Latest News

Commentary, Opinion

New month, new me: Keeping New Year’s resolutions for February and beyond

If you’re reading this article, and also happened to make a New Year’s Resolution this year, there’s a good chance—seventy-three per cent to be exact—that you will break your resolution by the end of the year. If the McGill GPA scale makes more sense to you, that means that Canadians get about a B for failing to keep resolutions.

Many people end up breaking their New Year’s resolutions in comedic ways. One of my friends resolved to drink less in 2018, only to get thoroughly intoxicated at a New Year’s Eve party. Another friend texted me late at night on New Year’s Eve promising that in 2018 she wouldn’t use her phone for thirty minutes before bedtime each night.

Given the notoriously low success rates of New Year’s resolutions, many have denounced them as unimportant or trivial. Most of these arguments revolve around one crucial and rather cynical idea: There’s no point in setting goals that you know you are going to break. However, this discouraging reality doesn’t always need to be the case. Instead, aspiring goal-setters should focus on the ideas of incentive and gratification in order to set goals that they will find rewarding and remain motivated in the long run.

The reason most New Year’s resolutions fail is because people use strategies that are designed for keeping short-term promises, rather than achieving long-term goals. Although motivational speakers and proclaimed authors offer fleeting snippets of motivation, many fail to provide a consistent method for keeping resolutions. But there are good strategies out there. Perhaps the best advice I’ve come across comes from the book, //Emotional Success: The Power of Gratitude, Compassion, and Pride// by David DeSteno, a psychology professor at Northeastern University. DeSteno argues that the best way to stick to goals is by cultivating social emotions—gratitude, compassion, and pride—all of which help increase self-control and delay gratification.

Aspiring goal-setters should focus on the ideas of incentive and gratification in order to set goals that they will find rewarding and remain motivated in the long run.

To DeSteno, a key component of being able to stick to goals and be successful is the ability to delay gratification. A famous psychological study from the 1960s, dubbed “The Marshmallow Test,” by Walter Mischel, proves just that. In the study, children were given two choices: They could either take one marshmallow immediately, or wait a couple of minutes for two marshmallows. The marshmallows were always visible to the child during the experiment, and at any point they could ring a bell and ask for their treat; however, if they did so, they would be given only one marshmallow. Mischel found that children who were able to wait longer had higher salaries, better grades, and were less likely to be incarcerated as adults.

There are multiple strategies to delay gratification, and some are much more effective than others. One strategy, instinctively used by many goal-setters, is to use sheer willpower to keep resolutions. This strategy is often ineffective, and can be quite stressful for the person, making it very hard to keep goals. Studies done by Greg Miller, a psychology professor at Northwestern University, show that people who relied on sheer willpower could somewhat stick to their resolutions, but at the cost of a physical toll on their health.

The reason that gratitude, compassion, and pride help increase self-control is quite straightforward. Keeping healthy relationships—the foremost objective for social animals such as humans—involves acting morally; often times, acting morally means placing the interests of others above oneself—a form of self sacrifice. It is easier to sacrifice something, or to delay gratification, when a person feels compassionate or appreciative. Examples of this phenomenon abound; at least for me, I’ve spent more hours and put more effort into projects that benefit my close friends, such as making gifts for birthdays.

Research by DeSteno has confirmed this experimentally: When feeling grateful or proud, people are more willing to sacrifice their time and energy—a trait that is crucial for achieving goals. Grateful individuals are known to be more willing to help others, more likely to make mutually beneficial financial decisions, and so on.

So, the key to keeping your resolutions this year? Feel grateful. Take a minute to appreciate all that you have, and take pride in your work.

And hey, if that fails, here’s to trying again in 2019.

 

Janson is a U0 student in the Faculty of Science. Hailing from Calgary, Alberta, Janson enjoys hiking and sightseeing in Banff National Park.

 

McGill, News

Creation of people of colour committee discussed at AUS Legislative Council

At its second meeting of the Winter semester on Jan. 24, the Arts Undergraduate Society (AUS) created the Ad-hoc People of Colour Committee and approved AUS budget changes. The motions to amend the Financial By-Laws and call for both departmental elections and a Winter referendum also passed.

Motion for the creation of an Ad-hoc People of Colour Committee

Vice-President (VP) Communications Maria Thomas and Arts Representative Jennifer Chan put forward a motion outlining the creation of an Ad-hoc committee for People of Colour within the AUS. The committee, which has been in the works for the past few months, would be a governance body for people of colour to safely discuss their concerns and ideas to make the AUS a more inclusive space. The motion passed unanimously.

“The idea is to create a […] safe space for people of colour that work in any capacity for AUS,” Thomas said. “The idea of it is that there would be a safe space for people of colour to talk about how they’re feeling and their experiences in AUS, whilst also carrying out events which promote diversity and equity, [such as] conversation circles every month which focus on a certain theme [and] a Multicultural Day.”

Thomas and Chan believe that there is a need for such a committee despite it having similar responsibilities to the existing Equity Committee, formed in 2013 to advise the AUS on policies related to equality and protection of marginalized groups. Whereas the Equity Committee has a broad mandate including addressing problems such as sexual harassment, the Ad-hoc People of Colour Committee will be specifically dedicated to the interests of racial minorities on campus and the promotion of conversations surrounding racial identity.

“People of colour within student government don’t have a platform for them to all have a conversation,” Chan said. “We’re quite segregated in terms of our groups already, so [the committee would provide a place] for creating collaboration and conversation.”

Motion to approve revised AUS budget

As a result of fee increases and amendments to financial by-laws, AUS President Erik Partridge and VP Finance Noah Lew proposed a number of changes to the AUS budget, all of which passed. These included reductions to the Financial Management Council (FMC) budget, which in previous years has not been fully spent, as well as reinstating a reduced Peer Tutoring grant. Lew also discussed plans to create a bursary to subsidize departmental event fees for students with financial need.

“[There are plans to] provide a bursary in which, if a student is in financial need, [and] if it’s a paid event or a departmental event or any AUS event, that [would cover the fee] and provide [the event] free of charge,” Lew said.

Motion regarding FMC decisions

Partridge and VP Academic Madeline Wilson moved to accept the FMC’s financial decisions made on Jan. 17, with an additional allocation of $400 made to the McGill Policy Association.

“My concern was […] that the majority of this allocation is going towards cash prizes for the winners of the case competition,” Partridge said. “Considering that this is student funds going to an outside group for cash prizes, it concerns me because it’s hard for us to track that the expenses are legitimate and not being derailed somewhere.”

The motion passed, with 26 votes in favour and 7 votes against.

The AUS Legislative Council will next meet on Feb. 7.

 

Basketball, Men's Varsity, Sports

Redmen basketball triumphant in big win over Gaiters

McGill Redmen
108

Bishop’s Gaiters
57

Talk about a bounceback victory. On Jan. 26, the McGill Redmen (8-2) fell to the Bishop’s University Gaiters (3-8) in a tough 86-81 away loss. The following night back home at Love Competition Hall, the Redmen showed their true colours as they controlled the game from start to finish in a 108-57 blowout victory over the same Gaiters team—with the Redmen’s largest regular season margin of victory since 1977.

“I was disappointed last night [Jan. 26] with our energy level,” Redmen Head Coach David DeAveiro said. “So, we really wanted to come out here and establish a level of energy and compete.”

McGill shot 49.4 per cent from the field. Five Redmen scored in double figures, led by fourth-year centre Noah Daoust’s 18 points in 17 minutes off the bench. Daoust filled the stat sheet elsewhere, too, adding five rebounds, four steals, and three assists.

Starting sloppy in the first quarter, both teams took some time to settle down, but it quickly became clear which direction the game was headed in. Both sides found themselves in foul trouble, attempting 22 shots from the line in total. At the end of the stop-and-start first frame, the Redmen were up 11.

McGill’s lead grew to 16 by the end of the second quarter. After a half filled with fouls and free throws, DeAveiro kept his side locked in the game with his halftime speech.

“He was just telling us to stay focused and to stop fouling,” fourth-year guard Alex Paquin said. “When we came out in the third quarter, we stopped fouling, we started moving our feet, pressuring. They really had no option.”

Indeed, McGill stopped antagonizing the referees. After fouling the Gaiters 15 times in the first half, the Redmen totalled only three fouls in their dominant third quarter run. They forced eight turnovers in the frame on their way to a 19-0 run, holding the Gaiters without a basket for nearly five minutes as the lead grew to 33 by the end of the quarter.

Paquin scored all six of his points and added two assists in the quarter to pace the Redmen. Fourth-year guard Avery Cadogan added eight, on his way to a total of 12 for the game.

“We love to play fast,” Paquin said. “Coach always tells us ‘push the ball, push the ball, run out.’ We want to make teams turn the ball over, play fast, and then get open threes, and not have to settle for five-on-five offence.”

McGill continued their dominance in the fourth quarter, as stifling defensive pressure held the Gaiters to only eight points in the closing frame while the Redmen scored 26 more of their own.

“When we start running, that’s when teams really struggle to guard us,” Daoust said. “They’re a really good transition team but the way to beat them is to run on them.”

Third-year guard Isaiah Cummins’ dunk with 2:28 left put a nice bow on the Redmen effort that evening. With the team bathing in the loud fan appreciation postgame, DeAveiro highlighted his team’s efforts on the second night of a back-to-back.

“If [the] result [had been the same] tonight as yesterday, but [we had] competed like we did today, I would have lived with it,” DeAveiro said. “I just know when we play like this, when we compete like this, we’re a hard team to beat.”

After one of their most impressive performances of the season, the Redmen look to keep up the energy in their next game on Feb. 1 against the Laval Rouge et Or.

Moment of the game

With 3:43 left in the third quarter, fourth-year guard Alex Paquin dropped a beautiful behind-the-back pass right into the hands of fourth-year centre Noah Daoust for an easy lay-in to extend McGill’s lead to 22.

 

Quotable

“My brother […is] a sophomore at Bishop’s [….] Unfortunately, he’s hurt […but] I’ll be interested to see what he has to say. He was texting me after the game [last night] being really supportive and I hated it, obviously because of how it went [….] We’ll see what kind of mood he’s in, hopefully he’s okay.” – Daoust on the McGill-Bishop’s sibling rivalry.

 

Stat Corner

Pressured by the relentless McGill Redmen defence, the Bishop’s Gaiters turned the ball over 36 times on Saturday night.

Arts & Entertainment, Music

Trib Mix: Sounds from elsewhere

As add/drop draws to a close, turn up the heat and let this international and multilingual playlist from The McGill Tribune take you elsewhere. Beginning with some familiar soft French sounds, the playlist eases into playful Italian and pensive Japanese. Fall in pyaar in Hindi and hum in Swahili, and clear your mind with some Filipino prog. Be transported from McLennan to Iran, Cuba, Japan, Germany, and elsewhere with this eclectic collection of the world’s melodies.

Science & Technology

Lesbians Who Tech are what’s missing from the industry

Unless you are a very specific type of person (white, straight, and male), the tech industry is a frustrating place to work. The fact that one of the world’s fastest growing, most influential fields is so overwhelmingly male is concerning, because the growth and evolution of so many other related industries and many aspects of our daily lives rest in the hands of a single, khaki-clad demographic. Just ask your female-identifying friends in engineering—the STEM fields are a boys club. Women, particularly those who are not straight-identifying, can easily be made to feel unwelcome. Enter: Lesbians Who Tech.

Lesbians Who Tech was founded in 2012 in San Francisco by Leanne Pittsford in an effort to connect and empower queer and lesbian women working in technology. Since its conception, the organization has gone international, with branches active in 41 cities worldwide. Rebecca Woodmass and Rachel Jean Pierre run the Montreal chapter. Their most recent summit, held at Studio XX on Jan. 17, featured four panelists involved in Montreal’s LGBTQ+ community, focusing on the innovative and often unlikely ways that technology and art intersect.

Concordia graduate Nichole A. Lee holds a Bachelor of Fine Arts in art education and uses tech-based art projects to overcome the “digital divide” in low-income communities. Her work with queer youth and ally communities encourages self-expression while teaching practical skills such as computer literacy and photography. Likewise, Karine Robichaud is using her experience in the tech industry for community outreach, and her website KingCom.ca allows young entrepreneurs to connect and promote their products.

Multidisciplinary artist Julia Dyck, a regular on Studio XX’s weekly CKUT show, “The XX Files,” first got her start with the organization when she submitted a feminist science-fiction radio documentary called “Manage Your Emojis,” starring herself and Apple’s Siri. Dyck has since written and spoken extensively on the intersection of feminism and technology. She is also an experimental musician, performance artist, and freelance hairdresser.

The final panelist of the evening was Bleue Liverpool, a multimedia artist specializing in projection mapping and video. Liverpool was the 2017 recipient of the Mary Ellen Mark Scholarship. Her work involves interactive video projection and photography that explores what she calls “a diasporic third-world feminism.” Her work privileges the voices of immigrant women in marginalized communities.

“Being a woman and an authority in tech is really rewarding but really hard,” Liverpool said during the Q&A portion of the evening. “I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been the only queer, black woman in the room.”

All four panelists were invited to discuss not only their work, but the implications and possibilities of being a queer woman working in the tech industry. Much like sexuality, our definitions of art and technology are dynamic, vast, and ever-changing. Because of this fluidity, the tech industry—despite its flaws—is rife with opportunity.

“There has been a really specific set of people in charge of the technology we are producing, and what we have right now reflects a really specific set of values,” Dyck said. She believes that the merging of art and technology has produced what she calls “a rebellious daughter of capitalism and liberalism.”

Dyck’s work is heavily inspired by Donna Haraway’s 1984 essay “The Cyborg Manifesto,” a piece that explores the idea that science is a “rhetoric” that we are made to believe is objective.

Acknowledging sexuality in the workplace challenges our notions of what belongs where. Introducing different identities into a notoriously-homogenous industry has highlighted different needs and perspectives. Technology has been a driving force behind social change not only because of its ability to connect us but because it has expanded the existing definitions of art, education, and commerce.

“Sexuality [is reflected in] our art making,” Lee said. ”It reflects our creative selves and there’s no limit to expression.”

Although sexism and heteronormativity in tech remain prevalent issues, Lesbians Who Tech is a celebration of what’s right with the industry. The organization places enormous emphasis on the value of community and collaboration, both for its ability to connect artists and professionals, and include as many different voices as possible. Step by revolutionary step, Lesbians Who Tech is moving the tech industry forward.

Commentary, Opinion

Time’s Up—on campus sexual violence

On Jan. 7, black gowns dominated the red carpet at the 75th annual Golden Globes, as stars displayed their solidarity for Time’s Up, a movement dedicated to ending sexual assault, harassment, and inequality in the workplace. It arose out of a wave of feminist activism in 2017 that bred similar movements, most prominently #MeToo.

Despite the increased attention that issues regarding sexual assault in Hollywood and other industries have gained over the past year, movements like Time’s Up and #MeToo need to translate into local change. While Hollywood is making immense progress, McGill and other institutions must use the momentum from global movements to address sexual violence in their own communities, rather than letting the entertainment industry hog the spotlight.

According to Statistics Canada, 635,000 sexual assaults were reported in 2014. Between 2009 and 2014, 117,238 sexual assaults were reported to police. The majority of sexual assaults go unreported and campuses are no exception to this epidemic—one in five women will experience sexual violence while attending a post-secondary institution.

Rampant sexual assault plagues university campuses across Canada, and McGill is not immune. From the alleged sexual assault of a student by a dentist in the Faculty of Dentistry in 2016; the allegations of sexual misconduct against the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Vice-President (VP) External in 2017 and by a professor in the Institute of Islamic Studies in 2017; or when three former members of the Redmen football team were accused of sexual assault and forcible confinement in 2012; McGill clearly has not yet solved its own issues with sexual violence. These examples are just some of the few that garnered national media coverage; however, as statistics reflect, the vast majority of cases do not receive the same magnitude of attention.

In order to work towards ending sexual violence on campus, McGill must treat it as a public health epidemic. Sexual assault is not only a crime, but it can also cause or exacerbate lasting mental health issues such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety. In some cases, it can even lead to suicide. The dark reality is that too many survivors, on and off campus, are forced to live this trauma every day.

McGill has policies in place regarding sexual violence; specifically, the Policy on Harassment, Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Prohibited by Law, and the Policy against Sexual Violence, which was implemented in Fall 2016. However, such policies are not sufficient to adequately protect survivors. The National Our Turn Action Plan, founded by students at Carleton University and signed onto by SSMU, gave McGill a C- rating for its sexual violence policy. Despite McGill including the entire “McGill Community” in its framework, faculty and students are technically processed differently, compromising comprehensive, clear complaint procedures when allegations arise against faculty members.

Other preventative sexual assault initiatives include, but are not limited to, Rez Project, “How To Frosh” videos before faculty frosh registration, and the Rape Aggression Defence Course (RAD). Although these initiatives are crafted with good intentions, they do not sufficiently address the problem on campus. Rez Project only targets students in residence, which neglects the majority of the McGill student body and all of the faculty. The short “How to Frosh” video only targets students who participate in faculty froshes. The RAD is not being offered this semester and its $20 registration fee makes it less accessible to some students. McGill treats issues such as plagiarism with enough weight to create a mandatory undergraduate and graduate course titled the Academic Integrity Tutorial (AAA 100). In comparison, there is no such mandatory sexual violence prevention training for McGill students.

McGill should capitalize on the impetus of the #MeToo and Time’s Up movements by working to prioritize the health of survivors of sexual violence. In the same way that plagiarism is considered a campus-wide issue that requires the help of the Academic Integrity Tutorial, McGill should consider sexual violence an issue with enough weight to create mandatory workshops or courses for all students and faculty. Furthermore, McGill needs to revise and refine its sexual violence policies to better protect students, such as addressing the differences between processing students and faculty, or expanding initiatives like Rez Project, “How To Frosh,” and RAD to better accommodate and address all of the McGill community. Time’s Up and #MeToo have given a voice to survivors of sexual violence to share their trauma, and McGill has a responsibility to listen to the voices of students that are suffering here, too.

Art, Arts & Entertainment

Odd Stumble’s Archipelago dunks on traditional gallery experiences

With increasing museum and gallery admission fees in more formal spaces, many spectators look to smaller events to discover artists, pushing the envelope of what it means to make art. From Jan. 11 to 14, Odd Stumble, in collaboration with Théâtre Rialto, organized Archipelago, a collection of interdisciplinary performances and art installations. With an emphasis on collaboration and improvisation, visitors embarked on an interactive experience with a map of the theatre as a guide. Traveling through the different areas of the venue, it was easy to immerse oneself into the various performances, regardless of the medium.

On the main stage, Nicolas Royer Artuso of Thought Experiment Productions performed “4’33 in Baghdad,” presenting his reflections on important socio-political themes. Inspired by John Cage’s “4’33,” he guided his audience to listen to the silence within the theatre. As video clips of a Baghdad neighbourhood flash onto the screen, he announced a festival celebration accompanied by fireworks. Sounds of explosions filled the space, with the neighbourhood being demolished right in front of us. Conflating aesthetics and politics, Artuso left audiences with the simple question: “How can we stay silent?”

In the adjacent room, Aquil Virani’s Sit with me invites the audience to sit in front of his developing portrait series, CelebrateHer. Accompanying the portrait was a soundscape in which a woman speaks to the audience, bringing the portrait to life with her own words.

Théâtre Rialto’s beauty is overwhelming. An operating “theatre palace” until the 1990s, the building itself was modelled after the Paris Opera House, distinct for its neo-baroque interior design. Leaving no space unexplored, I ventured into the restroom. Stepping inside, I entered artmaker Jessica Rae’s The Green Room, which visualized a dream-like world with puppets and bright colours, establishing a certain slight uneasiness as schools of fish jumped from sink to sink. In the adjacent restroom, multidisciplinary artist Naomi Aldrich presented Trace (72): “Evidence or an indication of the former presence or existence of something,” a performance exploring mark making. At first glance, Aldrich’s positioning in between the bathroom stalls seemed off-putting. As she reapplied paint on her feet and hands, she began to count along with the voice that booms above the listener. Within this physical narrative, the passing of time, as well as her repetition of the markings, reinforced her performance.

These performances appeared to be independent of one another, but all somehow made the viewer think about how to interact with the various installations. In the Piccolo room downstairs, Maggie Winston began her performance of Wolf Tea, combining handmade masks, puppets, physical theatre, digital projections, and soundscapes. Combining the mundane with fantasy, Winston visualized how they intertwine in this constructed reality. Across the room, Carlo Polidoro Lopez presented several artworks, visualizing complex socio-political experiences. In a secret staircase, he illustrated the defining moment of his life: Witnessing the deaths of several family members at a young age. Using various discarded materials, Lopez’s artworks demonstrated that you don’t need much to make beautiful art.

A definite highlight of the art funhouse was KyAzMa, an electronic-bass-folk hybrid, creating a cinematic sonic experience like no other. Members William Moon and Christina Enigma cited numerous influences for this project, such as Radiohead, Boards of Canada, and Fleetwood Mac. The band filled the room with a healing energy, providing a needed calm-down within Archipelago’s sensory overload.

Unlike a traditional trip to a gallery, Odd Stumble’s art extravaganza demanded the viewer to actively participate in experiencing the art. Whether it was juxtaposing the mundane with the violent or exploring the healing potential of vocal harmonies, Archipelago reflected a refusal to stay silent, and reworked the definition of how art can be experienced by the everyday viewer.

 

Science & Technology

Fast radio bursts tangle with unknown forces

Streaking across the sky with a luminosity far greater than the sun’s, fast radio bursts (FRBs) remain powerful yet mysterious phenomena. They were discovered in 2007 when curiosity inspired the astronomer Duncan Lorimer to search the farthest reaches of space, with the FRBs being powerful enough to surpass the typical limitations of scientific equipment. Over a decade later, these transient radio phantoms remain a puzzle for modern astronomers; they travel for billions of years with no discernable pattern, only to emit waves for milliseconds. They are reminiscent of the radio waves emitted by pulsars, rotating stars that release waves of electromagnetic radiation like a lighthouse. However, FRBs are much brighter, travel much further, and had not been found to occur in the same spot twice until FRB 121102 was observed in 2012.

“Fast radio bursts are like flashes, they occur randomly in the sky,” Shriharsh Tendulkar, postdoctoral fellow at the McGill Space Institute, said. “We don’t know where the next one will occur so we search a large area of the sky, [however, with FRB 121102,] we knew the location very precisely and we knew this thing repeats, so we knew that we could point at it and keep recording data.”

An international team of astronomers—whose ranks included Tendulkar and Victoria Kaspi, professor of physics and director of the McGill Space Institute—conducted a study of FRB 121102 and found evidence of huge distortions in the direction of the radio waves. The astronomers concluded earlier this month that this “twisting” or “rotation” of the radio waves can be sourced to the Faraday effect, a phenomenon describing the influence of  magnetic fields on waves.

“[FRB 121102] had to have propagated through a strong magnetic field to see that kind of twisting in the electric field,” Kaspi said. “Nobody’s ever seen anything that strong except near really massive black holes like the one in the center of the galaxy.”

There are no known phenomena that can rival the magnetic influence of black holes, which can have a million times more mass than the sun. This suggests that the radio waves pass near a black hole. However, this theory is the result of applying familiar understandings to the observable effects, rather than observations of the environment actually surrounding FRB 121102. Thus, it remains unclear what exactly is exerting the immense magnetic field.

“We’re sure the magnetic field is really high, but we don’t know what causes it,” Tendulkar said. “It is possible that there is some other exotic shell around [FRB 121102] which we don’t completely understand. There are theoretical models where, if you have a supernova explode, the shell that remains after the explosion—in certain cases—could cause a rotation measure that high.”

The next tool for unshrouding the mysteries of FRBs will come in the form of the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME). Although CHIME was originally conceived to study dark energy, it is incidentally perfect for detecting FRBs; whereas only 27 of these anomalies have been observed so far, Tendulkar predicts that CHIME will enable between 5 and 50 detections per day. However, as CHIME is currently still under construction in British Columbia, the recently damaged Arecibo Observatory telescope in Puerto Rico remains crucial for locating FRBs.

“We’re really proud they put the telescope on the front page [of the academic journal Nature] because Puerto Rico got really devastated by Hurricane Maria, and the telescope in particular suffered quite a bit of damage,” Kaspi said, referencing awareness for victims of the hurricane and her team’s findings being published on the cover of Nature. “It’s a really bad scene in Puerto Rico but they’ve been working around the clock to get the observatory back up and running in addition to many other basic needs.”

Scientists are eager to see how new technologies and substantive data will help unravel the mysteries of the FRBs.

“It’s always fun to have a brand new problem to work on,” Kaspi said. “Nature didn’t have to give us this lovely gift, but nature gave us the gift and we were in the right place at the right time to be able to make progress.”

 

Montreal, News

Montreal Women’s March returns with empowering intersectional messages

On Jan. 20, the Manif des Femmes Montréal, or Women’s March on Montreal, returned to Place-des-Arts for the first anniversary of 2017’s international Women’s March. Organized by leaders of the Centre des Femmes de l’UQÀM, Stella, and Black Lives Matter, the rally called for increasing representation and inclusivity in nonviolent activist movements. Donning pink knit pussy hats and wielding hand-made posters, hundreds of people participated in the rally.

Last year, Montreal’s Women’s March was organized in solidarity with the Women’s March on Washington in response to the election and inauguration of United States President Donald Trump. This year however, the Montreal march focused less on American politics and more broadly on intersectionality and the fight for the rights of women of all races, political perspectives, sexual orientations, and gender identities globally.

Sandra Wesley, an organizer and executive director of sex worker rights group Stella, strove for the march to be inclusive for those who typically feel marginalized and excluded from political activism, including sex workers, immigrants, and transgender individuals.

“Last year, the march was tied to the inauguration of Donald Trump, which overshadowed the demands of women and clouded the scene with anger rather than progression,” Wesley said. “This year, the rally was less tied to specific events than it was shedding light on sexism, discrimination, and violence that will not be tolerated any longer.”

During the rally, leaders of the three organizer groups gave speeches. Barbara Chin, a feminist performer, also spoke, sharing statistics about the marginalization and sexualization of women, and asking the crowd to join hands as she applauded the historical resilience of women.

“As a community, as we are here for each other, for ourselves and for the world,” Chin said. “As women, we are made to believe that we are second class citizens [….] We are not respected, therefore we are exploited.”

The rise of the #MeToo movement this past year gave prominence to conversations surrounding sexual violence at the march. Protesters also referenced newer hashtags such as #thisisnolongertolerated and #timetoact to promote political involvement.

For activist Elise Van Leer, U1 Science, who attended the Women’s March on Washington last year, the focus on #MeToo and hashtag activism made this year’s march in Montreal stand out.

“I think the 20th of January will always be significant for me since attending the march in my hometown, D.C., last year,” Van Leer said. “The rally on Saturday, while much smaller, was a really eye-opening experience because you could really feel the energy and passion of the speakers. It almost felt less commercialized and more authentic. It was really meaningful to have the emphasis on intersectionality and the ‘#MeToo’ movement and you could tell everyone there really wanted to be there. I felt empowered in a way I hadn’t before within the city.”

 

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue