Latest News

Basketball, Martlets, Sports

Basketball: RSEQ Champion Martlets place fourth at CIS Nationals

The 2016 RSEQ champion McGill Martlets traveled to the CIS Final 8 at the University of New Brunswick in Fredericton, New Brunswick as the No. 1 seed. It was their fifth straight RSEQ championship, only the first time that McGill has entered Nationals as the first seed. Last year the Martlets progressed to the final game, but lost in the finals in a tight game to the Windsor Lancers, who won their fifth straight title. This year, McGill went into the tournament last Thursday with a 22-2 overall record against CIS opponents this season. They also had the best defensive record of any team–allowing an average of only 50.7 points per game, and riding a 15-game win streak.

“[We’d] had a target on our back all year so [we were] familiar with the pressure of being a top-ranked team,” veteran Head Coach Ryan Thorne, who is in his 13th year at the helm, said.

The Martlets’ first outing of the weekend came in the quarterfinal against the eighth-seeded hosts UNB. The Martlets came out firing, scoring 20 points in the first quarter with seniors Mariam Sylla and Dianna Ros and junior Alex Kiss-Rusk leading the way, scoring 12, 11, and 10 points apiece for the night. McGill let the home team come back a bit in the second half, but comfortably won 58-52 to progress to the semifinal against the Ryerson Rams.

Thorne, won was named the 2016 CIS Coach-of-the-Year, praised his co-captain Ros’ influence on the players around them.

“That’s veteran leadership out there, that’s maturity,” Thorne said. “There were some key decisions that changed the momentum of the game and that’s why you need her out there in crunch time.”

Saturday’s semifinal against fifth-seeded Ryerson, who were the highest scoring team in the country this year, proved to be a harder challenge for McGill. The Rams’ offence came out strong, outscoring the Martlets 45-28 in the first half for the Martlets’ largest deficit of the season.

“We lost it in the first half,” Thorne said. “We weren’t focused and disciplined and they took advantage of that, creating turnovers and getting transition baskets.”

The Martlets were unable to find an answer in the second half, trailing by 20 at the end of the third quarter and finishing the game down by 15 with a score of 87-72. Ryerson had three players with over 15 points, while junior forward Jennifer Silver’s 21 points led McGill’s losing effort.

“I’m disappointed,” Silver said. “We didn’t do the little things that we talked about pre-game, we didn’t execute the gameplan and we got hurt on the things we were trying to avoid.”

McGill entered the bronze-medal game against the No. 3 seed Saint Mary’s Huskies without Sylla, who succumbed to a knee injury the night before against Ryerson. Kiss-Rusk put up her ninth double-double of the season–scoring 16 points and registering 11 boards–but it wasn’t enough to make up for McGill’s offensive difficulties. The Martlets fell 56-43, their lowest offensive output in four years. Coach Thorne summed up the team’s sentiment after the loss.

“Disappointed, I think that’s the one word,” Thorne said. “We didn’t play well at all through this whole tournament, and having our best player out really showed today. For a team that battled and worked so hard all season long it’s unfortunate, the outcome, but you have to look across the board: Players and coaches, we all could have done better.”

Arts & Entertainment, Theatre

TNC’s The Flood Thereafter feels entirely washed up

The Flood Thereafter was a risky choice for a student production. Tuesday Night Café Theatre (TNC) Directors Daphné Morin and Cleo da Fonseca chose a complex piece that weaves surrealism, small-town identity, and Greek myth together. Coming in closer to two hours than the promised hour and a half, The Flood Thereafter plods along its way to an unsatisfying conclusion, with brief flashes of insight scattered throughout.

The play tells the story of a small fishing town in rural Quebec, told primarily through the lens of a young stripper named June (Camille Banville). June is beloved by the people of the town but feels trapped. When a young trucker named Dennis’ (Jérémy Benoit) truck breaks down, she chases after him and the freedom he represents. June acts as a kind of siren, drawing Dennis ever deeper into the twisted affairs of the town even as she tries to win him as her way out. Their relationship shakes the town out of its established order, allowing hidden stories and secrets to rise to the surface.

The most glaring issue with the production was one of representation.The play features several old, worn-out small town characters that student actors did not show a complete understanding of. Pierre-Luc Senécal plays Homer, a disabled fisherman torn between his duty to his wife and his attraction to June. Senécal’s voice begins with a raspy quality, but loses that along the way. His portrayal never hits the emotional levels available within the text. The agony and confusion of the character don’t come through. Several times throughout the play, his character joins his drinking buddy, George (Thomas Khullar), to watch June dance, a performance that is supposedly so beautiful it makes the men cry. These scenes succeed in a certain way: June is placed behind a screen behind the audience, leaving a bit of uncertainty whether to look at the men or her. This questioning in alignment is a nice touch, but unfortunately the men ham up this scene with over the top gestures, failing to capture anything that looks like genuine desire.

There are multiple moments during the performance where the actors’ performances come off as robotic, rather than indulging in the deeper meaning of their actions. For instance, early in the play George’s character is said to rip up napkins in a diner. In a later scene, George enters the diner and begins to methodically tear the napkins as if it’s part of his job, not as someone taking his frustration out on the environment around him. His partner in that scene, Grace (Morin), plays a mother from a rural town in Quebec. Throughout the show she deftly switches between French and English, but her English is so perfect that it makes her character’s background difficult to believe.

Amalea Ruffett plays Homer’s wife, Penelope, who waits at home as per her namesake. Ruffett utilized a very traditional “Theatre Voice,” which worked when she acted as a storyteller but did not really fit her character. Even though she is made up to look like an older woman, she doesn’t carry herself with any kind of weight that her character’s age suggests. In a scene of seduction where she flirts with Dennis—a much younger man—she manages to seem somewhat seductive but the pent up desire of a loveless marriage is missing, and Benoit and her don’t interact well enough to make the scene compelling.

Benoit and Banville do play the young lovers well—they have enough chemistry to make a sexual pantomime late in the play effective. Benoit is drawn into the whirlpool of the sleepy town, showing his curiosity and frustration successfully, making both his attraction to June and responsibility to his girlfriend believable. Banville aptly captures the innocence of her character, if not her sexuality. A minor gripe with her performance is how she was made to wear a textually significant wig clumsily on top of her hair rather than covering her hair up, another small but significant error that harms suspension of disbelief. The play has a few more of such errors—glasses which are supposed to have ice and don’t, hair that is supposed to be like rope but has clearly been conditioned within a day, and injuries that haphazardly appear and disappear.

These minor errors compound an uninspired direction of dialogue. For a play with an enormous amount of dialogue and long monologues, there are far too many scenes blocked with two characters simply sitting next to each-other looking out into the audience. Furthermore, these scenes of dialogue have far too many pauses, making moments where silence could be powerful less so and slowing the pace even more. While, perhaps this directorial decision was to make the audience feel trapped in the small town with the townspeople, it ultimately comes out boring. Surrealism from the source text is almost absent, only shown through lighting in the dance sequences and the play’s ending.

The Flood Thereafter will be at TNC from Mar. 23-25 at 8 p.m. Tickets are $6 for students.

News, SSMU

Ben Ger wins SSMU presidency amid low voter turnout

Following the second-lowest voter turnout since 2005, the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) elected Ben Ger as SSMU President with 65.4 per cent of the vote over his opponent, Jordan Sinder. 17.5 per cent of the undergraduate student body participated in the Winter Referendum and SSMU elections.

Ger’s colleagues on the executive team will be Vice-President (VP) Operations Sacha Magder, VP Internal Daniel Lawrie, VP Finance Niall Carolan, VP External David Aird, VP University Affairs Erin Sobat, and VP Student Life Elaine Patterson. Ger is optimistic about delivering his campaign promises.

“I am unbelievably thankful,” Ger said. “I’m excited the student body trusts me with this position. I’m looking forward to [next year], hopefully the best year that SSMU has ever had. Council Reform Committee will come through, we are going to include more voices at the table, whether that be exactly at SSMU council or somewhere else. Our finances will be balanced, we’ll figure out a way to make sure everyone’s happy.”

Sinder praised his campaign team and its efforts and declared his continued support for Ger in the future.

“I’m honestly very proud,” Sinder said. “We did everything that we could as a campaign team [….] We raised important issues, we engaged students who otherwise might not have been engaged in SSMU politics […] and I have absolutely no regrets with the campaign that we ran. But with that said, Ben is a great guy, he’s been really involved with SSMU, he’s well-experienced for this position, and he’s going to be a great president. I’m going to be the biggest supporter of his presidency next year, and I look forward to working with him.”

Patterson, the only woman on the incoming executive, pointed to equitability as priority for next year.

“I’m really thrilled and so thankful that I get to be in this position next year, and I hopefully get to lay down the groundwork for it,” Patterson said. “As far as being the only woman on the executive next year, I am certain that all of the men that I will be working with next year have good heads on their shoulders and that I will be able to convey things to them about […] gender equality, but also hopefully just equitability in the general sense.”

Winter 2016 referendum questions

The question on whether or not SSMU will affiliate with the new Quebec student federation, the Association for the Voice of Education in Quebec (AVEQ), failed, with 62.1 per cent voting “No.”

Aird, as incoming VP External, expressed disappointment in the motion’s failurer. 

“I think that it was tough to communicate the true value of joining AVEQ to the student body,” Aird said. “I think that the texts that were […] on the ballots didn’t do justice to the true value of joining a federation [….] I think people were reluctant to pay a new fee that they weren’t convinced that it would actually benefit them. For that reason, I fully intend on revisiting the question next year, once students have had more time to talk about it,w more time to see what goes on with AVEQ and revisit the arguments in favour and against.”

The proposed general constitutional amendments were passed, with 72.7 per cent voting “Yes.” The proposed amendments to Articles 13.2 and 13.3, which would have created a General Assembly (GA) steering committee failed, with 52.6 per cent voting “No.” The Motion Regarding the Creation of a Club Fund Fee passed, earning 57.4 per cent “Yes,” while 81.6 per cent voted for the creation of a mental health fee. The proposal for an increase in the SSMU health plan fee to cover mental health passed, with 73.6 per cent votes in support.

The motion regarding the TVM: Student Television at McGill Fee renewal passed with 54.9 per cent voting “Yes.” However, the Motion to Increase the TVM fee failed with 61.9 per cent dissenting. The motion to renew the SSMU equity fee passed with a majority of 65.8 per cent. The motion to renew the SSMU Access Bursary Fund also passed with 67.9 per cent voting for renewal.  Both the smoke-free campus plebiscite and the on-campus bike facility plebiscite passed, earning majorities of 73 per cent and 83.1 per cent, respectively.

Senators for the 2016-2017 academic year include Science Senator Sean Taylor, Arts & Science Senator Guy Ettlin, Music Senator Mitchel Russo, Engineering Senator Alexander Dow, Education Senator Parvesh Chainani, Medicine Senator Joshua Chin, Law Senator Shannon Snow, and Arts Senators William Cleveland, Casarina Hocevar, and Charles Keita.

An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated in a typo that turnout was 7.5 per cent. The Tribune regrets this error. 

SSMU
McGill Matters, Podcasts

McGill Matters, EP. 1: When SSMU is confronted with “external” and “divisive” issues

[audiotrack title=”McGill Matters, EP. 1: When SSMU is confronted with external and divisive issues” songwriter=”Zachary Carson, Albert Park, and David Watson” date=”March 18, 2016″ width=”700″ height=”200″ src=”https://24f2041bb5b609d25f1a97039f71682cc9154421.googledrive.com/host/0B9rQxTeDv2duM0FmSjBSYkZFS1k/mcgillmatters1.mp3″ autoplay=”on”]

In Episode 1 of McGill Matters, Zac Carson, David Watson, and Albert Park discuss the referendum question on the motion regarding amendments to SSMU’s Constitution. McGill students will be voting on minor corrections to the SSMU constitution, as well as the fate of the much more controversial articles, 13.2 and 13.3. These articles would allow an unelected Steering Committee, made up of the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) President, the Vice President of University Affairs, and six other council members, to block any motion of deemed “divisive” and “external” to SSMU’s mandate from being discussed at the General Assembly (GA). This referendum question comes in the wake of the contentious Boycotts, Divestments, and Sanctions (BDS) motion that was brought to the Winter GA, and which resulted in disagreements among those in favour and against the motion.

Trib Mix
Arts & Entertainment, Music

Trib Mix: Guilty Pleasures

Midterm season isn’t complete with a good emotional break-down and a moment to just let completely loose. The best way to successfully accomplish both is by jamming out to your favourite guilty pleasure song, but not just any mildly embarrassing track. The perfect song for getting over midterm insanity is the type of track that you’ve been faithful to since middle school, the one you blast on your headphones in the middle of McLennan, the one that completes you in a way no other song can. For the March Trib Mix: Guilty Pleasures Edition, the editors at the McGill Tribune have selected their go-to guilty pleasure track to make up one of the most incredible and cringe-worthy playlists yet.

“Goodbye My Lover”—James Blunt

James Blunt received equal measures success and derision with his hit single “You're Beautiful.” His debut album Back to Bedlam/ (2003) remained stylistically true to his number one hit, and included the emotionally overwrought “Goodbye My Lover.”

Although commercially successful, Blunt has been plagued with criticisms of being self-indulgent and excessively cheesy throughout /Back to Bedlam/. However, no one is more critical than Blunt himself. A prolific and hilarious tweeter, Blunt is often self-deprecating in his online interactions, such as this exchange with Ed Sheeran:

In “Goodbye My Lover,” the minimalist nature of the production does well to highlight the unique nasal quality of Blunt’s voice, forcing the listener to fully take in his vocal talents. His turn of phrase and unconventional pronunciation encapsulates his artistic talent.

“I know you well, I know your spell… / I've watched you sleeping for a while / I'd be the father of your child.”

Although both Blunt and “Goodbye My Lover” are objectively terrible, both have a certain /je ne sais quoi/. Melodically catchy and emotionally evocative, I catch myself happily singing along, in spite of the extreme levels of public embarrassment this causes.

—Mingye Chen

“Savin’ Me”—Nickelback

As an initial disclaimer, I'm not a fan of Nickelback's music as a whole. But part of me does always feel bad for the reputation they get as being Canada's worst export. While their career, and Chad Kroeger's greasy hairstyle, has undoubtedly gone on years too long, my reservations about bashing them come from three songs from the early 2000s: "How You Remind Me," "Someday," and "Savin Me." Good things really do come in threes, because those three songs are literally it. Most guilty pleasures are songs that you kind of know are bad but usually were popular when you were younger so they make you feel nostalgic. MuchMusic definitely played the hell out of these three songs at the time, and I take that as a sign that I was not the only one who liked them.

"Savin Me" wins in particular because of the video. There's definitely a lot to say about "Someday" and its alternate endings, but "Savin Me" has stuck with me to this day as being so cool. It's one of the few music videos where Nickelback isn't performing, and I think that helps it not be too ridiculous. In the video, one person sees timers glowing above everybody's heads. He can't figure out what it means until he sees an older woman's run out, and he realizes that it's the amount of time until they die. He sees another woman's timer drastically dropping as she goes to her car, and just in time saves her from a giant falling sculpture, and the power is then transferred to her. It's emotional and creepy and guaranteed is one of the most memorable (Canadian) music videos from the time.

—Natalie Vineberg

“Dance floor anthem”—Good Charlotte

I acutely remember sitting on the floor of my room covered in gel paints. I had an oversized neon yellow t-shirt spread out in front of me, and on it I had just finished writing every single word to the song “Dance floor anthem” by Good Charlotte. At 15, the angst and the despairing feelings of being single but wanting a boyfriend consumed me. “Dance floor anthem’s” gritty chords and speaking/singing lyrics fed precisely into the hungriest part of my soul. “If you’ve got nothing left / Say I don’t wanna be in love / I don’t wanna be in love,” the band swooned into my ears.

It was natural and easy to sing along with Joel Madden, as I dyed my hair with colored chalks to match other pop-punk kids. The song was relatable; any boy or girl who has felt like they were in love could be the ‘he’ or ‘she’ in the song. It’s catchy with that perfect 2010 dance-floor vibe, with the bridge leading into an optimistic end, “Now you know what to do / So come on, get up, girl.” A fusion between hellogoodbye’s “Here (In your arms)” and Green Day’s “American Idiot,” the song is satisfying, a little bit gritty, and the perfect combination for any 15 (and 22) year-old.

—Chloe Nevitt

Martlets, Men's Varsity, Sports

Track and field: Martlets finish 13th, Redmen 17th at CIS Championships

The McGill Martlets and Redmen track teams had a solid showing at the CIS Championships this past weekend at York University. Overall, the Martlets finished 13th of 21 teams overall, and the Redmen slotted in at 17.

The first day of the meet proved to be exciting for McGill as senior pentathlete Helena Reinfels clinched a silver medal with a score of 3686 points, finishing just behind Kaleigh Hole of the Western Mustangs.

“In all honesty it’s all still pretty surreal,” Reinfels said of her podium finish. “It’s only my second year doing the pentathlon, so I’m still learning a lot with every competition…last year I ended ninth at CIS. This year I’m second, and I definitely came up as a surprise for my competitors, which is pretty neat…it just leaves me extremely motivated.”

Reinfels, a geography major managed the highest podium finish by a Martlet at a CIS meet since 2005 while simultaneously breaking a McGill record for the pentathlon—a record Reinsfeld had already broken at the McGill Team Challenge in January, and previously held by Alana Battison. Reinfels also managed the best individual result of a Martlet track athlete since 2003. Currently, she holds the RSEQ record in the pentathlon.

“Breaking records is something that I find a very humbling experience,” Reinfels explained. “I know how much I’ve worked to get where I am [….] Alana [Battiston], the previous record holder, was actually my training partner last year and one of my close friends, so it makes it almost more special to me to be able to keep up her hard work and determination.”

McGill lay dormant the second day of the meet, tallying zero podium wins, but rallied for the last event on Sunday, the final day, in the men’s 4x400m relay. Ryan McLelland, Ethan Wilkinson, Vincent Parent-Pichette, and Javier Montalvo propelled McGill to a third place podium finish with a time of 3:17.45. Saskatchewan Huskies won gold in the event, and the Toronto Varsity Blues finished second.

Overall, the Windsor Lancers won the men’s CIS championship, while the Blues won the women's championship.

“At the end of this weekend, looking back, I think we have a lot to be proud of,” said Reinfels of the McGill track team’s overall performance. “Everyone was working really hard and gave it their best and that’s what matters. If you can walk off the track with an empty tank, that’s what counts.”

Stat of the meet:

0.19 of a second was the distance between the bronze medal winning Redmen and silver medal Varsity Blues, as Toronto just edged out McGill in the men’s 4×400 m held on Sunday. Saskatchewan decisively won the event by almost a full second.

Moment of the meet:

Reinfels’ McGill record breaking pentathlon performance on the first day of the meet gave McGill momentum heading into the rest of the weekend.

Quotable:

“I remember being at the CIS Championship back in my first year and watching the girls running the 300 meter and being in awe of what they were able to push themselves to do. I was so inspired […] and now, this year when I was getting into my blocks for the 300 meter final, I was just thinking ‘go out there and leave it all out on the track’ with a flashback to watching those girls four years prior, and realizing I had done it and had come in full circle…I certainly am not satisfied for the long term and don’t plan on hanging up my spikes for some time. I still have a few more goals to reach, but am more than proud and extremely happy with the way this season unfolded” – Reinfels on how her track career has come in a full circle from her first to senior year, allowing her to achieve her goals and continue to strive for more.

Basketball, Sports

NCAA March Madness 2016 preview

Michigan State Spartans

Head Coach Tom Izzo has put together arguably one of his best offensive teams. Led by Denzel Valentine, the most versatile player in college basketball and USA Today’s Player-of-the-Year, the Spartans have been able to overwhelm teams offensively while using their depth and talented young athletes to wear down teams on defence. During March Madness, good coaching, depth and clutch play are all essential factors. Fortunately for die-hard Spartans fans, the combination of Izzo, a deep rotation, and Valentine respectively meet all three of those requirements. The time is here for Izzo’s second championship. —Arman Bery

Kansas Jayhawks

Rock, chalk, Jayhawk. It might be the easy pick, but it’s the right one. This team is incredibly well-coached—Head Coach Bill Self has a veteran group that is both experienced and deep. In addition to the excellent depth, this team is lights out from beyond the arc. Often, when giants fall in March, they do so to teams that get hot from three point range; Kansas is shooting a mind-boggling 42.6 per cent from three and has six legitimate three-point shooting threats. Since losing three out of five in mid-January, the Jayhawks haven’t lost a game, and have become a lockdown defensive unit. This is the one team that has stood out in an otherwise up-and-down year for college basketball; in the end, their consistent well-rounded play will have them cutting down the nets in a few weeks’ time. —Mayaz Alam

Kentucky Wildcats

The winners of the SEC basketball tournament have the leadership, coaching, and chip on their shoulder to avenge last year’s elite eight exit and win the NCAA tournament. Point guard Tyler Ulis has been phenomenal this year and couples extremely well with Jamal Murray to give any opposition team the fits. Kentucky has also finished the season on a strong winning streak, and is in a good head space for the NCAA tournament. Offensively, Kentucky is the 10th best team in the nation in one of the toughest divisions. With John Calipari as coach and explosive, intelligent players, Kentucky have enough to win the tournament. Zikomo Smith 

North Carolina Tar Heels

The East’s No.1-seeded North Carolina Tar Heels enter the tournament on a five-game win streak and as the deserving holders of this year’s ACC regular season and tournament titles. UNC enjoys a plethora of scoring options at its disposal, with four players averaging over 12 points a game this season: Brice Johnson (16.6), Joel Berry (12.7), Marcus Paige (12.1), and Justin Jackson (12.1). Big men Kennedy Meeks and Isaiah Hicks will anchor the defence and dominate the boards on both sides of the court. Head Coach Roy Williams will be eager for an eighth career Final Four appearance and a third NCAA title in his 28-year career. The Tar Heels have all the necessary pieces for a title this year—at this point it’s just a matter of execution. Nick Jasinski

Click on the segments below each "Sweet Sixteen" team to see the Tribune's March Madness predictions. The colour of each round's victor will propagate down through the circle.

AUS McGill Lounge
News

AUS Council discusses controversial SSMU referenda

The Arts Internship Office (AIO) will receive $16,000 following the approval of the Arts Student Employment Fund (ASEF) at the Arts Undergraduate Society (AUS) Legislative Council meeting on March 9. The meeting also saw controversy over the upcoming Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) referendum period.

The meeting began with a presentation from the "No" committee for SSMU's Motion Regarding Constitutional Amendments. The amendments, which will be voted on in a referendum next week by the student body,  would require a steering committee to determine whether proposed motions are external or divisive, and decide whether the issue may be  included in the GA agenda accordingly.

Julie Skarha, internal commissioner for AUS Environmental Council spoke  on behalf of the "No" committee about the nature of the committee created by the motion.

"It's important to know that the Steering Committee is not elected,” she said. “It is a very small group of people who are ultimately making a large decision about what is considered divisive […] and there’s no set criteria for this in the motion [….] We do not believe that this is a democratic process at all. SSMU already has a very restrictive process in order to get a motion on the agenda.”

Skarha also explained that the motion does not mention an appeals process, and that the student body had no input on the motion.

"There was no mention of an appeals process for this amendment,” Skarha said. “It would be a permanent change. No consultation was done with the student body for this. That's a big thing.”

The Constitutional Amendment comes after a motion supporting Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS) against Israel that was recently approved at the Winter GA, but later failed in online ratification. Arguments against these amendments were met with criticism by the Vice-President (VP) External of the McGill Anthropology Students' Association, Itai Gibli, who claimed that the steering committee would be able to prevent harmfully divisive motions from continually resurfacing, despite past failures.

"[The Constitutional Amendment] is not about stopping the student democratic voice,” said Gibli. “[A motion like BDS] turns the whole student body upside down for two weeks. This is what it's trying to minimise."

Also representing the "No" committee, VP External of First-Year Events, Academic, and Representative Council (FEARC) Erik Partridge, expressed concerns about the requirement of a two-thirds majority vote at the GA to overturn the steering committee’s decision, and subsequently, a two-thirds majority for the motion itself to be passed.

“I think that this motion was brought forward with good intentions,” Partridge said. “It’s important to have [a debate] and for everyone’s voice to be  heard. We just want to make sure that democracy can run its course.”

Following this discussion,  a motion was passed approving the allocation of the ASEF, which is collected every year from professors' undesignated funds, and this year totalled $40,000 according to AUS VP Academic Gabriel Gilling.

“We allocated money based on clarity of the applications and also the perceived impact that they would have on students,” said Gilling.

The largest sum of money, a total of $16,000, was allocated to the AIO for the Arts Undergraduate Research Internship Award (ARIA). ARIA supports students who work with professors in research positions during the summer, and is also partially funded by professors, according to Gilling.

“Every dollar that we allocate to ARIA is matched by the professors, so the $16,000 that we’ve allocated [is] in fact representative of $32,000 so that’s a tremendous service that we’re giving to students,” said Gilling. “Effectively we can say that the $16,000 is actually hiring 16 students.”

A motion regarding a 10.4 per cent increase in the fee for McGill's Panama Field Study Semester (PFSS) Program was also approved. According to AUS President Jacob Greenspon, this was because of the weak Canadian dollar. AUS VP Academic Gabriel Gilling asked whether this fee would be adjusted to its previous level if the Canadian dollar's value were to rise in the future, to which Greenspon responded.

“We only approve the specific changes so I guess they can keep this up as high for future years,” Greenspon said. “But if they reduce the fee, they don’t have to ask for our approval.”

SSMU General Assembly
a, Off the Board, Opinion

State of the SSMUnion: The fate of the General Assembly

The Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) held its annual Winter General Assembly (GA) on Feb. 22, hosting roughly 900 students within the SSMU Building for a six-hour debate over multiple different issues. The GA was a dramatically different showing than the Fall 2015 GA, which, due to a lack of controversial agenda items, failed to reach quorum. This prompted SSMU President Kareem Ibrahim to make a simple and effective argument: Dismantle the bi-annual GA system, and replace it with one annual general meeting.

Over the past few years, the GA has faced wavering student interest due to lack of consistency in the controversy of the motions and, in some cases, poor promotion on behalf of SSMU. The variation in student attendance just in the past three years is striking: The Fall 2013 GA reached a maximum attendance of 50 students, while the Winter 2014 GA maintained quorum through all but one motion. The next two GAs saw an attendance of 739 and 550 students respectively, far surpassing the number of students required to meet quorum due to the contentious nature of the motions brought forward, both regarding the situation in Palestine. The inability of this meeting to fulfill its democratic purpose unless emotional and personal controversies are brought forward illustrates its ineffective nature at actually addressing needs relevant to students’ day-to-day lives.

 

 

Were there to be a sudden and extreme pique in interest, SSMU, who is mandated to allow all students to vote, would be unable to provide space for the entire student body. As multiple students would be unable to voice their opinions on the issues at hand, the system is potentially undemocratic.

 

SSMU Vice-President (VP) Finance & Operations Zacheriah Houston noted how, in addition to inconsistent attendance rates, figuring out where to host the GA every semester presents its own challenges.

“Last year [the SSMU executives] tried [to hold the GA in SSMU] and it was horrible, so they moved it to Leacock,” Houston said. “In my opinion, the one we just did was better than the previous two [….] logistically it was much better [….] In terms of the GA as a whole though, just the way that it works and the fact that we can’t get a reasonable turn-out unless we put a Palestine-Israel motion on the agenda, there’s a lot of improvement to be had there.”

Ibrahim echoed Houston’s comments, adding that he isn’t the first President to wonder about the usefulness of the GA and its failure to engage students unless a divisive issue is present.

“There’s been lots of discussion regarding the abolition of the [GA] in past years,” Ibrahim said. “I think that’s largely due to the size of the student body and how they can’t fit in this building. According to the [SSMU] porters, who have been here for 30 years, [the Feb. 22] GA was the biggest that they’ve seen [… but] the issue of BDS has been on this campus for decades.”

Ibrahim’s comments highlight another key issue with the current form of the GA: The SSMU Building is only equipped to fit around 1,000 students, nowhere near the size of the student body represented by SSMU. Were there to be a sudden and extreme pique in interest, SSMU, who is mandated to allow all students to vote, would be unable to provide space for the entire student body. As multiple students would be unable to voice their opinions on the issues at hand, the system is potentially undemocratic.

The structure of the GA has been flawed for a long time, prompting SSMU to host a forum in 2011 to discuss how to change the GA in order to make it more appealing to students. The same year, former SSMU President Zach Newburgh put forth a referendum question that would abolish the GA and instead replace it with an annual general meeting where issues would be debated but not voted upon. The issues debated would be voted on via online ratification, which was instituted earlier that same year. That debate took place a year after the McGill Tribune’s editorial board also called for an outright abolition of the GA, claiming that it had “become more damaging than productive, and [failed] to serve its purpose.” Reforms, such as mandating all motions passed in the GA have to pass online ratification, improving the webcasting of the GA, and introducing workshops to explain how the GA works, are, however, meaningless when it comes to substantive reform of the GA for an extended period of time.

Student consultation is a first necessary step to reforming the GA, but the fact is that feedback will likely be limited and meaningless if it is gathered during a time when no controversial motions are brought up, and students memories of past GA failings are dim. SSMU should proceed with its plans of restricting the institution of a GA if no motions are brought forth as a first step; however, the ultimate goal should involve introducing an annual general meeting with a dramatically decreased quorum in order to pass the necessary bureaucratic motions, and leave it up to students to call for a GA if they feel it’s necessary, similar to the way Special GAs can be instituted today. The result of this could be that student apathy continues, and GAs as we know them cease to exist; however, if interest groups find that they are not willing to put in the work necessary to call forth a GA, then the fault is theirs, and SSMU no longer has to waste its time on motions that lack student interest.

 

 

Morgan Alexander is a managing editor at the McGill Tribune. She is very passionate about being passionate about sloths.

 

 

 

 

 
a, Art, Arts & Entertainment

Design in the university context: The ethical implications of McGill’s iconography

The world is saturated with imagery that dictates ideologies. Brand loyalty cultivated by familiar icons affects cultural, political, and individual identity. 

“There’s a reason that Coca Cola has barely changed its logo in 120 years,” Christopher Moore, professor of Design and Computation Arts at Concordia University said. “It gives a sense of establishment, and establishment can lead to trust and familiarity.”  

For good or for bad, over hundreds of years these organizations have built up a lexicon of associations to particular shapes and colours that now influence how we act as a society. Maybe your family has voted conservative in every election for 100 years, or maybe you wouldn’t dream of using a Canon camera over a Nikon. These preferences, although sometimes arbitrary, are a result of many years and hundreds of thousands of dollars put into creating brand loyalty. Graphic designers are essential in creating this relationship. 

“We tend to have lifelong associations with brands based on how we were raised and the kind of products that our family would purchase,” Moore explained. “The designer has to interpret [an organization’s] ideas into something concrete.”

This task becomes quite complex, as the graphic designer’s toolbox (line, color, shape, contrast, etc.) is inherently influenced by power structures that have been evolving and compounding over hundreds, and even thousands, of years. 

As a type of visual language, graphic design at its core comes from a human understanding of what linguist Ferdinand de Saussure called the signifier (the shape of a word, order of letters, and phonetic sound) and the signified (the concept or object associated with the signifier). The signifier-signified relationship has evolved via historical events and social movements, especially in the visual context. For example, colonialism has had a major influence on our perception of particular visual signifiers. 

The perception of color is inherent to the colonial experience according to Sajdeep Soomal a graphic designer who has worked with the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) and McGill Athletics. 

“[Colonialism has] produced this relationship and particular understanding of color, to the terms civilized and primitive.” Soomal said. “It assigned those dichotomies. So that’s what we have to play with when we’re producing graphic design here in this space.” 

 “I need to use the ‘McGill red,’ there’s no getting around that,” Soomal said of his work for McGill Athletics. “And in this localized context that signifies a particular politics.” 

Political, religious, and First Nations associations are all important factors to consider in analyzing what McGill is representing through their use of the colour red. It may be that McGill doesn’t intend to represent any of these factors, but nevertheless, they play into McGill’s image. 

“All of the visual language we have is already inebriated with value,” Soomal explained. “And that value exists along, and has been produced through, axes of power.”

With all these implications involved in visual design, a graphic designer has the hard task of reconciling social and professional responsibility. Sometimes, it’s impossible to avoid doing work for clients whose message you don’t necessarily agree with. Liz Sulmont, a freelance graphic designer who has worked with Campus Life & Engagement, SSMU, and other campus organizations, said that she at first didn’t totally grasp the impact her work would have. 

“I realized when I grew more as a designer, that the work you create for your clients is essentially bringing their ideas to life,” Sulmont said. “That means you have to acknowledge some responsibility for the consequences of those ideas. It’s definitely a tricky situation because your job is on the line and the mixture of personal issues and work is always uncomfortable.” 

Soomal echoed these concerns, citing the lack of job security in his field. 

“The jobs are precarious enough that they can easily be replaced,” he said, “it’s more of a matter of just producing what you’re asked to produce, and negotiating over smaller things.” 

Graphic design can be a tool for both good and evil, and in both cases can have tremendous impact. Social movements can garner loyalty with branding just as much as corporations can. 

“All graphic design is inherently social and political,” Soomal said. “It’s a social technology, a means of communication, which means it’s inevitably implicated in power relations.” 

In activism, graphic design can be manipulated in powerful ways to challenge power relations. 

“It becomes a rallying point, something that’s identifiable,” Moore elaborated. “It demonstrates your values, your beliefs. It’s a way of creating tribes around certain ideals and ideologies, for better or for worse.”

Locally, 2012’s Maple Spring protests could be identified by the striking graphic design done by a group formed at UQAM called the École de la Montagne Rouge. Their red square symbol and dynamic posters made the movement identifiable and unified. A global example is the pink triangle, which was reclaimed in the 1980s from its original usage by the Nazis as a way to identify homosexual men and women, and reformatted into an icon for the gay rights movement. While the end result is deceptively simple, the development of activist graphics is thorough and carefully crafted. In his work for F*ck Austerity, Soomal chose each colour very carefully. 

“The use of yellow and red there was to signify solidarity between diverse coalition groups, like radical coalition groups,” Soomal said. “I tried to invoke these two colors in the context of radical activism.” 

Every organization, be it a business, movement, or school, creates a visual identity to communicate and represent unique values and history. Universities often use a crest or similar logo to create this identity. The aesthetic construction of that image is key in the formation of a relationship between the consumer and the organization. McGill’s crest, adopted in 1821, sports three red martlets, a mythical bird with no legs that is always shown in flight. At the top is an open book inscribed with the words “In Domino Confido,” or “I trust in the Lord,” the motto of founder James McGill. Two crowns topped with fleur-de-lis flank the open book- a reminder of Montreal’s French origins. Finally, the three peaks represent Montreal’s three mountains. The crest has formal meanings attached to it, and of course, the religious and colonial connotations are present, but it’s more relevant to note that the use of the crest signifies a school grounded in tradition. 

“[McGill’s modern word mark] reflects a way of trying to link the traditions of the institutions but modernize and demonstrate the relevance to today’s world,” Moore commented. This is something that he noted a lot of newer schools, such as Concordia, are trying to do. 

Graphic design is a vital component in considering the legacy and impact of an institution. A few shapes and lines must be relevant, impactful, sensitive, and distinct. The graphic designer’s livelihood is based on the knowledge of and the ability to manipulate these tools. But the consumer’s familiarity is equally important; it holds institutions accountable for their public image. Moore and Soomal agreed that too few graphic designers as well as consumers are trained in this context of critical thinking, which was why Soomal reached out to Moore to help start Design Cooperative. The Cooperative holds free workshops on design techniques, Photoshop, and Illustrator, while discussing the social and political implications of design. 

“As a designer, it becomes your task to reimagine whatever you’re trying to represent and create possibilities,”  Soomal said,  “that way, you can build a future that you want to live in.” 

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue