Latest News

McGill, News

Police called to AUS/SUS Grad Ball to handle coat check debacle

The end of the sold-out 2016  Arts Undergraduate Society (AUS) and the Science Undergraduate Society (SUS) annual Grad Ball descended into chaos at coat check. Guests were unable to retrieve their belongings and around 2:30 a.m. the police were called to intervene. The event took place on the evening of Saturday, March 19, at Le Windsor Hotel in Montreal’s Golden Square Mile and included dinner, dancing, and an open bar.

Hailey Krychman, U3 Arts, commended the general coordination and execution of the ball.

“The overall event was really fun,” she said. “I think overall people were very classy, despite being super drunk, and I didn’t really feel like anything was going wrong. The music was great and so was the venue. It was very well organized by the AUS and SUS. Of course because there were open bars, there were sometimes long lines but nothing unmanageable or excessively rowdy.”

However, issues arose as the evening concluded. According to U3 Computer Science and Biology student Cassandra Rogers, with hundreds of guests, and only a few staff members manning the coat check, the night became disorganized as guests attempted to collect their belongings to leave.

“There was no security to speak of managing the crowd or creating a line, and there were only three or four people working behind the coat check desk,” Rogers recalled.  “At the counter, I was shoved and pushed down by other students trying to reach over me to attract the attention of the coat check staff. Some people were trying to climb over other people [….] More than a few men in the crowd were making inappropriate comments about being in such close proximity to so many women [….] The crowd was overflowing up the stairs and into the main hall by the time I was able to escape.” 

According to Cleona Tsang, U3 Psychology, coat check staff eventually stopped using the ticket system all together, leading to students’ belongings being left out in the open.

“There were also just a bunch of coats and bags thrown out past the coat check room and my coat and my friend’s coat and my bag were just on the floor up for grabs,” she said. “Anyone could have taken that stuff. Plus, they gave up with the tickets [halfway through] and just yelled out, ‘Whose is this jacket?’ and whoever said, ‘Mine’ got to take it home. No organization whatsoever. I was lucky I found my stuff, but I was there for an hour and a half.”

Douglass Luo, U4 Economics, also described a volatile situation at coat check.

“Everyone just crowded around the coat check, yelling at each other and trying to shove their way to the front,” he said. “It felt like a riot was about to break out. I’m lucky I was near the front of the line, because I hear a lot of people didn’t get their coats.”

Rogers took note of several students who were inebriated but were unable to receive aid from the McGill Student Emergency Response Team (M-SERT).

“Some people were very drunk and ill, and it seemed like medics or M-SERT staff weren’t really able to fight their way through the crowd to get to them,” Rogers added.

Officers from the Service de Police de la Ville de Montréal (SPVM) ultimately responded to the scene and reportedly used harsh tactics to get through the crowd.

“People were screaming and shouting and cursing and someone yelled [that] she was going to punch someone if they didn’t stop stepping on her toes,” Tsang said. “The police arrived and someone—I think it was a policeman—just shoved a bunch of us back by brute force. It was very aggressive and rowdy and a lot of people tried to take control of the situation but the crowd was so unforgiving.”

In a post on the Grad Ball Facebook event page, the AUS and SUS formally apologized and explained what had happened.

“Employees of Le Windsor felt unable to handle the crowd around coat check and decided to call the police,” the Grad Ball Committee wrote.

 At the time of publication, the SPVM had no report of the night’s events, according to Marie-Élaine Ladouceur, SPVM media relations.

“I checked the events of that evening,” Ladouceur said. “I didn’t find any report.”

In response to statements concerning police brutality towards guests, the Grad Ball Committee announced on its Facebook event that it  would look into pursuing a formal complaint with the SPVM. 

“[We] are considering filing a complaint with the SPVM regarding the events which took place on the evening of March 19 at Le Windsor on behalf of guests who felt harassed or mistreated by law enforcement officials,” AUS President Jacob Greenspon said. “As stated on our Facebook post on March 21, we encourage anyone who wanted to provide a statement to email us.”

Greenspon stated that no testimonies have yet been received to follow through with a formal complaint.

“Given that neither the Grad Ball Committee nor any Faculty Executives have received any reports from guests as of yet, it is unlikely that we will file a complaint with the SPVM, but we remain open to the possibility if students come forward,” Greenspon said. “The [AUS] and [SUS] will be following up with Le Windsor to relay complaints we’ve received from our guests and to help find any lost belongings.”

a, Features

In the beginning, God created the scientist

The Christian Old Testament tells beautiful stories. It is poetic, rich in morals, and well-written. The beginning of the world, as described by Genesis 1, creates a haze whereby from nothing, God creates something.

“In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth,” the Bible reads. “On the first day, God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light. God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. God called the light, ‘day’ and the darkness, he called ‘night.’”

According to the BBC, Earth was formed by accretion (the coming together of matter due to gravitational force to form larger bodies) from a solar nebula creating an incredibly hot mass, covered in toxic volcanic gases. Though the Bible does not acknowledge the empirical creation of the world, and the /BBC/ does not acknowledge the Biblical explanation, the two are not mutually exclusive.

Before being pummeled by meteor impacts and cooling down enough to form a crust, the Earth did look like the formless, empty, and dark Earth described in the Bible. According to some scientists, however, the Bible’s later claims that God made everything from birds, the moon, and trees—creationism—are false. But the Bible is not a scientific paper, written to stake claims about the world and our surroundings. Rather, it is a book—a very old book—compiled of historical texts and sources from different authors and civilizations.

“The Bible speaks a language that’s over 2,000 years old [and] when some people try reading it as if it scientific fact, you start to distort what is actually meant,” my brother, Alex Nevitt, a seminarian at the Gregorian University in Rome, explained. “You need to speak theology to understand what’s written in the Bible.”

I, like many others, do not speak theology. I am a scientist and an atheist. Though my mother is agnostic, my father is an extremely devout and practicing Catholic and my brother is studying to become a priest. Admittedly, dinner is weird.

“I don’t believe in creationism, I don’t think it’s a truth,” my brother continued. “That is something that’s happened in modern times where the Bible has been read as if it is speaking in scientific language [….] However, the Bible doesn’t speak that way.”

When I was younger, I had a hard time reconciling the Bible with my education because all stories and explanations were always inexplicably tied to God, and my public school never mentioned Him. But my devout father always tried to keep Him in my heart.

“I was brought up in the faith since I was a baby,” my father, Bill Nevitt, explained. “I went to Catholic grammar school, Catholic high school […] and finished and graduated from a Catholic college.”

Ikiru
Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

Flashback: Ikiru (1952)

“A man dying of cancer searches for life meaning.”  When condensed into this single phrase, the plot of Ikiru seems trite and simple. Yet renowned director Akira Kurosawa is an original storyteller who uses this familiar narrative to create an existential masterpiece. 

The opening shot of the film is an X-ray of a stomach belonging to Public Affairs Section Chief Kanji Watanabe (Takashi Shimura). The stomach is filled with tumors that will eventually kill him. The narrator of the film introduces the viewer to Watanabe hunched over at his desk.

“It would only be tiresome to meet him right now,” the narrator explained. “After all, he’s simply passing time without actually living his life. In other words, he’s not really alive.”  Watanabe’s job consists of stamping paperwork and appearing busy.  

Having worked monotonously in the public affairs department for 25 years, not skipping a single day on the job, Watanabe is appropriately nicknamed “The Mummy.”  

Upon learning of his death sentence, Watanabe initially plunges into a state of despair.  He takes to drinking and meets a young man at a bar who learns of his situation and guides him through a night of hedonistic enjoyment.  At a crowded dance hall, Watanabe requests a song entitled “Life is Brief.” The happy dancers pause in their footsteps to listen pensively to Watanabe’s soft voice as he sings the lyrics. This plaintive, heart-breaking song perfectly encapsulates the elegiac tone of Ikiru.  

As Watanabe’s imminent death approaches, he rids himself of his sorrow and transforms into a Christ-like figure who, resurrected from his deathlike daily routine, aims to better his community. Through this religious interpretation, women play an important role as Watanabe’s disciples. In the beginning of the film, a group of poor women visit the public affairs department with a proposal to make a sewage pit into a children’s playground.  They are constantly deferred until Watanabe cuts through the red tape and takes action. At Watanabe’s funeral, these women weep and bow to his shrine like worshippers. 

One woman in the film is the youthful and energetic Toyo Odagiri (Miki Odagiri), whom Watanabe enjoys spending time with. While previously working at Watanabe’s office, Toyo quits her job to produce toy bunnies. “I feel like I am playing with every baby in Japan,” she tells him of her work.  At his shrine, she leaves a fuzzy bunny that hops around playfully.  

Kurosawa uses movement strategically in Ikiru. Filming the stagnant office workers sitting hunched at their desks and men talking criss-crossed signify a morbidity of spirit. Perhaps the reason for Watanabe’s laconicism is that talking is a way of not moving. For example, the bureaucrats stall and defer proposals yet achieve no action. Unlike the others, Watanabe is a character of movement. In the most picturesque scene of the film, Watanabe rocks in a child’s swing, not talking but once again singing “Life is Brief.”  

Sound, such as background noise or pregnant silence, is also used strategically by Kurosawa to elicit emotional responses from the viewer. After dining with Toyo, Watanabe descends the staircase of the restaurant as a group of girls sing “Happy Birthday” to their friend. As the camera focuses on Watanabe’s smiling and awakened face, it seems as if the girls are celebrating his rebirth.  

Ikiru, though made in 1952, was not released in the United States until 1960 as it was labeled “too Japanese.”  Ironically, Ikiru’s subject matter could not be more universal, as the film forces the viewer to acknowledge the brevity of human existence and the importance of breaking free from idleness.

McGill, News

BoG votes against divestment following release of CAMSR report

On March 23, Principal Suzanne Fortier sent an email to the McGill student body announcing that the Board of Governors (BoG) had decided not to divest from McGill’s holdings in fossil fuel companies. Divest McGill first submitted a call to divest from fossil fuels to the Committee to Advise on Matters of Social Responsibility (CAMSR) in Feb 2015. CAMSR took over a year to make their decision, finally delivering their report to the BoG on March 17.

The final CAMSR report on divestment thanked Divest McGill for bringing the issue of climate change to attention at McGill, but stated that CAMSR and Divest McGill hold different views on the role that extractive industries play.

“The Committee is persuaded that the beneficial impact of fossil fuel companies offsets or outweighs injurious impact at this time,” CAMSR’s report stated.

The report outlined that they had not found the actions of fossil fuel companies to cause social injury, despite the case presented by Divest McGill. 

“Continuing to explore or refusing to keep unburnable reserves underground does not directly have grave injurious impact on individuals or the natural environment,” the report stated. “Climate change is an injurious impact primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels by end-users rather than activities of fossil fuel companies.”

Jed Lenetsky, U1 Environment and member of Divest McGill, said that the BoG did not properly examine the harm being done by fossil fuel companies.

“The fact that they didn’t even consider extreme extraction as social injury was a serious affront to people who are being directly affected by irresponsible extraction methods every day,” Lenetsky said. “They also claimed that climate change shouldn’t be considered social injury because it hasn’t yet reached grave levels. Hundreds of thousands of people dying every year, and more being displaced across the world because of climate change, seems pretty dire to us.”

Mike Andrew, president of the Co-op Mining Engineering Undergraduate Society (CMEUS) explained that the society supports McGill’s decision to not divest.

“Many students in the program obtain internships and post graduation positions at fossil fuel companies,” he said. “CMEUS [… is] committed to ensuring the stability of Canada’s energy future in a safe and sustainable manner. Collectively, we understand the importance of transitioning to a carbon neutral economy in the face of climate change. That being said, fossil fuel companies are among the largest investors in the green energy technology that is needed for this transition.”

CAMSR explained how divestment would not be an impactful movement against climate change.

“Divestment, whether to exert financial influence or for symbolic purposes, would not be an effective means of addressing climate change,” the report reads. “It is an ultimate action that is disconnected from the intended outcome of reducing the injurious impact represented by climate change. It also is a distraction to efficacious forms of action, and somewhat overreaching relative to reasonable next steps given the current economic and political reality. The Committee sees no advantage or benefit for McGill to engage in action that would have negligible impact on climate change.”

Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Vice-President (VP) External Affairs Emily Boytinck stated that the BoG and CAMSR did not allow McGill students to be a part of the decision process.

“All CAMSR meetings were held in closed sessions, and the final report was released to the board only 26 hours before it was voted on,” Boytinck said. “Furthermore, the BoG never once heard from Divest McGill directly, despite the fact that Divest McGill attended every board meeting as observers this year.”

Although he did not respond to a request for comment, Chair of the BoG, Stuart “Kip” Cobbett was closely involved in the deliberation process.

“Earlier in the year, a few members of Divest McGill met with Kip Cobbett and Michael Di Grappa, [vice-principal Administration and Finance], to discuss the idea of releasing a draft report before it was voted on at the [BoG],” Boytinck said. “This way, there could be feedback provided on the report and community voices would be able to be heard. This is not uncommon practice, as Dalhousie released a draft report initially as well. Kip Cobbett, however, responded by noting that this was not a conversation.”

Kareem Ibrahim, SSMU president and member of theBoG, stated that an increase in transparency would benefit any future decisions regarding divestment.

“Although the University followed its procedures appropriately, we would certainly appreciate a more open process next time, as exists in many other comparable universities,” Ibrahim said. “This would require some changes to our governance procedures, but in the spirit of transparent and two-way dialogue, I don’t think this would be an issue.”

The choice not to divest left many students frustrated with the university and the lack of consideration for student voices. 

“The decision by members of the Board to maintain McGill’s investments in fossil fuels is disappointing and embarrassing to say the least,” Lenetsky said. “Not only does their decision signal their inability to lead on issues of great importance to all of humankind, it also demonstrates how disconnected they are from the McGill community. They were the first body at McGill to reject divestment, and did so after refusing to conduct community consultation or provide a draft report for community comment. They didn’t even have the courtesy to inform us of the vote.”

Although there are not yet any formal plans to present the case for divestment again, Doug Sweet, director of the McGill’s Media Relations Office, indicated that the BoG could revisit divestment in the future. 

“CAMSR has finished its work on this file,” Sweet wrote in an email to the Tribune. “If and when another request is made, it will re-engage.” 

Lenetsky noted that this is not the last time that Divest McGill will petition the University.

“This is not the end of our campaign by any means,” he said. “If anything, the Board’s ridiculous report is galvanizing further support and action for divestment. We simply care too much to let our university continue to be on the wrong side of history.”

On Tuesday March 29, Divest McGill began a sit-in in front of the James Administration Building. According to the event’s Facebook page, sit-in participants are prepared to stay until all demands are met.

Temple
Art, Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

Video Games in Education: Turning GPA into EXP

In an era where social media sites are dominated by the likes of Farmville, bars and pubs increasingly entice patrons with the prospect of some drunken Dance Dance Revolution, and even the elderly have been swept by the rush of Candy Crush, video games have successfully expanded beyond their niche origins and have permeated society on an intergenerational level. One such area of video game proliferation, however unlikely it may seem, has been the classroom. 

Contrary to the lingering notion that video games kill brain cells, an idea that plagued many a Cold War-era household, educators at both the primary and higher levels have started to tap into the unique potential  of games for stimulating curiosity and imparting experience in ways that traditional schooling simply cannot. Montreal in particular—through the research conducted by Darren Wershler, associate professor of  English and Concordia University Research Chair in Media & Contemporary Literature, and the graduate courses taught by Dr. Christian Ehret, assistant professor at McGill’s Faculty of Education—stands as a pioneer in uncovering these largely untapped rewards games can offer for the classroom and beyond. But what exactly can games offer the classroom, and why do they even need them in the first place?

“I’ve always tried to see if I can use the game as a kind of allegory,” Wershler said.  “Can we use the game to teach students how ideology works, or explore concepts such as free will and forced choice? Instead of saying we’re going to take this theory and apply it to game, it’s like turning the telescope around and going the other way. You use the game to tell you something about a larger intellectual question. This kind of approach allows students to end up thinking about things that are of interest to them from other categories.” 

As the panic surrounding mid-term/finals season proves, grades and the fear of failure surrounding them constitute one of the defining elements of acquiring an education. Yet that fear is often so palpable that students increasingly run the risk of becoming averse towards the subject material and come to view education through a lens of woe rather than wonder, ultimately hindering their growth. As Lee Sheldon, associate professor and co-director at the Games and Simulation Arts and Sciences program at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, articulates in his book The Multiplayer Classroom, the modern classroom directly contributes to this fear of academia through its foundation upon letter grades which are assigned “as penalties for failure,” where students start at 100 and then whittle their score down through mistakes. The tried and tested mechanics used to incentivize player engagement in video games offer an invaluable tool for teachers in combating this fear of failure. 

By having students start at an F and then ‘rise up’ in level to achieve an A through ‘Experience Points’ distributed across assignments ‘ranked’ in difficulty, offering unlockable ‘achievements’ in recognition of exceptional accomplishments, and organizing ‘guild’ systems wherein students receive bonus points for helping each other, Sheldon’s case study ultimately showed how the use of such RPG mechanics led students to achieve a higher interest in learning and better grades. Games allow students to move up instead of fall down academically, and, while the grade numbers are practically the same, such a psychological difference is crucial for stimulating the joy and wonder learning is supposed to be all about.

Another common problem many students face, particularly at the earlier stages of education, lies within the concept of transference, where students often feel that the things they learn in the classroom bear little relevance to life outside the classroom.Video games, as amalgamations of so many different fields, stand as one of the perfect teaching mediums with which to show the interconnectedness of class concepts. 

“Game studies are always interdisciplinary because  games are such weird, fractionating objects,”  Wershler said. “You need some insights coming from film studies, digital media, communication theory, literary studies about narrative, philosophy, programming […] you really can’t approach games from a sole disciplinary perspective as you just miss stuff.”

In one of his most successful class projects, Wershler had students studying Plato’s Republic attempt to recreate a utopia within the sandbox engine of Minecraft. Utilizing the game in such a manner ultimately led students, according to Wershler, to both connect with the material in a deeper, more personal way, and have a wider grasp on how these concepts transcend the assignment.

‘Class divisions’ between Minecraft-savvy students and those less so, ecological debates concerning the actual building of the project, and issues of responsibility all were entailed in the fact that the project was so massive it detrimentally “slowed the entire class server to a crawl” for other students. 

“Their utopia forced them to think about a whole set of questions that they weren’t aware of when they started, but by the time they were finished were able to think about in the ways philosophers have always approached utopia and dystopia,” Wershler said. “That’s sort of what I mean by games as allegory. When game studies in the classroom work at their best, the game becomes an occasion for thinking about something larger.”

For Ehret the commmunity surrounding the game is more important than the content. 

“Video games, regardless of the content, create opportunities to learn differently than other platoforms: Open world games, for example, teach players how to grapple with new languages, symbiotitc codes, like icons, and ways of talking to each other that are different from the communitication of everyday life, but also transfer to other areas of your life,” Ehret said. “So when we talk about literacy now, we talk about multiple literacy, so you might know standard english, or standard french, but can you switch between all of those various discourses, and do so adjunctively? Video games are one of those types of languages, or discourse communities, and kids learning and talking in those areas have a lot of transerfable skills to academic writing.”

Perhaps one of the most powerful areas in which games can uniquely impact students in the modern classroom is in their sense of agency. Student agency refers to the sense, or lack thereof, of how much control students feel they have over their studies and how much they perceive their academic choices, whether choosing classes or picking a university, to be meaningful choices they can actually make. It has become a common trope that kids within the public school system increasingly feel that college is out of their grasp, or that they’re ensnared in whatever pre-determined plan was set out by their parents, and thus can’t meaningfully change their lives or the community around them. When agency dwindles, so too does student motivation. School, once again, begins to foster the very sentiments that turn students away from it. Video games, a medium all about action and ‘doing,’ stand as one of the best ways to empower students and make them believe their choices matter. 

Ehret has conducted extensive research on the social impact of video games, and his experiences powerfully demonstrate the potential games have to impart the notion that kids can impact their communities.

“A Minecraft club at the Nashville Public Library was created for the specific purpose [of] redesign[ing] and reimagin[ing] areas of the city that were currently dilapidated or home to underprivileged communities, and to think about how to design them for ‘spatial justice,’  with more mobility between communities, green spaces, and community gardens in mind, and to think about all those things that would create more fruitful communities,” Ehret said. “The kids involved became like urban planners in Minecraft and reimagined those spaces and actually rebuilt them according to their imaginings together and presented it to local city planners. Those sandbox games like Minecraft provide at least two big potentials, one for us to harness kids’ expertise in games, but also to reimagine, with and alongside kids, not as experts ourselves, potential projects for social justice.”

While implementing video games and their mechanics in schools is certainly not devoid of challenges, the positive changes they bring to the classroom to make them a necessary force in the 21st century school system. If the curiosity that is supposed to at the foundation of education is to be rekindled, there needs to be a move away from a system of based on moving down, and focus on levelling up. 

From the BrainSTEM, Science & Technology

Growth attenuation therapy mimics an ugly past

A recent article published in the New York Times discussed a boy named Ricky, who had been diagnosed with cerebral palsy and static encephalopathy. His permanent brain damage meant he was unable to walk and had very limited eyesight. Ricky is now nine years old, but his body is the size of a four-year-old’s; his parents opted to stop his growth with a treatment known as ‘growth attenuation therapy’ in order to make his illness more manageable. While not illegal, the therapy floats in a grey area of medical and bioethical discourse, and its nature eerily echoes historical therapies now deemed entirely unethical.

Growth attenuation therapy involves the administration of estrogen to close the epiphyseal plates of bones, leading to a halt in their growth. The therapy grew in popularity in the 1940s and 1950s, when girls and young women would receive it to stop their growth before becoming ‘too tall.’ As height became more desirable to many women in the following decades, the popularity of the treatment waned.

Today, growth attenuation therapy is administered to children with profound physical and cognitive disabilities that become more difficult for parents to deal with as the children grow. The therapy is meant to increase the ability of parents to care for a disabled child who is believed to hold no chance of living an otherwise normal life. Some bioethicists argue that it is a sufficiently safe therapy allowing improved quality of life for disabled children and their families. By halting disabled childrens’ growth, parents are said to be better able to manage their physical size and provide better care for their child, and therefore  some ethicists strongly advocate for the therapy.

Halting the growth of a child unable to volunteer for the therapy is highly criticized by disability rights groups, who argue that the therapy violates a person’s civil rights. The treatment in girls is also slightly more complex than in boys, because growth attenuation of females involves treating the child with a hysterectomy—removing a woman’s uterus—to prevent menstruation. This would mean the child would never be able to reproduce. In the case of many suffering from strong disabilities, this might not greatly affect the course of their lives, but the therapy still draws the attention of feminist groups arguing that involuntary hysterectomy cannot be ethically justified.

On a historical level, the therapy eerily resembles the mid-20th century popularity of the lobotomy to improve the manageability of psychiatric patients. According to Professor Jack Pressman of University of California, San Francisco, the procedure included severing the tissues connecting the prefrontal cortex and the rest of the brain, making “society’s troublesome individuals more complacent and compliant.” The lobotomy was performed to shape members of society whose minds did not conform to social standards, and make psychiatric caregivers’ jobs easier. The procedure later died in popularity as prescription of the synthetic tranquilizer took over the medical marketplace, providing a reversible and less drastic way to improve patient compliance.

While the lobotomy holds more devious connotations than growth attenuation therapy, both procedures act as involuntary and irreversible medical interventions meant to improve the manageability of patients for their caregivers. Disability rights campaigners argue that this is simply not ethically justifiable, while parents praise growth attenuation therapy for easing their lives. No empirical studies have been performed to prove the benefits of the therapy, leaving many physicians and hospitals hesitant to provide it given the ethical grey area in which it lies. It is important to keep in mind that bioethical discourse changes throughout time, and therapies once deemed entirely justifiable may now appear completely archaic. The only way to guarantee that we do not repeat past mistakes in bioethics is by remembering our medical history.

Student Life

Looking through the student lens at the Fokus Film Festival

The Fokus Film Festival, an annual event organized by TVM: Student Television at McGill, took place at Cinema du Parc last week, where student filmmakers had the opportunity to submit their work to be screened in a public forum. Three directors with screened works shared insight on how to get started in the filmmaking process as well as the challenges faced by student filmmakers.

“McGill, in my opinion, as an academic institution, isn’t very accommodating to a lot of creative souls, especially ones who want to practice and create in film and television,” said Lou Gatti, U3 Arts, who had his films Waterway to Stardom: Who is Flood Girl? and Getaways screened at Fokus. “That’s where TVM has aided myself and […] a lot of other filmmakers in the community with an understanding of process.”

McGill’s Faculty of Arts offers only a minor in World Cinema, which Gatti, as well as fellow director Ben Koring, U3 Arts, agreed can be disappointing for aspiring filmmakers wishing to learn more about the field.

“Other than TVM, which is great because they have a lot of content coming out, McGill isn’t great for film,” Koring said. “It’s got everything. But no film school, not great film classes, I’ve only been able to take one or two so that is a bit frustrating.”

At the same time, Sashka Avanyan, U1 Arts, who had three films screened at Fokus: Babushka, Moscow I Miss You, and How To Fall In Love, noted that McGill's high academic calibre can be a source of inspiration for student filmmakers.

“Being in an environment where there are so many successful people and just knowing that you’re on campus where there’s so much knowledge and academics at a very high level […] that’s inspiring in itself because it makes you want to strive to that level,” Avanyan said.

Another hurdle for many student filmmakers is the time constraints felt by those who balance academics with their craft, instead of choosing to combine both into a single degree. Time becomes a highly coveted resource for most creatives minds who recognize that there is a constant pull and push to stay active in academic life at McGill while still pursuing personal creative passions.

 

 

“I have a philosophy that’s […] use your limitations whether it’s 72 hours, or a concept, or your equipment, to your own advantage. Don’t see it as an inhibitor, see it more as a framework to work within.

One way several directors mitigated the time constraints faced by student filmmakers, as well as gained practical experience in the field, was through a filmmaking competition sponsored by TVM. Directors were instructed to write, shoot, and edit an entire film within 72 hours. One of Avanyan’s films Babushka as well as one of Koring’s films Karma Police—both which were screened at Fokus—were products of this competition.

For Koring, these time and resource constraints, whether they are due to simply being a student, or the regulations imposed by events like 72-hour competitions, can be put to use in a productive manner. For example, while Koring’s submission was shot entirely on iPhones using an app he bought for $15, this app ultimately complimented the goofy style of the mockumentary film he was creating. Additionally, the angel costumes used in the film were made by a friend’s girlfriend while another musical buddy helped create the ‘Larry David-esque’ theme music and the other sound effects.

“I have a philosophy that’s […] use your limitations whether it’s 72 hours, or a concept, or your equipment, to your own advantage,” Koring said. “Don’t see it as an inhibitor, see it more as a framework to work within. I only know this many people, I know these locations we can use, I only have this equipment […] You have to make your concept based on those constraints.”

Besides the challenges, rewards, and community that are fostered by creative endeavours, there are still certain aspects of the creative process that Avanyan does not want to go unnoticed. Women in industry, and specifically women in the film industry, are topics she has been exploring since her first submission to Fokus last year with a documentary piece on femininity. The 10 minute film paralleled interviews featuring Armenian women and Canadian women; however, now she hopes to release a newer twist on the film which features the more refined technical skills she has gained over the past year.

“Everyone I look up to in the film industry is male, and there are definitely female editors and directors that are stellar and fascinating, but they don’t have as much visibility,” Avanyan said. “It’s really, really visible that there aren’t enough women in the industry in the roles of direction and editing […] I think it’s important to be conscious of that, no matter what your gender is.”

The parting advice that the student filmmakers have for students looking to get into filmmaking at McGill is to get involved in the creative process, whether that be through writing or editing, and by joining groups such as TVM or participating in events like Fokus. In the bigger picture, becoming involved in the McGill filmmaking community has led some of these directors to think differently about their future in film.

“When I came to McGill […] I did not have a clear idea in my mind that I wanted to pursue film,” Avanyan said. “Last year was my first year and I had four films shown at Fokus [….] I remember that was a very clear jumping board for me because I met a bunch of filmmakers here at McGill. They were talking to me about how they had stayed involved with film during their time at McGill and then […] I very concretely decided that this is what I want to pursue.”

 

 

Student Life, Student of the Week

Student of the Week: Chris Gismondi

While many McGill students struggle to work fitness into their daily schedules in addition to balancing academics and extracurriculars, Chris Gismondi, U4 Joint Honours Art History and History with a minor in Indigenous Studies, has no problem with this. After taking a Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) minicourse in pole dancing, Gismondi fell quickly in love with the sport and is currently planning his second trip to the Canadian National Pole Fitness Championship this summer.

“It’s very close to me as [a] student experience because I started in first year,” Gismondi said.  “I’ve always been an active person [and] used exercise as a way to deal with stress. I loved pole dancing so much [….] You forget you’re even doing it because it’s so much fun.”

As he has progressed in the competitive pole dancing community, however, Gismondi has become more aware of the bias that some hold toward its origins in stripping.

“Pole dancing comes from the sex industry,” Gismondi explained. “Some people like pretending that it doesn’t come from the sex industry, and put down sex workers, when sex workers already get a lot of [flak] from society, and I don’t think we as pole dancers should really be doing that, as we take their sport.”

Gismondi’s acute awareness of social injustices moves beyond his experience in the pole dancing community. He has also developed a passion for indigenous rights after become aware in university of the realities of racism and colonialism.

“I came to school and started learning about indigenous issues,” Gismondi recalled. “In public school, elementary school, and high school, you don’t really get that education. I started to learn more and got really passionate, and I just want to keep learning more as much as I can.”

Part of his effort to do so entails serving as a coordinator for the McGill Student Indigenous Studies Journal, which was founded to showcase undergraduate research on indigenous issues and give voice to indigenous students on campus. The journal recently changed its name in response to critique from indigenous groups on campus. 

“The [journal] was founded in 2009, and at the time there wasn’t a minor, there wasn’t a lot of dialogue on indigenous issues,” Gismondi explained. “The journal was a way to raise people’s awareness and publish student work [on] these topics. But our context has changed a lot, so we wanted to listen to and respond to some critiques indigenous students here had of the journal, and try to make it a responsible form of allyship. [We also wanted to] make it a space where indigenous students feel like they can contribute or be on the editorial team or have their stuff published.”

In addition to being an ally for indigenous voices at McGill, Gismondi advocates for environmental justice on campus in his position as the sustainable events coordinator for SSMU. 

“It’s remarkable how many student groups don’t know that there’s a green fund available for them to apply to for their events,” Gismondi said. “I try to raise awareness for that. I meet with clubs and I help them brainstorm how to limit the impact of any big events they plan on holding, whether it be catering or transport or things like that.”

Gismondi devotes a lot of his time and energy to making McGill more eco-friendly, but he recognizes that the average student is not able to commit to the environmental cause to the same extent. Nonetheless, there are many small ways in which students can lower their carbon footprints by establishing greener daily habits. 

“I think there’s something about student culture that can be a little bit apathetic and very convenience-based,” Gismondi said. “[Being eco-friendly requires] planning ahead and making your own meals and bringing tupperware when you go out so you don’t have to get a take out container. I think those are very feasible, we just often don’t think about them. And it’s hard, we’re pressed for time, we’re really busy, so it is difficult, but it’s not impossible.”

Looking back on his time at McGill, Gismondi feels that his involvement in social justice causes has helped define his student experience. 

“I really enjoyed getting involved,” Gismondi said. “Being passionate about social justice and environmental issues, […] for me that [has] been very rewarding.”

Recipes, Student Life

Acing the end-of-year potluck party

As Montreal slowly defrosts and patios enter their thawing phase, McGill students will begin the gradual return to life outdoors. For many, a staple of both the end of the year and the warmer weather are potluck parties. Don’t get stuck being the person who brings the last-minute bag of chips, or the store-bought box of cookies. Here are three easy-to-make dishes that can be easily shared among friends, and taste delicious enough to treat yourself to after the end of a tough semester.

 

Appetizer: Cucumber bites

Makes 36 bites

Ingredients:

4 ounce of cream cheese, softened

¼ cup of ranch dressing

2 tbs of dill

4 cucumbers

16 cherry tomatoes 

Sprinkle of paprika

Instructions:

1. In a blender, mix cream cheese, ranch dressing, and dill.

2. Peel cucumbers, then slice into 1-inch pieces. Using a melon baller, scoop out a small hole from each cucumber bite.

3. Fill hole with cream cheese mixture, top with half a cherry tomato, and garnish with paprika to taste. Serve chilled. 

 

Meal: Chicken fried rice with a spicy twist

Serves 8

Ingredients:

600g of basmati 

2 chicken stock cubes

8 skinless chicken breasts, thinly sliced

4 red peppers, sliced

600g of kidney beans

Handful of coriander, chopped

300g of frozen peas

1 onion, sliced

3 tsp of ground cumin

2 tbsp of sunflower oil

Instructions

1. Put rice and chicken stock in a sauce pan, cover with water, and bring to a boil. Allow rice to simmer for approximately 20 minutes, then drain.

2. Put chicken with coriander and spices. Stir fry peppers in the sunflower oil for three minutes, until softened. Add chicken to pan and cook until tender (approximately five minutes). Add rice, beans, peas, and onions, and cook to taste. 

(Adapted from bbcgoodfood.com)

 

Dessert: Peanut butter rum balls 

Makes 48 balls

Ingredients

2 1/2 cups of icing sugar

2 cups of chocolate cookie crumbs

1 cup of butter, softened

1 cup of flaked coconut

3/4 cup finely chopped peanuts

1/2 cup of smooth peanut butter

1/2 cup of granulated sugar

1/8 cup of cocoa 

2 tbsp of rum

Granulated sugar

Instructions

1. Combine icing sugar, cookie crumbs, cocoa, butter, coconut, peanuts, peanut butter, sugar, and rum in a large bowl and blend into dough-like consistency.

2. Shape balls into 1/2-inch to 3/4-inch balls and roll in granulated sugar. Place in fridge in airtight container, and then keep until hardened.  

(Adapted from foodnetwork.ca)

Science & Technology

MonWHO inspires students to discuss public health

Three days, hundreds of delegates and one goal: To inspire people to talk and think critically about public health. The Montreal World Health Organization Simulation (MonWHO) kicked off on Friday March 18, bringing together students from universities all around Quebec to gain insight into public health. This year’s theme was non-communicable diseases, a topic especially relevant given aging populations in developed countries.

“This […] theme will challenge delegates to reexamine how we tackle disease prevention and how we manage our responses to disease,” Alexandria Petit-Thorne, executive director of MonWHO, wrote in an open letter to prospective delegates.

One of the most exciting parts of MonWHO is its Global Health Fair. The Fair brings in organizations from the Montreal community to network with students, providing delegates the opportunity to learn about internships and volunteer opportunities available to them which contribute to global health efforts. Organizations, whic have participated in the past, have included MEDLIFE McGill and Aids Community Care Montreal.

“The Global Health Fair was introduced to the MonWHO conference in 2008 with the aim to showcase the global health initiatives, such as clubs and organizations, around the McGill and Montreal community,” event organizer Ga Eun Lee explained. “It is an educational space for both organization representatives and conference participants to share perspectives on global health issues and solutions, and to provide opportunities for delegates to get involved.” 

The Fair’s goal is to take students out of the fantasy world of simulation and into the real world by providing them with information on how they can have an impact on public health.

“As part of the MonWHO mission statement, the secretariat aims to ‘raise student awareness about global health issues’ and to ‘provide a means for students to play a proactive role in global health policy,’” Lee said. “The Global Health Fair was created in 2008 to fulfill these statements by educating delegates about the various global health initiatives that contribute to advancing health around the world.”

MonWHO also draws students from more diverse backgrounds than traditional Model UN (MUN) conferences.

“[The delegates at MonWHO are] people who are really passionate about the [issue,]” said Juliana Fanous,  chargé d’affaires at MonWHO. “It’s not the type of thing that has the [flashiness] that Model UN has.”

This is largely tied to the students who are participating in the event.

“[Our delegate backgrounds are] very interdisciplinary,” Fanous said. “We [get] a lot of students from different backgrounds, from sociology to microbiology, so we [get] a lot of diverse opinions that are brought into debates.”

Many participants at the event mentioned the shared passion and interest in global health as one of the highlights of the event.

“It was an interesting crossover between tiptoeing into policy but at the same time being with other people who are interested in global health,” McGill student Emilia Chatelier said.

Another aspect participants cited as being particularly engaging was the role-playing component of the conference.

“What I liked was that we were put in the country’s perspective[s],” McGill alumnus Alexandre Chadi said. “We were asked to prepare beforehand. It was really interesting to put yourself in that mindframe, and to start voicing and arguing for that country, being really an advocate. So all of these political aspects came into play.”

But the political issues remained secondary to the main goal of addressing public health problems.

“There’s a lot of attention that goes into conferences like Model UN, which focuses on issues of more of a political nature, and there wasn’t a lot focused on issues pertaining to global health, and it’s an issue that a lot of students care about,” event organizer Angela Yang said. “The goal of MonWHO is to stimulate discussion and debate on [global health] and encourage students to […] gain experience in drafting solutions and policy work.”

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue