Latest News

a, McGill, News

Quebec finance minister holds pre-budgetary town hall at McGill

Quebec Finance Minister Carlos Leitão,  participated in a town hall meeting on the upcoming provincial budget revision at the Desautels Faculty of Management on Monday, Feb. 15, fielding questions from both students and professors on public finance, environmental economic policy, and Quebec’s changing tax structure.

The town hall addressed three topics: Public finance, economy and environment, and financing innovation and education.  Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Vice-President (VP) External, Emily Boytinck, brought forward her concerns over austerity and its disproportionate effects on university students, notably students who experience learning challenges.

“Throughout these cuts, the students who are most affected are consistently the ones who are already marginalized by society […] whether it be children with learning disabilities, or students with mental health issues in university,” Boytinck said.  “It's across the board the same sort of thing.”  

Leitão refrained from referring to budgetary restrictions as austerity, but stated that education will be a financial priority—however, he placed the responsibility of education funding outside his purview, and on the Education and Family Ministers.  

“We have a period, yes, of a very tight budget,” Leitão said. “As I said before, we need to make sure that our operating budgets can be financed [….] Going forward, we do have the necessity to make sure [we] spend a little more in education and in health.  We believe that […] spending in education will be considerably stronger than it was last year.”

Mark Michaud, senior planning analyst at McGill, questioned how the government will ensure stability within the budget at the provincial level, and how this could affect preparations for McGill's own budget and strategic goals for the future.

"As somebody who works in planning […] a certain amount of predictability is always appreciated,” Michaud said. “I know you mentioned […] there’s always uncertainty, but […] what can the government do to help us in our responsible long-term planning […] and [in] helping us pass that predictability to the families, and the students who have to pay to study here?"

The solution, according to Leitão, lies in first balancing revenues and expenditures in Quebec's operating budget.   

"In my opinion, it is so important for us […] to have a balanced budget," Leitão said. "It's not some sort of ideological obsession [….] In order to make sure that we're sending that message, that we now have a predictable and stable framework, it is crucial."

Leitão cited a recent fiscal commission investigating the structure of taxation in Quebec, which indicated that personal and corporate income taxes were the main contribution to budget revenues, and offered recommendations to decrease reliance on these taxes.   

“A third or so of the recommendations of the commission were already put into place,” he said.  “We already made some significant adjustments […] regarding tax credits and other corporate taxes, but not so much on the personal side.”

McGill Economics Professor Christopher Ragan, echoed Leitão’s concern over Quebec’s current income tax burden.

“You are a well-trained McGill economist, so you know […] the economic damage that can be caused by high rates of taxation,” Ragan said. “In particular, [of] personal income taxation and corporate income taxation [….] You also know that there are both environmental and economic benefits that come from putting a price on pollution.”

Leitão pointed to the efficacy of Quebec’s current system of pricing carbon, and its potential for generating revenue for the future.

“Something we already have in place is a cap-and-trade system,” he said. “It exists and works reasonably well [….It] generates revenue for the government […] which has generated over a billion dollars.”

a, Album Reviews, Arts & Entertainment

Album Review: EVOL – Future

A question that might come to mind when analyzing trap music is whether the lyrical content is in fact an accurate representation of the rapper's selves and their views. With this question in mind, what can one make of Future? As his life fell apart in recent years, his music has receded further and further away from human decency, with fugue-like beats and gruesome lyrics depicting himself as drugged out, violent, almost criminal. But as his music tumbled deeper into the abyss, the acclaim and success he found skyrocketed. Future's character is both enthralling and disturbing: The content of his drawling verses will shock you—if you manage to pay attention. He is the super-villain incumbent of trap: Dark, brooding, and dangerous. 

In 2015, Future managed to put out a universally acclaimed album (DS2), catch the interest of pop-star/Internet-meme Drake, release a mixtape with him, sell over 300,000 units of said mixtape in its first week, and somehow bring Kanye West—an artist known for influencing others—to scrape up a track (“FACTS”) that was clearly inspired by Future’s sound. He had a spectacular year, and it’s clear how good he feels about that on EVOL. The concerning lines are still around (“I wanna fuck the DA lady in her mouth, though”), the beats are still drone-heavy, but here Future moves past his lean-infused sound to something much more triumphant: On EVOL, he becomes a real super-villain.

Tracks like “Maybach” display Future mixing classic braggadocio with his corrupted, drug-abusing persona. Desperate grasps for more confidence, like “I get better and better with time, don’t I?” sound natural. “Lil Haiti Baby” expands on this, putting Future on a beat Lil Wayne could’ve rapped over on Tha Carter IV. Booming bass underscores Future’s raspy boasts, before the song collapses into a darker, familiar tale of violence and addiction. “Xanny Family,” with stripped down beats and surprisingly clear vocals, is a sobering break between the two, almost reminding the listener that the rapper Future is an actual person, and he might be suffering—the title of the album is LOVE spelt backwards. There are more than a few moments within songs where that thought wanders to the forefront, before retreating back into the darkness.

As the second half of the album descends into more generic tracks, including “Lie to Me,” a strange almost-love-ballad, and a weaker rehash of better songs from previous albums, like “Jersey” or “Jumpman,” with “Program,” Future grows more removed from our world. The Weeknd provides the only feature on the album, and practically blends into the overall flow out of Future’s mind, since he is essentially his R&B counterpart. The lingering introspection of “Fly Shit Only” rounds out the album, and it’s unfamiliar, striking production leaves the listener confused and wondering who exactly the real Future is. EVOL is entertaining, disturbing, and enthralling at times, but the true emotions, beliefs, and motivations of its protagonist remain a mystery.

Sounds like:

Future, but louder than usual.

Standout Track:

“Xanny Family”

Best lyric:

I did what I had to do, I ran in that bitch I didn't have a mask / I did what I should have did, survive through the trenches and look like a man

Ingrid Bergman: In Her Own Words
a, Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

Ingrid Bergman: A captivating look into the life of one of Hollywood’s greatest stars

Ingrid Bergman: In Her Own Words, a documentary directed by Stig Björkman, honours the life and art of actress Ingrid Bergman. The film offers an inside look into the life of the Swedish actress who embodied the Golden Age of Hollywood and starred in iconic films worldwide, including Casablanca (1942) and Notorious (1946). Not only does the film pay homage to Bergman’s success as an actress, but it provides an intimate look into her family life and three marriages to doctor Petter Lindström, director Roberto Rossellini, and producer Lars Schmidt. In essence, Ingrid Bergman: In Her Own Words is a touching tribute to a woman who followed her destiny to create the life of her dreams.

The film paints a lovely portrait of Bergman, an independent woman who followed her heart from Stockholm to Hollywood, then to Italy, France, and England. The piece provides a glimpse into the many lives she led, not just on stage but in life, centering on her most important role: A mother to her four children. The film utilizes rare video footage and interviews with her children that highlight the significant role she had in shaping their lives. Despite a nontraditional upbringing, their reverence for their mother is unmistakable, which is emphasized throughout the film.

The primary focus of the film is given to the life Bergman led, both on and off screen. It is essentially her own story told through a collage of diary entries, home movies, letters, and personal photographs woven together by her life experiences. Alicia Vikander narrates the film and gives a voice to Bergman’s diary entries in their original form by voicing over photographs that correspond to Bergman’s diary entries. The score by Michael Nyman provides a beautiful backdrop to the scenes and photographs.

Bergman’s story began in Stockholm, Sweden, as an aspiring actress. The film brings to light Bergman’s relationship with her father, a photographer who influenced her passion for film and photography. After the untimely death of her parents, Bergman went to live with her aunt and studied acting at the Royal Dramatic Theatre School. Bergman’s talent for acting was immediately evident and following great success in Swedish cinema, she relocated to Hollywood, leaving behind her first husband Petter and young daughter, Pia, who later came to live with her in New York and Los Angeles.

The narrative of the film is presented through archival footage, clips from Ingrid Bergman’s time in Hollywood and on stage in Paris, which includes her speech receiving her first Academy Award for Best Actress in Gaslight (1943). The film includes interviews with her children Pia Lindstrom, Ingrid, Isabella and Renato Rossellini, as well as close friends and family members. The interviews add a personal touch to the film, and the documentary looks at Bergman’s life through a nostalgic lens, rather than in a critical manner. Essentially celebrating Bergman, the documentary juxtaposes moments from Bergman's life shifting from Hollywood to her family life. A deeper theme expressed in the documentary is the impact Bergman had on her children, and the documentary is told through their eyes.

Bergman’s diary entries express her conflicting roles as mother, wife and actress. They recount her attained fantasy of living in Hollywood working as an actress combined with her insatiable thirst for adventure; however, life was not always a fairytale for Bergman. After falling in love with Rossellini, who was then married, she was shunned from Hollywood for committing adultery. The film shows how the Rossellini family navigated the scandal surrounding the marriage, and the life she led in Italy. During this period, Bergman mainly starred in Italian films, as well as in theatre productions in Paris, starring in a vast array of roles including playing the lead in Joan of Arc (1948).

Bergman was an avid photographer and filmed her travels with her husband and, her family life, focussing on her children.The camera was a powerful tool for Bergman as it allowed her to document her life experiences. Photography was not only a creative outlet, but it allowed her to carry her memories with her throughout her travels and time abroad. In this manner, the film provides a first-hand look into Bergman’s adventurous spirit and her commitment to preserving her memories.

Ingrid Bergman: In Her Own Words is a testament to Bergman’s accomplishments, artistry, and enthusiasm for life that touched all those who met her. Bergman’s enduring charm was one of her defining characteristics, which is ever-present in her films and photographs.

a, Opinion

Race Project attendance should be encouraged, not coerced

The implementation of Race Project, an extension of Rez Project that seeks to encourage discussion of race and colonialism in university residence, had a rocky start this semester as attendance was not as high as facilitators had hoped. In a recent article for the McGill Daily, floor fellows and facilitators were quoted as suggesting that attendance be incorporated into students’ lease agreements. This raises the question of whether forced attendance will positively encourage more students to discuss issues of racism and diversity at McGill. Widening the range of attendance has been a stipulated concern for facilitators, but such a measure would be an example of treating the symptom, not the cause of students not attending the workshop. In fact, student enthusiasm is often more stunted in these workshops by the format of the discussions than by whether the attendance system is lenient or not. If first year students are reluctant to take part in the first place, then compelling them by fear of penalty is not a positive remedy. To put it simply, forcing attendance for students that feel uncomfortable in these settings is counter-productive, especially for a project that seeks to create a more inclusive environment in residences.

Race Project is a necessary initiative at McGill that stresses the need for more open discussions on diversity. For students, racial and cultural uniformity among professors creates a narrowed exposure to different points of view. There is also a lack of diversity in the student body; at the moment, there are less than 200 Aboriginal students at McGill. In an establishment that should, in fact, educate people on the nuances of human cultures and perspectives, this is a worrying fact. Minority cultures on campus are drowned out by a curriculum put forth only by white professors and as a result, minorities become more and more isolated. If minority viewpoints are neglected in academics, then students are not prompted to recognize their value in everyday life. In this context, Race Project represents an essential site for students to express themselves on issues of racism on campus. But for this process to work, it is essential that they feel included and safe in the discussion; to this end, making it a legal obligation would be counterintuitive.

In a domain as introspective as race and identity, students should retain their right to decide to participate or not. Some subjects can be very difficult to broach and the exchanges that ensue might also be triggering. For some, this may be a window of opportunity—an outlet for minority culture where frustrations are expressed and assistance sought. For others, it is just another occasion in which they are spotlighted or, worse, pitied. Consequently, In order for the atmosphere in Race Project workshops to be propitious to a devoted discussion, the platform should be more open and comprise students who participate willingly.

Rather than making attendance mandatory in lease agreements, organizers should take more steps to improve the availability and accessibility of the workshops themselves. The program is, after all, in its infancy—now would be the ideal time to consider smaller steps to improve attendance before leaping to a more drastic measure. For instance, workshops could be held multiple times throughout the year. There is potential for one to take place in the Fall semester and another in the Winter semester; this would to help to create a sense of continuity and provide an opportunity for reflection. Talking about these issues once does not etch them into students’ memories. But taking steps to create a conversation will. As a result, the entire initiative could be made less formal and subtly introduced into rez life in a variety of manners. Floor fellows, who are already in collaboration with Race Project, could also be instructed to stir similar conversations during ‘Floor Tea,’ for example.

The need for Race Project is undeniable—it was developed as a result of student demand. But in ensuring that the project fulfills its purpose and lays the foundation for students to be critical and self-reflective members of the McGill community, it must grant students the choice of whether or not to partake.

a, Opinion

Whine and cheese

There is no denying that access to professors is the foundation of a successful university experience: They offer advice, answer questions, and provide students with the resources they need to reach their goals, such as letters of reference and research opportunities. For the average undergraduate, however, there are only so many ways to get to know a professor. Going to class is an oft-overlooked but effective method, as is attending office hours. Though professors are, with few exceptions, genuinely interested in their students, class sizes are often too large and office hours too few. It is not always easy to get an instructor to remember your name, let alone develop a fruitful connection with them. The departmental student organisations’ preferred modus operandi when it comes to tackling this issue is, of course, the ‘wine and cheese.’

The Computer Science Undergraduate Society (CSUS) recently hosted a wine and cheese,attended by both students and professors in the department. The frequency with which these types of events occur—one could easily get tipsy with the faculty of a department every week—reflects the necessity for McGill students to take the initiative when it comes to establishing fruitful contact with professors: Facilitation is beneficial only so long as students are willing to take the first step.

There is much to be said in their favour. Apart from the free wine and delicious cheese—both of which are highly effective social lubricants—they offer students the chance to have a real conversation with their professors, who, it must be said, enjoy talking about their research as much as, if not more than, the research process itself. Moreover, such events have the advantage of being held in more informal settings, away from the academic focus of class and office hours. This has a certain humanising effect on otherwise intimidating figures, and it obviates the (perceived) need for pre-prepared discussion points that constitutes many a student’s excuse for not attending office hours.

Yet informality is not always a positive thing. A recent gathering hosted by the Chemistry Undergraduate Students’ Society (CUSS) and advertised via Facebook featured a warning to students, telling them not to get too drunk. The potential for rowdiness poses a risk to newly developed and fragile student-professor relationships, especially for those who might not be used to drinking. The prospect of attending class after imbibing a bit too much in a professor’s presence is not only unappealing—it is downright terrifying.

Moreover, as these events are student-organised and hosted, the department’s star scholars are under no obligation to attend. This can result in get-togethers that are more reminiscent of awkward family functions than networking events. Even when such a scenario is avoided, the competition for a professor’s attention is fierce, highlighting the wider issue of the increasing student-to-professor ratio at McGill.

The departmental student societies’ insistence on wine and cheese socials derives from an undeniable need to create opportunities for students to meet their department’s faculty. An undergraduate at McGill is one among many. Students must therefore fend for themselves and make full use of the resources at their disposal. This of course means attending wine and cheese events, but it also entails making the effort to knock on a professor’s door.

a, Hockey, Martlets, Sports

Hockey: Martlets eke past Gee Gees in shootout, clinch home ice advantage

The RSEQ second-place ranked McGill Martlets (12-5-2) edged out the third place Ottawa GeeGees (10-6-2) in an exciting shootout win on Sunday afternoon at McConnell Arena. Entering the game, the Martlet’s playoff matchup against Ottawa was already set, the only question was of who would host the series. With Sunday’s win, McGill clinched second place and home-ice advantage.

The Martlets had a rocky start to the game. Rookie forward Nicole Howlett took an early double minor penalty for a check to the head and, though the Martlets successfully killed it off, they spent much of the first period playing in their own zone. Ottawa’s strong forecheck meant that the hosts had trouble executing passes in the defensive zone and breaking the puck out.

Marimee Godbout-Parent scored the Gee Gees’ only goal of the game midway through the first period after tired Martlet players were stuck on the rink after an icing call.

The Martlets started out the second period in a hole. Already down one goal, they had to kill off a 5-on-3 for 92 seconds just two minutes into the period against the best power play in CIS hockey. The penalty kill was up to the challenge, though. The penalty killers were effective at limiting chances all afternoon and goaltender Taylor Hough stopped the few chances Ottawa did get.

McGill turned things around after that challenge and dominated much of the play for the rest of the game, outshooting Ottawa, 43-25.

“I didn't think we were great in the first period,” Head Coach Peter Smith said. “I thought we had a terrific second period. Give Ottawa a little credit, they pushed back hard in the third and I thought, overall, for 40 minutes, I liked our game.”

After killing off the early 5-on-3, the Martlets’ offence took over. They were great at breaking out of their zone and transitioning the puck up quickly through the neutral zone. Their forecheckers were quick on the puck, making it difficult for the Ottawa defence to clear the zone.

McGill’s first powerplay unit generated multiple scoring chances in the second period but couldn’t even the score until senior forward Gabrielle Davidson tied the game up for the Martlets at 12:54 in the period.

The Martlets had a bevy of great scoring chances after Davidson’s goal but failed to pull ahead due to the stellar play of  Ottawa’s goaltender, Sarah-Maude Labrecque. She stood on her head for 65 minutes and was able to send the game to a shootout. Labrecque had some help from the post, too. Davidson nearly put the puck in on the 4-on-3 advantage in overtime but hit the crossbar.

The goalies were the story in the shootout, too. Tied 1-1 after three shooters, the contest ended up going seven rounds before the game could be decided. senior centre Melodie Daoust, who looked dangerous the entire game, shot twice and scored both times. She was the only McGill shooter to score.

McGill plays Concordia on Feb. 19 in McConnell Arena for their final game of the regular season.

Quotable

“I thought [our penalty kill (PK) ] was real good, I thought we were real well prepared for it. We've struggled a little bit–pucks have been going in on us on the PK and I thought we did a real good job today. We spent quite a bit of time preparing for it.” —Smith on the penalty kill, which did not allow a goal.

Play of the game

Davidson scored McGill’s only goal of the game on a 3-on-1 rush midway through the second period. The play featured some great passing between Davidson and Daoust before it ended up in the back of the net.

Stat corner

3-2, McGill’s record against Ottawa this season, is  important because McGill and Ottawa could end up tied in the standings at the end of the regular season. Winning the season series means winning the tiebreaker and clinching home ice advantage.

#Oscarssowhite
a, Arts & Entertainment, Cult Mentality, Film and TV, Podcasts

Cult Mentality EP. 1: Tackling the #oscarssowhite debate

[audiotrack title=”Cult Mentality EP. 1: Tackling the #oscarssowhite debate” songwriter=”April Barrett, Selin Altuntur, and Tanveer Ahmed” date=”February 16, 2015″ width=”700″ height=”200″ src=”https://24f2041bb5b609d25f1a97039f71682cc9154421.googledrive.com/host/0B9rQxTeDv2duM0FmSjBSYkZFS1k/Oscars%20Podcast%20%28Final%29.mp3″ autoplay=”on”]

This week’s Cult Mentality podcast centres on the #oscarssowhite debate. The debate arose in response to the Academy Awards’ snub of actors and filmmakers of colour year after year. The hashtag aims to highlight the inequity of Oscar nominations, as well as promote viewers to boycott this year’s Academy Awards along with prominent black celebrities, like Jada Pinkett-Smith and Spike Lee.

The work of people of colour has been largely ignored and under-appreciated in Hollywood and that is due to an ongoing systemic racism in the film industry. But this conversation is concerned specifically with the actual act of boycotting. Is boycotting the Oscars, as a viewer, a productive way to make a change in the industry? Or does it totally miss the problem at the heart of all this?

Arts and Entertainment contributors Tanveer Ahmed and Selin Altuntur, sat down with editor April Barrett to discuss both sides of the debate.

a, Martlets, Sports

Volleyball: McGill outplays pesky UQAM on Senior Night

The McGill Martlet (15-7) volleyball program has never won an RSEQ championship. This year’s team is determined to make history and took a step further to reaching that goal on Senior Night, beating the last-placed UQAM Citadins (5-16) in three sets to one (25-17,  24-26, 25-21, 25-17).

The Citadins, who just completed their first season in program history, were resilient in all four sets—they clawed their way back from a deficit in the second period before winning 26-24 and were within striking distance of the Martlets; however, with the win McGill secured home court advantage in the RSEQ playoffs where they will face off against the Sherbrooke Vert et Or (15-7), with whom they are currently tied for second place in the RSEQ standings. Martlet Head Coach Rachele Beliveau highlighted her team’s character and execution as the keys to success in the victory.

“I think […] we played a pretty good game,” Beliveau said. “The execution [was good], except at the end of the second set where we made some mistakes that I think we shouldn’t really be doing [….] The good thing is we were able to come back and then we came back in the third set from 11-17 to […] win the set. It shows character [….] We have done it a few times this year and we were able to come back and equalize the game and get the win.”

The two teams were fairly even through the first set until senior power hitter Catherine Amyot captured momentum with four straight aces. She also had five kills in the first set, showcasing an array of moves to put points on the board. Amyot was sensational, finished with 22 kills on the night, a game-high.

[metaslider id=43374]

Senior setter Dawoodjee, who was honoured after the game for a decorated five-year career, spread the ball effectively to her teammates throughout the game and exhibited poise throughout. Sophomore power hitter Emilie Matte de Grasse also had a standout performance on the night, notching 12 kills. Moving forward, the Martlets will continue to rely on both Dawoodjee and Matte de Grasse as well as the steady presence of middle hitter Myriam Robitaille, who finished with 11 kills and three blocks.

Although the Martlets have never won the RSEQ championship, they won a bronze medal in 2012 at the CIS National Championships. They’ll be looking to return to the national level starting next Friday, Feb. 19 in their semifinal against the Vert et Or. The two teams will face off in a best-of-three game series. It will be a challenge for the Martlets to make history but Beliveau is confident that her squad is up for the task.

“If we win the semifinals this week, we will go to Nationals,” Beliveau said. “Our goal is really focusing this week on playing Sherbrooke. If we attack well and can have a good variation in the offence we should be able to get through.”

Moment of the game

Dawoodjee found Amyot who promptly spiked a dagger straight into the ground, icing the game for match point.

Stat corner

The Martlets were active on their feet, tallying 75 digs, 49 more than the Citadins.

Quotable

“[Dawoodjee] improved a lot [over her McGill career]. In the first season she was only 18 years old […] and coming into our league […] everybody is two years older from the beginning and when you come at only 18 years old in it’s a big game. She has good physical qualities, and we started to work and work and work. When she stepped on the court three years ago, from that moment [on] she only improved from one year to the other.  We did some individual [work], she prepared well in the summer,  […] so it was just give her ball so she can learn. And she has improved every single year.” – Beliveau on Dawoodjee’s career.

a, Football, Sports

Blast from the Past: The evolution of football

Every sport has a rubicon to cross, a dividing line between infancy and legitimacy. A concoction of traditions, house rules, and conventions huddle together and break apart across time, forming and reforming to become an entity that doesn’t look anything like its predecessors, but has elements of all of them. For football, that moment came on a crisp November day in New Haven, Connecticut, 140 years before Super Bowl 50

Though it is now the most widely-followed American sport, football was invented in Canada. First known as “mob football” where peasants would try to transport a ball from one location to another by any means necessary short of murder. The teams’ sizes were elastic, there were no designated playing fields to speak of, nor any written rules for that matter. Settlement in the United States gradually brought the game from the streets of England to America’s elite universities where schools like Princeton, Yale, and Harvard would play semi-organized matches that resembled modern soccer more than anything. Generally, two teams of 25 players on a field would try to kick a ball (they couldn’t touch the ball, but they were encouraged to physically attack their opponents any way they could) into the other team’s goal. These games became so violent that football was banned at the collegiate level for a few years. 

Meanwhile, the game became popular at McGill University in the form of rugby, different from American football in that the ball was oblong instead of round, and players could carry it instead of just kick it. Players could also score ‘tries’ by moving the ball past the other team’s end of the field, a way of scoring that evolved into what we now know as a touchdown. The American and Canadian worlds eventually collided in a May, 1875 two-game series between McGill and Harvard, where one game was played with Harvard’s rules and the other one with McGill’s. 

Harvard liked McGill’s rules so much that they advocated for their use in the November, 1875 game against Yale. Yale countered with its own set of rules and—in perhaps the most important compromise in sports history—the universities sat down and negotiated for a combination of the two playing styles (though mostly favouring McGill’s rugby style), creating football’s first set of codified rules. In their game—now played annually and known simply as “The Game” for its importance—Harvard’s experience led them to a 4-0 shutout. In attendance that day was a dissatisfied Yale student named Walter Camp, better known now as the “father of modern football.” 

A member of the Skull and Bones Society and triple-varsity athlete, Camp was responsible for smoothing the rough edges that the Harvard-Yale compromise had created in the gameplay. He attended university conventions where football’s rules were debated and expanded—this included regulations such as introducing the line of scrimmage and the system of downs to keep the game moving quickly, cutting down team sizes to 11 on each side, and changed the scoring so touchdowns yielded more points than field goals. Camp had shaped what was an awkward combination of soccer and rugby into something workable. In the years after his changes were made, college football exploded in popularity, radiating outward from the Eastern seaboard. 

Enter Glenn Scobey “Pop” Warner, essentially football’s first beta tester. A coach known for doing anything to win, Warner exploited the same loophole that would one day let golden retrievers play professional basketball: There was no rule specifically forbidding it, so it was allowed. Warner used every diversionary trick in the book, sewing football-shaped patches onto players’ jerseys to confuse the opposition and adding pockets to the insides of jerseys so his players could run the ball with no danger of getting it knocked away. Warner, along with other prominent coaches of the time were integral to the evolution of the game; if somebody is trying to exploit the game in any way they can, then the rules are going to change to prevent them from doing that, and thus the game becomes more legitimate.

Nearly half a century after Camp walked out of the Yale-Harvard match, the NFL was formed, further shaping the game into what its known as today. It’s impossible for Camp to have seen the future coming from his vantage point, but he must have been cognizant of the violent, unorganized mayhem of the game’s origin stretching back farther than he could comprehend. The compromise showed him that there was a way forward from all that–a way that wasn’t necessarily perfect or safe, but forward for the sport of football.

a, Opinion

Donald Trump, make McGill great again

There is a huge problem at this university: McGill doesn’t win anymore. However, the expiration of Principal Suzanne Fortier’s term in June 2018 provides an important opportunity to reverse McGill’s decline. In 2018, the McGill Board of Governors should appoint Donald J. Trump to the position of principal and vice-chancellor of McGill University, provided Mr. Trump is not at that time serving as president of the United States. Through his impressive campaign to secure the Republican nomination for president of the United States, Trump has displayed the vision, qualities, and leadership skills necessary to run McGill, and is uniquely qualified to make McGill great again.

On the campaign trail, Trump has won the respect of many American voters with his tough stance on illegal immigration, including his proposal to build a wall along the Mexican border. This is exactly the kind of attitude that is needed at McGill. In recent years, McGill’s campus has been devastated by the flow of illegal samosas pouring across its borders. These foreign snacks are causing tremendous problems on campus. With their cheap prices, samosas are taking the job of feeding McGill students from hardworking local foods like poutine, timbits, Subway, and Première Moisson. These foreign indulgences need to be deported immediately.

To keep all samosas out, Principal Trump should promise to build a wall around McGill’s campus, and make Concordia pay for it.

In order to make Trump feel at home on campus, the university must be prepared to rename a building in Trump’s honour, and have his name written on it in “yuge” golden letters.

Trump has also garnered much attention for his obsession with polls and his determination to always be a winner—an attitude that is sorely needed at McGill. In the 2015-2016 Times Higher Education World University Rankings, McGill was the third-ranked Canadian university, finishing behind first place University of Toronto, and University of British Columbia. Clearly, our leaders don’t know what they’re doing. U of T is laughing at us. Much as he promises the American people he will deal with China, Mr. Trump should, if appointed Principal, send “smart people” as negotiators to U of T, and get McGill a “better deal.” With such dismal rankings, Principal Trump would not rest until McGill reclaimed its spot as the number one university in Canada, and would surely promise McGill students “so much winning you may get bored of winning.”

However, persuading Trump to accept the position of Principal at McGill will require some small sacrifices from the McGill community. In order to make Trump feel at home on campus, the university must be prepared to rename a building in Trump’s honour, and have his name written on it in “yuge” golden letters. The McConnell Engineering Building would be an ideal choice: McGill already has a McConnell Arena and a McConnell Residence—the Trump Engineering Building would help avoid further confusion. Mr. Trump would likely also wish to modify McGill’s curriculum to better suit his business views; students and faculty must be prepared for new courses such as ECON 3000: The Art of the Deal, or ACCT 4500: Small Loans of a Million Dollars.

As he will no longer be campaigning against Jeb Bush, Trump will also need a new target for his bullying. I suggest Buzz, the Concordia Stingers mascot, since the McGill community would be more accepting of Trump’s mean tweets if they were directed at a representative of a rival school. Plus, if the online feud ever escalated into a real-world fight, many McGill students would surely find the image of Donald Trump wrestling a man in a giant bumblebee costume quite amusing.

Despite these minor adjustments, Donald J. Trump is still the best qualified candidate to assume the position of McGill principal in 2018. By cracking down on illegal snack immigration, and resolving to restore McGill’s ranking as the number one university in Canada, Trump has the potential to turn this university into a winner. In 2018, the Board of Governors must chose the principal that will make McGill great again!

David Watson is a second year political science student and (very) minor league hockey player. He enjoys music, dogs, and eating entire boxes of Kraft Dinner in a single sitting.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue