Latest News

Arts & Entertainment, Music

Intersessions workshop encourages diversity, accessibility in Montreal DJ culture

There is a distinct lack of diversity in the Montreal electronic music scene. Many hopeful DJs feel the music industry is inaccessible because of the group of predominantly heteronormative males controlling it. Intersessions, founded in Vancouver by DJs Rhi Blossom and Chippy Nonstop, is a series of workshops working to change this lack of diversity by providing underrepresented demographics with DJ and music production classes. The project’s goal is to address the electronic music industry’s remarkable gender and sexuality based imbalance by providing inexpensive classes for people on the LGBTQIA2S+ spectrum. 

On Sept. 19, Montreal’s first production workshop was hosted at Outro, a local company that provides creators with access to free artist-to-artist samples and loops. DJs Blossom and Maddie Ross led the workshop in Outro’s studio space. For the first portion of the evening, two local producers gave a tutorial on the respective production tools that they use: JaymieSilk on FL Studio, and Valeda on Ableton. Attendees were encouraged to follow along on their laptops, and could come to the event early if they needed help downloading the software. I had never produced music before—the case for about two-thirds of the attendees—and found this a little overwhelming. However, the point of the class was not to make us  pros, but to give us a foundation for doing our own exploratory work using the software. Following their instructions, attendees were given a chance to play around with the software and ask questions, before the panel discussion that would close the night.

The panel discussion, which centered around the two artists’ experiences, was the most interesting part of the workshop. It began with Blossom asking Jaymie Silk and Valeda how they started making electronic music. Both artists revealed that they are predominantly self-taught, and praised YouTube as a great place to learn. They emphasized that expensive equipment is not necessary to make music, and that they still rely heavily on creating using their laptops. Silk spoke of “a new generation of producers” who are self-taught like them and less concerned with the formal techniques of production, but still able to create really interesting music. Both artists are grateful for the large community of DIY music producers in Montreal which they have become a part of. 

Valeda and Silk then discussed the issue of tokenization—a problem that many of Montreal’s local DJs continue to face. Silk recalled being put on a lineup that had little in common with his sound, other than the fact that all of the DJs were black. Valeda recounted playing some bigger venues, where it seemed like the people who booked her didn’t even like her music, but needed a girl for their lineup. It is an inner struggle when confronted with these situations. The exposure is still valuable, and the artist needs to make money, but it can be obvious that they are getting booked just to fill a quota or to project an image. 

Finally, there was a fruitful discussion about cultural appropriation and the exploitation of certain genres. Jaymie Silk, who comes from the ballroom scene—a ball culture that originated in Harlem as a place of refuge from societal oppression of sexuality, race, and gender—explained that many DJs will make ballroom style house music, while not acknowledging the style’s complex and important history. The same goes for the current trend of appropriating Jamaican culture by sampling dancehall beats. In order to pay respect to the music they sample, DJs need to be familiar with the history behind the genre they work within. Artists should ask themselves whether they truly care about the music they’re sampling. 

Power imbalance within any given context must be assumed, rather than overlooked. As much as we love to place our Montreal music scene on a pedestal of progressivism, oppressive practices continue to obstruct equality and fairness for all. Events like Intersessions are integral in shaping the musical culture of the future—one that is more responsible and accessible.  

Research Briefs, Science & Technology

Fantastic new science professors and where to find them

As one of the top universities in Canada, McGill boasts top-notch professors—dedicated academics and researchers from all around the world. According to Gregor Fussmann, chair of the Department of Biology, as many as 200 candidates initially apply for a single tenure track position. From these, a search committee identifies a long list of around 25 applicants based on research excellence, publication record, and teaching ability. Around five of these candidates are then invited for an interview, and one is ultimately hired. This year, eight new outstanding professors joined the Faculty of Science.   

A few of these professors shared exciting aspects of their research, the classes they will teach, life advice, and hobbies with The McGill Tribune, because they are people too. Although each of these professors has different interests, they all share a common passion for their research and a willingness to include the rest of the McGill community.

 

Assistant Professor Sarah Racine, Department of Psychology

Sarah Racine obtained her Honours BSc degree at McGill before continuing her studies in the US. She is thrilled to be back at her alma mater as a member of the Department of Psychology.

Racine’s research focuses on examining the risk and maintenance factors for eating disorders. According to a 2014 McGill Student Psychological Wellbeing survey, one to three per cent of McGill students struggle with eating disorders, and McGill has recently cut its Eating Disorder Program.

Racine’s research is therefore crucial for the students that fall within this percentage. Right now, she and a team of researchers are working on “a study in which [they] examine whether different emotional responses to food [can] predict different eating disorder symptoms.” If you hope to learn more about Racine and her work, she will be teaching PSYC 408, Principles of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, in the Winter semester.

Racine advises undergraduates to seriously reflect on whether or not going to graduate school is the right path for them.

“I suggest getting involved in numerous research lab[s] as early as possible in your degree […] and learn about the joys and hardships of graduate study and academia,” Racine said.

Outside of work, Racine enjoys Zumba and dance classes, visiting Montreal museums, and trying out the city’s amazing restaurants.

 

Assistant Professor Jessica Lin, Department of Mathematics and Statistics

Jessica Lin joins the Department of Mathematics and Statistics from the University of Madison—Wisconsin, where she pursued her postdoctoral studies. She specializes in “Stochastic Homogenization,” a discipline that uses both partial differential equations and probability theory.

“I’m interested in physical models which have microscopic, random effects,” Lin wrote. “Random effects certainly influence a physical system, and if those effects are sufficiently small, then I can say on average what is happening. [I] can build the right mathematical formulation to model a wide variety of ‘typical’ physical settings.”

Such random processes include how fires can spread in randomly positioned trees, or how conductive a metal can be with random deposits of rust. Lin described the department as a “great fit” for her research and particularly enjoys her colleagues, who have been helpful and welcoming since she has arrived.  

Outside of McGill, Lin is an avid dancer, studying both ballet and salsa during the weekends. She advises McGill students to explore the University’s ample resources and what they have to offer.

 

Assistant Professor Carolina Dufour, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences

Carolina Dufour is a physical oceanographer, and has thus joined the McGill Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences. Her research is particularly relevant in light of global warming. She studies the role of the Southern Ocean—the southern parts of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans that surround Antarctica—in the climate system and its response to climate change. Polar oceans such as the Southern Ocean are key regions for mitigating global warming.  

“They take up significant amounts of excess heat and carbon released to the atmosphere by human activities,” Dufour wrote. “[At] the same time, polar oceans are experiencing very fast changes that are believed to continue over the next decades.”

To study the response of ocean circulation and the carbon cycle on climate change, Dufour uses numerical models. She will be teaching ATOC 182, Introduction to Oceanic Sciences, next winter.

“[I want to] share my passion about the ocean, […] as [it] plays such an important role in climate change,” Dufour wrote.

Dufour enjoys Montreal’s festivals, parks, and bakeries, as well as playing volleyball at a local club. She advises students to strive to achieve a good work-life balance and to relieve stress.

“Keep some room for [things other] than work in [your] life,” Dufour suggested.

 

Assistant Professor Matthew Harrington, Department of Chemistry

Matthew Harrington joined the Department of Chemistry at McGill from Berlin, where he led a research group in the Department of Biomaterials at the Max Planck Institute. At McGill, he continues to pursue the same line of research: Investigating materials made from biological organisms. He hopes to create new synthetic materials mimicking animal-made polymers’ sustainable properties. As an example, Harrington cited the velvet worm, whose slime can form into stiff, water-soluble fibers that, when dissolved, can then reform into new fibers from the solution—a perfect model for developing recyclable polymers.

For those interested in these topics, Harrington will teach CHEM 334, Advanced Materials, next semester. This class will focus on biological materials research and “smart” materials, which “respond in a programmed way to specific environmental stimuli.”

Harrington advises students to reach out to professors and urges them to interact with their profs and get involved in research.

“I was intimidated by the professors and didn’t want to bother them with my questions,” Harrington said of himself as an undergrad, “but now that I’m on the other side, I really appreciate it when a student shows interest.”

Outside of his career as a McGill professor, Harrington enjoys riding his bike, playing guitar and banjo, and eating poutine.

 

Assistant Professor Yann le Polain de Waroux, Department of Geography & the Institute for the Study of International Development

Unique among the other professors, Yann le Polain de Waroux is a joint professor for both the Geography Department in the Faculty of Science and the Institute for the Study of International Development in the Faculty of Arts. 

Right now, le Polain de Waroux is researching deforestation, focusing on how large companies in South America “make decisions about expanding agriculture on forested land, and the ways in which we can better regulate this deforestation.” 

He is also interested in what happens once deforestation has taken place in terms of how people adapt, move, or change their lifestyles. 

Listening to experiences from people in deforested areas ultimately gives him a better understanding of how these people telling them relate to the land and to the rest of the world. 

“[I love] the stories of all these different people,” le Polain de Waroux wrote. “Whether it is poor people in the mountains of Morocco […] or rich farmers in the Argentine pampas.” 

Le Polain de Waroux will be teaching a new class this winter:  INTD 497, a research seminar on international development, as well as GEOG 210, Global Place and People, and GEOG 310, Development and Livelihood.

Le Polain de Waroux suggests that undergrads not stress about doing things just for the sake of building a CV or resume; sometimes the most valuable life experiences come from unexpected places, such as travelling or random jobs. 

Le Polain de Waroux enjoys Aikido and would be a Ravenclaw at Hogwarts.

Basketball, Sports

Everybody hurts, sometimes: Social media accounts reveal Kevin Durant’s emotional side

Last summer, Kevin Durant made possibly the biggest decision he’ll ever make. After eight years with the Oklahoma City Thunder, he published an article on The Player’s Tribune, announcing his intention to sign with the 73-win Warriors—not long after his Thunder had blown a 3-1 series lead against them in the Western Conference Finals. The fan base’s backlash was swift and strong, with followers burning jerseys and calling him names all over the Internet. Still, he remained steadfast in his decision.

“I believe I am doing what I feel is the right thing at this point in my life and my playing career,” Durant wrote in his article.

He was tired of finishing second, and he appeared in an April 2013 issue of Sports Illustrated saying just as much. He wanted a championship, and he wanted to win. He wanted to be on top of the basketball world.

One year later, Durant got exactly that—a championship and a Finals MVP. And in an effort to catch up to his title-defending Warriors team, other contenders were extremely active this offseason, with the Rockets trading for Chris Paul and the Thunder forming their own super-team. However, Durant’s social media interactions were the more notable events of the Golden State offseason.

For any frequent Twitter user, it’s pretty easy to tell that Durant’s favourite activity on the platform is responding to critics. As a result, his tweeting episode on Sept. 18 and 19 wasn’t really surprising. In the debacle, Durant’s account replied to a tweet in the third person, explaining why he made his free agency decision and trashing the Thunder’s coach, organization, and roster—except for Russell Westbrook. Some of the Internet community latched onto the theory that Durant had “burner accounts,” or accounts he could use to defend himself without being attached to his own name and had simply forgotten to switch to one of those accounts before this particular set of tweets. Durant, however, rejected that explanation, admitting to having written the contentious tweets himself.

Although Durant’s unprofessional and immature actions were indefensible, his original decision can be justified—regardless of the commotion it caused. His departure for greener pastures was unpopular. From the looks of it, either he didn’t expect fans to turn on him so quickly, or he expected to handle the backlash much better. As a consequence, social media use has turned into his instrument for self-defence. Judging from his high frequency of response to criticism, it seems as though he still feels the need to justify his year-old decision to everyone.

This reaction is decidedly human. It’s tough to always be in the spotlight. The task gets immeasurably harder when every decision an athlete makes gets put under a microscope—they’ll be be discussed for hours upon hours during the never-ending sports news cycle. It can be especially difficult for someone like Durant, whose decisions are particularly controversial.

Kevin Durant’s strange, humanizing summer on social media didn’t end with the tweets. He’s an active YouTube user and responds to fans there as well. One comment from his verified account caught everyone’s eye last week, giving the basketball world another revealing look at Kevin Durant.

“I play basketball, I got acne, I grew up with nothing,” Durant wrote. “[I’m] still figuring myself out in my late [20’s] [….] I’m closer to you than [you] think.”

This comment is just another example of how Durant has opened up more and more frequently this offseason, with appearances on Bill Simmons’s podcasts, replies to nobodies on Twitter, and other newsworthy YouTube comments. As a result, it’s much more useful to understand and see him as just another ordinary person thrust into extraordinary circumstances. As far as his decision goes, he was clearly tired of coming in second. He chose to join Golden State and finished first. With that result, he got what he wanted, but now it seems that what he needs is for the sports universe to accept his decision.

Ask Ainsley, Private, Student Life

Ask Ainsley: How do I learn to put myself first?

Dear Ainsley,

Schoolwork is piling up and my stress level is rising—all the while, one of my best friends is constantly asking me to hang out late at night. I know she’s going through a rough patch after recently breaking up with her significant other, but I've been losing sleep, with having to hang out all the time and constantly check in on her. I love my friend dearly, I just feel like she asks a lot of me, and sometimes takes advantage of my kindness. I want to make sure she is happy, but not at the expense of my own well-being. How can I prioritize my needs without being a bad friend?

Sincerely,

Prioritizing Other People (POP)


Dear POP,

Your situation reminds me of my own relationships with my friends, actually. I have often found myself getting so overwhelmed trying to help and support them that I forget to take time for myself or think about the kind of support I need. I eventually reached a point where I needed to evaluate my current situation and from there, decide what amount of time I could truly commit to others. As important as it is to be a supportive friend, it’s equally as important to know where to draw the line in terms of focusing too much on others’ needs instead of your own. By saying “yes” to someone else, you shouldn’t be saying “no” to yourself.

The first step in prioritizing yourself is accepting that you can’t change who you are—it’s human nature to want to make people happy. However, you can change some of your actions when you navigate this friendship, and doing so could ultimately put you in a better mental state. Once you acknowledge that you may be a people pleaser—meaning you tend to prioritize other people’s feelings over your own in order to make everyone happy—and figure out why you’re so eager to please those around you, it’s a lot easier to understand the root of your anxieties.  

It’s also important to know the limits of how much time you can afford to give to others. If you have a tendency to accommodate everyone’s wants and needs, try reducing the word “yes” and embracing “no.” In the case of your friend, the more you get used to saying “no” to those late night hang outs when you need alone time, the less guilt you’ll feel in doing so. When you do say yes, try setting time limits for how long you can hang out to ensure that you can still have the time to yourself that you need. If you really struggle with saying “no,” try to remind yourself that there will always be other times and opportunities to help someone that will end up working better for your schedule. Of course it’s nice to see loved ones happy, but if you are overwhelmed, true friends should understand that you can’t always be available to help them and won’t take advantage of you for feeling guilty.

In terms of learning how to tend to your own needs more, developing a self-care routine can be immensely helpful. I tend to get really overwhelmed with work and commitments, forgetting that I need time to relax. If you find that you may also be lacking the time to meet your needs, it might be beneficial for you to consider dropping a commitment or two. If you’re giving up something that you need, such as getting a good night’s sleep or studying for a test, it might be time to reevaluate and refocus. There is no shame in caring for yourself—you deserve to be happy, too.

All in all, remember that it’s okay to not always be everything to everyone—and that you can’t make everyone happy all the time. By knowing how much time you can truly offer to others and committing to creating a healthier mental state for yourself, you will be way more capable of committing to things that are the most important to you and to the people you love.

With love and care,

Ainsley

Student Life

A bond like no other: Rooming with friends

From Joey and Chandler, to Will and Grace, to the Golden Girls, pop culture narratives inundate us with the idea that living with friends is an essential part of being young, a right of passage into adulthood. These iconic friendships have romanticized this idea, establishing it as the norm, despite the reality that many people choose not to live with close friends, instead opting to live with acquaintances or random roommates. Though it’s not for everyone, living with close companions can make for a wonderful experience—late night chats and evenings filled with laughs are merely a sliver of the plentiful benefits. The memories created within the walls of a shared apartment last a lifetime.

Many McGill students opt to room with their friends. Having roommates takes dedication, but having best friends for roommates takes a whole lot more. Though it serves as a way to grow closer than ever, living with one’s bestie should be thoughtfully approached. Rooming with friends isn’t one sleepover after the other; it requires effort to maintain the closeness of a relationship. There will be times when arguments occur or lifestyles clash—some people prefer to do dishes at the end of day, while others might perceive this as leaving nothing but a mess in the sink. Or perhaps one roommate likes to go to bed before 11 p.m., but others in the apartment enjoy staying up until 2 a.m. watching movies. The small conflicts can create larger issues in any relationship if they’re not properly addressed, which makes strong communication vital.

On the other hand, potential pros of living with one’s close friends include the fact that friends have already established a certain level of respect with one another; their quirks and habits are nothing new, thus eliminating the grace period of getting to know one’s new cohabitants. Rooming with a best friend can be the ultimate bonding experience. Roommates see each other when they first wake up, when they come home from a long night out, and at the end of the worst of days. Living with a best friend can also mean having someone to come home to and unwind with.

Emilie Marsaudon, U2 Arts, has made a learning experience out of living with her best friend. Though sharing an apartment with one of her closest gals entails spending a lot of time together, that extra time has ultimately brought them closer together.

“Living with someone you know, or in my case, one of my best friends, is absolutely amazing,” Marsaudon said. “It brings the friendship to a whole new level because you are with them a vast majority of the time. [For me it is having] someone to eat junk food with […] and watch obnoxious TV with you, which is a mega plus.”

Living with roommates can also help ease the transition into a new environment. Because moving to a new city lacking familiar faces can be isolating for out-of-province or international students, rooming with other people ensures that they have a small network on which to rely throughout this process.

For Isis Palay, U2 Arts, having roommates has helped her adjust to life in Canada after moving from France to attend McGill. Reducing her rent cost was one original reason she decided to live with roommates, as was wanting to live with her best friend. Currently, Palay, her best friend, and three others live together in an apartment.

“I love living with people in an apartment,” Palay said. “Living with people is work, but it is also super rewarding. Having flatmates is the perfect choice for me. I love that my roommates are always in a good mood in the morning. It cheers me up.”

Baseball, Behind the Bench, Sports

Behind the Bench: Polarity and empathy with the Cleveland Indians

I love baseball. In late February every year, stale, heavy winter air is punctured by the clap of a baseball burning into the back of a leather glove. It’s my favourite sound.

I grew up in Central Ohio and—like many of my childhood friends and neighbours—I am a passionate Ohio sports fan. Most of all, I love the Cleveland Indians. For those who aren’t familiar, they’re the MLB team with the terribly offensive logo—a buck-toothed, red-faced, feather-wearing caricature—to accompany an already offensive name. Naturally, this logo causes controversy. The sides to the debate are predictable: Outsiders demand the logo be changed since it’s remarkably insensitive to the long history of discrimination against Native American peoples, while fans defend it as an iconic symbol that has no bad intentions—the logo has been associated with their beloved team since 1901. Not many people are members of both parties; I am.

As a child, I didn’t understand why the logo was so offensive. In fact, I loved the team for it: One of my ancestors was a Native American from the Illinois Territory. I do not remember exactly when I heard the word racist associated with the team, but I was shocked. Years after this revelation, however, it’s clear to me how hurtful the depiction is to so many people. I maintain, however, that I don’t necessarily pick one side—I can empathize with both. Fan bases form for teams, not branding, so changing the logo to something more appropriate is not an attack on fans. It’s simply the righting of a long-standing wrong.

I am both a diehard fan who believes in the purity of the team, and someone who realizes that this century-old symbol undermines entire cultures. Still, no matter how I approach such a polarized issue, I am left out in the cold and pressured to choose one party or the other. I can’t comfortably set myself alongside other devoted fans who wish to retain the logo, but I don’t completely agree with the opposition’s tactics either. The fundamental problem is that there is so little common ground in a debate where I understand both sides.

This should not be a debate of two sides; rather, fans and opponents should be working together to find the best alternative. There is only one ultimate solution: Changing the logo and the corresponding name. I maintain that devoted Indians fans are, at heart, like me: They are fans of Cleveland the city and therefore the team, not the team and therefore the city. While the logo is the single image that represents the team, it is not the foundation of the city, nor our fandom—it is merely an expression of it. This means it can change with time.

Being a lightning rod for controversy is not best for the team nor the city of Cleveland. In straddling the divide, I try to get opposers to understand that life-long fans will not give up so easily, and hurling insults is no way to their heart. Instead, Cleveland supporters must help their fellow fans face the reality that a name and logo cooked up in 1901 really should not have any bearing on who we are today.

As long as we root for the team from Cleveland, it doesn’t ultimately matter what their name is. People who root for a team embroiled in controversy over an offensive logo do it primarily because they love their home. In trying to politely convince them of what is right, it is important to remember that even if they agree, accepting a change in logo may still be hard. It is essential to have a conversation—not a dispute—in order to enact positive change.

Commentary, Opinion

Montreal does not need beautification, but restoration

Among the gaping potholes, crumbling concrete, and constant display of orange construction cones around Montreal, a different colour has sprung up around the Lachine area of Highway 20. Sound barriers and underpasses have been painted blue, little blue reflective signs have been stuck into the ground, and giant blue light fixtures have been installed along the highway. However, the art installation seems out of place and out of touch with the city, especially since it leads from the airport to downtown Montreal. It’s obvious that the project is more oriented to visitors than residents. For Montrealers, the main concern regarding Highway 20 is its safety—not beauty—since the infrastructure has been falling apart for years.

This new display of blue is actually a birthday present for Montreal, graciously given to the city by The National Bank. “Bleu de Bleu,” as the installation is called, is the brainchild of Montreal artist Alain Paiement. The project cost $3.2 million and took 20 workers 1,000 hours to complete over the time span of four months. Sadly, the project was poorly executed and does not reflect its hefty price tag. The money would have been better spent on fixing the crumbling concrete, which would have also had the desired beautifying effect.

The installation has three components that work together to convey that blue is the colour of water and the Quebec flag, as President and CEO of The National Bank, Louis Vachon, keenly pointed out. The first is the blue paint over an underpass and sound barriers. The underpass has been entirely covered in blue, holes and all, while the existing designs of the sound barriers have been painted in an array of shapes and designs. The second component of the installation are the 400 blue reflective panels that have been placed along seemingly unrelated areas of the highway and the Dorval circle. The third component is the 86 blue light fixtures that have been installed between 55th and 32nd Avenue, which either look a lot like lightsabers or something phallic. Luckily, these lights only use up as much energy as three regular street lights. This seems somewhat unnecessary, since lighting already existed along that particular stretch of highway.

 

For Montrealers, the main concern regarding Highway 20 is its safety—not beauty—since the infrastructure has been falling apart for years.

Like a lot of decisions regarding Montreal’s crumbling infrastructure, this project has completely missed the mark. As Global News reports, the project focuses on incoming tourists rather than Montreal residents. Even more unfortunate is the fact that the blue underpass had lot of holes, which have become more obvious since the paint job. This is especially aggravating, since the $3.2 million project could have fixed the concrete, instead of just painting over it.

As for the art aspect of the project, this, too, fell flat. The blue that was chosen has a purple hue to it, neither representing water nor the colour of the Quebec flag. Additionally confusing is the fact that while the project is supposed to “evoke the shores of the St-Laurent River,” it is also supposed to convey music. Paiement was inspired by reggae, jazz, and classical music, which would have been the last genre combination I would have thought of upon looking at “Bleu de Bleu.” Then again, to be fair, my initial thought when I first set eyes on the blue underpass was that the city had added a protective coat on the concrete to shield it from the weather.

While one can commend The National Bank for wanting to bring life and art to a rather dull part of everyone’s day, the apparent focus on impressing incoming tourists over restoring vital infrastructure leaves one more annoyed than anything at the sight of “Bleu de Bleu.” Since the de la Concorde collapse in 2006, the structural problems of the Champlain Bridge, and the current rebuilding of the Turcot Yards, infrastructure has been a constant concern of residents, making this installation appear tone deaf and out of touch. And even if it is only supposed to be an art installation, with all the incredible murals on display in St-Henri and the recent addition to the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts, Montreal citizens expect better. Overall this was a great opportunity missed, for both the project and Montrealers.

 

 


Thea is a U2 McGill student majoring in Political Science and minoring in Philosophy and German Studies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Out on the Town, Private, Student Life

Markets of Montreal: A guide to exploring Montreal’s fall food venues

Now that the seemingly endless summer has wrapped up, fall is finally upon us—and with the changing seasons comes the perfect weather for strolling through Montreal’s food markets. Make the best of the city’s beautiful, albeit short-lived, fall season with The McGill Tribune’s rundown of the best venues around.

Marché Jean-Talon

(Daria Kiseleva / The McGill Tribune)

7070 Ave Henri Julien, Montreal, QC H2S 3S3

Hours of Operation: Mon, Tues, Weds, Sat from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. & Thurs, Fri from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. & Sun from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.

A 30-minute metro ride from McGill, Marché Jean-Talon is a maze of fresh produce, seasonal flowers, and small shops. As the largest market in the city with the greatest diversity of products, it’s the perfect place to stop for a coffee and croissant before filling your grocery bags. At any of the bakeries, fisheries, or chocolatiers, you are guaranteed to encounter plenty of free samples as you meander through all the market has to offer—so feel free to come hungry and make a lunch out of it.

Marché Atwater

(Daria Kiseleva / The McGill Tribune)

138 Ave Atwater, Montreal, QC H4C 2H6

Hours of Operation: Mon, Tues, Weds from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. & Thurs from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. & Fri 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. & Sat, Sun from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.

A few bus stops west of campus, Marché Atwater is in full fall swing. Though the market has less fresh produce than Marché Jean Talon, Marché Atwater makes up for it with its amazing selections of cheese, bread, and meat. Snack on fondue cheese bread, warm chilli, or pastries from the large Première Moisson as you wander through. For those who are already planning their Halloween, Marché Atwater’s display of pumpkins is a must-see.

Marché Saint Jacques

(Daria Kiseleva / The McGill Tribune)

2035 Rue Amherst, Montreal, QC H2L 3L8

Hours of Operation: Mon, Tues, Weds, Thurs, Fri: 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. & Sat from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. & Sun from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Marché Saint Jacques, located just north of Montreal’s Gay Village, is a quaint market, ideal for those who get overwhelmed by the extensive choices at the city’s larger markets. But even in its smaller setting, Marché Saint Jacques manages to satisfy your fall market needs. You’ll still find everything you need for the upcoming Thanksgiving weekend weekend in one place: Pastas, pastries, produce, and coffees.

McGill Farmers’ Market

(Daria Kiseleva / The McGill Tribune)

Rue McTavish, Montreal, QC H3A 0C9

Hours of Operation: Thurs 11 a.m. to 5 p.m., ending on Oct. 26

Found on McTavish every Thursday, the McGill Farmers’ Market is our very own one-stop-shop for Thursday’s lunches and dinners. Here you’ll find the key ingredients to make your own meals—breads, jams, honeys, and organically-grown produce from the Macdonald Campus—but you can also buy smaller goodies, like coffee, tea, baked goods, and plates of Indian food. Save traveling to the aforementioned markets on the weekends and indulge in McGill’s very own market for its remaining four Thursdays of the fall. 

Commentary, Opinion

McGill campus is still stuck in the BDS debate

If you didn't understand last week's highly technical debate over the constitutionality of the composition of the Students' Society of McGill University (SSMU)'s Board of Directors, you may be in luck. Underlying that debate was an entirely different issue, one much more familiar to students—the dispute over the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement at McGill.

On the surface, the Board meeting on Sept. 26 was dominated by a lengthy discussion of whether or not the 12 directors currently sitting on the Board fulfilled the requirements of the SSMU Constitution, which stipulates that four of the members should come from the SSMU executive. Given the resignations of two SSMU executives in winter 2017, the number of executives on the Board had fallen to three, and the vacant spots were filled with Members-at-Large, in accordance with the Constitution.

But, while the debate may have been framed around constitutional issues, the way it unfolded suggested that it wasn't just a debate about the Constitution. It was about BDS. More than any constitutional issue, the whole controversy surrounding the Board of Directors showed how deeply the issue of BDS has become embedded in McGill’s student politics, and the kind of dysfunction that can result.

Upper-year students are by now well-accustomed to the ongoing controversy over the BDS movement at McGill. The latest round of the debate began after the Board’s Sept. 17 vote to ratify the J-Board's ruling on BDS passed with 11 votes in favour, and one abstention. The week after—at the very next meeting of the Board—came the issue of the Board's constitutionality.

This dispute at the Board of Directors is just the latest example of how the BDS issue can tear at the fabric of McGill's student society.

This timing was an early sign that the debate over the constitutionality of the Board had an additional dimension to it. Minutes from previous sessions show that the Board had been meeting and passing motions with less than four SSMU executives since at least March 2017, and yet, the issue of constitutionality was never raised, nor were the Board's decisions questioned. It was only after the decision to ratify the BDS ruling that objections were made to a composition that by then had been in effect for months. Even more revealing is that the charge of unconstitutionality was brought forward by the only Director who had not voted in favour of the previous week's ratification of the J-Board’s ruling against BDS. Although she voted in favour of the ruling, after the fact, Vice-President (VP) Internal Maya Koparkar also agreed with allegations of the board’s unconstitutionality.

The unfolding of the Board's discussion on Sept. 26 provided further signs that the issue of constitutionality was being approached through the lens of BDS. The sensitivity of BDS explains why the subject of the validity of the Board's recent decisions came up early, and often. It explains why the discussion carried on even after SSMU General Manager Ryan Hughes informed the Board that the SSMU's legal counsel had assured him that, while the Board must move to appoint another executive by its next meeting, its composition was still constitutional, if murky. And it certainly explains how a discussion about constitutionality eventually devolved into a director accusing other members of politicizing the previous week's decision, and of sharing information with Jewish advocacy groups.

The BDS movement has been defeated in a referendum and declared unconstitutional by the J-Board, yet it continues to shape debates over seemingly unrelated issues even at the highest levels of student governance. This dispute at the Board of Directors is just the latest example of how the BDS issue can tear at the fabric of McGill's student society.

Prolonging the BDS debate by injecting it into the Board of Directors is irresponsible and damaging behaviour. It falsely undermines the legitimacy of the Board of Directors, and ultimately, hurts students. The institutions of SSMU exist to serve the student body; wasting their time by prolonging a debate that has already been settled by the Judicial Board distracts them from their core duties toward students.

It's increasingly looking like SSMU will be incapable of operating at its full potential until students finally resolve to put the issue of BDS aside. SSMU’s biggest problem doesn’t lie in its Constitution, but in the persistence of this divisive issue on campus.

 

David Watson is a U3 Political Science and History student. He is a (very) minor league hockey player who enjoys music, dogs, and eating entire boxes of Kraft Dinner in a single sitting.

 

 

Arts & Entertainment, Pop Rhetoric

Pop Rhetoric: Selling horror

Three weekends into its theatre run, Andrés Muschietti’s It continued to lead the box-office with an impressive $29.8 million three-day total. Simultaneously, Darren Aronofsky’s mother! kept collecting dust with a meek $3.3 million in its second weekend despite strong TIFF word-of-mouth and Jennifer Lawrence’s star power. Both films are critically-acclaimed, classified horror, and aimed at the same demographic, which begs the question: Why the discrepancy? Simple: Although they had similar marketing, they lie at polar opposites of the horror spectrum.

Ever since the unexpected success of David Robert Mitchell’s It Follows (2015), “post-horror” has slowly been creeping out from the dark corners of the American art-house scene, establishing itself as a bona fide cultural phenomenon. Mood-oriented, slow, quiet, uncomfortable, amoral, and uninterested in clear answers, the movement represents a drastic departure from the loud, exposition-heavy, and jump-scare-riddled horror movies to which the public has become accustomed. Indeed, post-horror wide-releases like The Witch (2016), It Comes at Night (2017), and The Neon Demon (2016) have little to do with the likes of crowd-pleasers such as The Conjuring (2013), Paranormal Activity (2009), Insidious (2011), and their respective sequels. While critics could not be happier, audiences are divided. According to the polling website Cinemascore, moviegoers attributed a “D” average to It Comes at Night, while mother! joined the select club of “F” graded films. By means of comparison, the regrettable 2013 3D remake of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre scored a C+.

Aside from the fact that post-horror is a more challenging experience than the standard genre fare, the public’s overwhelmingly negative response could be attributed to distributors’ inability to pinpoint the sub-genre’s audience, and the dishonest marketing campaigns ensuing from this dilemma. For instance, take the trailer for Robert Eggers’s The Witch: It features creepy children, possession, hints of bloody action sequences, and paranormal activities. The two-minute, heart-pounding sequence does nothing to prepare viewers for this slow-burning exercise in discomfort. Sure, it is a remarkable achievement in filmmaking. But when one pays $14 for what is sold as a new take on The Blair Witch Project (1999), only to be greeted with Middle-English folktales and carefully crafted stills of grasslands, there is sure to be disappointment.

In addition, there is  widespread debate about what a horror movie should be. Variations on “it is suspenseful […] but in no way horror” riddle the public- review pages of the above-mentioned films. Unfortunately, none of these amateur critics laid down what they mean by “horror.” Likely, most filmgoers have a very narrow definition of the term, one that probably includes the physical presence of a frightening antagonist, sequences that will make them jump off their seat, and multiple bloody deaths. However, that is not what horror, by definition, entails. Horror is defined by “an overwhelming and painful feeling caused by something frightfully shocking, terrifying, or revolting.” As such, horror should be a difficult, disorienting, draining experience. It should push moral boundaries, ask uncomfortable questions, and inspire heated arguments. If that is indeed what horror means, then post-horror is more “horror” than any number of Paranormal Activity sequels.

Distributors are stuck with a dilemma. Either they trick more movie-goers into seeing a film they likely will hate, or they aim at the right audience and pray they make their money back. Personally, I find a third option more compelling: Educate viewers through fair, global marketing campaigns, and keep pushing for wide releases. It might take a while before it pays off, but if they are set on making post-horror a long-term profitable venture, studios have no other option. Maybe then Aronosfky will outsell the reboot of the hour.

 

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue