give Childish Gambino’s Camp a 1.6 out of 10 and Chief Keef’s Finally Rich a 7.5. Both rappers, with opposite personalities and styles, were exploited by Noisey in an awkward ‘back and forth’ interview, where the more articulate Gambino tried to elicit more than a few words from the mumbling Keef. Pitchfork, however, took the exploitation to an extreme, by taking the quiet 17-year-old to freestyle at a gun range, while he was on probation for gun related charges. This culminated in a 60-day jail sentence for Keef, and an eventual retraction by Pitchfork.

One might defend these outlets by saying that they need controversy to attract views—after all, both provide free content, and have a proudly anti-corporate stance. But while no one is accusing them of being influenced by Big Oil, VICE has its own record label, VICE Records, which is affiliated with acts such as Justice and Snoop Lion, and holds a partnership with CNN. Pitchfork, meanwhile, moonlights as a concert promoter for its Pitchfork Music Festival. In a cutthroat moment for media, reviews may not pay the bills, but in conflict of interest cases like these, I’ve lost just as much faith in their critics’ opinions as Musk has lost in those of the Times.

One critic that stands out in the sea of noise that is online music commentary is Anthony Fantano, who runs the video blog The Needle Drop, and calls himself the internet’s “busiest music nerd.” He reviews a variety of genres, consistently churns out thoughtful reviews, and most importantly, is prevented by the blog’s video format from employing flowery metaphors with a straight face; instead, he comments in depth about the structure and pace of an album, the context of its release, and ultimately, whether or not he found it entertaining. In a media atmosphere cluttered with commentary fluff, the no-nonsense approach appeals to Fantano’s 100,000 YouTube subscribers. The independent and personal nature of the reviews lend to Fantano’s credibility, while the legacy, professionalism, and broad reach of the New York Times supports theirs. Ultimately, the consistency and quality of both types of commentary are strong points. Where criticism falls apart, however, is when an outlet attempts to combine personal candor and humour with professional weight, when neither is present in their writing.

(Remi Lu / The McGill Tribune)
a, Arts & Entertainment

McGill’s Savoy succeeds with uproarious comic opera

As senate reform once again makes its awkward, halting round through this country’s public consciousness, it is perhaps timely to reflect on this peculiar institution’s elder brother: the British House of Lords. No longer a bastion of the hereditary aristocracy—though they still hold a seventh of the seats—the upper chamber of peerage and privilege is nevertheless as ‘undemocratic’ as it has ever been. Many wonder what it is the little Lords do. They check power, review bills, and conduct research? Wonderful! Do they need 800 of them just for that?

Phyllis seems discomforted by her popularity with the Lords. (Remi Lu / The McGill Tribune)
Phyllis seems discomforted by her popularity with the Lords.
(Remi Lu / The McGill Tribune)

With the (at last) creation of the UK Supreme Court in 2009, this critic maintains that the idea of a ‘useful Lord’ is best regarded as a flight of fancy, a magical creature of fairy dust and imagination. Iolanthe, the comic opera by Gilbert and Sullivan, does exactly that. Esteemed peers consort with fairy maidens, and by the end it is impossible to say which group is more absurd. The McGill Savoy Society’s production is delightful, acute, and assuredly accomplished, helping the sharp political commentary go down smoothly with the ambrosia of satire.

Though the aristocracy is a target of ridicule, Iolanthe is at its heart a story of love. Strephon, a lowly shepherd, must contend for the hand of Phyllis with the Lord Chancellor and several Lords of Parliament. An ostensibly unfair fight, Strephon is, in theory, assisted by his half-fairy heritage and his fairy mother, Iolanthe—though this causes significant confusion and turmoil in itself.

Under Emma McQueen’s direction, the impressive cast is notable for their excellent grasp of character. Performers aren’t simply waiting for their turn to speak, but fully take on their roles, frequently charming the audiences with subtle quirks that nevertheless do not distract. Volume is occasionally a problem, and the technical equipment which aims to remedy this appears to only have sporadic effectiveness. However, the actors are mostly able to compensate with clear and nuanced articulation.

As the Queen of the Fairies, Claire Rollans is a staggering presence on stage, one worthy of a true monarch. Rollans’ speech is mesmerizing, evincing both commanding power and soft allure, sometimes in the same sentence. Stefano Saykaly’s Lord Chancellor displays impressive comedic sensibilities, and while sometimes struggling with the challenging patter characteristic of Gilbert and Sullivan, possesses an otherwise radiant voice. The sprightly stepped Strephon, played by Scott Cope, easily wins hearts with his amiable and quirky demeanour.

(Remi Lu / The McGill Tribune)
(Remi Lu / The McGill Tribune)

Led by the bold conductorial gesticulations of music director David Matthew Brounley, Savoy’s orchestra is supremely accomplished, breathing life into Sullivan’s light and melodious score. Maria Mejia’s choreography is intricate, inventive, and often peculiar in the best of ways. Though Alan MacMillan’s lighting is curiously staid and static, Jean Claude Olivier’s set design features impressive paint detail, and successfully conveys the fairy-tale setting. Elizabeth Barter’s costumes range from the ornate robes of the Lord Chancellor to the perhaps-too-barren outfits of the fairies, but all are rightly rich in colour, with the cloaks of the Lords an outright sumptuous visual feast.

Through memorable music and healthy doses of humour, Savoy Society’s Iolanthe turns the often bitter pill of political debate into an immensely pleasurable experience.

The McGill Savoy Society’s production of Iolanthe runs Feb. 21 to 23 at Moyse Hall, 7:30 p.m. with an additional 2:00 p.m. matinee on Feb. 23. Student tickets $12.

a, Arts & Entertainment

Picks for the 2013 Oscar Winners

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has a reputation as tame, dust-covered fossils that shirk from innovation and gravitate towards the crowd-pleaser. This was true for the Best Picture winners of the last two years—both The Artist and The King’s Speech are fine, but not spectacular, eulogies for a golden age lost to time—and results are likely to be the same this season.

Still, if there is anything to be learned from Meryl Streep’s (Iron Lady) surprise win over Viola Davis (The Help) last year, it’s that there is no such thing as a sure-thing with the Oscar races. With that in mind, the Tribune tries its hand at some Oscar prognostications.

Best Actress

Will Win: Jennifer Lawrence (Silver Linings Playbook)

Could Win: Jessica Chastain (Zero Dark Thirty)

Should Win: Chastain or Emmanuelle Riva (Amour)

Lawrence has been praised for her role as a troubled nymphomaniac in David O. Russell’s self-consciously unorthodox rom-com. Chastain, however, is nipping at her heels, as the CIA operative who found Osama bin Laden—an understated performance that belies formidable talent. Riva seems unlikely to win, but her crushingly poignant portrayal of mortality is both terrifying and mesmerizing.

Best Actor

Will Win: Daniel Day-Lewis, Lincoln

Could Win: n/a

Should Win: Day-Lewis

Not many are daring enough to bet against Day-Lewis’ win at this point; even fewer are able to make a compelling case for another. Nominees are strong of course, particularly Joaquin Phoenix (The Master) and Hugh Jackman (Les Misérables). But Day-Lewis’ magnanimous portrayal of America’s 16th President is on a plane of virtuosity all of its own.

Best Supporting Actress

Will Win: Anne Hathaway (Les Misérables)

Could Win: n/a

Should Win: Hathaway

All the nominees have memorable moments in their respective films, such as Jacki Weaver’s “crabby snacks and homemades” from Silver Linings Playbook, Sally Field’s Mrs. Lincoln and her fierce tongue-lashings, and Amy Adams’ now-infamous bathroom handjob in The Master. But no moment is as memorable as Hathaway’s “I Dreamed a Dream,” a devastatingly raw swan song that leaves one reeling from its power.

Best Supporting Actor

Will Win: Tommy Lee Jones (Lincoln)

Could Win: Robert De Niro (Silver Linings Playbook)

Should Win: Lee Jones

Lee Jones and De Niro are more or less neck-and-neck at this point, though the former began as the early favourite, playing the delightfully scathing congressman Thaddeus Stevens. De Niro gives his best performance in years in Silver Linings Playbook—but is that really saying much? Sadly overlooked is Philip Seymour Hoffman (The Master), whose commanding performance would be a strong contender were it not for the juggernaut that is Lincoln.

Best Picture

Will Win: Argo

Could Win: Lincoln

Should Win: Zero Dark Thirty

Smart money was on Lincoln, Spielberg’s glowing tribute to the eponymous emancipator, until Argo—Ben Affleck’s white-washed but thrilling portrayal of Iranian history—began picking up key awards. The clash of these two historical dramas have sidelined Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty, an accomplished and masterful telling of “history’s greatest manhunt” that is easily the strongest of this year’s bunch.

Best Director

Will Win: Steven Spielberg, Lincoln

Could Win: Ang Lee, Life of Pi

Should Win: Michael Haneke, Amour

Spielberg seems poised to add to previous wins for Schindler’s List (1993) and Saving Private Ryan (1998) with a third statuette come Sunday. Though unlikely, some have pondered whether the Academy might feel guilty for snubbing Lee’s Brokeback Mountain in 2005. The only true auteur of the nominees, however, is Haneke, whose Amour continues in his tradition of uncompromising, brutal portraits of human frailty.

The 85th Academy Awards will take place Sunday, Feb. 24, 7 p.m.

Best Original Screenplay: Zero Dark Thirty
Best Adapted Screenplay:
Argo
Best Animated Feature:
Wreck-It Ralph
Best Foreign Film:
Amour
Best Documentary Feature:
Searching for Sugar Man
Best Cinematography:
Life of Pi
Best Editing:
Argo
Best Score:
Life of Pi
Best Song:
Adele, “Skyfall”
Best Visual Effects:
Life of Pi
Best Sound Editing:
Life of Pi
Best Sound Mixing:
Life of Pi
Best Production Design:
Anna Karenina
Best Costume Design:
Anna Karenina
Best Makeup and Hairstyling:
The Hobbit
Best Animated Short:
Paperman
Best Live Action Short:
Curfew
Best Documentary Short:
Open Heart


Naturally, DNA stores all the information to create a multicellular organism from a single cell. (images-forbes)
a, Science & Technology

A sonnet stored in DNA would sound as sweet

DNA has an incredible capability to store information. Now, thanks to a simple cipher, DNA can be manipulated to act as a storage system for digital data.

The importance of archiving data holds significantly more relevance in today’s world, where information is generated at an increasing pace. From GDP economic trends to classical compositions like Shakespeare’s sonnets, there is a surplus of information that needs to be stored and preserved, and the list keeps growing every day.

However, there are two fundamental issues with archiving huge amounts of data: first, the sheer volume of information, and second, storing data in a format that will remain universal over long periods of time.

This is where DNA comes in. The idea of storing information in DNA struck scientists Ewan Birney and Nick Goldman of the European Bioinformatics Institute, over a few beers at a pub. They were discussing the issue of trying to cut down the costs associated with maintaining a vast archival unit of hard drives, which takes up a lot of space and electricity.

Nature has an easy answer to this problem. DNA stores information to create a multicellular organism from a single cell; it performs this task using a minimum amount of space, and in a manner that preserves the information in a universal format for long periods of time.

Computers store information using a binary number system, which encodes a series of 0’s and 1’s. DNA stores information in terms of nucleotide bases known as Adenine, Thymine, Cytosine, and Guanine—abbreviated A, T, C, and G respectively. Just as the combination of 0’s and 1’s leads to a myriad of images, games, sounds, text, and videos, the combination of the four bases A, C, T, and G leads to a set of instructions for the formation of every single cell in the body.

To store digital data in the bases of DNA, Birney and Goldman used a system that stored a byte (a sequence of eight 1’s or 0’s) as five DNA letters. To create an encoding pattern with zero error, they constructed strings of DNA letters that had no adjacent repeats. Every stream of data was encoded in exactly 117 letters, each with indexing information that would indicate where this stream belonged in the overall code.

Another advantage of DNA storage is that it avoids the problems caused by rapidly changing technology. Recall the Floppy Disk, once the most efficient portable storage media. If any important data were to be found stored on these disks today, it would essentially be lost.

On the other hand, DNA will always hold importance—even if the mechanisms to access information change. One could leave a vial with DNA in a time capsule, and 500 years later, it would still be readable and accessible by future generations.

A research team led by George Church and Sriram Kosuri from the Harvard Wyss Institute set a world record in data storage, by storing 700 terabytes (Tb) of information in a gram of DNA. To put that in perspective, one would need 151 kilos of three Tb hard disks to store the same amount of information. Essentially, they had smashed the previous information storage density record by over a thousand times.

Currently, the costs associated with DNA storage are estimated to be fairly high—$12,400 to write the storage system and $220 to read it—but these costs are falling significantly faster than those of other electronics. The benefits of this system, such as the single writing cost, drive the increase use of DNA storage systems.

This technology has one more interesting application: the DNA used to store data could very well be the DNA in your skin. Due to the short lifespan of skin cells, data stored within this DNA survives for only a short duration of time. This would allow secure transmission of sensitive information, with the assurance that it would be destroyed soon after the recipient had seen it.

Looking to the future, DNA may no longer play just a biological role in our lives. Soon it could be cheaper for companies to keep DNA archives, rather than a warehouse full of hard drives.

a, Science & Technology

Does chocolate make you smarter?

As it becomes increasingly difficult to find a seat at McLennan, it’s clear midterms are fully underway at McGill. Although these tests make up less of our grades than finals, many students will do whatever it takes to perform well. Tactics range from taking up residence in the library to therapeutic baking to provide nourishment—and stress relief—while studying. While we’ve heard plenty of tips to improve both our study habits and test scores, a 2012 paper in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests an interesting solution to boosting your GPA: chocolate.

youngster.com
youngster.com

The study investigated the link between cognitive ability and flavanols—a type of antioxidant present in foods such as chocolate, green tea, and red wine. Essentially, the researchers plotted chocolate consumption per country against the number of Nobel Prize Laureates produced by each in order to see if there was any correlation.

Surprisingly, the plot revealed a strong correlation of 0.79, with Sweden as the only anomaly. Take Sweden out of the picture, and the correlation improves to 0.86, suggesting a positive correlation between chocolate and intelligence.

“I attribute essentially all my success to the very large amount of chocolate that I consume,” joked American physicist Eric Cornell in an interview with Reuters, who shared the Nobel Prize in 2001. “I feel that milk chocolate makes you stupid. Now, dark chocolate is the way to go. It’s one thing if you want a medicine or chemistry Nobel Prize. But if you want a physics Nobel Prize, it pretty much has got to be dark chocolate.”

Although it’s a jest, Cornell makes a good point. The correlation between chocolate and Nobel Prize Laureates may be strong, but caution should be exercised before ordering Juliette & Chocolat’s entire dessert menu in the name of your grades.

The figures for chocolate consumption only came from two sources, Caobisco and Chocosuisse, and cover only four years of chocolate consumption. In comparison, the data for the Nobel Prize winners takes into account laureates from 1900 to 2011. This difference in time periods from which the data was taken is experimentally problematic.

While the correlation is interesting, it should be taken with a grain of salt. McGill chemistry professor Karine Auclair points out that countries who consume a large amount of chocolate also consume large amounts of milk, suggesting that it is a healthy and balanced diet that leads to improving cognitive abilities. Others attribute this correlation between chocolate and intelligence to socioeconomic factors. Scandinavian countries appear at the top of the graph, and are known to score high both on the Human Development Index (HDI) and in terms of per capita income. Likely higher chocolate consumption simply relates to greater affluence and an improved lifestyle.

It seems that while eating a few pounds of chocolate the night before an exam will do nothing more for your grades than induce  a sugar rush, leading a balanced lifestyle can in fact help improve your cognitive performance. This fact is not a mystery; with the stress of midterms over these next few weeks, it serves as a healthy reminder.

a, Science & Technology

Tiny, immortal jellyfish: Scientists discover immortality in pinky-nail-sized jellyfish

From the philosopher’s stone to Voldemort and his horcuxes, humans have long been fascinated with the concept of immortality. However, scientists have found that one pinky-nail-sized jellyfish species has the remarkable ability to live forever. 

Turritopsis nutricula, which originated in the Caribbean, is biologically immortal; its mortality rate doesn’t increase with age, although it remains vulnerable to death through injury.

These jellyfishs’ immortality makes them an apt invasive species. T. nutricula are transported in the ballasts of ships and  have been found in various corners of the world, including Spain, Florida, and Japan.

The secret to T. nutricula’s infinite life is a phenomenon called transdifferentiation. This is a process whereby sexually matured jellyfish revert back to their juvenile form through a conversion of their cell types. The embryonic stem cells of animals, including humans, are able to undergo a similar differentiation process during embryonic development and tissue repair. Pluripotent cells (starter cells that become other cell types) are turned into cells with specific functions by controlling which genes are on or off in that cell.  What is unique about T. nutricula, is that already differentiated cells (cells that have a particular function, like brain or cardiac cells), have the ability to differentiate again, especially in times of environmental stress.

Transdifferentiation can be thought of an ongoing Benjamin Button complex, in which these jellyfish revert from their old state back to a juvenile one. The sexually matured stage—with its bell shaped body (known as the umbrella) and tentacles—is the most commonly known of the jellyfish’s multi-stage lifecycle. In their juvenile stage, the polyp, jellyfish are fairly stationary and live in colonies attached to the sea floor. In the transdifferentiation process, the umbrella inverts, and the tentacles are reabsorbed. The jellyfish then attaches to a suitable substrate, and the cells undergo transdifferentiation to form a new polyp colony.

Along with being an enigma of the natural world, T. nutricula provides many opportunities for diverse human medical applications, such as organ reproduction and potential cures for cancer. Much like the jellyfish’s life span, the possibilities are endless.

worldofstock.com
a, News

Meet the main players at the Quebec Education Summit

On Feb. 25 and 26, the provincial government will hold a summit for  members of civil society and the higher education community to discuss the future of  the post-secondary education system in Quebec.

Before the summit commences, the Tribune set out to give students a look at some of the primary stakeholders, their views on prominent issues up for discussion, and their plans for the two days. 

Parti Québécois (PQ)

The PQ planned the summit in the wake of intense debate and frequent student protests regarding the former Liberal government’s proposed tuition annual increase of $325 for five years, which the PQ rescinded following their election last September. 

In January, Higher Education Minister Pierre Duchesne said free tuition is not an option for the Quebec government, and that the government is instead looking at indexing tuition fees to the cost of living.

“The good thing about this possibility is that there are different indexation models, some of which resemble a freeze, others which are indexed based on certain indicators,” Duchesne said in January.

However, the government has promised that discussion at the summit is not limited to tuition—quality of higher education, access to higher education, governance and university funding, and contribution of research to the province’s development will be the four main themes covered during the two-day event. Four preliminary workshops with the parties involved have taken place since the summit was officially announced last November. Premier Pauline Marois and Duchesne will discuss these issues with student organizations and post-secondary establishments.

“This is vital for Quebec society,” Marois said at a press conference last November. “Our prosperity rests on knowledge and education .… I hope this is a fruitful debate for all.”

Conférence des recteurs et des principaux des universités du Québec (CREPUQ) 

CREPUQ is a non-profit organization that was founded in 1963. It is composed of university administrators who work to improve the efficiency of Quebec’s higher education system. Representing all 19 Quebec universities, its main concerns are research, funding, and the university activities affected by government bills. It also serves as a coordinator between universities and a research centre for administration.

In anticipation of the summit, CREPUQ proposed last November to create an independent public council in charge of studying and counselling academic affairs.

“[The council] would report to the National Assembly and the people of Quebec on the situation of the university system in general and, more specifically, on … the quality of university programs and how well they are meeting society’s needs; Quebec’s competitive position with regard to research in all fields of knowledge; and how universities are contributing to social, cultural, scientific, technological, and economic development,” a CREPUQ statement from November reads.

According to its website, CREPUQ’s stance is that every Quebecker who desires to and is qualified to enter university should be able to, and that universities have the job of ensuring accessibility while maintaining a high quality of education.

The organization claims that, in comparison with their trans-Canadian counterparts, Quebec universities are underfunded by $850 million. For that reason, CREPUQ advocates stable funding as necessary to support research and development.

As a member of CREPUQ, McGill’s administration agrees that Quebec universities are underfunded. The administration recently posted on McGill’s website that, if given more funding, it would use these funds to invest in talent and infrastructure, as well as to work on reducing the university’s deficit.

The McGill website defines improving talent as lending “more support—financial and otherwise—for our students, including a commitment to spend 30 per cent of all new net tuition revenue on improving student aid and accessibility, competitive compensation, and improved academic support for professors.”

Fédération étudiante universitaire de Québec (FEUQ)

FEUQ was created in 1989 immediately following the government’s decision to end Quebec’s tuition freeze. Its 14 member associations represent more than 125,000 Quebec university students, making it the largest student group in the province.

According to its official website, FEUQ’s mission is to represent student associations across Quebec and to put their positions at the forefront of discourse on higher education. They also aim to promote unity in the recent student movement.

The FEUQ has historically opposed tuition increases, calling them problematic. Accessibility and student debt have remained central issues for the Federation. In 2011, it supported the PQ’s position to freeze tuition.

“We’re looking to actually make sure that people understand what it means to preserve accessibility in university and to propose two things: better financing and a better governance of universities, ” FEUQ President Martine Desjardins told the Tribune in November.

To increase accountability and promote universities’ efficiency, the FEUQ advocates for a commission to evaluate the universities in Quebec, promotes collaboration and accountability of universities, and aims to pursue this proposal in the upcoming summit.

“We do have this kind of commission for the CEGEP system—that’s how we want to actually propose this commission [at] the summit, ” Desjardins said. “We’re very hopeful that we’ll have a big consensus about this proposition. ”

While some student groups, like ASSÉ, have distanced themselves from the summit, the FEUQ will continue to put pressure on the PQ to opt for a tuition freeze.

FEUQ participated in four preliminary meetings leading up to the summit, posted a document explaining their positions on each theme online, and presented them to the government before each meeting.

Table de concertation étudiante du Québec (TaCEQ)

Founded in 2009 and representing 60,000 students, TaCEQ is one of the youngest and smallest student associations in Quebec. The Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) is one of the four member unions that constitute TaCEQ, alongside student societies from Université Laval and Université de Sherbrooke.

SSMU Vice-President External Robin Reid-Fraser will be one of TaCEQ’s representatives at the summit. She said TaCEQ wants to bring several ideas to the table.

“[We want there to be] a process in place that would have companies contribute to somebody’s education—not [as] in specific, targeted things that they get to choose, but for them to be funding … education that can go to everybody,” she said. “Another [idea] is that there be a charter for student researchers … because right now, student researchers fall through the cracks in terms of representation and their rights.”

SSMU will also promote policies at the Summit that TaCEQ doesn’t necessarily share. According to Reid-Fraser, the Society wants a better process to facilitate discussion about the education system across the province. Reid-Fraser noted that she has only just received the summit’s agenda—barely a week and a half before the event will take place.

“The concern I have now is that it is not very inclusive,” she said. “If we are talking about reshaping our universities, we need to be bringing people who are not in universities right now, and have them talk about their connection and how they view these institutions.”

Reid-Fraser also recognized the summit’s benefit, since the meetings leading up to the event allow her to hear the views of the main actors in the discussion .

“This summit could be the opportunity to realize that there are so many things that need to be worked on and that give a direction for a more thorough process to address some of those issues,” she said. “That being said, it is very unclear what the government wants.”

Association pour une solidarité syndicale étudiante (ASSÉ)

Founded in 2001, ASSÉ is a student organization with approximately 70,000 members from universities and colleges across Quebec. On Feb. 13, ASSÉ officially announced that it would not participate in the summit on higher education. The organization has unofficially expressed concerns about the summit since the PQ announced it in September. ASSÉ’s main goal is free education, which the PQ has said will not be seriously considered at the summit.

Jérémie Bédard-Wien, ASSÉ’s finance secretary, said the group is organizing a demonstration for the second day of the summit on Feb. 26, and that they are expecting thousands of people to attend.

“It is clear that free education is off the table—the decision has already been taken by the government,” Bédard-Wein said. “We should not give [the summit] credibility. We should make ourselves heard outside rather than inside.”

Before last week, none of McGill’s many student associations were members of ASSÉ. On Tuesday Feb. 12, the Art History and Communication Studies Graduates Student Association voted to join ASSÉ, making them the first student association at McGill to be  a part of the organization.

Last spring, a temporary coalition of ASSÉ known as CLASSE (Coalition large de l’ASSÉ) organized many of the protests against tuition hikes that occurred in downtown Montreal. While many McGill students were involved in the student movement last spring, only a few faculties and departments voted to go on strike. Bédard-Wien expressed hope that McGill students will mobilize more for the summit than they did in the spring.

Montrealers gathered on Sunday to oppose new legislation aimed at amending Quebec’s language laws. (Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune)
a, News

Montrealers gather to say “no” to PQ’s Bill 14

More than 200 people gathered in the square opposite Quebec Premier Pauline Marois’ office on Sunday afternoon to protest the Parti Québécois’ (PQ) proposed changes to language laws with Bill 14. The rally featured several guest speakers who denounced the bill’s potential impacts on Quebec society, and was organized by two minority rights groups—the Unity Group and PutBackTheFlag.com.

(Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune)
(Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune)

Introduced by the provincial government on Dec. 5, Bill 14 focuses on amending Bill 101—Quebec’s Charter of the French Language. The bill seeks to further protect and promote the French language in Quebec in the realms of business, education, and municipalities.

Bill 14 would restrict the use of English in the workplace by mandating that businesses with 26 or more employees must make French their “normal and everyday language of work,” whereas currently this applies to businesses with 50 or more employees. The new legislation would also amend the bilingual status of certain municipalities. If the law were to pass, a community would only be considered bilingual if English were the mother tongue of at least 50 per cent of its population.

According to Jimmy Kalafatidis, chairman of the Unity Group, Sunday’s protest was an opportunity for both Anglophones and Francophones to demonstrate their discontent with Bill 14.

“Basically what we’re doing here is … trying to send a message to [the Coalition Avenir Québec] and the Liberals to vote down Bill 14,” he said. “[The bill] is detrimental to our economy … to education … to business in general .… It hurts everybody.”

Colin Standish, a law student at Université Laval, was one of four guest speakers who spoke at the rally. Standish expressed concern with the impact Bill 14 would have on the bilingual status of municipalities with both Francophone and Anglophone citizens.

“With [Bill 14], we would see 45 of 90 bilingual status municipalities lose [the] ability to communicate with citizens in the language of their choice,” he said. “In the Eastern Townships … we have 18 bilingual-status towns right now, and 15 of them would be taken away.”

Many of those present at the protest shared Standish’s opinion. Chris Durrant, a third-year law student at McGill said he was shocked by Bill 14’s new bilingual status requirements.

(Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune)
(Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune)

“Requiring 50 per cent Anglophones is ridiculous,” he said. “Certainly, no minorities in the rest of Canada, [like] Franco-Ontarians, would be subjected to such a high standard. I firmly support the right to protect the French language in Quebec, but this goes beyond that. This is persecution of the English-speaking community.”

In his speech, Standish further denounced Bill 14 for its proposed changes to the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.

“[In the bill], we see the term “ethnic minorities” changed to “cultural communities,” he said. “In international human rights tribunals, ethnic minorities do have rights, [but] cultural communities don’t. So if we see our rights infringed upon here in Quebec, and want to take it to the Supreme Court … we would actually have no rights here in this province.”

Attendees expressed concern with Bill 14’s impact on students’ ability to finish school, and to enroll in English CEGEPs.

“To graduate CEGEP and secondary school, even from an English system, you would have to pass a French exam,” Standish said. “It’s totally disconnected from any pedagogical goal, [and] also explicitly disconnected from merit-based acquisition of academic credentials.”

Kalafatidis also pointed to the difficulties Bill 14 would create for students to secure employment in the province after graduation.

“When I graduated [from Concordia] in 1994, everybody left [the province] because of the language laws,” Kalafatidis said. “We don’t want the best and the brightest [students] to leave. We want them to stay here, and help grow the economy, and help grow Quebec into a very strong multilingual society.”

Daniel Roy, who said he was not speaking on behalf of any group or organization, attended the rally to express his support for Bill 14.

“The French language is beginning to disappear in America, and it is beginning to disappear in Quebec, as well,” Roy said in French. “I support Bill 14 because it reinforces certain [aspects] of Bill 101 that have been diluted several times by the Supreme Court … and I don’t think [the bill] goes far enough. It’s important to preserve .…  French in Quebec.”

Throughout the duration of the event, several police vans lined the street, blocking traffic from accessing McGill College between Sherbrooke and President Kennedy. No arrests were made, and the protestors began to disperse after an hour.

According to The Montreal Gazette, a parliamentary committee will hold public hearings regarding Bill 14 in March.

Sébastien focuses on whipping up culinary magic, while enduring father Michel’s whithering gaze. (www.twi-ny.com)
a, Arts & Entertainment

Cooking up a family feud

The world of haute cuisine is a mystery: what happens in the kitchen is usually kept secret, and what comes out is invariably delicious, beautiful, and expensive. Every dish has a deliberate balance of textures, flavours, and colours. Similarly, every restaurant has a clearly defined balance of power that inevitably shapes the product.

In the documentary Step up to the Plate (Entre Les Bras), viewers finally receive access to the Bras family, owners of a 3-Michelin-star restaurant that is about to see one of the most closely-watched power transfers in the restaurant world. Situated deep in the beautiful Aubrac region of France, the restaurant sits atop a mountain both physically and symbolically—it is currently ranked among the top 50 restaurants in the world, and was as high as no. 6 in 2007. All eyes are on it as Michel Bras steps back, and hands control over to his son Sébastien, who was practically raised for the role.

Directed by Paul Lacoste, the film seeks to explore the family history and dynamics in order to predict the restaurant’s future. How will the dishes, and the fate of the restaurant change as a result of the new leadership? It is a question that not even the members of the Bras family can answer.

The movie itself is astonishingly simple and crisp; the audience is drawn to the food and the family more than anything else. The chefs are the true artists here, not the filmmakers, whose role is simply to capture food-as-art on camera. This is done flawlessly. A highlight of the narrative is Sébastien’s quest to create his own new masterpiece, which takes an enormous amount of time, technique, and artistry. There is no epic music or hectic distraction; instead viewers are forced to focus intensely, just as Sébastien does, as the dish comes together. Only when it is complete do we see what he saw all along—a brilliant combination of elements that only a master chef would have been able to envision. The preparation of this dish is unlike anything you can find on the Food Network or YouTube, and for this reason alone, the movie is a must-watch.

The father-son relationship is a classic dynamic, yet remains unique in the film—both clearly have enormous respect for one another, but the equilibrium of power is still very much teetering as the father relinquishes his responsibilities. Sébastien is eager to take over; he wants to maintain continuity but sees opportunity to show his own identity in the food. Meanwhile, Michel watches closely to make sure the integrity of the dishes remains intact, and the quality is as high as ever. As their family and friends agree, “It’s not a revolution; there is continuity.” Consequently, the world can expect the restaurant to remain one of the best—though under new leadership, it’s still in the family, and that in itself is a guarantee of excellence.

In this documentary, audiences get a clearly defined sense of how a delicate power transfer can be accomplished. Step up to the Plate offers a unique exploration of a family-owned, world-renowned haute cuisine restaurant, an opportunity that is not to be missed.

Step up to the Plate is showing until Feb. 21, 7:15 p.m. at Cinema du Parc (3575 Avenue du Parc). Student tickets $8.50.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue