The art scattered around McGill’s campus is a result of efforts by hundreds of artists over the past two centuries. Though publicly displaying these artworks can result in damage or vandalism, it’s a risk the the Visual Arts Collection is willing to take, according to Visual Arts Collection Assistant Daisy Charles.
“The idea of the collection is for it be public and enjoyed by the community,” Charles said. “What’s the point of artwork you can’t see?”
McGill’s Visual Arts Collection is as old as the university itself; today it includes over 2,300 pieces. Unfortunately, many of McGill’s students don’t realize that such a collection even exists.
“I studied art history [at McGill] and I didn’t even know there was a collection,” Charles said. “I was here for three years writing about art—walking by these pieces—[without knowing] this was a collection that was managed.”
The visual arts collection is actually responsible for decorating the many halls, offices, and spaces on McGill’s campus. The collection isn’t placed in a traditional museum setting, however, where one would anticipate art.
Consequently, a person with a busy schedule and a busy mind won’t notice their surroundings, and as a result, the art on campus often becomes background noise. The rich history of the art and the artists, put on display to ease the eyes of students, deserves attention. McGill, effectively, is the museum.
The Portraits
The Portrait of James McGill
The collection began with the acquisition of the portrait of James McGill in Redpath Hall, which is the oldest piece in McGill’s Visual Arts Collection.
“[This portrait] was done by a really famous Canadian portrait painter [named] Louis Dulongpré,” Charles said. “We [actually] don’t know the exact date of [when] the painting [was completed] but it was donated [to McGill] in the 1830s by one of his friends.”
For the last 200 years, McGill has commissioned artists to paint portraits of people who have worked for the school, like deans, chancellors, and professors—a tradition which is upheld to this day.
“Every principal still, when they leave, has a portrait of them done that is then hung in Redpath Hall,” explained Charles. “Heather Munroe-Blum’s portrait is being finished now [and will be] installed soon.”
The Portrait of Dr. W.H. Drummond
A lot of the older portraits in the Collection have been done by artists who would later play influential roles in the development of the Canadian art scene. In 1907, the landscape artist F.S. Coburn was commissioned to paint a portrait of the late Quebecois poet Dr. William Henry Drummond.
“It’s a really interesting picture [because Coburn] painted Drummond’s wife on one side and then Drummond on the other side,” Charles said. “It’s been flipped [back and forth] over time. For 10 years we’ll do one side, and then [for] 10 years, the other side.”
As a result, past inventories will describe the painting as being of a different person, depending on which side was shown. Today, the painting—with Drummond displayed—hangs in the Faculty Club.
The Sculptures
The Caryatid Fountain
Perhaps most prominent of the sculptures is the large fountain that acts as a chair, meeting spot, and beacon during McGill’s annual Open Air Pub (OAP).
“It’s called the Caryatid Fountain, said Charles. “Caryatid is a classical architectural term for a human used as a pillar to hold something up. The [statue figures] are holding up the bowl, which is then being used as a water fountain.”
The sculpture found at the centre of the fountain is known as the The Three Bares, and was designed separately from the rest of the fountain. Its history is as rich as the life of its creator, American sculptor and collector, Gertrude Vanderbilt Whitney.
In the early ‘20s Whitney was commissioned to make the sculpture for the New Arlington Hotel lobby in Washington, D.C. But when the Great Depression hit, and the Hotel was never built. Bares suddenly had no home.
“[Whitney] was very good friends with a woman named Ellen Ballon who was a famous pianist who went to school at McGill,” Charles said. “Ballon moved to New York in the ’20s, and went to [Whitney’s] studio, […] saw this sculpture, and suggested that [Whitney] give it to McGill.”
For many, the gift was seen as a gesture of goodwill between Canada and the U.S., and consequently it picked up nicknames like, ‘The Friendship Fountain,’ and the ‘Goodwill Fountain.’ For others, the gift was seen as being hugely inappropriate for a campus environment.
“I deplore the erection of three naked male figures in prominent position of the Campus and this statue is a menace to our pure-thinking girls and boys,” wrote one critic to McGill.
Despite the critics, McGill continued its plans to build the fountain, but the process continued to be met with delays, as McGill was also being affected by the economic crisis that was plaguing the U.S.
“It was the beginning of the Depression, and the University had no money,” said Charles. “[So the sculpture] sat in a box for years because no one could afford to build a fountain and set it up.”
In the end, Whitney donated the necessary funds for the installation, and on May 31, 1931, the sculpture and the fountain were officially unveiled. Today, to avoid these kinds of delays, the University will not accept gifts if the donor will pay for the installation.
Lantern
East of the Redpath Museum, not 20 feet from Caryatid Fountain, stands Lantern. Donated to McGill in 1968, Lantern was created by Austrian artist Ernestine Tahedl, the wife of a professor at the university.
“[The piece was] called Lantern because it was originally lit up [by] spot lights inside of it,” Charles explained. “So at night, you can imagine how nice it would look all lit up.”
The university had wanted a piece that would be seen during the winter months.
“It was supposed to be lit, and it was lit for two years,” explained Tahedl. “Access to the lamp was difficult [however], so it hasn’t been lit for years.”
Lantern was a controversial piece when it was first introduced.
“[It] wasn’t supposed to be permanent,” said Tahedl. “It was only supposed to be up for six months. [But] they decided they wanted to keep it.”
Tahedl first made a maquette—a scale model—of the piece in clay. It was then cast in concrete, and pieces of thick glass, called dalles, were set into the stone. The final product is striking and intense—typical of the Brutalist movement that had gripped construction methods during the same era.
“There was a lot of disagreement about it and whether or not the University wanted to accept it and so it was kind of a controversial piece,” explained Charles. “Some people didn’t like it.”
The Visual Arts Committee—which is responsible for advising on the acquisition of artworks—ultimately ended up deciding to accept Lantern.
The Bronze Statue of James McGill & Transition Muette
Not all of the sculptures found around McGill have experienced such tumultuous changes. The bronze statue of James McGill, found near the entrance of Roddick Gates, was done as late as 1996 by David Roper-Curzon. The large sculpture found in front of the Wong Building was done by Montreal-based artist Jacek Jarnus Zkiwicz, as part of a Quebec Policy called the “politique d’intégration des arts à l’architecture” (in English: “Percent for Art”). It requires publicly-funded construction budgets to fall above a certain amount need to allocate about one per cent of their funds to commissioning a new piece of art. The government will then choose from a list of ‘Percent for Art’ artists to do the piece.
Thus, in 1997, when the Wong Building was finally constructed, as part of the policy, so was Transition Muette.
“It’s made of the [four] metals that are being tested on [inside] the building—copper, steel, zinc, and stainless steel,” Charles said. “The idea was that [Zkiwicz] was reflecting what goes on inside, outside.”
A number of factors has made tracing the origins and the locations of all of the pieces in the collection difficult. This is due primarily to the nature of the collection; not only is it big in size, but it’s spread over a large amount of space. According to Charltes, this is compounded by the fact that until recently, the University didn’t have a team dedicated specifically to maintaining the Visual Arts Collection.
“At first, it was someone who worked at the McCord [Museum], who’s job-on-the-side was also caring for the Visuals Arts Collection,” Charles explained.
In April 2013, Wendy Owens became the first full-time director of the Visual Arts Collection. Under her direction, multiple surveys of McGill’s art collection have been taken to determine the history, whereabouts, and value of all of McGill’s art. Today, the team oversees the acquisition of artworks, and their subsequent distribution within the university. It is this flow of art to, and then within, the university is where the unique nature of the collection really shines.
“Things move because people borrow our works,” Charles said. “If you work at McGill, you can borrow an artwork to hang in your office.”
Faculty members can choose from pieces that aren’t already claimed for other areas to decorate their spaces, and if someone no longer wants a piece, it can re-enter the circulation. Before this, the art donated to the university must be approved by the acquisition committee, comprised of professors, administrators, art historians, and architects. They decide whether or not artworks received by the university are appropriate for their audience.
“They try to pick things that pertain to Canada, Quebec, Montreal, or are decorative pieces that would […] enhance the campus,” Charles said. “[They] can’t accept things that aren’t appropriate for public display. [For example], a couple of years ago, an artist offered us a gigantic male nude which was not delicate, [so they couldn’t] accept.”
The process of selecting artwork for a campus is very different than the process required for a museum. Pieces often need to be able to withstand vandalism, be inoffensive, and require little or no background in the form of descriptive plaques.
The art scattered around McGill’s campus is a result of the efforts of hundreds of artists over the past two centuries.
Though publicly displaying these artworks can result in damage or vandalism, it’s a risk the the Visual Arts Collection is willing to take.
“The idea of the collection is for it be public and enjoyed by the community,” Charles said. “What’s the point of artwork you can’t see?”