Latest News

a, Arts & Entertainment, Music

Pop rhetoric: The marriage of hip hop and jazz on rap’s periphery

In 2011, three jazz students at Toronto’s Humber College performed a piece inspired by rap collective Odd Future. Their instructors promptly declared that the piece had no artistic value. Undiscouraged, the young musicians uploaded their arrangement to YouTube under the name “The Odd Future Sessions.” As it happened, Odd Future’s leader Tyler the Creator disagreed with Humber’s brass and invited the trio, now known as BADBADNOTGOOD (BBNG), on tour with the collective. 

Four years and four albums later, BBNG have come to represent a type of jazz that unabashedly flaunts its hip hop and R&B influences. A BBNG concert experience is closer to Earl Sweatshirt than Dave Brubeck; a throng of primarily young fans mosh to jazz interpretations of tracks by hip hop luminaries such as Kanye West, Nas, and Gang Starr. Recently, the trio collaborated with Wu Tang Clan member and rap legend Ghostface Killah. Their newest album, Sour Soul, perfectly represents the cross-pollination of hip hop and jazz.

However, this blending of genres is hardly a new phenomenon. In many ways, the marriage of jazz and hip hop first emerged in the late eighties with the music of a loose confederation of producers and MC’s known as the Native Tongues Collective. Artists such as A Tribe Called Quest, De La Soul, and the Jungle Brothers sought to blend jazz, rap, and Afrocentric ideology to create a socially as well as musically conscious brand of hip hop. To these artists, the parallels between hip hop and jazz were obvious—Q-Tip rhymes on Tribe’s legendary “Excursions”: “You could find the Abstract listening to Hip Hop/ My pops used to say it reminded him of bebop.” Similarly, Tribe’s single “Jazz (We’ve Got)” paid homage to the legendary jazz label Blue Note Records in its cover art and production style. 

In the late eighties and early nineties, hip hop often faced criticism for being a parasitic genre that leeched off the genius of others such as R&B, funk, and jazz. However, it appears the feeling was at least partially reciprocated by mainstream jazz artists. Herbie Hancock had been experimenting with hip hop beats and production since the early 1980s. Brandford Marsalis collaborated with producer DJ Premier on his Buckshot Lefonque project in 1994. 

However, despite Tribe’s influential work, and other innovations in the early 2000s from producers such as J Dilla and Madlib, mainstream success has remained elusive for jazz-infused hip hop artists. Indeed, even modern acts such as BBNG who have been accepted into hip hop’s inner circle have yet to gain the mainstream recognition of their contemporaries. The classics of the genre, albums like Tribe’s The Low End Theory (1991), Madvillain’s Madvillainy (2004), and J Dilla’s Donuts (2006), remain critically but not commercially acclaimed. Why? Perhaps the answer also explains why jazz has failed to appeal to mainstream listeners. Like its source material, jazz rap features little in the way of catchy hooks or booming production permanent in its contemporaries. Both the genre’s lyrics and instrumentation are introspective and subtle by definition. The genre’s understated yet detailed qualities have garnered it a great degree of recognition among musicians and critics but are often lost on mainstream audiences. However, it has always thrived by looking to the outside rather than the centre of the hip hop audience, allowing it to both reinforce and criticize the hip hop lifestyle—see De La Soul’s masterful “Stakes Is High” for evidence. 

Perhaps jazz and hip hop were never meant to exist together at the top of the charts. The underground remains its natural home. Despite BBNG’s sizeable momentum, based on previous cases, it is hard to see artists like them becoming hip-hop megastars. However, there’s plenty of room to succeed on the edge of the mainstream. Here’s hoping I’m proven wrong. 

a, Recipes, Student Life

Making the simple exquisite: How to make juicy and perfect chicken

Follow this simple method for juicy and tender chicken breasts

Step 1

Flatten the boneless, skinless chicken breasts. 

Pound the chicken until it is a half inch thick using anything heavy you can find in your kitchen. This ensures a consistent, even-handed preparation.

Step 2

Season the chicken breasts. 

Use any seasoning desired for your dish, such as salt, pepper, or thyme. 

Step 3

Preheat the pan. 

Heat a pan over medium-high heat. When hot, add approximately 1 tablespoon of olive oil or butter.

Step 4

Cook chicken breasts for 1 minute  (do not move them). 

This will give the chicken breast a golden 

colour on one side.

Step 5

Flip the chicken breasts.

Step 6

Turn the heat down to low.

Step 7

Cover the pan with a tight-fitting lid.

Step 8

Cook on low for 10 minutes (do not lift the lid).

Step 9

Remove the lid and check the chicken for rawness.

Take one chicken breast off the heat and make a small incision to check the inside. Do not cut the chicken all the way through. If you do not see any pink, remove the chicken from the heat.

Step 10

Let the chicken breast rest for at least five minutes before slicing. 

This ensures any juices will remain in the meat, keeping the chicken nice and juicy.

 

a, Science & Technology, Student Research

This Month in Student Research: Adam Marks

Dr. Claudio Cuello told Adam Marks that he could have a job if he found someone in the lab to take him on as an undergraduate researcher. Accepting the challenge, Marks approached a masters student to ask for a role. Two years later, the two of them are under review for publication, with another study in the works.

Alzheimer’s disease is typically characterized by short-term memory loss and disorientation, tending to manifest with age. Despite a recent surge of awareness, very little is known about the disease. As such, a majority of research surrounding Alzheimer’s currently focuses on understanding the disease from a biomolecular standpoint, rather than developing treatment methods.

Cuello’s lab at McGill is one of the foremost research centres on Alzheimer’s disease. Marks, who applied to Cuello’s lab in his sophomore year, is now a third-year biochemistry student working on his own projects at the Cuello lab. His current research focuses on characterizing the disease.

“[We’re trying to] look for biomarkers [to] understand the background mechanism behind why the symptoms are manifesting in the way that they are,” Marks said. “[We’re] looking at the cognitive deficits, outcomes of what’s going on, and [reasons] why these things are going on.”

The disease is typically characterized by both an accumulation of amyloid beta plaque proteins in the brain, and a build-up of tau protein aggregates. Although researchers have discovered that these aggregates are present in the brain of Alzheimer’s patients, no conclusions have yet been made as to the cause of these build-ups.

At the moment, Marks works with a rat amylopathy model—developed by the lab to mirror the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s—to find novel markers of the disease. 

“I’ve been doing […] a lot of immunohistochemistry [protocols], which involves taking tissues—either rat brain or mouse brain […] and staining it with antibodies against a specific protein, looking [at cells under a microscope], trying to find localizations of these proteins, and trying to find trends in the data,” Marks said.

Marks has been involved in research since his high school days, when he worked in a lab studying Multiple Sclerosis. Approaching two years now in the Cuello lab, Marks has achieved the seniority to engage in more projects, able to give more input on the research that is conducted in the lab. Although most students conducting undergraduate research focus primarily on applying to medical school, Marks said he has no desire to limit himself to clinical medicine. After all these years devoted to research, his goal is to develop his own research project as part of an MD/PhD program.

“For me personally, I need to maintain this aspect of my life with research,” Marks said. “With the [MD/PhD], you get a dual degree [….] You need to fully devote yourself to medical school and give 100 per cent to your research. I think that’s a nice balance, and it’s exactly what I want to do with my life.”

Beyond his passion for the research itself, Marks champions the research community and the sense of collaboration it creates.

“I like the whole [concept] behind research and the community it generates,” Marks said. “The whole sharing […] between labs and even lab members, just bouncing ideas off each other. It’s really an environment for developing new ideas and improving the scientific community as a whole.”

a, Fact or Fiction, Science & Technology

Fact or Fiction: Is it blue and black, or white and gold?

 

#TheDress became a viral sensation at the end of February, triggering heated arguments: Is the dress blue and black, or white and gold? Though the trivial debate was blown tiresomely out of proportion, the disagreements have revealed amazing differences in how our eyes and brains have developed to perceive colour.

To see colours and composite images, wavelengths of light hit the retina in the back of the eye. In the retina, light is sorted by cone cells sensitive to red, blue, or green wavelengths. From there, activated cone cells send action potentials along the optic nerve to the visual processing cortex of the brain. The combination of signals allows our brain to make near-instantaneous judgments on the colours around us.

“Ninety-nine per cent of the time we’ll see the same colours,” Dr. Julia Haller, the ophthalmologist-in-chief at Wills Eye Hospital in Philadelphia explained to CNN. “But the picture of this dress seems to have tints that hit the sweet spot that’s confusing to a lot of people.”

The light from the object that enters our eyes is dependent not only on the object’s intrinsic properties but also on the object’s surrounding illumination. The ability to assign fixed colours amidst changing ambient lighting is called colour constancy. Colour constancy allows us to manage these ambient differences, like sunlight at noon versus at sunset.

“Our visual system is supposed to throw away information about the illuminant and extract information about the actual reflectance,” explained neuroscientist Jay Neitz from the University of Washington. “I’ve studied individual differences in colour vision for 30 years, and this is one of the biggest individual differences I’ve ever seen.”

The discrepancy for this particular image lies in the lack of information about the dress’s surroundings. Though the background appears light in color, the source of illumination is not clear. If the dress appears washed out in bright light, then often the dress is seen to be blue and black. But if the dress is perceived under a dark shadow, it is more likely that the dress is seen as white and gold. When the context of illumination varies, so will visual perception.

What do these differences mean? Why do some view the dress in a shadow while others perceive an overexposed room?

“Why do some people love cilantro and others say it tastes like soap?” Haller responded. “Why do some people have perfect pitch and others are tone deaf? It’s the same with vision—our sensory apparatus is fine tuned.”

Our highly developed sense of colour likely stems from a biological evolutionary advantage. As trichromats—those who have red, green, and blue sensitive cone cells—human ancestors were more likely to perceive a difference in colour between a ripe fruit and its surrounding foliage compared to dichromats—almost all non-primate mammals. Heightened sensitivity to colour differences thus conferred a greater chance of survival to fellow trichromats. Our ability to sense a wide array of color likely means there are slight variations in our visual information filtering. The differences of perceived dress colour is therefore likely the product of evolutionary variability. 

a, News, SSMU

SSMU Council endorses QPIRG referendum question

Motion to support QPIRG Winter 2015 referendum

Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Council passed a motion to support the McGill  branch of the Québec Public Interest Research Group (QPIRG)’s 2015 referendum by endorsing a “Yes” vote for a fee increase from the current $3.75 per semester to $5.00 per semester for full-time students. SSMU Vice-President University Affairs Claire Stewart-Kanigan spoke to the motion.  

“QPIRG provides a hub on campus for social justice-related research, advocacy, and organizing,” she said. “But it’s also a great academic resource for the community [….] QPIRG provides an excellent service on campus and there is clearly rationale for the expansion of their resources to continue providing the great services that they do.” 

QPIRG plans to use the $42,000 that would be gained from the fee increase to sustain current programming as well as to fund new initiatives, such as the creation of more work study positions, according to QPIRG student board members Ella Belfer and Cadence O’Neal.

“Over the past few years, our finances have been increasingly unsustainable,” Belfer said to Council. “We’ve been trying to supplement that as much as possible with grants and external sources of funding, but a lot of those sources of funding have been drying up, and at the same time, inflation has made our budget a lot smaller.” 

Among the services that QPIRG has had to cut back on this year are Culture Shock and Social Justice Days, two of QPIRG’s annual event series. Culture Shock, which in the past has run for a full week, was reduced to three days.

“It’s really important that SSMU is vocal in supporting QPIRG,” Belfer said. “One of the valuable things that we’ve been able to provide to the campus is an alternative space for people who don’t necessarily feel like they’re included in a lot of typical McGill activities, anything from frosh to ongoing programs, clubs, and events.”

Motion regarding interim changes for Board of Directors elections

Council also passed a motion regarding interim changes for the Board of Directors elections. The motion allows elections for the Board of Directors to take place earlier in the year, institutionalizes the responsibility of being a councillor on the Board of Directors during the summer period, and gives SSMU permission to run a referendum to approve Board of Director nominations outside the regular approval timeframe, according to the motion document and its mover Stewart-Kanigan. 

It also mandates outgoing Executive Committee members to inform incoming councillors of the opportunity to sit on the Board of Directors and train the elected councillors to be informed of the opportunity before June 1.   

“The benefit [of this motion] is that the Election Committee will actually be able to do work during the summer,” Medicine Senator David Benrimoh said. “This will actually end up with a better Board of Directors that’s better trained and knows what it’s getting itself into.”

Notice of motion to support family care

Stewart-Kanigan raised a notice of motion regarding the SSMU Policy of Support for Family Care. The motion, if passed, would have SSMU adopt an ongoing stance of support for current and future efforts to expand child care services for SSMU and McGill community members. SSMU would also participate in advocacy efforts to lobby the Quebec government to expand the provision of limits on daycare licenses granted by the government.

“[Family care] has been an ongoing challenge on campus,” Stewart-Kanigan said. “The daycare needs are dramatically underserved, with over 700 children currently on the waiting list with the McGill Childcare Centre [….] These are longstanding issues that are going to require multi-year advocacy, and it’s important to have a policy that stands through for those series of years.”

The motion will be brought to Council on March 12. 

a, Arts & Entertainment, Music

Lose your language to dance with Le Couleur

Montreal-based trio Le Couleur is back in town promoting their latest EP, Dolce Desir. The drummer of the electro-dance-pop group, Steven Chouniard, took time to speak with the Tribune in the midst of their tour, which began in New York City and will be continuing up to Quebec City.

For a group singing entirely in French, playing for predominantly English-speaking audiences in anglophone cities like New York and Toronto may seem like a risk. As Chouinard explained, it’s quite the opposite.  

“I didn’t expect anything like this,” Chouinard admitted, describing the success of their tour thus far. “We’re singing in French [for mostly] English people, so you don’t know what [to expect]. But it went really well, actually. The American people are very open [to] this language.” 

The band also attributes its success within anglophone audiences to the style of music it plays. 

“We are doing this kind of dance-y house disco music that can take on any language,” Chouinard said.

When prompted with the question of defining the band’s music, however, Chouinard paused. 

“That is a hard question actually, because we don’t like to categorize our music,” Chouinard explained. “No artist likes to categorize [his or her] music [….] I would say, like I said earlier, it’s dance music. We want to make people dance.”

In defining the impact he wanted to have in the music world, Chouinard responded humbly: It’s not about the fame, it’s about the music. 

“We just want to to play our music in front of people,” Chouinard said. “And the more people [that are] there, the more happy we are [….] You put all your passion, all your money, all your time, all your heart in those songs […] The goal is just to play in front of more people, and just live with your music, live with your passion.”

 Le Couleur’s passion about their music means they rarely have time to do anything else, but when the members of Le Couleur do find free time, they enjoy tracking down musical gems—particularly vinyl records. It’s difficult for the group to find spare moments like these while on tour, however. Chouinard acknowledged the difficulties that come with constant travel.

“You arrive [at the city you’re performing in], you’ve been driving all day, you get to the venue for the soundcheck, you have some time between the soundcheck and the performance, you eat—sometimes you don’t have time, so you don’t eat,” Chouinard lamented. “In the morning, you pack up the set and you get to the other [venue].” 

The high-speed, high-intensity nature of going on tour is just part of the job. Outlining his hectic schedule for the past few days, Chouinard explained how he had only gotten three hours of sleep the night before. Playing shows at night had kept him up late, only to wake up several hours later in the early morning to travel to the next stop on tour. However, Chouinard noted that type of hard work and motivation is essential to finding prosperity in the music business. 

“You have to work very, very hard, and you don’t give up, you keep going.” 

a, Opinion

Commentary: Pinkwashing event ignores LGBTQ progress in Israel

I got off the bus at the station and eagerly looked around. Excitement rushed through my veins as I saw him. With a huge smile on my face, I fell into his arms; this was my boyfriend. We walked along the water’s edge, hand in hand, as people passed us with hidden smiles of pride and support. I wasn’t used to that, but then I reminded myself: I was in Israel.

As a person who has benefitted personally from the LGBTQ rights that Israel upholds, I was deeply offended when I found out about McGill’s Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights’ (SPHR) Pinkwashing event, “Palestine is a Queer Issue: A Workshop on Israeli Pinkwashing and Homonationalism,” a workshop which seeks to inform students about alleged Israeli pinkwashing. Pinkwashing is the idea that Israel has and promotes LGBTQ rights in order to distract from its treatment of Palestinians. It does not take into account the fact that hundreds of thousands of citizens of Israel, and tourists like myself, are actually benefitting every single minute of every single day from these rights, which are in place because Israel was founded on principles of equality

As stated in the Declaration of Independence, Israel upholds equal rights for all inhabitants regardless of religion, race, or sex. Israel holds regular free and democratic elections and has an independent judiciary. All of these are the requirements and fundamental aspects of a liberal democratic country. Furthermore, Israel is a proud supporter of LGBTQ rights, unheard of in the Middle East and still uncommon throughout the world.

LGBTQ rights are human rights and should never be reduced to claims of political scheming.

The attempts of naysayers to turn around the progress of LGBTQ citizens’ rights in Israel and use it as an attack on Israel is astounding. The term pinkwashing is offensive to all those who fought hard for equal LGBTQ rights in Israel, to all citizens and visitors of Israel who have directly benefited from these laws, and to anyone who earnestly defends and promotes LGBTQ rights anywhere in the world. To shame Israel, or any country, for having progressive laws protecting a minority is appalling.

Israel promotes its LGBTQ rights, along with all of its citizens’ minority rights, not to distract from the Palestinian’s plight, but out of pride of being a liberal democracy. In fact, the first step towards LGBTQ rights, namely not enforcing previous bans on homosexual activity, occurred in Israel in the early 1960s. However, having LGBTQ rights does not make Israel the democracy that it is. Israel’s regular representational elections and independent judiciary do that. Instead, LGBTQ rights are just one example of how Israel extends human rights to all of its citizens.

Unfortunately, Israel has legitimate security concerns, and has the responsibility as a democracy to protect all of its citizens including Jews, Christians, Muslims, Druze and LGBTQ. Israel ensures that it upholds the fundamental human rights of each of these groups. Both Palestinians and Israelis have committed reprehensible acts, and as such, claiming one to be an innocent victim is not helpful. Clearly, this discussion is complex, and not the simplistic case of aggressor versus innocent victim, and adding the claim of pinkwashing into the mix is egregious. LGBTQ rights are human rights and should never be reduced to claims of political scheming. They should only be used as a beacon of hope for equality, much needed in the region. The only way forward is open, two-sided dialogue—not one-sided censures, divestments, or movements such as the offensive pinkwashing event, which are not helpful for the pursuit of reconciliation or peace.

 

Have your say, write for opinion. Email [email protected]

 

a, Science & Technology

Protecting against piracy using DRMs

Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology has permeated our phones, our computers, even our coffee makers. In theory, DRM is meant to protect content creators from piracy; however, its critics are quick to disagree. According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, DRM technologies “impede innovation, security, and basic user rights and expectations, while failing to inhibit copyright infringement.” 

Although DRM is not at the front of most people’s minds when they read a book on an e-reader or listen to music on an iPhone, it plays a major role in how media is consumed and what sources it can be accessed from. DRM ensures that eBooks bought from Amazon can only be read on a Kindle, and Microsoft can limit the number of computers that can run a single licence of Office. 

While it’s possible to get around DRM and, for example, read books from the Kindle store on a Nook, the expertise and time required to do so provides enough of a barrier that the average consumer is forced to either own two different devices, or purchase content from only a single provider. The pervasiveness of DRM turns it into something to be assumed rather than questioned.

Occasionally, DRM does win the spotlight. When Microsoft initially unveiled the Xbox One, gamers were outraged because of the “always-online” functionality that prevented players from borrowing games from friends or purchasing second-hand editions. The reaction of the Xbox community was so overwhelmingly negative that Microsoft ended up scrapping the concept. 

Ignoring consumer opposition to DRM can land a company in hot water, as Keurig has recently discovered. The coffee machine giant released its ‘Keurig 2.0’ in 2014, quietly adding a feature that prevented new machines from reading K-cups that it hadn’t produced. Despite consumer backlash, Keurig has stood by its decision to add DRM to the coffee industry. It saw a 12 per cent decline in revenue in Canada in the financial quarter following the Keurig 2.0 release.

DRM opposition can be seen as being moral. Opponents think that the practice goes against individual rights and gives too much power to large corporations. On a more practical level, DRM can also lead to major security vulnerabilities. In the early 2000s, Sony used software called XCP to restrict customer use of the music on CDs produced by the company. It was later revealed that this software left users’ computers vulnerable to third-party attacks. 

DRM is also criticized for its inefficacy. In theory, the technology is intended to prevent piracy. In practice, it is still possible for users to circumvent these restrictions. In fact, many methods of doing so can be found with a quick Google search; typing “Keurig 2.0” into the search engine prompts “keurig 2.0 hack” as one of the first suggestions. Jailbroken iPhones, an array of file conversion software, and programs that rip movies off of DVDs are all examples of how easy it is to get around DRM.

For most, DRM is little more than an inconvenience, like traffic jams. Its ubiquity causes it to fall off of the radar, except for the occasional media frenzy. This becomes a problem when the inconvenience turns into a liability, as was the case with Sony in 2005. Without an informed consumer base, it’s easy for DRM to be used in such a way that consumer rights are compromised. This leads to DRM’s greatest danger: It’s everywhere, but no one realizes.

Parti Québécois leader Pauline Marois addresses her supporters in victory rally, minutes before fatal shooting. (Simon Poitrimolt / McGill Tribune)
a, Opinion

Commentary: Language requirements necessary for Quebec’s culture and economy

Quebec’s incessant language war found new fuel as McGill and Concordia recently released statements criticizing the province’s strict French language requirement for granting permanent residency, which was introduced in 2013 by the Parti Québécois (PQ). The universities claim that strict rules requiring proficiency in French are making it difficult to attract foreign professors.

The Liberal Party of Quebec responded to these complaints and instituted changes in December 2014 to make it easier for candidates with doctoral degrees to gain permanent resident status by giving them more ‘points’ in the immigration process. It would not be fair or necessary to implement further changes to make it easier for foreign professors to come to Quebec. The provincial government subsidizes universities with taxpayer money. Considering that the majority of taxpayers in Quebec are French-speaking, it is safe to assume that it wouldn’t represent the majority’s wishes to allow easier immigration for non-francophones to teach in Quebec’s universities.

Many anglophones have continued to demand that the government reform language laws to make it even easier for professors to bypass the requirements, in the hopes that this would allow universities to obtain the best talents possible. However, this mandate fails to look at the issue from a wider perspective. The clear goal of the strict language standards is to protect the French language in Quebec. All Quebec institutions—including McGill and Concordia—have a lot to gain from the preservation of the native language in the long run, which is what attracts many students to Montreal and to their universities. Therefore, the regulations are best left alone.

“All Quebec institutions […] have a lot to gain from the preservation of the native language in the long run.”

The urgency of the decline of the French language in Canada is another main factor necessitating strict language regulations. According to Statistics Canada, in 1981, 25 per cent of Canadians reported using French as the main language in their home, and in 2011, this percentage shrank to 21 per cent. While this drop is alarming enough for francophones, the truly worrisome part is that the decreasing use of French in Quebec itself is contributing to the decline rather than offsetting it. While there are many factors contributing to this decline of French in Quebec, the influx of non-French speaking immigrants constitutes a large part of the decline in French usage.

The Quebec government seeks to stop the movement away from the French language. Unless the movement away from using French is slowed, division and hostility between anglophones and francophones will reach a boiling point. According to some, political division and threats of separation are already key players behind Quebec’s poor economy. Investors and researchers do not want to put time or resources into a province that is as politically volatile as Quebec. Therefore, preserving the native language and maintaining political stability by keeping the majority happy is one way for Quebec to attract more business in the future, which will, in itself, attract more foreign workers and professors.

Furthermore, the idea of bringing in foreign professors and other workers at the cost of Quebec’s language and culture is counterproductive. Many people come to Quebec for the distinct lifestyle it offers—some even come to learn French. As McGill Principal Suzanne Fortier said in 2013, “McGill can attract the best professors and the best researchers because it attracts the best students. And we can attract the best students because they are attracted to Quebec.” Quebec’s identity is based around being the only French-speaking province in Canada, and if the language continues to get phased out, the province may not attract as many newcomers. While the strict language requirements may seem harsh, they are an efficient way to ensure the survival of the French language in Quebec, which will improve its economy and preserve its identity in the long run.

Have your say, write for opinion. Email [email protected]

a, Off the Board, Opinion

Off the board: Broadening the feminist scope – In defence of Lana Del Rey

In a now-famous interview with Fader Magazine, Lana Del Rey was quoted saying, “For me, the issue of feminism is just not an interesting concept,” and that she is “more interested in intergalactic explorations.” This resulted in backlash, harsh criticisms, and a firm ‘anti-feminist’ label on her and her subsequent album, Ultraviolence.

At first, it’s not hard to see where this backlash stems from. Del Rey’s entire musical persona is that of a damsel-in-distress, stuck on the wrong side of the American dream, in which she was so brainwashed and confused between love and abuse that her ‘lover’ “hit [her] and it felt like a kiss.” Thus, critics such as Nolan Feeney the New York Times insisted that Del Rey was not only anti-feminist, but also glorifying domestic violence. Even Lorde weighed in on the controversy, stating that, “This type of shirt-tugging, don’t leave me stuff just isn’t healthy for young girls to hear.” It is true that Del Rey’s drug and sex-filled lyrical themes don’t paint the most traditionally empowering image of the modern woman. 

However, her outspokenness against the traditional feminist image of a powerful, independent woman is what makes Del Rey not only a controversial figure, but also an easy target. Strong, independent, and charismatic women such as Beyoncé and Lorde are the poster girls for the feminist movement. They are people who strive for a dominant position within society, and this shows in their music and how the public perceives them. Del Rey, on the other hand, comes across as a lonely, depressed, and desperate character; unsure of herself and lost in a whirlwind of American flags, red dresses, and men. Beneath the makeup and ’60s-bouffant hair, however, Del Rey is a reflection of our own loud voices, ideas, and frustrations. Silenced by her critics and feminist detractors, she is a model onto which society projects and pins up its own dangerously skewed perceptions. 

In an interview with the Huffington Post, Kim Gordon, founder of the band Sonic Youth, discussed the issue that many critics have with Del Rey: “Lana Del Rey […] believes women can do whatever they want, which, in her world, tilts towards self-destruction.” Del Rey is labelled anti-feminist because she is accused of undermining everything that women have worked hard in order to move away from. Therefore, her wallowing around in a lonely room of drugs, depression, and dependency is seen as detrimental to the feminist movement. 

However, these criticisms of Del Rey’s work and the lifestyle she chooses go completely against the values that feminist movement should be upholding. Why can’t there be a soft, broken, and vulnerable feminist? 

Society should be accepting of women of all personalities, choices, and lifestyles—not ignoring them because they don’t fit within the standard feminist mould.

Rejecting Lana Del Rey and her form of femininity is detrimental to the movement. Focusing the spotlight on super-women like Beyoncé creates an unrealistic and unachievable model for women to strive for, and deepens the stereotype of a feminist woman as someone who is conventionally ‘powerful.’ Society should be accepting of women of all personalities, choices, and lifestyles—not ignoring them because they don’t fit within the ‘standard’ feminist mould. In the monologue to her music video for “Ride,” Del Rey asks, “Who are you? Are you in touch with all of your darkest fantasies?” before confidently declaring: “I am; I am fucking crazy…. But I am free.” This notion of being free perfectly encapsulates Del Rey’s stance towards the feminist movement: Women should be free to be themselves, even if that self is flawed, and at times weak and disempowered. In her interview with Fader Magazine, Del Rey expanded on her attitude towards feminism, stating that, “[Her] idea of a true feminist is a woman who feels free enough to do whatever she wants.” She takes her freedom for granted, living the way she wants, with whoever she wants, all while defying the critics of her actions in the process.

Del Rey fills a gap within the feminist movement. She stands for the dark, the submissive, and the misjudged. Her very existence, and the criticism she’s received, is reflective of the anti-feminism that still exists today, but those who are attacking her choices and lifestyle are the very people who also claim to want equality. By accepting one type of woman as the ideal of feminism, the movement narrows itself and becomes unable to branch out and reach the broader range of individuals who are trying to exist, shutting them down because they do not fit into the categories that have been created in the name of ‘progress.’

Have your say, write for opinion. Email [email protected]

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue