Latest News

McGill, News

Anti-violence fee levy allegedly unconstitutional

On Oct. 14, Student Society of McGill University (SSMU) Senator Bryan Buraga petitioned the SSMU Judicial Board (J-Board), which oversees disputes over SSMU laws, to hold a hearing on the constitutionality of the Anti-Violence Fee Levy (AVFL). The AVFL will be voted on in the upcoming Fall Referendum and, if it passes, an opt-outable fee of $0.45 per student, per term, will be charged to fund the new Gendered and Sexual Violence Policy (GSVP). The policy, approved on Oct. 18 by the Legislative Council, formalizes a response to sexual violence involving SSMU members. It originated in response to two SSMU executives resigning in 2017 as a result of allegations of sexual violence.

The petition charges SSMU President Tre Mansdoerfer with failing to follow SSMU’s Internal Regulations. Buraga argues that the AVFL motion was presented to the SSMU Legislative Council with an insufficient number of movers.

“The president had a habit of submitting motions to the steering committee that did not have the proper number of movers, then asking for movers from the steering committee,” Buraga said.

Mansdoerfer believes Buraga’s understanding of SSMU policy is erroneous.

“The biggest misinterpretation comes from [Buraga] not understanding how the Internal Regulations function and how different regulations take precedence over others,” Mansdoerfer said. “The standing rules, which are in the Internal Regulations of Governance, state that we need three movers for a motion. This rule takes precedence over the rules in the Internal Regulations of Elections.”

The petition also argues that Vice President (VP) Finance Jun Wang has an obligation to fund the GSVP without charging a fee levy or cutting other parts of the budget. Instead, Buraga believes that the money should come from SSMU’s $3.6 million emergency fund. He argues that, morally and ethically, students should not have to pay additional costs for the GSVP and that it needs a reliable source of funding.

“There shouldn’t be a separate fee,” Buraga said. “It should be included within the operating budget. By separating it into the Anti-Violence Fee Levy (AFVL) […] in every five years there’s a risk that it’s not going to pass.”

During a meeting of the Legislative Council on Oct. 11, Buraga presented amendments to both the GSVP and the AFVL that would require that VP Finance to fund the policy without a fee levy. In reply, Wang noted that similar policies were funded with levies, and that, without the AFVL, he would be forced to cut other parts of the budget to fund the GSVP. Both amendments failed. Wang did not reply to the The McGill Tribune’s request for comment.

Mansdoerfer believes that Buraga is inappropriately using the J-Board to further his own political agenda.

“[Buraga] did not interact with me at all before filing the petition,” Mansdoerfer said. “I don’t feel that the petition is about the constitutionality [of the referendum]. It’s about the fee [….] It’s very important to recognize that, in my opinion, [Buraga] very minimally cares about the constitutionality of the question.”

Connor Spencer, SSMU’s VP External for 2017-18 and a key player in the creation of the GSVP, believes that the use of a fee levy is justified in ensuring that students have mechanisms in place to respond to acts of sexual violence.

“SSMU keeps growing, but the fee levy has not,” Spencer said. “Yes, I do think a student fee is justified, [as] we need to be able to fund [the GSVP]. Currently, SSMU does not have the ability to fund it internally. They already have a decently-tight budget compared to other student unions.”

Spencer also stated that students should be more critical of SSMU spending.

“There’s another question here about how money is [allocated] within SSMU, and this is something that members should care about,” Spencer said. “[Students] should call out their student association to be more transparent about the budget.”

The Fall Referendum polling period will take place Nov 9-12. The J-Board, which has accepted Buraga’s petition, will be seeking intervenors before it begins a hearing.

Creative, Podcasts

The Curiosity Podcast | Episode 3: #ChangeTheName with Tomas Jirousek

Today we speak to Tomas Jirousek, the Indigenous Affairs commissioner for SSMU and a lead organizer behind the #ChangeTheName campaign which is pushing to change the name of McGill mens’ varsity sports teams from “Redmen”.

Tomas talks about how it feels as an indigenous athlete on a team bearing this name, his hopes for the future of McGill, and fills out some details on the campaign itself.

By Tristan Surman

Creative

Word on the Y – Should we change the “Redmen” name?

The McGill Tribune asks students whether they feel we should change the “Redmen” name.

Video by Sofia Mikton and Bilal Virji

McGill, News

Open letter calls for immediate renaming of men’s varsity teams

The Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Legislative Council overwhelmingly passed the Motion Regarding Renaming of McGill’s Men’s Varsity Teams at their Oct. 11 session, approving the question ‘Do you endorse the immediate renaming of the ‘Redmen’ name and mandate the SSMU to work toward immediate renaming of the Varsity Men’s Team?’ for the Fall 2018 referendum period. This motion follows the 2015 final report of Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), which, among other recommendations, calls for increased support for indigenous students from post-secondary institutions and anti-racism awareness in sports. High schools in Arnprior, Saskatoon, Saint Catherine’s, and the Greater Toronto Area, among other institutions, have already changed their team names.

The TRC’s final report led to the formation of the McGill Provost’s Task Force on Indigenous Studies and Indigenous Education, which called for consultation on the renaming of university teams, buildings, and scholarships. McGill’s Working Group on Principles of Commemoration and Renaming released their draft report in August and continues to engage in community consultations in preparation for the release of their final report on Dec. 6. Ultimately, the decision to rename McGill’s varsity teams rests on the Board of Governors (BoG).

SSMU Indigenous Affairs Commissioner Tomas Jirousek, member of the Kainai First Nation in southern Alberta and varsity rowing team athlete, has been vocal about the need to change the name of the varsity teams. In addition to starting a Change.org petition and writing an open letter to the McGill administration, Jirousek will lead a demonstration against the continued use of the name on Oct. 31. For him, the name is associated with prejudice against the indigenous community, and its continued usage is harmful.

“There is a painful history of colonialism in the history,” Jirousek said. “When thinking of the name, stereotypical images come to mind. We have been known as the McGill Squaws and Indians in the past. There [have] been stereotypical representations on helmets and jerseys in the past, representative of a hurtful connection between indigenous people and the University.”

For other McGill athletes, and according to Montreal Gazette columnist Martin Patriquin, the name Redmen is associated with the school colours. Varsity soccer player Médéric Gervais does not believe the name is related to negative stereotypes and so should not be changed.

“Without outside influence, I would not think that the ‘Redmen’ name means anything racial,” Gervais said.  “Université Laval’s team is named the ‘Rouge et Or’ [red and gold], and with that logic it would make sense for us to be named the Redmen. The team is named after its colours and should therefore keep its name.”

Robert Hu, First Year Council representative for SSMU Council, voted against the Oct. 11 motion, although not out of disagreement about whether the name should be changed. Hu argued that the motion is only prefixed with evidence of the racist connotations of the name’s origins, problematically presenting only one side of the debate.

“I would like to say that I, personally, do not really like the name either,” Hu said. “The reason I voted against the motion is […] because the motion was one sided. There should just be the questions ‘yes or no’– let the rest of the debate decide the outcome.”

Hu believes that voters should consider the different voices and perspectives in the debate before casting their votes.

“Before such a decision is taken, you have to consider if it is inherently used to oppress indigenous people, or [if it is] a misunderstanding,” Hu said. “[The name] affects the whole McGill community. Because the varsity players are ambassadors to McGill, everyone should have a say in it. It has huge implications.”

A demonstration against the continued use of the Redmen name will take place outside the James Administration building on Oct. 31 at 2:00 p.m.

#ChangeTheName
Editorial, Opinion

#ChangeTheName, and change the norms, too

Thousands of students, allies, and Montrealers have been calling on McGill to change the name of their varsity men’s sports teams. A petition on Change.org has garnered over 8,000 signatures as of press time, and a demonstration is taking place on Oct. 31, due in large part to the work of Students’ Society of McGIll University’s (SSMU) Indigenous Affairs Commissioner Tomas Jirousek. With coverage from CBC News and the Montreal Gazette, all of Montreal is watching McGill’s next steps. It’s time that McGill acknowledges that holding on to a racist team name disenfranchises its indigenous students. Changing it is only one step of many that the University must take in order to create a more inclusive campus.

McGill claims that the name originated in reference to the red jerseys worn by athletes, and in honour of McGill’s Scottish heritage due to the celts’ reputation for having red hair. Regardless of its supposed origins, the name has been used throughout the university’s history in association with stereotypes about indigenous peoples. For example, the word ‘Indians’ historically referred to the men’s sports teams, while women’s teams were referred to as the ‘Squaws.’ From 1982 to 1992, the team’s logo was a silhouette of an indigenous person wearing a headdress.

Other schools that once used the same name, such as Denis Morris and Arnprior high schools in Ontario, have adopted other team names, in 2016 and 2017 respectively. In 2017, then Ontario education minister Mitzie Hunter asked Toronto school boards to review their sports teams’ logos and names, and consider changing any that could be considered derogatory. Despite this momentum, McGill has been hesitant to change the name due to claims of tradition and athletic pride. These concerns, however, do not outweigh the arguments to rebrand. Changing the name will only benefit McGill, creating an identity that the entire student body can be proud of.

In an email to the McGill student body on Oct. 23, Provost and Vice-Principal Academic Christopher Manfredi announced that the administration would not make a decision regarding the name change until the Working Group on Principles of Commemoration and Renaming submits their final report. However, none of the members or chairs of the working group are indigenous, although they did consult with an indigenous professor when constructing their draft report. Regardless of the working group’s stated intentions, it is important that indigenous students be better represented in institutional decisions like these, especially when those decisions ultimately influence their future on this campus.

A racist team name is only one of countless barriers that indigenous students face at McGill. For example, there are only two courses under the Indigenous Studies course code; the minor’s other course requirements are in other fields. McGill does not currently offer any undergraduate major programs in Indigenous Studies, or any indigenous language, except in the Faculty of Education. McGill is situated on Haudenosaunee and Anishinabeg territory, and the university’s educational programs should reflect and honour the history of this land and the traditions of these nations.

Beyond diversifying academia, McGill must continue diversifying its student services. The First People’s House, which offers housing, events, student support, and other services for indigenous students, is an example of such a resource. McGill should continue and expand on services like the First People’s House, and offer more funding and educational opportunities for indigenous and low-income students.

Moreover, creating inclusive spaces is not a mandate reserved for the upper echelons of administration. All student groups on campus should seek to increase indigenous representation, and our own editorial board shares these disappointing gaps. It is crucial that student groups, clubs, and services take active steps in involving indigenous voices beyond just land acknowledgements.

The most important role students can play is that of an ally. The #ChangeTheName campaign and its positive reception are a result of student-led activism, including that of Jirousek and the Indigenous Student Alliance, and SSMU Indigenous Affairs. To ensure the campaign’s success, it is imperative that students demonstrate their support and allyship by signing the open letter, signing the Change.org petition, and most importantly, physically showing up to the demonstration on Oct. 31. Moreover, student involvement should not be limited to a single protest: Indigenous exclusion persists far beyond the name of the men’s varsity teams. Students must continue holding McGill accountable after the protest—whether that’s by attending working group meetings, or getting involved with SSMU’s Indigenous Affairs Committee—to ensure that McGill takes substantive steps toward fostering a more representative institution.  Changing the name should be the first of many developments regarding McGill’s indigenous community, and the first step toward a more inclusive campus.

 

The #ChangeTheName demonstration will take place on Oct. 31 in front of the Milton Gates from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue