Latest News

Commentary, Opinion

Designated smoking areas rather than smoke-free campus

On Oct. 18, McGill sent an email to students detailing a policy proposal on the movement towards a smoke-free campus. The proposal states that the Downtown Campus will prohibit smoking on the premises—aside from the Upper Residences, which will have a designated smoking area.

I am not a smoker. With that in mind, I still believe that the policy proposal put forward by McGill to move towards an entirely smoke-free campus is mistaken in its approach. This is not the best way to handle the needs of smokers versus those of non-smokers. Kicking smoking off campus is picking sides rather than accepting both smokers and non-smokers as members of the McGill community. A better solution would be to create several designated smoking areas throughout the Downtown Campus, which is something the Working Group recognized as important to maintain at Upper Residences. It is important on the rest of the campus, too. 

Smoking is essentially a social and stress-relieving activity. These are two very important aspects of a McGill student’s life. McGill isn’t exactly known for its plethora of student services; it is a common complaint that the university’s support for its student body is lacking, especially when it comes to mental health services. It is possible that students are in part smoking to deal with the stress of McGill academics, and it would be wrong to put the squeeze on this function without offering up alternatives to students.

McGill has a responsibility to deal with its own smokers, not simply to push them off campus and make them somebody else’s problem. Smokers tend to congregate around each other, planting their roots in areas that quickly become littered with stubs and vacated of non-smokers. These areas currently exist around campus: What student isn’t familiar with the litany of nerve-wracked students huddled under the Redpath underpass, smoking to relieve the stress of a deadline? If these smokers were pushed off campus, they would have to migrate en masse. They might instead congregate across from the Roddick Gates, on the wide sidewalk in front of Paragraphe books, or to some other sheltered area nearby. Pushing the smokers off campus would create bubbles of McGill students smoking around the surrounding neighbourhood. This isn’t fair to nearby businesses and residents, and won’t help the reputation of students in the area. In any off-campus location, they would just be blocking the sidewalks, smoking, and getting in people’s way.

The maintenance of current designated smoking areas is a better solution than a totally smoke-free campus. These spaces offer a better and fairer balance between the needs of smokers and non-smokers at McGill. Designated smoking areas allow smokers a place to indulge in their stress-relieving habit as accepted members of the McGill community. They also keep smokers away from high-traffic areas to accommodate those who do not wish to be exposed to harmful secondhand smoke.

The proposal fails to consider McGill’s responsibility not just to protect its non-smokers, but also to also include its smokers. Students who smoke are as much a part of the McGill community as those who do not. It would be exclusionary to force them off of school grounds in order to partake in their habit—one that is in part a social way of dealing with stress. In order to protect those who do not wish to be exposed to secondhand smoke, while still acknowledging smokers as a part of the McGill community, the creation of designated smoking areas throughout campus is the best solution.

Basketball, Men's Varsity, Sports

McGill Redmen basketball overcome Laval Rouge et Or despite offensive troubles

McGill Redmen
62

Laval Rouge et Or
61

Despite shooting only 35 per cent from the field in their season opener, the McGill Redmen (1-0-0) rallied in the fourth quarter to beat the Laval Rouge et Or (0-1-0) 62-61 on Nov. 10 at Love Competition Hall.

 “We missed a lot of shots, open 3’s,” Head Coach David DeAveiro said. “I don’t remember the last time we shot the ball like that.”

The Redmen’s anemic offence allowed Laval to jump out to an early 11-0 lead in the first frame. While McGill played solid defence–holding Laval to 4 of 23 shooting from the field–the visitors dominated the early portion of the game. DeAveiro turned to his bench to inject some energy back into the game. 

“We got young guys off the bench that are making big shots,” DeAveiro said. “We had Daniel [Pieper] playing well for us today, Greg Trahan played well today [.…] Our bench did a really good job.”

Players coming off the bench provided a spark for McGill in the second quarter. They began connecting on their field goals and the team played with a newfound intensity. Laval’s foul trouble hindered their efforts on offence and defence. The Redmen managed to come within one point of the Rouge et Or at the end of the first half. 

McGill flagged again in the early moments of the third quarter, however, and Laval jumped out ahead. Coach DeAveiro once again turned to his young bench. 

“[Our] second half [adjustments are] where we wanted to be [from the start],” DeAveiro said. “We wanted to move the ball more from side to side [and] share it. We wanted to attack after swinging it a few times and we got some baskets.” 

McGill was still down by one point at the end of the third quarter, but Laval’s lead lasted less than a minute in the fourth as McGill went on a 6-0 run to start the final frame. Fourth-year forward Francois Bourque sealed the game by making a pair of free throws to put McGill up by four and retrieved a loose ball with 30 seconds left to prevent Laval from closing the gap in the final moments.

 “I knew at that point the game was over,” Bourque said. “They couldn’t close the game or take the pressure and they turned the ball over.” 

McGill’s next match is at UQÀM on Nov. 17 at 8:00 p.m. where the Redmen are expected to pick up a second win before returning home for Pots and Pans night against their crosstown-rival the Concordia Stingers on Nov. 24.

 

Stat Corner

McGill has won three of the last six games against Laval by two points or less.

 Quotable

“Shots we just normally make we missed. Sometimes that’s basketball. You make shots, you miss shots.” – Redmen Coach David DeAveiro on the team’s offensive struggles.

 Moment of the Game

Francois Bourque retrieved a loose ball with 34 seconds left to ensure a McGill victory over Laval.

Commentary, Opinion

Remembrance Day should not be an occasion for indifference

The time of year has once again arrived when we see bright scarlet poppies pinned on the breasts of innumerable coats and sweaters. Evoking the frightening clashes of bayonets upon bloody fields, the reverberating shocks and explosions of shells colliding with rain-beaten garrisons, and the agonized screams of trembling men, this ornament sits as a timeless reminder of a turbulent war that shook the world and our nation. And yet, the history of this day—which this little trinket symbolizes—as well as Canada’s broad military history, are often neglected in the bustling conversations across campus.

It is not so surprising that the modern young person is less than enthusiastic about commemorating the legacy of war. When it comes to Remembrance Day, the interest of most Canadians is waning. In a 2006 poll conducted by The Globe and Mail, only 41 per cent of Canadians said they would attend a Remembrance Day ceremony—a nine per cent drop from the preceding year. It also revealed that one in four believed that U.S. General Douglas MacArthur was Canadian; only 31 per cent could identify flying ace Billy Bishop and leading commander Sir Arthur Currie as Canadian military heroes.

A lack of familiarity with Canadian military history generates a respect that is remote, vague, and impersonal. The hazy remembrance of a nameless soldier hardly creates a dignified and realistic tribute to the casualties of several wars. This lack of familiarity converts many apparent acts of Remembrance Day recognition into meaningless, banal customs.

 

 

A lack of familiarity with Canadian military history generates a respect that is remote, vague, and impersonal.

This general disengagement with Remembrance Day is furthered by the fact that some student organizations have attempted to detract from honouring Canada’s military history on this day. For example, Demilitarize McGill’s protests during last year’s Remembrance Day Ceremony at Lower Field indicate that the military tradition has at least to some degree, particularly among youth, been scorned instead of appreciated, in part because of discontent with Canada’s participation in more recent conflicts in Syria and Afghanistan.

Modern student activism, which fosters critical thinking and cultivates political discussion, should not be discouraged. However, a greater understanding of the Canadian military history must be achieved before it can be dismissed in its entirety. Canadians must take Remembrance Day as an opportunity to remember other prominent pieces of Canadian military history. Canada also made valuable contributions in the Second World War and the Korean War, which are worthy of recognition and appreciation. If Canadians realized some of the Canadian military’s considerable efforts to prevent human rights abuses and defend the rights of vulnerable nations from aggression, they might be more hesitant to dismiss or scorn its history.

The problems with student observance of Remembrance Day are unlikely to improve this year: Montreal’s annual Remembrance Day ceremony is no longer being held on McGill’s downtown campus due to construction on Sherbrooke Street. Yet in the absence of a formal ceremony, students should still consciously and honestly examine why Canada embraces Remembrance Day. One ought to know the historical and contemporary legacy of our nation’s military before one can celebrate or dismiss it.

 

 

 

Montreal, News

Summit on Refugees in the 21st Century brings together students, faculty, and activists from across Canada

On Nov. 5 over 100 students, faculty, and activists from across Canada gathered at The Citizens Summit on Refugees in the 21st Century for a full day of workshops and panels at Thomson House.

According to the Government of Canada, there are currently 33,723 Syrian refugees in Canada; over 25,000 of these refugees were resettled by the government between November 2015 and March 2016. Canada intends to continue the resettlement process through 2016. Activists at the Summit addressed the variety of struggles faced by refugees upon arrival, including social, political, and health care challenges. Earlier this year, the United Nations announced its New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, which promises to adopt a global compact to facilitate migration in 2018.

In his keynote speech, the Honourable Irwin Cotler, an emeritus professor of Law at McGill University and chairman of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights, emphasized the need for immediate action by Canadian citizens and the government to tackle the global refugee crisis.

“How many more killings do we have to endure until those compacts are adopted, and why do we have to await the adoption of those global compacts?” Cotler asked. “Right now we have global contracts, treaties that we are not putting into play. While I welcome the convening of 193 countries and adoption of the New York Declaration […] what it lacks is the urgency respecting the human suffering that is so persistent, so pervasive internationally, that we have a responsibility to protect.”

Vahan Kololian, founder and chairman of the Mosaic Institute, the think-and-do-tank that hosted the Summit, echoed Cotler’s call for immediate action.

“Canada should be playing a much larger role on the global stage,” Kololian said.  “Why doesn’t Canada organize a conference in Ottawa, and invite the U.S. and Russia, and tell them, ‘We really hope you will come, because the world needs to talk.’”

Cotler reminded individuals of their ability to make an impact.  

“[You may think], I’m not a Mandela, or I’m not a Wallenberg,” Cotler said. “But every person has within them the ability to make a difference. We have to understand that these are not a matter of abstract statistics. Beyond and behind each statistic is a person with a name, with an identity, each person being a universe. If you save a single person, it is as if you have saved an entire universe, just as if you kill a single person it is as if you have killed an entire universe [….] We are each the guarantors of each other’s destiny. That is what underpins the theme of this conference today.”

Participants had the option of attending two of four workshops addressing various aspects of the refugee migration and resettlement process. Rania Younes and Derakhshan Qurban-Ali of the Toronto-based nonprofit WelcomeHomeTO led a workshop in which students were asked to pitch their own ideas to ease the resettlement process.

“[Our goal] was to inform participants of the challenges and opportunities to be found during the refugee resettlement experience and to empower them to develop and implement their own innovative ideas [and] initiatives,” Qurban-Ali said.

Panelist Rivka Augenfeld, former president of La Table de Concertation des Organismes au Service des Personnes Réfugiées et Immigrantes–an organization that advocates on behalf of refugees in Quebec–felt that the event highlighted the potential for youth involvement.

“[Today] gives a lie to the idea that young people don’t care. They do care,” Augenfeld said. “They’re just looking for a way to find meaningful involvement and meaningful experience, and that the energy that you put into something can go somewhere.”

In the day’s closing remarks, Serisha Iyar, U3 Arts, a fellow of the host Mosaic Institute, finished the day off with an appeal to fellow students.

“Whether [our involvement] is through refugee resettlement, initiating conversations with an intersectional mindset, addressing issues through arts and culture, policy reform, or empowering those who have already begun to take action, everyone has a role to play,” Iyar said. “I would encourage you all to search and seek out opportunities that will enable you to be involved in a meaningful capacity that utilizes your own unique skillsets.”

McGill, News

Construction challenging for students with reduced mobility

Construction on and around McGill’s downtown campus has been causing accessibility issues for individuals with injuries or mobility impairments. Roadwork on McTavish and Dr. Penfield is directly impacting pedestrians wishing to access the west side of campus–especially for those with reduced mobility. Construction is due to the City of Montreal’s preparation for its 375th anniversary and is set to be completed in May 2017.

Director of the Office for Students with Disabilities (OSD) Terri Phillips noted that construction has been especially difficult for students with reduced mobility. 

“Pathways are continually shifting and changing, which creates difficulties not only for those with mobility impairments, but also those who experience visual impairment,” Phillips said. “The unevenness and, in some instances, reduced width of these pathways create navigational barriers. Often being constructed of gravel creates challenges related to the washing out of temporary ramps, as well as uneven and debris-littered corridors.” 

Senior Director of Student Services Cara Piperni acknowledged the difficulty that users of the McGill campus are currently experiencing due to construction.

“The configuration of pathways through the construction zones are frequently changing […making] it difficult for students with mobility impairments to be able to anticipate their journey from point A to point B,” Piperni said. 

According to Phillips, McGill is committed to accommodating students with reduced mobility despite challenges created by on-campus construction during this time and is one of the few Canadian Universities that provides adapted transportation. The university runs an on-campus bus service that provides personalized transport across campus between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. This service is available to all McGill students and staff with impairments or injuries that reduce their mobility. 

“Security Services has increased the hours that the [adapted transportation] van is operating during this construction period [in order] to support the increased demand for service,” Phillips said.

Darren Elias, U1 Management, is currently experiencing reduced mobility due to surgery on his leg and explained that the adapted transportation service is sometimes difficult to utilize. 

“The minibus service closes at 5:30 p.m. and it is by a first-come, first-serve basis,” Elias said. “Since I missed the first couple weeks of school due to surgery, I had to adapt my academic schedule as there were limited openings with the adapted transportation service.” 

According to Phillips, accommodating and helping students is an ongoing process. 

“Facilities Management is working on a day to day basis with the City of Montreal to identify and rectify accessibility concerns as they arise,” Phillips said. 

According to Phillips, the city has been in communication with the OSD when major pathways are being changed. In turn, the OSD is responding to student complaints in order to solve problems on an ongoing basis. An online form on the OSD website allows students to voice their concerns with construction accessibility anonymously.

Some students have complained that it is difficult to get from Lower McTavish to Peel and Dr. Penfield by way of the Brown Building, specifically after hours. Piperni said that this issue is being addressed by extending the hours of the Brown Building to 10:30 p.m. on weekdays.

“[Student Services has] arranged for the Brown building to be open longer hours Monday [through] Friday,” Piperni said. “This will ensure safe and universally accessible route of passage to Dr. Penfield, Peel and Upper McTavish for those experiencing mobility-related barriers.”

Campbell Veasey, U2 Arts, is on crutches after hip surgery is concerned that the university is not doing enough to accommodate those students who are experiencing reduced mobility. 

“I’m not even in a wheelchair and it’s hard,” Veasey said. “Getting up and down McTavish is almost impossible, especially on rainy days [….] McGill is definitely not doing enough and if I was to pinpoint the improvement area it would be reworking their construction, parts at a time. Which is next to impossible for their agenda so I don’t really see a solution in sight.”

Commentary, Opinion

Snowden revelations: The paradox of McGill students’ support for free expression and hostility towards AMUSE

The Nov. 2 live video lecture of Edward Snowden—the famous whistleblower who leaked NSA documents on mass government surveillance—was eagerly anticipated by many at McGill and within the Greater Montreal community. However, few were expecting a mosh pit of students trying to force their way into the lecture, nor the Association of McGill University Support Employees (AMUSE) picketing the event. 

Snowden's presentation and live-chat were just as I had imagined: Insightful, eloquent, and inspiring. The content of Snowden’s lecture—his revelations, Bill C-51, and the attack on journalism in Canada—was not particularly unexpected. Instead, I was caught off guard by the ironic disjuncture between the students who waited for hours to hear Snowden talk about civil liberties and free expression, while dismissing—and in some cases, verbally harassing—AMUSE protesters who were peacefully exercising the very rights for which Snowden advocates. Snowden made it clear that our generation must uphold the human right to free expression. McGill students should take Snowden’s message and apply it to our university. 

AMUSE is a labour union that represents around 1,500 casual and temporary employees at McGill. AMUSE members have been working under an expired collective agreement since April 2015 and are protesting the university’s inaction in securing a new agreement for their union. AMUSE’s requests include that its members receive a minimum wage of $15/hour, paid sick days, as well as access to health, dental, disability, and parental leave benefits. During the lineup for Snowden, AMUSE members handed out fliers which claimed that their labour union was not trying to dismiss Snowden’s work in their strike. 

Understandably, many students who queued for Snowden were frustrated by the unorganized lineup of around 5,000 people, the prospect that they would not make it into the lecture hall, and the inconveniences of a picket line. Students unleashed their frustrations by yelling at AMUSE to leave, ripping up the fliers that AMUSE was handing out, and screaming obscenities at AMUSE protesters. However, these reactions were neither productive nor democratic. Unbeknownst to many, AMUSE was not actually blocking the entrance to Leacock—its protestors were just delaying entry into the building to make sure that those who were entering knew about their strike.

(Lauren Benson-Armer / The McGill Tribune)
(Lauren Benson-Armer / The McGill Tribune)

 

Some criticism was justified: AMUSE could have chosen to picket another event that was less chaotic than the Snowden talk, or it could have conducted its strike without causing as much interference or delay. Yet, regardless of whatever stance individuals took on AMUSE, the protesters had just as much right as the next person to be in that lineup. The event occurred at McGill, which is the workplace of AMUSE members and falls within the jurisdiction of its strike.

Snowden’s message supports the right of workers to voice their discontent. Whether or not one sides with AMUSE, students should stand by its right to demand change from the university. In fact, Snowden began his speech by addressing AMUSE’s picketing to ask the audience to try to understand the motives behind their strike, rather than jumping to criticize it.

“I understand there’s a strike, which caused a lot of trouble,” Snowden said. “[Don’t] hold that against the protestors. We need to remember that this is what happens in a democracy. We have inconveniences […] these are not weaknesses, but a strength. Although these individuals may have caused difficulty, it was for something that they must believe in strongly.”  

Everyone in the audience clapped when he said that, despite booing AMUSE just minutes earlier. 

By picketing the Snowden event, which was within AMUSE’s jurisdiction, protesters were democratically—albeit inconveniently—expressing their frustration with the university administration. Instead of trying to stifle the voice of AMUSE, students should have respected the integrity of its strike, or, at the very least, let the protesters speak freely about their cause. 

Hockey, Men's Varsity, Private, Sports

McGill Redmen hockey overtake Laurentian Voyageurs in second period sweep

The McGill Redmen (7-2-0) overcame a tenacious first period performance by the Laurentian Voyageurs (4-5-0) with three goals in the second period to win 6-2 at McConnell Arena on Saturday.

“It was a great win, team effort,” second-year right-winger Christophe Lalonde said. “We had a slow start [in the] first five minutes, but then we came back and pushed up the pace, and just kept grinding.”

The first five minutes of the game culminated in a Voyageurs goal. A ten-minute stretch of intense back-and-forth with multiple shots on net followed.

“Our game plan was to put the puck below the red line, the goal line, and then just apply pressure on their defence and then shoot from everywhere,” Lalonde said.

While the strategy eventually resulted in two first period goals for McGill, it also caused numerous turnovers in the offensive zone that forced the Redmen defence to scramble back and nullify the ensuing breakaways.

“In a game like tonight, the [offensive] turnovers [were not] a big deal,” McGill fifth-year defenceman Nathan Chiarlitti said. “We just [needed] to get a little bit of momentum going, but we’ll just try and work on that throughout the season.”

This ultra-aggressive approach reaped rewards for the Redmen who took the lead with three goals in the second period. Ultimately, a slew of penalties in the third period ended any momentum for Laurentian as McGill’s strong powerplay team dominated.

“Special teams were good on both sides [powerplay and penalty kill],” Redmen Head Coach Kelly Nobes said. “We had everybody going tonight, all four lines, six defence, our goalie, there were no passengers and that’s a lot of fun to play like that, so that’s the positives of tonight.”

The next games for McGIll hockey will be at Waterloo against Laurier on Nov. 11 at 7:30 p.m. and Waterloo on Nov. 12 at 4 p.m. 

“The focus is going to be on the hard work and being ready to start the game on time, because we’re not doing that lately,” Redmen defenceman Redgie Bois said. “Just be ready, and I think it’s going to go well.”

 

Stat Corner

The Redmen took 43 shots on net to get their six goals, whereas the Voyageurs only managed to get 22 shots past a strong McGill defensive line.

 

Quotable

“We just kept shooting — we knew that the goalie was going to at least [mess up] once.” – McGill’s Christophe Lalonde on the team’s offensive strategy.

 

Moment of the Game

McGill’s Redgie Bois, following a powerplay goal by Laurentian, broke into the offensive zone and scored, the rapidity of their response dashing any hopes of a Voyageur comeback.

Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

A behind-the-scenes look at McGill on the big screen

In the climactic scene of 2008’s Get Smart, Maxwell Smart (Steve Carrell) hastily scans his surroundings, desperate to escape a holding cell, where the fictional CONTROL intelligence agency is keeping him captive. In a crucial final moment, he notices the film’s iconic red convertible, and uses the automobile to crash out of the CONTROL facility. What most moviegoers do not know is that the interior of the holding cell is actually McGill’s Redpath Museum, and the doors that Carrell’s fiery red car furiously barge through belong to the university’s postcard-perfect Arts Building. 

Get Smart is only one of the countless box office hits shot at McGill, which include X-Men: Days of Future Past, North Pole, and Warm Bodies. Two weeks ago, students were thrilled to spot Ben Stiller wandering around campus, working on his next project. Behind collaborations like these are people like Rosetta Vannelli, the associate director of Housing & Conferences, and Stephanie Miller, the administrative coordinator for Student Housing & Conference Services. Vannelli and Miller coordinate the process of arranging films to shoot at McGill. They filter requests, negotiate and arrange payments with campus stakeholders, help scout locations, and build and maintain relationships with film bureaus and location managers. 

Vannelli shared a tidbit from her experience as a coordinator during the filming of Get Smart at McGill. 

“In the filming of the Get Smart movie, when the car exits through the Arts Building front doors onto the steps, the crew realized at the last minute that the width of the door would not permit the car to pass through due to the side mirrors, so they had to remove them for the scene […] and then you see the car again on the campus grounds and the mirrors are on!” Vanelli said. 

Montreal has long been a cinematic hub, a key location for major motion pictures like White House Down, Brooklyn,  and Stephen Spielberg’s The Terminal. Montreal’s appeal as a location is its malleability, and at the centre of that appeal is McGill. A historic institution within a busy city, McGill had doubled as everything from the Pentagon to Harvard. 

“We have a variety of buildings with a variety of styles allowing us to appeal to a broad range of films or televisions series, etc […]” Vannelli explained. “As location managers say, they can shoot anything at McGill from a period piece, to an 90s series scene to a contemporary scene to a futuristic science fiction scene all in one day in one location!” 

Montreal’s fusion of historic European architecture, artistic culture, and modern urban life makes it unique for its inhabitants as well as for film viewers. On film, however, this distinct combination can be easily manipulated to portray virtually any other city in the world. 

“Montreal was the only city in North America that gave us the flexibility to double [for] Paris, New York, New Jersey, and Philadelphia,” said Jim Young, producer of The Words, in an interview with the Quebec Film and Television Council (QFTC).

The relationship between McGill and film production is symbiotic.

 “Certainly, there is financial gain for the university with such a program in this form of an alternate revenue,” said Miller. 

Generally, access fees range between $2,000 and $4,000 a day, but this fee is location-dependent; buildings like Redpath Museum and the Faculty Club are more expensive. Access fees are only part of the economic implications. The university also charges building service staff, parking, and security service fees. This profit benefits the university in a multitude of ways. 

“I always try to provide at least 25 per cent [of the fees paid by the filmmakers] directly to the faculty [where the project is being filmed]. As well, a percentage of the overall access fee is returned to the university as part of the Student Housing and Hospitality Services commitment,” Vannelli said in an interview for McGill’s alumni magazine, McGill News.  

However, McGill focuses on more than profit, and is well aware of the cultural impact their historic setting holds. McGill makes a concerted effort to help Quebec and Montreal based artists by giving subsidies to projects with low production budgets. 

“We feel it is important to support the local filmmakers and encourage this industry,” Miller explained. 

McGill is one of many Canadian universities that uses their campus as locations for film. Many universities, especially schools near cities with thriving film industries like the University of Toronto and Simon Frasier University, have media relations departments dedicated to work with film production companies. 

McGill has promoted its successes in the film industry to other universities in Montreal. 

“We are quite proud of the reputation we have with the location managers and with the City of Montreal Film and TV Commission,” explained Vannelli. “We have been asked in the past to speak to other Montreal universities about the processes.” 

Filming on campus poses many benefits to universities; however, big productions may also disrupt student life. 

“Film crews have a habit of taking over an assigned space in [a] bold fashion, and tend to forget that they are in a university setting,” explained Vannelli, “We learned very quickly to put safeguards in place that minimize the inconvenience that may be caused.” 

“We generally permit shoots mainly in summer when there is a smaller student population on campus,” explained Miller. “Proper communication is key!’ 

Beyond the McGill campus, Montreal is a desirable destination for filmmakers. From a financial perspective, Montreal is attractive because it offers tax incentives. The QFTC advertises that, “Quebec offers some of the most advantageous cash rebates available in North America,” with, “20 per cent cash-back on all expenses.” Larry Franco, a line producer of White House Down, told QFTC that Montreal was $25 million cheaper than elsewhere. 

Montreal also offers superior technological support. The QFTC explains that Montreal has over 40 visual effect companies, making it one of the best cities for post-production work in the world.  

Juan Diego Solanas, director of 2012’s Upside Down, told QFTC, “I was so impressed by the professionalism of the technicians here, and the DOP’s [Director of Photography], they are unbelievable.”

Beyond the technical components, the filming process also places Montreal—and more specifically, McGill—at the centre of an illuminating artistic experience. Vannelli explained that it’s particularly interesting to have insight into the artistic development of a film. She and Miller have witnessed all aspects of this creative process; Vannelli was in awe of acclaimed 27-year-old director Xavier Dolan and his work on the film Mommy, which he filmed at the Arts Building. 

“As he explained the scene to his crew during a technical visit, it was easy to envision the scene as he likely saw it in his own mind […] a masterful director!” Vannelli remembered.

Filming at McGill gives students an exciting opportunity to recognize their alma mater on the big screen. More than that, it is a chance to watch talented actors and directors work to produce a creative vision, and a source of inspiration for students with the hopes of one day putting their Hollywood dreams into action. 

McGill, News

Drop in appointments overhauled at McGill Counselling and Mental Health Services

Starting this October, receiving medical notes for exam and assignment deferrals has been made substantially more difficult. With the ongoing integration of McGill Counselling and Mental Health Services (MCMHS), drop in appointments at the student mental health clinic have been overhauled. As a part of this change, students will no longer be able to receive medical notes during drop in hours unless they meet the criteria for the newly designed “Safety Appointments.”

Safety Appointments function the same as drop in appointments, but they are reserved for students who are considered urgent cases. This includes those who are having thoughts of harming themselves or others, have had a recent drug overdose, have recently attempted suicide, or been hospitalized in a psychiatric ward. It also includes those who have recently been physically assaulted, are feeling disconnected from reality, or are fearing for their physical safety. Drop in hours for students with psychological ailments that do not meet these criteria have been eliminated. For these students, medical notes will be available only if they have had past appointments at MCMHS.

According to the Director of McGill Counselling Service Dr. Vera Romano, MCMHS was faced with significant issues with wait times for both drop-ins and scheduled appointments.

“One of the key rationales for delineating the safety appointments [was] the fact that, when the intake process got bottlenecked, […] it created situations where a lot of [the] urgent appointments […] were filled,” Romano said. “Those who actually were in danger or were in grave need did not have access.We did not implement a change in our [medical note] policy. We have implemented changes that have to do with access, and those have ramifications on how students access medical notes.”

According to Romano, the overhaul of MCMHS is a continuing process.

“It’s very important to communicate that we have not yet finished the launch,” Romano said.  “That is, we’re still in design stage. We’re looking for feedback to see what’s working [and] what’s not.”

The availability of medical notes is one of many items that Student Services plans to address as they continue to tweak MCMHS following its integration. According to the Interim Senior Director of Student Services Cara Piperni, the administration is looking into a number of options to address the issue of medical notes.

“We’re looking at the possibility of having a case manager, like a nurse or a social worker, and they could have time carved out to deal with [medical notes],” Piperni said. “We are looking at the possibility of defining ‘urgent appointments.’”

According to Piperni, it is unlikely that urgent appointments could be used to receive medical documentation for exam deferrals.

Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Vice-President (VP) University Affairs Erin Sobat thinks that the policy change was shortsighted.

“I don’t think that [they are] considering the reality of how accommodation works,” Sobat said.

Sobat has reached out to Student Services in order to negotiate making medical notes more widely available within the new urgent care system.

“I don’t think Student Services fully understands the fact that [they] are basically hanging out to dry this category of students that doesn’t meet this threshold of urgent need,” Sobat said.

Caitlin Courchesne, U3 Science, feels conflicted about the changes. She understands the rationale, but, as a former drop in patient at MCMHS, she is simultaneously frustrated.

“You might not know exactly what a mental health disorder is until it presents itself under a situation of high stress,” Courchesne said. “In the context of [the] exam period, I can imagine that there is probably an influx of students who go [to drop in appointments]. If someone is going who doesn’t need it, then that puts someone else who really does need to access the service at a disadvantage.”

However, Courchesne also feels it is difficult to define a person’s need for mental health services and is worried that without access to medical notes, many students will lack the time necessary to seek mental health support.

“What is the definition of who needs it and who doesn’t? That’s a spectrum,” Courchesne said. “I’ve used emergency drop in during exam time. I went through a loss during [an exam period]. I lost my grandmother. That, by definition, wouldn’t qualify for me to get exempt from an exam anymore [….] It's just frustrating for me to look back on that.”

Out on the Town, Student Life

Coffee shops that are actually conducive to studying

With midterm season coming to an end, many McGill students have finally left the library and emerged into the daylight again. Unfortunately, these few exam-free weeks are short lived. Finals are slowly creeping up and, personally, I am not ready to set up camp in McLennan again. This is where Montreal’s well-known café culture becomes enticing. There is an endless number of places where you can find a change of scenery, get your daily coffee fix, and retain your last shred of sanity until exams are over. Cafés can be a hit or miss when it comes to their potential as a study space, with their varying noise levels and sometimes unreliable Wi-fi. Fortunately, I have tried and tested several in the downtown area surrounding campus for their potential as a study space. 

 

(Hannah Taylor / The McGill Tribune)
(Hannah Taylor / The McGill Tribune)

Cafe Humble Lion:

904 rue Sherbrooke O.
This small quirky cafe is just opposite the Roddick Gates on Sherbrooke, making it the most conveniently-located place on this list if you are already on campus. The staff are always friendly, and the coffee is some of the best I’ve had in Montreal. Their menu includes a range of small, delicious items for a small lunch or snack, although this limits the number of hours I can spend here, before  need a proper meal at some point during the day. The music isn’t too loud or disturbing, and the atmosphere and decor is really pleasant. It can get fairly crowded during peak hours and weekdays because of its downtown location, but is relatively quiet over the weekends, so it caters to almost all study environment preferences, depending on the day. It isn’t ideal if you like to spread your books and notes out, as their tables and countertops are quite small. However, the wifi is very fast, so I would recommend going here alone to catch up on lecture notes or answer emails. Cafe Humble Lion has 3.5 stars on Yelp, but as a student, I think it deserves a higher rating.


Yelp rating: 3.8/5
Tribune rating: 4.5/5

Price: $$
 

(Ellen Owsowitz / The McGill Tribune)
(Ellen Owsowitz / The McGill Tribune)

Cafe Nocturne:

19 rue Prince Arthur O.

Formerly called Café Kitsune, this study spot isn’t the biggest of places, but still feels very spacious with the large amount of natural light, in part beacause of its floor-to-ceiling windows. The high communal tables inside are wide enough to fit all of your study materials, though this is not preferable for someone who tends to feel claustrophobic, or needs their own personal space when studying. The Wi-fi works well, the lighting is good, and most of the customers are students, which can be motivating, since everyone else is also working on schoolwork. The music is on the alternative side and can be loud at times, and there are often people walking in and out of the shop. I would recommend bringing earplugs or headphones if you are easily distracted. As a study space, Café Nocturne is still high up on my list with its fun atmosphere and convenient location; however, I have given it a lower rating than Yelp because of the noisy and heavily-trafficked environment can be.

Yelp Rating: 4.5/5

Tribune Rating: 4/5 

Price: $$

 

(Ellen Owsowitz / The McGill Tribune)
(Ellen Owsowitz / The McGill Tribune)

Cafe Parvis:

433 Rue Mayor

More of a restaurant than a coffee house, Café Parvis provides the perfect motivation to get up in the morning and treat yourself to a good brunch while studying. The space is practically made for Instagram, with plenty of natural light, aesthetically-pleasing decor of soft tones, and plants hanging from the ceiling. It has a bar where you can sit with a coffee or tea and work for a couple of hours without too much disruption from those eating lunch at the tables. It’s not ideal for group studying, but provides a nice atmosphere to finish that assignment on which you’ve been putting off for a while. There might be too much going on in the background to concentrate for extended periods of time; therefore, the space works better for smaller tasks that don’t require extended focus, such as answering emails. It can get extremely busy during lunch and dinner as well, and the number of people studying at Café Parvis is quickly replaced by parties eating meals rather than studying. For this reason, I would highly recommend going as early in the morning as possible—7 a.m. on week days and 10 a.m. on week nights.

Yelp Rating: 4.3/5

Tribune Rating: 3.5/5

Price: $$


(Margaux Delalex / The McGill Tribune)
(Margaux Delalex / The McGill Tribune)

Anticafé:

294 rue Sainte-Catherine O.

Probably the quirkiest place on the list, the Anticafé is a place for those who get too distracted when they study at home, but can’t stand working in the library or more commercial cafés. Open until 11 p.m. every night, Anticafé is an apartment in Place des Arts that has been converted into a public space with mismatched tables and couches in every room. Instead of buying your coffee and snacks, you pay for the amount of time you stay here, starting at $3 up to a maximum of $9. This provides you with unlimited coffee, tea, and cookies, and you can heat up any food you bring in the microwave or toaster. The second floor is reasonably quiet, and has a great view of Place des Arts; however, the overall atmosphere was a little too relaxed for me, with a lot of people walking around or having casual conversations instead of working. 

Yelp Rating: 4.5/5 stars

Tribune Rating: 3/5 stars

Price: $

(Margaux Delalex / The McGill Tribune)
(Margaux Delalex / The McGill Tribune)

Cafe OSMO:

51 rue Sherbrooke O.

Café OSMO was specifically created as a social workspace geared towards students and entrepreneurs. It is furnished with modern decor and plenty of space where you can spread out your work and get comfortable. The room itself is quite spacious, with large windows and skylights that let in plenty of natural light, despite being a basement property. The WiFi is extremely fast, and there are plenty of electrical sockets dotting the walls, ensuring that you can always charge your laptop, phone, or tablet when you need to. The space  is optimal for both group projects and individual studying. Unfortunately, the café closes at 6 p.m. every day, and is closed on the weekends, which isn’t very practical when your next midterm is on a Monday. Even so, when Café OSMO is open, I always get plenty of work done.

Yelp Rating: 4.2/5

Tribune Rating: 4/5

Price: $$$

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue