Latest News

NFL Fantasy Football
a, Football, Sports

Fantasy Football: Keep calm, everything is fine

You’re excited. You spent all Sunday streaming as many games as your bandwidth could handle and now you’re about to overreact when it comes to your fantasy football team. Before you relegate Peyton Manning to the bench next week, make sure to take a step back and make sense of what happened in Week 1.

Marucs Mariota is not a Hall-of-Famer: Well, he might be one day, but certainly not yet. Pick him up if he’s a free agent in your league, but keep in mind that he played the Buccaneers last week and there’s a reason that Tampa Bay had the worst record in the league last year. Also, do not count Jameis Winston out just yet. Sure he struggled in his first game, but he was missing wide receiver Mike Evans who’s expected to be back next week. It wasn’t too long ago that we were questioning if Andrew Luck was the real deal after one bad week in 2012.

James Jones is back: After two years in the football graveyard that is Oakland, Jones is back with superstar quarterback Aaron Rodgers and the Green Bay Packers. He and Rodgers just have ‘it’—a certain connection that always seems to result in the back of the end zone. In 2012, when he led the league in touchdown receptions, one out of every five of  his catches put points on the board. If he’s available in your league, pick him up.

Percy Harvin is tempting: When he’s not getting in fights with teammates or injured, Percy Harvin can be a serious game changer. He’s never really had a true position in the NFL, but his combination of speed and agility gives Buffalo Bills Head Coach Rex Ryan a lethal weapon he can play anywhere on the field. It’s only Week 1, but Harvin could become the go-to-receiver for new quarterback Tyrod Taylor.

The fill ins: Indianapolis Colts wideout Donte Moncrief is going to be the top receiver in Indy until T.Y. Hilton gets back from a knee injury. If Terrance Williams is available in your league, he could be a fantasy game-changer in Dallas until Dez Bryant returns from injury. Tennessee running back Bishop Sankey had an outstanding week one and with David Cobb out, he should be the Titans’ starting running back for the foreseeable future.

Defence roulette: This can be a dangerous strategy, but if you missed out on getting one of the league’s top defences you will have to juggle your team’s defence from week-to-week. If the Dolphins are available, they’re your best bet this week, but in deep leagues, you might want to go with the Titans defence. They’re matched up against the Browns this week and with or without Josh McCown, they’re totally punchless. If you’re really lucky, Johnny Manziel gets the start and you’re guaranteed a turnover or two.

Lightning round: Everything is fine! Manning will be fine in Denver. Will he lead the league in touchdown passes? No, but he should be your team’s starting quarterback every single week. Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson will probably be fine. This was most likely just a bad week, but it might take Peterson a while to get back into his rhythm. Carlos Hyde is fine. He just locked down the starting job in one of the league’s most run-heavy offence’s out in San Francisco. Lastly, your team is fine. Don’t over-think your roster. Your starters should start and barring some exceptional circumstances, your bench players should sit. If you start tinkering with your lineup, you will likely lose.

SSMU McGill
a, News, SSMU

SSMU weighing involvement in developing student federations

In March, the Fédération des Associations Étudiantes du Campus de l’Université de Montreal (FAÉCUM), a student union at the Université de Montreal, chose to disaffiliate from the Fédération Etudiante Universitaire du Quebec (FEUQ), a provincial student federation. Consequently, the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) and other student associations entered into congresses about forming a new provincial federation

SSMU Vice-President (VP) External, Emily Boytinck, stated that two new provincial student federations, the Union Etudiants du Quebec (UEQ) and the Association for the Voice of Education in Quebec (AVEQ), had been formed as a result of these summer congresses. 

“I’ve been going to […] congresses [for both] all summer,” she said. “Things that we decided were […] the voting method, the structures– what are the portfolios, what are the committees– that sort of thing.”

SSMU is a currently a non-voting observer at the UEQ, and a voting participant at the AVEQ roundtable. SSMU has not contributed financially to either federation.

“In April, [the UEQ] wanted everyone to sign this contract, to provide resources for the association,” Boytinck stated. “No financial commitment was technically required. We didn’t sign the contract [because] we didn’t want to.”

Boytinck explained that student associations will decide on their affiliations once the administrative structures of each federation have been finalized. The student associations that have signed contracts with the UEQ are still not officially affiliated with the UEQ because the contracts pertained to the developmental stages of the federation.

“In late September there will be the last [congress] for the AVEQ, that’s where a lot of the final decisions will be made,” Boytinck said. “I think a lot of people are starting to look into affiliations very soon.”

She added that the UEQ had already hired their executives, while AVEQ will be hiring part-time staff. 

“Right now [AVEQ is] in the process of hiring two staff members instead of executives,” she said. “[They will] be hired by any student organizations that are participating [in AVEQ’s roundtable]. [SSMU] didn’t put any money in, but we’re still going to be involved in the decision.”

Both federations are also finalizing their fee structures.

“[The UEQ’s] fee levy per student per semester is $4.50,” Boytinck said. “The AVEQ’s is most likely going to be $2.50. Our finance committee meetings [with AVEQ are] ongoing, so that will be more confirmed later.” 

According to Boytinck, UEQ and AVEQ were created as a result of disagreements over the original FEUQ’s proportional voting system. 

“SSMU was one of the founding members of the FEUQ, and we’ve joined and left three times,” she said. “In recent years [the FEUQ’s] proportional voting system has caused tensions due to the back door politics that this type of voting method creates.” 

The proportional vote, Boytinck explained, required a double majority in order for a motion to be passed. First, every member association at the table received one vote. This is known as the one association, one vote method. Each vote was then weighted based on the size and membership of each association: The larger the association, the more weight their vote carried. 

“[SSMU is] the fourth-largest student association in Quebec,” Boytinck said. “With the double majority system […] large associations […] can stop things that pass by the one association, one vote […. SSMU is] still subject to a lot of risk for that.”

VP External of Regroupement des étudiants de maîtrise, de diplôme et de doctorat de l’Université de Sherbrooke’ (REMDUS), the graduate students’ society at l’Université Sherbrooke, Guillaume Raymond, commented on the financial and contractual obligations UEQ required  from student associations during its developmental stage. 

“Some associations didn’t want to [have a] formal organization […or] have  a contract signed because that would involve putting money [in the project],” Raymond stated. “But we did want this.”

The Université de Quebec à Montreal’s (UQÀM) Association des étudiantes et étudiants de la Faculté des sciences de l’Éducation de l’UQAM (ADEESE) left the UEQ roundtable over such contractual obligations. 

“[ADEESE] wanted to [avoid spending the] resources and money of members in a process they wouldn’t join later; this didn’t fit the consensus around the table,” the executive council explained in French on its website. “We feel [this] urgency isn’t justified, given the importance of taking time to establish the foundations of [the] association.”

Raymond expressed confidence in UEQ’s progress, however. 

“We’re currently still working on it in the hopes that it will be finalized within the months to come,” he said. “It helps with the resources we’ve put on the project […] so I’m confident that in the coming months, we will have something to present to the students.” 

SSMU, the Concordia Students’ Union (CSU), and  McGill’s Post-Grad Student Society (PGSS) released a letter of support for AVEQ this summer. Boytinck highlighted that the roundtable discussions with AVEQ had been productive with regards to establishing core values.

“As anglophone student associations, we’re in a very different place compared to other student associations,” she said. “There’s been a lot [in terms] of accommodation, so we’ve been really impressed by that.”

Going forward, Boytinck stated that she will present information about both federations to SSMU’s Legislative Council. SSMU will have the option to join one federation or remain disaffiliated, and this decision would be ratified through a referendum question that will be presented to all students.

“Personally, I’m in no rush,” she explained. “I think that in order for students to know really what’s going on, there needs to be a ton of consultation.” 

Additional reporting done by Shrinkhala Dawadi

a, Out on the Town, Student Life

Out on the town: Montreal’s best eggs Benedict

The eggs Benedict is a staple of any brunch menu. In its truest form it is a soft-poached egg on top of a savoury bed of ham, laid on an English muffin and covered in the raison d’être, hollandaise sauce. Hollandaise sauce is a French sauce made primarily of egg yolk and butter, but also often seasoned with lemon, cayenne pepper, and salt. The three following restaurants are the strongest contenders in the battle for the title of Montreal’s best eggs Benedict.

Restaurant L'Avenue

 

Located up in the borough of Plateau-Mont Royal, Restaurant L’Avenue has the widest variety of eggs Benedict on the list. The restaurant is easy to spot from the line of brunch-goers spilling out the door. The wait for smaller groups is normally fairly well-paced, which is a relief to customers since the restaurant does not take reservations. Bright graffiti covers the walls of the bustling dining room with a suspended motorcycle hanging from the ceiling, giving the atmosphere a funky but comfortable feel. For those who are Instagram aficionados, L’Avenue’s bathroom is a popular selfie destination due to its one of a kind glow-in-the-dark graffiti theme.

Eggs Benedict prices range from $12.50 to $15 with plenty of options from classic to the sucré-salé-croustillant. The latter dish distinguishes L’Avenue from other top breakfast locations. It is two poached eggs on top of panko covered French toast, with black forest ham, gruyère cheese, covered in hollandaise and drizzled with maple syrup, and comes with a side of home fries. The sucré-salé-croustillant is an overwhelming amount of food to consume but is sensational in taste. On a day you are looking for an adventurous twist on eggs Benedict, Restaurant L’Avenue is the place to go—just make sure you have time to wait in line!

 

 

Bistro Tôt ou Tard

 

In between Centre-Ville Est and The Village, Bistro Tôt ou Tard sits cozily on the corner of Rue Cherrier where Rue Amherst meets Avenue du Parc la Fontaine. Immediately, you will notice the restaurant’s cute but small patio, perfect for enjoying the last few weeks of warm weather while sitting close to the park. The bistro-styled restaurant offers a few different types of benedict with various toppings—goat cheese, brie, spinach, and asparagus—all of which are priced at $13.95. Bistro Tôt ou Tard takes the Benedict further by adding a plentiful amount of sides including sauteed mushrooms, breakfast potatoes, bacon, ham, sausage, baguette, a fruit bowl, and either coffee or tea. The restaurant’s Benedict with mushrooms and brie is also worth noting. It has a focaccia base with mushrooms, brie, caramelized onions, and hollandaise. Bistro Tôt ou Tard’s sauce has an exceptional consistency—just the right amount of creaminess without becoming too gelatinous. Another bonus is the hours; the restaurant is open seven days a week from 7 a.m. until 10 p.m., although unfortunately, all-day breakfast isn’t available. Take advantage of a sunny day in the near future and go for the take-out option then enjoy a breakfast picnic in Parc la Fontaine.

 

La Société

 

La Société, located downtown, is known for its fine dining. Its eggs Benedict is thus the most expensive Benedict on the list; however, it is definitely worth the higher price tag. The upscale French-style bistro, with its delicately tiled floors and stained-glass ceiling, exudes the feeling of luxury and opulence. Its brunch menu includes a few different types of benedicts—the classic, the lobster, and the Montreal, ranging from $16 to $19 depending on toppings. The restaurant’s classic eggs Benedict—ham, poached eggs, and hollandaise—comes with a hearty dose of breakfast potatoes. The hollandaise sauce itself is creamy and perfectly complements the rest of the ingredients.

La Société’s eggs benedict is available on both their breakfast and brunch menu. On weekdays, breakfast is from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m., and from 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. on Saturday and Sundays. Don’t worry if you’re not an early weekend riser though, brunch on the weekend begins at 10 a.m. and finishes at 3 p.m. If you find yourself one morning cruising down Rue de la Montagne, stopping into La Société is a must.

Stephen Colbert and George Clooney
a, Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

The extended reign of Stephen Colbert

SInce the days of Johnny Carson, the format of late night talk shows hasn’t changed much. Working with some variation of the ‘opening monologue, guest one, guest two, pre-recorded bit, musical guest, goodnight’ formula has proven to be ironically versatile. A revolving door of new hosts has also helped prevent this formula from going stale. In its first week, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, the newest addition to the late night roster, has followed the precedent his forebearers have set, though not necessarily to a fault.

This switch from Comedy Central newsroom to late night standard is an odd change for fans of the right-wing blowhard that Colbert played on The Colbert Report for nine years. In fact, he’s gone from a persona that was an exercise in winking irony to one that seems much more earnest and probably closer to his own personality. It’s clearly a big adjustment to make, and the transition comes with a few hiccups. Some of the jokes seem toothless and geared towards a more family-friendly audience, as if he’s trying to reign himself in and prevent saying something that could potentially alienate some of CBS’ older viewer base. Still, it’s reassuring to see that his monologues are mostly geared towards the political humour that he’s known for.

It’s no surprise, then, that his political interviews are the segment of his show with the most promise. He takes an interview strategy of trying to find the human being behind the political façade, something that most other talk shows would steer away from. Admittedly, he had trouble finding a way to make Jeb Bush seem interesting or human throughout a flat and choppy interview. In contrast his interview with Vice-President of the United States Joe Biden revealed a sense of emotional vulnerability and empathy that is rare in politicians as the two shared stories of the loved ones that they’ve lost. Biden telling anecdotes about the inherent goodness of his recently-deceased son was simultaneously heartbreaking and life-affirming, as well as something that wouldn’t seem possible on any other current late night show.

On the other hand, the celebrity interviews are the most inconsistent part of the show. Part of this comes with the territory; for whatever reason the charm that some actors give off in films doesn’t extend to the relatively more spontaneous late night format. An interview with Scarlett Johansson, for instance, ended up becoming a conversation between two people who seem nice, but have absolutely nothing interesting to say to each other.

Interviews with other people tend not to hinge on how interesting the subject is, but the quality of the questions Colbert asks, which is an essential part of being a good host. An interview with Uber CEO, Travis Kalanick, is successful entirely because Colbert peppers him with a series of incisive questions about the ethics of Uber’s business practices. Another chat with comedian Amy Schumer is successful partially because Colbert is able to play the straight man in her hilarious anecdotes. Segments like these show that Colbert is already playing in a different league than the more effusive pandering of his late night counterparts, Jimmy Fallon or Jimmy Kimmel. Part of this is the extensive experience he has from his previous show, and part is the commitment to showmanship that he clearly takes very seriously.

Most of the flaws that seem inherent to this show are due to the fact that new late night hosts are works in progress. Studios are used to buying such long contracts with them under the assurance that hosts will get better with more time. Even a seasoned veteran like Colbert has to take some time getting used to an expanded and altered format on another network. Despite first-week creaks here and there, Colbert presents the platonic ideal of what a traditional late-night show can be.

Lachine Canal
a, Features

Unearthing Montreal’s urban landscapes

For some students, venturing beyond the McGill bubble means going bar-hopping on Saint- Laurent or adventurously moving to the Plateau after moving out of residence. But truly understanding the city—especially without being a native citizen—is hard to do on one’s own. There’s usually a specific identity and character behind each region, and Montreal is a city that resounds in its uniqueness.

Sharing an unexplored side of Montreal with the public is one of the goals of Héritage Montreal, an independent non-governmental organization. The institute’s main mission is to advocate for sustainable urban development by balancing environmental, historical, geographical, architectural, and cultural considerations within the Greater Montreal Area.

With the development and growth of new architecture and landscape, Héritage Montreal focuses mainly on mappable geography. These landscapes might include fixed properties or be covered by urban planning instruments. The organization aims to raise awareness and awaken the curiosity of Montrealers about both the visible aspects of their city’s heritage and the hidden contexts behind it.

According to Dinu Bumbaru, the policy director of Héritage Montreal, many Montrealers are curious about the history behind the city’s landscape. To cater to this demand, Héritage Montreal created Architectours, a program that offers walking tours around the city to the public. The tours are offered as part of the organization’s efforts to inform citizens about the neighbourhoods they live in, and experience their historical and cultural significance through understanding the landscape’s origins.

Besides offering walking tours, Héritage Montreal advocates for the preservation of heritage cities and consults with the city on urban affairs. According to Bumbaru, the concern is not just with individual sites, but generally with the way the city handles its urban development.

You could let it go—and we could burn Montreal in a couple of years—and ruin everything, without a Montreal spirit behind it,” he said. “For instance, we push for public hearings [with] l’Office du consultation publique. [We] push for a Heritage Council to be established in the city. The city is such a complex machine. It gives a chance to have a heritage clock inside that can give some hope for consistency.”

To contribute to the organization’s knowledge of preservation and to educate them, Héritage Montreal takes on summer interns. Catherine Lennartz, a World Heritage Studies master’s student at the Brandenburg University of Technology, said that the Architectours help the organization’s mission by including more Montrealers in the process of preservation and education. It’s essential to honour the historical figures whose stories took place within this culturally-rich landscape. For example, if you’re observing a building, it is not just about who built it, and what the architecture is, but also who has used it, and who it remains important for.

For me, [the Architectours] are a question of getting Montrealers to know their city better,” said Lennartz. “Not everyone has the opportunity to learn that much about the history and the architecture of the city; and because the tours are so specific, I find it’s great for people who have maybe lived here their whole lives but never really looked at the heritage around them.”

Bumbaru himself has worked at Héritage Montreal for over 30 years, and occasionally leads tours in addition to executing the organization’s other endeavours. Born in Vancouver, Bumbaru graduated in Architecture from the Université de Montréal, and moved on to study Architectural Conservation at the University of York in the U.K. and at the International Center for the Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM) in Rome.

I started in 1982 […] I was hired here as part of a job creation program for graduates,” Bumbaru said. “The Quebec government had this program to support 20 weeks of work for new graduates, so they could start gaining work experience.”

After working for a few years in the organization, he took a break fin 1988 to study in Rome. Bumbaru subsequently returned to Héritage Montreal, eventually becoming executive director. But suddenly, in 1992, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) recruited him overnight to assess the urgent condition of the war-torn area in the besieged city of Dubrovnik, Croatia. Bumbaru was replaced as executive director during his time in Croatia, but upon returning safely, he was re-hired as policy director, his position ever since. As policy director, Bumbaru focuses the action of Héritage Montreal towards his passions: Education and advocacy.

For Bumbaru, the landscape of a city defines its heritage. It’s something each citizen must protect by being aware of the landmarks which they’re meant to preserve. Although the tours are usually accompanied by historical lessons, Bumbaru started an August tour of the Lachine Canal and surrounding areas by emphasizing that he wasn’t a historian, and that the tours naturally integrate several facets of urban landscapes.

Bumbaru highlighted the importance of allowing individuals to truly experience the tangible reality of the geography upon which they embarked.

We’re not visiting history, we’re strolling through geography,” he said.

While leading a small group of participants, Bumbaru touched on architecture, urban planning, and geography. He also discussed the often contentious integration of industrial, recreational, and residential development alongside the many heritage locations that line historic sites like the Lachine Canal. As opposed to a lecture hall, where textbook history is inceptive, walking tours use a physical location as the literal point of departure.

In the past, we used to say ‘The parentage of heritage was history,’” said Bumbaru. “When thinking about it a bit further, there are three dimensions to this: First, geography; second, society; and third, history.”

The tours also help to advocate for an accessible, human-friendly Montreal. While regional planners talk of “walkable cities,” Héritage Montreal has different ambitions—tours that transcend walking as a simple mode of transportation and cross over into exploring.

The Architectours are celebrating Héritage Montreal’s 40th anniversary this year by presenting “Greatest Hits,” retrospective of their most popular walking tours. Over August and September, these have included the dynamic neighbourhoods of Griffintown, Mile End, Golden Square Mile, and Côte-des-Neiges.

Despite conducting a survey of ‘greatest hits,’ this year’s Architectours failed to include perhaps one of Héritage Montreal’s most popular excursions: A tour of the infamous Silo No. 5, an abandoned grain elevator dating back to 1903, at the base of Old Port. The original idea of visiting Silo No. 5, the largest abandoned building in the city, came about during Héritage Montreal’s 35th anniversary in 2010, as a gift to the Montrealers who supported them.

Incidentally, 15 years prior, Héritage Montreal fought with the port authority over the proposed demolition of Silo No. 5.

For [the port authority], Silo No. 5 is the equivalent of a redundant filing cabinet […] the equivalent of an office desk that is unused,” Bumbaru said. “They just want to throw it away—it’s just that it’s 800 metres long.”

Thus, bringing individuals to Silo No.5—a location with a history intertwined with that of Héritage Montreal’s—had a special significance in line with the organization’s mission.

To Bumbaru’s pleasant surprise, the tour was a massive hit with Montrealers.

We just thought, well, this is going to interest only a few people because we were told nobody likes the Silos you know?” he said. “Nobody cares. And it took us three years to go through the waiting list [for the tour]. There was a clear demonstration that people were curious about it.”

Nonetheless, whether intentional or simply symptomatic of Montreal’s contemporary urban landscape, many of the tours are of neighbourhoods “in transformation,” including the aforementioned Lachine Canal.

Transformation doesn’t need to be banal,” Bumbaru said. “There can be a lot of invention in that. Perhaps, in Montreal, we’ve done it in a less spectacular [way] than others. In Montreal over time, we don’t have time to do things à la Dubai, but we try to consider ourselves more avant garde. Looking at the city more in a new way, one of our slogans is élever le regard—to raise the eye.”

Stonewall cast rioting
a, Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

Pop Rhetoric: Revisionist Stonewall nothing more than a whitewashing of queer history

The trailer for Roland Emmerich’s film, Stonewall, was released earlier this summer to a flurry of criticism over the blonde-haired, blue-eyed cis-gender boy it revolves around. Although the film attempts to authentically portray a dramatized version of one of the most significant events in LGBT history, it largely omits queer people of colour and transgender women, who in reality began and led the Stonewall Riots.

The trailer opens with flashy clips and audio from U.S. President Barack Obama’s 2013 inauguration speech mentioning “Seneca Falls, Selma, and Stonewall,” as defining moments in the fight for equal rights. Set in 1960s New York City, the plot revolves around Danny Winter (Jeremy Irvine), a fictional young gay man fleeing his homophobic Midwestern small-town life to follow his dreams in Manhattan.

The actual events of Stonewall and the subsequent protests follow a strikingly different path. It was, in fact, women such as Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera—black and latina transgender activists, respectively—who first endured the police brutality and dehumanization that ignited the riots. At the time, the patrons of The Stonewall Inn—a gay tavern and recreational bar in New York City—were drag queens, butch lesbians, sex workers, and homeless youth—the vast majority of whom were people of colour. Because of the lack of legal protection for members of the LGBT community, the club was often subjected to police raids—but when one such raid became particularly violent, the community fought back, launching what is now considered the catalyst for the LGBT civil rights movement.

Miss Major Griffin-Gracy—a transgender woman of colour and influential activist who was clubbed by police before getting arrested during the first night of riots—said in a recent interview with Autostraddle that Stonewall’s storyline was “so disappointing.”

“How dare they attempt to do this again?” Griffin Gracy said during the interview. “A few years ago they did another Stonewall movie, and I swear if I saw a black person, it had to be a shadow running against the face of somebody who was white!” 

Hollywood has a tendency to create films using this technique. Too often, stories about the struggles that minorities face are told through the manufactured lens of a white hero surrounded by white background characters. In the case of Stonewall, it is not just a matter of including more black and brown bodies in background roles to create a politically correct ratio, it is about an entire movement’s narrative being erased. Queer, and particularly transgender people of colour were not just fellow participants in the riots and protests, they were the catalyst for change, and their refusal to bend to forces of oppression sparked the organized fight for LGBT rights.

Various members of the LGBT community have spoken out in opposition to the film and an online petition to boycott the film has reached almost 25,000 signatures. The campaign website encourages people to speak out against the film because “it is time that black and brown transwomen and drag queens are recognized for their efforts in the riots throughout the nation.” 

It is important to remember that movies and media influence society as well as erasing parts of history has consequences. Movies made for entertainment—even if made with the best intentions—are still created with bias. All this being said, only the trailer of Stonewall has been released.

“I understand that following the release of our trailer there have been initial concerns about how this character’s involvement is portrayed,” Director Roland Emmerich wrote in a public post on his Facebook page. “But when this film finally comes to theaters, audiences will see that it deeply honours the real-life activists who were there.” 

It will ultimately be up to audiences to determine if that truly is the case.

Stonewall is scheduled to premiere on September 25.

a, News, SSMU

Meet the 2015-2016 SSMU executives

  • Kareem Ibrahim

  • Emily Boytinck

  • Lola Baraldi

  • Kimber Bialik

  • Chloe Rourke

  • Zacheriah Houston

 

a, Student Life

Reimagining Frosh

During the first week of September, Montreal’s air was saturated with the enthusiasm, anticipation, and cheer that accompanied McGill’s Orientation Week for incoming first-years. In previous years, McGill’s Frosh has been criticized for its alcohol-centric activities and lack of respect for its surroundings. Building on efforts from past Frosh teams, there were concerted efforts made by Frosh coordinators this year to continue creating an enjoyable atmosphere for both participants and the local community by implementing several new initiatives, activities, and policies.

The gradual shift towards a more inclusive Frosh entailed adding more diverse and non-drinking events to the program. Both Arts and Management Frosh gave students the chance to watch Montreal’s CFL team, the Alouettes, play a game in Molson Stadium. Management students were also invited to cheer during Redbull’s soap box races, an event where local amateur racers build and race their own non-electric vehicles, while Engineering Frosh hosted a dry block party. All Frosh participants had the option to attend a throwback-themed night event with a live band on the same night as the EDM concert at New City Gas, in response to requests for more diverse night events and music selection. Lastly, the beer tent on Lower Field was drastically reduced to lesson the focus on alcohol.

While inclusivity among Frosh participants was important, there was another group of people who were considered thoroughly in the process: The Milton-Parc community. In the past, the area’s residents have had to bear loud cheers, unruly behaviour, and party music at all hours of the day during Frosh Week. This year, policies were implemented to foster a respectful relationship between Frosh and its surrounding environment. Letters were mailed to the members of the Milton-Parc community outling SSMU’s commitment to minimizing disruptions, and offering contact information should disrespectful behaviour arise. Loud and offensive chants were banned from being taught and used, a policy that had been implemented in the past years.  Additionally, a better relationship with the community was cultivated through social events. 

“We organized our first ever potluck barbecue for the Milton-Parc community citizens,” Executive Director of Management Frosh Joshua Schulman, explained. “With regards to the [Service de la Police de la Ville de Montreal], we met with [SPVM] beforehand to explain our schedules to make sure all our participants were safe.”

Having classes start on Friday also meant that major changes to the week’s programming needed to be made. In response, there was an extra day of Frosh that made activities more spaced out and with more downtime in the mornings to rest.

“We obviously did not want to incentivize students to not go to class, so we kept all Thursday night events low-key and on the day of class, the only event on Friday was a games and inflatable day on lower field,” Lola Baraldi, Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Vice-President Internal, said. “It was planned so students could trickle in and out between classes […] and faculty-specific events picked up once classes finished […] It led to a lot more alternative and inclusive programming.”

A final addition to Frosh this year was the introduction of Red Frogs at an event. Red Frogs is a peer support network for young people who stay fully sober at events and act as a harm reduction service. They offered  support at social events and educated students on safe partying behaviour. Red Frogs appeared at the majority of Frosh events where they gave out water, granola bars and sunscreen, and provided a safe space to take breaks from the madness of Frosh.

As Frosh continues on its transition from its drinking-centered past to a more inclusive present, organizers and staff hope to keep pushing forward changes that assure Orientation Week remains a positive memory in the minds of future McGill students. 

 

a, Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

2015 Emmy Predictions

The 2015 Emmy nominees are so full of familiar faces to the degree that the newcomers are negligible. When picking winners, the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences (ATAS) tends to keep awarding old favourites or layers accolades on one standout newbie. To acknowledge both Emmy traditions and hopes-against-hope, the Tribune has made its predictions for this years big winners, and added in arguments for the unlikely favourite.

Best Comedy Series

Will win: Veep

This year, the real question is: Who can prevent Modern Family from winning an unprecedented sixth consecutive Emmy? Veep seems to be an obvious candidate. The show, which has been poking fun at Washington’s often messy political business since 2012, seems to get better with each new season. Having been nominated every year since its debut, the time might be just about right to pick up an award.

Should win: Parks and Recreation

It seems hard to believe that Parks and Recreation has not won a single Emmy. After all, the show has been a staple of primetime comedy since 2008 and has enjoyed critical acclaim as well. The ATAS tends to snub everything that is in any way related to Amy Poehler, so this will probably be another year without recognition for this great show.

Best Actor in a Comedy Series

Will win: Jeffrey Tambor – Transparent

Giving a performance that displays a level of depth and melancholy that didn’t seem possible from this usually-comedic actor, Tambor shines in his role playing a man who decides to transition to become a woman late in life. Although it won’t be a flashy enough performance for some voters, the importance and impact of a role like this will not be lost on the committee at large

Should win: Jeffrey Tambor – Transparent

Sometimes a performance is so good that even the Emmys can’t mess it up. This is one of those perception-altering performances that will be talked about for years to come.

Best Actress in a Comedy Series

Will win: Julia Louis-Dreyfus – Veep

The embodiment of the expression “old habits die hard,” Louis-Dreyus is slated to have a four-peat win for her role in Veep. At this point giving the award to Louis-Dreyfus feels more like paying a yearly rent check, but if Bryan Cranston can win this often, so can she.

Should win: Amy Poehler – Parks and Recreation

Now that Parks and Recreation has finished, this is Poehler’s last chance to snag the award. We expect the show to act towards Poehler the same way it did towards Steve Carrell at the end of The Office, leaving her high and dry in spite of seven hilarious seasons.

Best Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series

Will win: Tituss Burgess – Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt

The musical stylings of Burgess as the effeminate, fame-hungry Titus Andromendon in Peeno Noir, an ode to black penis, should be enough to earn him an Emmy. It is Burgess’ ability to add seriousness and stability to a character designed to be outlandish and untamable that proves this breakout actor is deserving of the award.

Should win: Tituss Burgess – Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt

The Titus Andromendon character was met with overwhelming adoration online. An entire cult following committed to Burgess’ memorable conviction and fresh relatability can’t be wrong.

Best Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series

Will win: Allison Janney – Mom

Inertia is the key factor here: When somebody gets awarded for a show relatively early in its run, they tend to stay a winner until the show falls out of favour. Combined with the fact that Allsion Janney is a great actress—as well as  a perennial Emmy favorite (if she wins, it’ll be her seventh acting Emmy)—this award is hers to lose.

Should win: Anna Chlumsky – Veep

Chlumsky, playing the vice president’s long-suffering chief-of-staff, has been doing some of the most subtly compelling character work on television. Every physical tic and line reading serves to create a fully-realized character who could have easily been played as one-note unlikeable.

Best Drama Series

Will win: Mad Men

Despite its arguable decline in quality in its later seasons, Mad Men saw a late-run return to form as the show sped up Don Draper’s inevitable fall from grace. The fact that Emmy voters are fond of awarding a show in its final year of eligibility (see Breaking Bad last year) means Mad Men is likely to take a final victory lap.

Should win: Orange is the New Black

Mad Men was great, but Orange is the New Black’s second season was one of the best stretches of television in recent memory. The heightened sense of drama and history that Lorraine Toussaint’s Vee brought to the show elevated what was already a series with a fantastic ensemble cast and sense of place.

Best Actor in a Drama Series

Will win: Jon Hamm – Mad Men

This should be the year that Hamm finally wins a long overdue Emmy. While Mad Men as a whole has snatched numerous Emmys, the front man himself actually never won despite being nominated every year since 2008. In his parting year as Don Draper, it seems almost inevitable that the Academy finally acknowledges his performance.

Should win: Jeff Daniels – The Newsroom

Yes, Jeff Daniels already won in 2013 and yes, The Newsroom’s final season might have had its weak points. But awarding Daniels would be a gesture to honour a show that presented an idea how a different version of the media circus could look. Plus, everyone who saw the season finale would be hard-pressed not to wish the whole cast more recognition.

Best Actress in a Drama Series

Will win: Taraji P. Henson – Empire

Typically acting awards go to the performances that feature the most acting—not necessarily the best. Such is the case with Henson’s admittedly fun, broad performance as the conniving matriarch of Empire’s central family. Combined with the zeitgeist appeal of Empire, this award seems close to a sure thing.

Should win: Elisabeth Moss – Mad Men

So far, Mad Men has been nominated for 31 acting Emmys, but has won none of them. This is a particular travesty with Elisabeth Moss, who has had one of the most satisfying character arcs in television playing Peggy Olsen’s transformation from a meek secretary to a prominent copywriter.

Best Supporting Actor in a Drama Series

Will win: Jonathan Banks – Better Call Saul

Already nominated for the same role in Breaking Bad, Jonathan Banks is back to take home the award for his reprisal of Mike Ehrmantraut. Unlike the predictions for some other categories, this win isn’t a clear call—newcomer Ben Mendelsohn of Bloodline has already been making waves among expert predictors—but expect Banks to float along with expected love for Better Call Saul.

Should win: Jim Carter – Downton Abbey

On his fourth nomination for the role of Mr. Carson, Carter has been soundly ignored this Emmy season by all but the nominating committee. His brilliant portrayal of a butler being forced to confront changing gender roles within the Abbey provides a dramatic, historically riveting glimpse into the overlooked lives of those affected by the First World War. He is deserving of more than a round of nominations.

Best Supporting Actress in a Drama Series

Will win: ?????

It’s a toss-up. This is the year of multiple returning actresses all in the roles of strong supporting female characters. Christine Baranski is back for her role in The Good Wife, along with Joanne Froggett for Downton Abbey and Christina Hendricks in Mad Men. Two Game of Thrones actresses along with Uzo Aduba of Orange is the New Black round out the nominations. It’s anyone’s game, excluding Emilia Clarke, who just isn’t at the same talent level of her competitors.

Should win: Christina Hendricks – Mad Men

Everyone who was nominated for this award clearly has the potential to win, but nobody deserves it like Hendricks does. The six-time nominee often stands in the shadow of her equally winless co-star Jon Hamm; but her portrayal of Joan Harris was mesmerizing and worthy of full recognition.

a, Opinion

Commentary: Student-Run Cafeteria is risky business

In additin to The Nest, a new, yet-to-be-named food provider has opened in the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) cafeteria this Fall. Both are student-run operations and together make up the Student-Run Café (SRC). This new addition is part of a larger plan by SSMU to move away from commercial tenants in the SSMU Building and towards student-run food providers.

The focus of a student-run food provider should be to offer affordable, healthy food that accommodates a wide variety of dietary needs and preferences. But given SSMU’s current financial state, the new SRC must make money. SSMU Vice-President (Finance and Operations) Zacheriah Houston told the Tribune that SSMU was giving up a guaranteed revenue of rent paid by commercial tenants for revenue that hinges on the new SRC’s profitability. He stated that he doesn’t foresee the SRC running a deficit similar to the $20,000 one that it experienced in Winter 2014, its first semester of operation, saying that SSMU has budgeted the new operation to run on a surplus, and that running a deficit is not an option. This is an alarming statement, as there is ample reason to be skeptical of the new SRC’s ability to generate revenue.

The SRC and the larger move towards student-run food providers present a tradeoff. On one hand, the change benefits students by ensuring that food providers on campus are open to student consultation and mandated with providing local and diet-sensitive options. On the other, such improvements are at the cost of lost guaranteed revenue to SSMU through rent, which could mean a potential loss of services for students. SSMU has already had to correct accounting errors, entailing a budget revision. SSMU is currently not in a position to lose any revenue, making the opening of another student-run operation a well-intentioned, but poorly-timed endeavour.

The opening of another student-run operation a well-intentioned, but poorly-timed endeavour.

In its current form, the SRC will face stiff competition on campus. In terms of potential to generate rent, the food operations’ location is highly valuable to SSMU. But it has low visibility to students, who may prefer other options closer to their classes and activities. Simply put, students don’t know it’s there. SNAX, by contrast, resides in a campus thoroughfare and as a result enjoys a steady stream of caffeine-hungry students. The new portion of the SRC is offering selections available at most large McGill Food and Dining Service (MFDS) locations, but does not accept the McGill meal plan. At the moment, it is a less convenient, less original option.

As long as The Nest retains its mandate as a sustainability hub, it will likely either run another deficit or, at best, break even. If this is the case, any revenue generated from the SRC will have to come from its new portion. And even if the SRC does generate revenue, if it is less than the rent previously paid to SSMU commercial tenants, then SSMU will have lost money.

While student consultation may help to balance out the costs of visiting the SRC by offering products not found elsewhere on campus, it is unlikely to be a total remedy. While the SRC currently intends to offer less expensive options, only time will tell whether students want to purchase items they can get more easily elsewhere.

Student consultation will ensure that the SRC provides a product that is demanded on campus. The caveat is that SSMU will rely on it to generate a sufficient revenue stream, otherwise other services may suffer. These two goals are not necessarily irreconcilable; however, in the case of the new SRC seem highly unlikely.

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue