Latest News

a, Recipes, Student Life

Five easy ways to use up old bananas

Do you have a bunch of bananas that are turning brown? Don’t throw them out! Here are a few quick and easy ways to use up your old bananas.

Make healthy ice cream: Freeze your bananas (after peeling!) and throw them in the blender. Blend until they have the same consistency as ice cream. Add peanut butter or Nutella for added flavour.

Bake banana bread: Banana bread actually tastes better when made with brown and bruised bananas.

Make banana ice cream bites: Melt 1 cup of chocolate chips and 1/2 cup of peanut butter in the microwave. Slice three bananas into bite-sized pieces and dip them in the chocolate. Lay chocolate covered banana slices on a baking pan and put them in the freezer for a quick dessert later on.

Flip gluten-free pancakes: Mix 1 1/2 bananas with two eggs and 1/8 teaspoon of baking powder. Cook on medium-heat in a frying pan to make gluten-free banana pancakes.

Add them to smookies or shakes: No one notices brown bananas when they’ve been mixed up with milk, berries, or yogurt! Use a blender to mix the following ingredients together. Add spinach leaves, a handful of nuts, or flax seed to make your smoothies even healthier.

Berry smoothie

1 banana

1 cup mixed berries

1 cup yogurt

1 cup milk

1/2 tbsp honey

Mango avocado smoothie

1 banana

1 avocado

1 cup cubed mango

1 cup orange juice

1/2 cup water

Chocolate banana milkshake

1 banana

2 cups chocolate ice cream

1/2 cup peanut butter

1 cup milk

2 tsp cocoa powder

Changing the game NBA lottery
a, Basketball, Sports

NBA Lottery

Traditionally, ‘tanking’ has been defined as teams losing games on purpose—either through a decimated roster or the benching of good players—in order to obtain a higher draft pick in the NBA Lottery system. The issue of tanking in the NBA has been a hot topic this season, with a terrible Eastern Conference ruining the quality of play in the league. Franchises are salivating at the thought of the loaded 2014 draft class—touted as one of the best in league history. 

The NBA itself has publicly recognized the issue this year, as losing teams have been thought to bring in less revenue and lower the overall entertainment value of the league. An alternative solution to the Lottery—which has been accused of rewarding losing teams—has been dubbed “The Wheel,” an option which emerged earlier this year in which a yearly drafting order is set in advance. However, the proposed solution has been widely criticized for giving college players the power to wait for a preferred team’s no. 1 overall draft year, thus potentially further penalizing smaller market teams. 

This week, Trib Sports weighs in on our thoughts on the NBA Lottery and tanking, and whether or not there are any acceptable solutions for the league to adopt.

A matter of incentive

Even if you aren’t a Philadelphia 76ers fan, there’s not a soul who can take pleasure in a 26-game losing streak. Schadenfreude has its limits. For a game that already produces the most predictable outcomes out of the “Big Four” North American sports, tanking is threatening to turn the NBA regular season into a glorified dress rehearsal for the playoffs from the first tip-off. Teams such as the Phoenix Suns will always be around to surprise fans, but the conference finals are all but set in stone. Nobody can blame the bottom-feeders of the league for tailoring their “strategy” to the incentive system provided by the NBA.

Incentive is the keyword here. A 25 per cent shot at the first overall pick doesn’t seem juicy enough to entice teams to aim for the worst record, but at the very least it can give an otherwise depressing season a concrete long-term goal. In other words, it’s a great way to reassure a restless fan base.

The chance of landing the first pick was actually increased to its present odds from 16.7 per cent, after the Orlando Magic somehow won the 1993 NBA draft lottery after barely missing the playoffs in the previous season. If the NBA were to revert to the pre-1993 system—or even further lower the odds 10 per cent—front offices wouldn’t find it so easy to sell tanking as a feasible strategy.

—Elie Waitzer

Rewarding the efficient

According to new NBA Commissioner Adam Silver, the effectiveness of a draft pick is dependent on the competency of a franchise’s management—not the talent of the drafted player. This is a logical position given that NBA teams only get two draft picks allotted to them. No matter how talented the player, a team’s system has the greatest impact on the win totals—just ask Kyrie Irving of the Cleveland Cavaliers.

Teams must be incentivized to encourage good management and effective basketball. The NBA should raise salary caps for non-playoff teams who meet certain defensive and offensive targets, respectively. For example, the best five non-playoff teams in the league by means of point differential should have a salary cap increase for the following year, thus rewarding their better play. This would allow other teams greater flexibility  in the team building process rather than solely relying on the draft, a hit and miss endeavour. The NBA should be encouraging a more efficient and winning style of basketball by using the salary cap to increase incentives for teams to win.

—Zikomo Smith

Strategy is strategy

If you ask any die-hard fan if they’d rather see their team finish just out of the playoffs or in dead last, you can rest assured they’ll almost always answer with the latter. While many find tanking unethical, the reality is that tanking is merely a strategy to position yourself at the top of the draft in hopes of accumulating assets for future success.

Over the past 10 years, the NBA’s worst team has only received the no. 1 overall pick once, while teams outside of the bottom three have received the highly coveted pick a surprising seven times. For teams who are lucky enough to get a top three pick, drafting a franchise player is no sure thing. Since 2004, four players taken in the top three of the draft have turned into superstars, while about 20 per cent of those picks have been considered a bust. The San Antonio Spurs turned the 1997 first overall pick into almost two decades of success, while teams like the Cleveland Cavaliers consistently find themselves in the lottery, despite having had four top-five picks in the past three years.

Tanking might seem like a good strategy, but with the way the lottery is set up alongside the chances of drafting a bust, it is clear that losing in the present doesn’t guarantee future success. The NBA doesn’t need to prevent teams from tanking, because good organizations know that losing intentionally is never a good idea.

—Aaron Rose

March Madness in the NBA

Success in the NBA—real success, the kind that is only achieved by winning a championship—is only tasted by a select few franchises. The other organizations, the metaphorical 99 per cent, have turned to tanking with mixed results. To fix the issue, new NBA commissioner Adam Silver should create an exciting way to punish reward poor team-building. One such idea would be to host a parallel post-season for the eight worst teams in the league by record, a spin-off on the ‘Entertaining as Hell Tournament’ proposed by ESPN’s Bill Simmons. These franchises would play in a single elimination tournament akin to the NCAA Tournament for the right to the highest draft pick in the upcoming entry draft. The winner of the three round tournament would receive the first overall pick, while the runner-up would pick second. For the teams who got knocked out in the semifinals, the franchise with the worse record would get the third pick while the other gets the fourth. Finally, teams that were eliminated in the first round, would receive picks five to eight based inversely on record. This would incentivize against having D-League talent on an NBA roster, while giving downtrodden fan bases a more accessible form of hope in a win-or-go-home tournament.

—Mayaz Alam

Olympic Stadium Montreal
a, Baseball, Sports

Out of the Park

Olympic Park sits north-east of the downtown core and is tucked away on the edge of Viauville, right by Pie-IX station. The surrounding area is mostly residential, with a few stores sprinkled here and there, and main streets are often four lanes wide. There are very few attractions drawing crowds to the area beyond the park, making foot traffic light. It was nearly 40 years ago that Montreal played host to the XXI Olympiad—the first ever held in Canada. Nowadays, the legacy of those Olympic Games is disputed. The Games themselves were largely successful, but once the flame was extinguished, massive debt that lingered made many taxpayers wonder whether it was all worth it.

Over the years, many of the venues have either begun to serve a new purpose or have been sold. The Velodrome, which played host to indoor cycling and judo events, later became the Biodome. Maurice Richard Arena, built to house Olympic boxing and wrestling, is now one of the city’s many ice rinks. The Olympic Village was sold in 1998 and is currently used as office space. Olympic Stadium, however, once the crown jewel of the Games, remains empty on most nights. Its high cost, rough condition, and slim usage have made it a sticking point for those who label the 1976 games a failure.

The “Big O,” as it is nicknamed, will play host to just three events this month: two soccer matches and a monster truck rally. The stadium is closed during the winter months due to safety concerns involving snow build-up on its roof. In the early days of the Montreal Expos—the original tenants of the venue who later moved away in 2004—the stadium gained a reputation as being one of the loudest in professional sports. These days, with no team to call its own or fans to fill the seats, it remains silent. The tower at its north base, the tallest inclined tower in the world, is typically busier than the stadium itself, providing a view of both Olympic Park and Montreal’s downtown. In 2012, after 35 years of sitting idle, the Esplanade just outside the stadium was overhauled and is now home to a skating rink in the winter and various events during the warmer months. Despite the many efforts to make Olympic Stadium an attractive destination again, it seems destined to remain a burden rather than a blessing for the city of Montreal.

“The Montreal Olympics can no more have a deficit, than a man can have a baby,” Montreal Mayor Jean Drapeau infamously proclaimed when the city was awarded the games. Drapeau, however, was clearly mistaken, as various complications and worker strikes led to skyrocketing construction costs.

For many cities vying for future Olympic Games, the 1976 Olympics have become a cautionary tale of sorts; it wasn’t until December of 2006 that Montreal was able to finally pay off its $1.5 billion Olympic debt. The final price tag was drastically higher than original predictions, and the Olympics nearly bankrupted the city. Olympic Stadium even earned the tongue-in-cheek nickname, “The Big Owe.” In the end, a large portion of the debt was paid off using revenue from a tobacco tax.

French architect Roger Taillibert designed nearly all the venues in Olympic Park, including Olympic Stadium, but was unapologetic about rising costs in the years prior to the games.

“Why should we recover money spent on public facilities?” Taillibert told the CBC in an interview before the games. “They are public facilities. It’s like a highway—it’s a need for the community. A hospital doesn’t have to recover its money, does it?”

Unlike a hospital, Olympic Stadium has done very little to truly help the public. Initial estimates for its cost were around $150-200 million, but when construction was finally completed in 1976, the stadium had cost $770 million and the retractable roof had yet to be installed. Nowadays, the roof is the source of significant woe. It no longer opens, and the surface is damaged by constant rips, thus requiring regular repairs. In 2012, maintenance costs were around $400,000 for 1,240 rips, but those costs doubled in 2013, with the number of rips practically tripled. To date, Olympic Stadium has cost around $1.5 billion—a sum that continues to rise.

These sorts of repairs would seem far less significant if the stadium was able to generate revenue, but that is not the case. The building hasn’t been the permanent home of any professional team since 2004, and musicians coming to town to play in front of large crowds now mostly end up at the Bell Centre or Parc Jean Drapeau.

While the Montreal Alouettes and the Montreal Impact, the city’s CFL and MLS franchises respectively, both occasionally play big games at Olympic Stadium, it’s the Montreal Expos—who called the building home for 27 years—that are most often associated with the venue. The Expos’ move to Washington 10 years ago did not come as a surprise. For years attendance had been low, and the lack of a competitive team made it difficult to change that. On most nights, between 10,000-15,000 fans walked through the turnstiles at the cavernous Olympic Stadium. This was a far cry from the early 1980s, when the Expos would rank near the top of the National League in attendance each season.

Many fans now see the 1994 MLB player strike as the beginning of the end. Crowds in the years prior to 1994 had begun to thin, but the Expos looked like a lock for the World Series that season. When the season was cancelled, Montreal held a 74-40 record and was six games ahead of the reigning NL Champion Atlanta Braves. Following the strike, several core players were either traded or not signed as part of cost-cutting measures, and fans were left wondering what could have been. It was clear that the Expos were on their way out by the time 2004 rolled around. In each of their final two seasons, the Expos played 22 home games in Puerto Rico and were dead last in attendance both years. In 2005, the Expos became the Washington Nationals, and Olympic Stadium was left empty.

A decade after the Expos’ departure, baseball returned to Olympic Stadium in the form of two exhibition games between the Toronto Blue Jays and New York Mets last weekend. Blue Jays President Paul Beeston is hopeful about baseball returning to Montreal, but facilities remain an issue for him.

“What they need is a stadium,” Beeston told Sportsnet last fall. “And if they get a new stadium, Montreal is a great baseball city.”

With or without a baseball team, however, the city of Montreal sits at a crossroads with respect to Olympic Stadium—and it will need to make a decision soon. The stadium costs taxpayers more money each year, but delivers very few benefits. It will either need to be torn down or drastically overhauled, neither of which is attractive in fiscal terms. A new roof will clearly be needed if the facility is going to remain, but it will not come cheap. According to the CBC, a fixed roof would cost around $200 million, and a retractable roof at least $300 million. On the other side of the coin, razing the stadium, tower, rotunda, and surrounding parking lots will also be an expensive proposition. One feasibility report from 2009 estimated a cost of around $700 million, though the author of the report, Gino Lanni, has said that the margin of error used was high enough that the findings could be skewed by a couple hundred million dollars.

Those in favour of investing more money in the stadium need to be certain they aren’t committing to this due to the sunk costs–unrecoverable, wasted investments—that Olympic Stadium represents. Some will argue that Olympic Stadium is an integral part of the city’s history, which while valid, is not enough on its own. Other arguments in favour of refurbishing the stadium hinge on possibilities that are far from being certain: a new baseball team, or Canada hosting the 2026 World Cup. As long as these sources of future revenue remain uncertain, more money should not be poured into the stadium.

Though it may hurt in the short term, demolishing Olympic Stadium is necessary for the city to finally move out from under the shadow of the 1976 games. Montreal has the opportunity to show former host cities in similar circumstances that it is never too late to fix an old mistake. Nearly 40 years after it first opened its doors, it is time for the city to say goodbye to Olympic Stadium.

Documents required to obtain a post-graduate work permit
a, Student Life

Post-grad visa: $155, staying in Canada: priceless

For graduating students, the haunting question “what are you doing after McGill” follows us wherever we go. But for international students, post-graduation plans are complicated by a further question—“can I even stay in Canada?”

Graduating international students can stay in Canada if they apply for a post-graduate work permit—the length of which can vary. If your program was over two years long, your permit can last up to three years; if your program was under two years, the duration of the permit will last as long as the program.

The permit costs $155, and allows international students to work anywhere in Canada even if you don’t have a job lined up when you apply. You’re also allowed to leave and return to the country throughout the duration of the permit.

To apply, students need to submit a copy of their passport, a copy of their valid study permit, and a letter from McGill confirming the completion of all degree requirements. There’s no language component to the application.

According to Corrie Bertone, international student advisor at McGill’s International Student Services, most students can apply for the permit online. Processing times vary, but Immigration Canada updates estimated times weekly online. However, students from “exempt countries,” which do not require entry visas, can go to the Canada-U.S. countries border crossing and receive one within a day. Among these are Australia, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, and most European countries.

Bertone says there’s one type of person she advises against getting a post-graduate work permit: those who plan to continue their studies in the next three years.

“This post grad-work permit is a once in a lifetime opportunity,” she says. “As soon as you submit an application for [the permit] and you obtain it, that’s it. You have it for three years. Should you decide to go to school next January, you can’t say to Immigration Canada, ‘Oh, put a hold on my work permit, I’m not using it anymore.’”

Because the permit can only be granted once, if a student were to decide to do a master’s degree in a year or two, he or she would not be able to reapply for a new permit afterwards. While other work permits are available, they often require you to have a job lined up and take longer to process.

“You can only get it once,” Bertone emphasizes. “That’s very important to keep in mind if somebody’s intention is to go back to school. It happens—sometimes students don’t get into their program, or they’re not quite sure of what to do, and they change their mind.”

Students can apply for the permit beginning on graduation day and only for the following 90 days, so it’s best to start early if you’re planning on getting a permit. Remember—you need a valid study permit at the time of your application, so even if your permit extends beyond 90 days after graduation, you still have to apply within that time frame.

“Even if your plan is not to remain in Canada but you find a good job offer, it’s a contract for a couple of years—it’s good experience and good money,” Bertone says. “But if somebody’s intention is to stay here, they can use this time that they’re working post-grad to hop on their future. It’s become a very good opportunity.”

Joen Lee Student of the week
a, Student Life

Student of the Week: Joen Lee

At first glance, you would never expect that soft-spoken Joen Lee could throw down a mean R&B rap.

Lee is the President of Effusion, one of McGill’s a cappella ensembles, and has devoted many hours to maintaining the well-oiled music-making machine.

Lee plays the “mama figure” in the group, and has used this year to integrate the “newbies” into the long established Effusion family.

“[There’s been] a lot of trying to get that ‘family vibe’ and really solidifying our dynamic […] because chemistry is so important,” Lee explained. “By developing that family vibe, good music comes from that.”

What sets Effusion apart from other McGill clubs, according to Lee, is their professional nature; the group can be booked for private events such as weddings and tours. They are a company rather than just a tight-knit singing group.

“We have so many gigs,” Lee said proudly. “Google hires us. We recently did a gig with FIFA [….] We are very much in a sense our own private business.”

Consequently, she has also become a sort of manager for the troupe.

“[I’m] always trying to interact with other people and liaise with other people, [but] at the same time, maintain the integrity of the group […] and maintain that professionalism, not just in the way we dress, [but] in our interactions and different things,” Lee said.

Not all of Lee’s work as president has been external; this year required a lot of organization for an influx of new members into the a cappella family.

“[There was] more internal work as well—organizing and coordinating each individual member and our schedule,” she said.

Her emphasis was on the dynamics of the group—to create the best possible relationships between members so they could perform to their best ability as one cohesive voice.

“I think as president, my first mandate was to be in tune with each [member], to be really in sync­—that was my main goal,” Lee said. “In the beginning of the semester, we actually did very few gigs just to work on us [.…] A proper foundation was [one of] my goals as president.”

Lee also took some new initiatives for the group this year.

“[We] got a really awesome recording together through a friend of mine,” she said. “[We’ve been] doing things we don’t usually do, [but] not too many changes because I think Effusion is all about tradition.”

Lee’s capacity as president has crossover from the Effusion scope and manifested itself in other areas of her life as well.

“[Presidency] has allowed me to grow so much personally,” she said. “The biggest thing for me is communication and presentation [.…] I think that has also made me learn to be more comfortable in my own skin—the fact that you’re on stage singing in front of hundreds of people.”

As Lee’s last weeks as a McGill student and as the president of Effusion dwindle down, there are some things she’ll take forward with her.

“You [interact] with all these professionals, adults, and groups of people most of the time, that you normally wouldn’t get to as a university student,” she said. “I think communication is a big [takeaway] for me […] it will apply, definitely, to other places—whatever I get into.”

McGill Tribune: What artist—living or dead—would you love to perform with?

Joen Lee: “I love classic jazz musicians. Ella Fitzgerald would be my favourite.”

MT: What’s your favourite shade of blue?

JL: Navy.

MT: Do you have a party trick?

JL: I’ve never rapped before in my life, but [in] the Fall I wanted to try it. In “Everybody’s Got Their Something” there’s a part that I rapped for and it was such a shocker for this little Asian girl to come in rapping.

MT: Pizza party or pastry party?

JL: Oooh, pastry party.

MT: What is your favourite song to sing when no one is listening?

JL: “6, 8, 12” by Brian Knight.

Medical school diaries
a, Science & Technology

The Med School Diaries

It was one of Montreal native Carl White Ulysse’s first days working in the hospital as a part of his second year in McGill’s medical program. The patient was lying down on his back as Ulysse manoeuvered the smooth, stainless steel of the laryngoscope through the patient’s vocal cords. He watched on the screen as the view shifted to the glottis—the space in between the chords—and the cords flapped open and closed. A year and a half after his acceptance into the program, he was finally performing hands-on work as a part of his path toward becoming a physician. It seemed like only a few moments ago he had submitted his application in anticipation of the hopes he would hear back positively from McGill.

For Sophia Bachilova, a second-year medical student at McGill from Massachusetts, she first fell in love with medicine when she spent a summer at a hospital undergoing physiotherapy for a broken arm. Although Bachilova was only four years old, this experience left an enduring impression on her that remained as she explored other aspects during her education.

“I always kept other options open to myself […] but I guess it was really as I was finishing my undergraduate and started volunteering at the Royal Victoria Hospital [when] I realized I wanted to apply and take the necessary time to [attend medical school],” Bachilova recalled. “Even though I didn’t get accepted at McGill the first time and got accepted to some schools in the States, I wanted to work in Montreal.”

Bachilova’s ‘aha’ moment resonates with many students who have clung onto their childhood aspiration to become a doctor. For others, medicine took a backseat in comparison to becoming a princess or going to outer space.

“I did a degree in evolutionary biology, which is not really applicable to medicine at all,” said Katherine Cole, who is currently in her second year of medical school at McGill and originally from Alberta. “I didn’t know that I wanted to be in medicine until quite late. I think in my first year of university, I started to figure out that this was where my skill set and interests were best suited. When you’re in high school, you like math; you like science; but to be able to formulate that into a career can sometimes be tough.”

Nebras Warsi, a first-year medical student from Saskatchewan, also found that his desire to become a doctor was a gradual process—something he discovered through a multitude of experiences.

“It was very gradual, and in my opinion, gradual is one of the ways to make sure,” Warsi explained. “It’s really quite difficult to say, ‘I want to commit to four years of medical school, and six years of residency, and education until I’m 35’ in one split second [….] Many of [my] experiences tied together. It’s kind of your own little story.”

At a university like McGill, which has of the most reputable life sciences programs across Canada, medical school is a goal shared among many. Considering this environment, anxiety runs rampant in the undergraduate community. The ugly beast rears its head each time exams approach and students fret over whether their grades will be good enough to make them competitive candidates for medical school.

In addition to this monster of anxiety is the elusive 4.0, all-rounded, perfect medical candidate. This is the student that scores near perfect on exams and is involved in 10 different clubs. He or she finds time to sleep, eat, and see friends, all the while shadowing physicians and conducting leading research in the laboratories.

“It’s definitely a competitive environment,” said Howie Guo, a U2 Cell and Anatomy student. “Aside from maintaining respectable grades in a full course-load, students now have to balance extra curricular activities in an effort to stand out  from their competition [….] Coupled with the fear that they may be rejected despite their best efforts, students nowadays constantly experience high levels of stress, which is completely ridiculous when you consider how young many of these applicants still are.”

McGill’s current medical students sympathize with the tough competition that they too faced during the application process. However, they emphasize that there is no secret formula to success—nor are students required to tick off an involvement checklist.

“People will [talk about medical school] from all perspectives. Some people will say you need to do the X, Y, and Z. I kind of did the X, Y, and Z, but then others will say it is too cookie-cutter and too simple [for the application],” Warsi said. “There is really no one way. We have in our class people who have done all sorts of things.”

“I remember people saying to me, ‘Why are you [volunteering with such similar organizations]? It makes your application look less varied,’” Cole added. “And I said, ‘I really enjoy doing it and it makes me feel very fulfilled.’”

While all three of these students embarked on different paths that led them to their current medical studies, they share an underlying passion that drove them to shape their education and experiences around their interests.

“You want to do what you are interested in and passionate about,” Cold said. “If you don’t, you almost act like a drone in some senses andww you just go through the motions, and that is a tough way to be—you miss out.”

Warsi added that periodically reflecting on himself and why he wanted to go into medicine drove him to shape his undergraduate education around his passion for neuroscience.

“There are a lot of ways you can get the skills to be a good leader, a good communicator, and someone who wants to care for people,” Warsi said. “There is no formula for it. Do whatever interests you; if you are passionate about doing something, then do it, and that’s what will get you in.”

Despite the diversity of students accepted into McGill’s medical program, this does not demean the difficulty of the application process. According to McGill’s medical school admissions website, “Successful applicants tend to have a degree GPA above 3.5 (average approximately 3.8). Applicants with a degree GPA below 3.4 are rarely considered competitive.” However, Warsi stressed that it’s not a magic GPA or a list of achievements that gets students admission into the program.

“What I’ve seen from my class is that we’re a set of very driven, very passionate people who want to make a difference in people’s lives as physicians,” Warsi said. “I think that the process is very competitive, but that this is really the main thing you need to have to get through it. GPA, MCAT, and whatever are all numbers, but what really makes an applicant stand out is their passion for what they do and for going into medicine.”

Even when meeting the academic requirements, it is difficult for students to stand out among the crowded field of applicants. However, all three of these medical students emphasize that having a story—a unique reason why you want to become a doctor and experiences that back it up—helped lead to the success of their applications.

“You can say to anybody that you want to be a doctor and that you want to help sick people, and that’s fantastic, but everyone will say that,” Bachilova explained. She encourages pre-med students to avoid volunteering in the hospital and shadowing physicians only because it seems like the necessary requirement for medical school.

“I think, if you don’t get in the first time, you can learn from that,” Bachilova added. “It’s just a year—you have the rest of your life to be a doctor [….] Take it as a learning opportunity. Most medical faculties don’t have a problem with you calling up and asking, ‘What don’t you like about my application?’”

Whatever the motivation, the medical school application is more than a series of numbers, grades, and lists of accomplishments. For the successful applicants, it involves a story—a story of developing a passion for medicine and discovering this passion throughout their experiences.

Check out mcgilltribune.com for a profile of each of these students and more on their application process and advice.

McGill forum on consent
a, Opinion

Looking ahead to a sexual assault policy

In an attempt to reduce the effects of rape culture on campus, York University has recently begun handing out rape whistles to female students at orientation. This approach to stopping sexual violence, reminiscent of a sardonic scene out of Pitch Perfect, highlights the pervasiveness of rape culture on university campuses, and the shocking inaction of university administrators in combating sexual assault, a problem all too common at universities.

According to statistics cited in an article in the Globe and Mail, over 20 per cent of women in universities experience sexual violence at some point during their university careers.  Countless examples illustrating this reality have been witnessed throughout Canadian universities in recent years, including McGill.  Allegations of sexual assault in 2011 made against McGill varsity football players that resurfaced this past, and the hazing incident in 2005 by members of another McGill team are two prominent examples of sexual violence occurring at our own university.  Beyond McGill, there have been further incidents, such as offensive and threatening frosh chants at UBC and Saint Mary’s in Halifax last Fall, as well as a string of six sexual assaults on the UBC campus.  These are but a few of the highly publicized examples of occurrences that happen with incredible frequency in Canada’s universities, many of which remain unreported.  In light of the highly unsafe nature of campuses, administrators should be expected to take the lead in fighting against sexual assault.  However, many universities including McGill lack a formalized policy on how to handle these cases.

At a forum on consent held at McGill in January, the Sexual Assault Center of the McGill Students’ Society (SACOMSS), the student-run and student-funded sexual assault center at McGill, put forth a policy proposal petitioning the administration to focus its attention on creating an institutional policy procedure for sexual assault cases, which the university currently lacks.  While many similar procedural outlines are scattered throughout other student codes of conduct, the students leading the proposal insist that until the policies are complete, coherent, and institutionalized into an independent sexual assault policy, the administration’s current strategies for handling cases of sexual assault are only empty promises. While some groups have drafted a policy, none have been instituted yet.

The proposed policy, outlined on the petition’s website and released to the public several weeks ago, aims to reform the way that McGill handles sexual assault in several important ways, including making the policy more inclusive to all members of the McGill community. The document puts forth clearly-articulated safety measures, and recommends hiring a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator to serve the McGill community.  Most importantly, however, is the recommendation for a policy that is proactive rather than reactive.  The McGill administration was criticized  by students for its slow and passive response to the sexual assault incident involving three Redmen football players.

By failing to enact enough preventative measures intended to impede such occurrences, and by failing to address the incident with due urgency and severity, the administration has demonstrated neglectful handling of sexual assault.  The proposed policy would provide the administration with the framework and tools necessary for a more aggressive and coherent approach to combating sexual assault on campus. Rather than focusing primarily on the means to mitigate the effects of sexual assault, the strategic aim should be to prevent sexual assault from happening altogether.  This would involve greater emphasis on workshops such as RezProject, and further education on consent.  The implementation of mandatory workshops for athletes, a motion which has already been adopted by SSMU in late November, in reaction to the university’s inadequate response to the aforementioned charges of sexual assault pressed against members of the varsity football team is another step in the right direction. While workshops on sexual responsibility and consent would be beneficial to  all members of the McGill community, sports teams are a good place  for the administration to test the concept and effects of mandatory workshops.

These reforms—in addition to the creation of a formalized sexual assault policy that focuses on proactive, pro-survivor measures—would lead McGill closer to eradicating rape culture on campus and combating sexual assault in society.

MOSAICA McGill
a, Creative

2013-2014 in photos

Student-Run Cafe SRC at SSMU
a, Opinion

What we learned opening a student-run café

After two years of planning, 3,493 burritos, and 7,824 customers, the Student-Run Cafe (SRC), “The Nest,” is wrapping up its first semester of operation. It has been an exhaustingly exhilarating experience, one that I feel very lucky and proud to have been a part of along with many other incredible students. No one tells you how hard opening a business is—not to mention a business in the food and beverage industry, under the meticulously bureaucratic structure that is the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU)—but we’ve been fortunate to have a team of staff members and a customer base that both inspire us to continually improve and remind us why all those late nights spent planning were worth it.

I cannot express enough gratitude or demonstrate enough humility. To every staff member that has given their time, and every customer that has given their taste buds—and money—thank you. Here, I’d like to share some of the successes, failures, and possibilities for the SRC moving forward.

One of the SRC’s biggest successes was our ability to strike a balance between quantity, quality, and price with respect to the food served. The reaction from customers in the first month was overwhelmingly about the reasonable pricing and the quality of the food. To get a homemade bowl of chili (in a vessel you could consume, no less) for $7 was something we worked really hard to achieve and maintain, and were glad to see noticed and appreciated.

Where I think the SRC fell short this semester was in its mission to be a hub for community engagement. While we did hold three engagement sessions during the Fall semester—which, I should add, only three people attended, press included—we were only able to collect feedback informally from our customer base during operation. This was incredibly useful, but still fell short of the collective decision-making model for which we were aiming. Engagement is an element of the SRC that should be addressed by both staff and SSMU executives, and I think we all underestimated the amount of time and energy required to just get schedules made and food served. While it was in fact only a take-away food service—although I would argue that a place that employed 12 students, supported seven student-run initiatives by way of affordable catering, and integrated composting services into the SSMU building embodies more than a mere lunch counter—this was one step in a direction that will continue to develop for several years.

To say that this intermediary step stifles momentum for the overall goal of bringing more student-centric space to the SSMU Building fails to appreciate or consider the way change operates within a bureaucratic structure as large and as complex as the SSMU. It would be advantageous and fruitful for the SRC and student-run spaces in general if, instead of destructively attacking the in-process efforts of individuals, the press actively engaged with and critically reflected upon the steps being taken as part of a greater picture.

Again, it seems the SRC is in a place of uncertainty. The building fee fiasco has left SSMU in a precarious position with respects to its financial sustainability, making projects like the SRC—which only recently adapted to a steep learning curve—vulnerable to reevaluation in the new funding environment. To be sure, it would be more profitable for SSMU to scrap the SRC, put in a new commercial tenant, and reap the rewards of revenue-generating real estate space, but this would be to reduce the SSMU to a society set on making money. It is my personal conviction that student societies should consider the value of their operations beyond their revenue-generating potential, but this must be echoed by the student body if it is to be realized.

What projects like the SRC need most is not more money, new equipment, or more catering events; what it needs desperately is engagement from students who care about the food they eat and the Society that serves them. The SRC has always been about more than just food; it’s meant to be a place where collaboration centralizes, and decision-making rests in the hands of the collective; where students can use the skills they’ve built in the classroom to construct and change the community they are a part of. This type of engagement does not require the physical space that the SRC currently lacks; it involves coming to the engagement sessions we hold, contributing feedback about the food and the service, and taking an active and invested role in the café’s future projects and development. The future of the SRC, like its past and present, rests in the hands of students; it can either be used and built, or lost.

 

Kathleen Bradley is a philosophy and economics student and is the VP Finance and Operations-elect for the 2014-2015 executive term. If you have any feedback, or would like to contribute to the SRC moving forward, you can contact her at [email protected].

a, Science & Technology

The Med School Diaries: Nebras Warsi

Nebras Warsi is a first year medical student at McGill University. He was born in England but spent a part of his life growing up in Saskatchewan. As an undergraduate at McGill University, and after his mother moved to Montreal, he was able to apply to McGill as an in-province student.

McGill Tribune: How did you know you wanted to go into medicine?

Nebras Warsi: “I came to McGill and did my undergraduate in Neuroscience. During that time, I just started volunteering with the community and seeing the types of things I could do for people. As I grew up, I shadowed some physicians and I knew that I loved my science classes. It all came together where I knew it was a type of career where I could really do everything that I was passionate about. When I look back at those four years of university, it built up. Every experience, every extra curricular that I did—they all added more to my drive to want to be a physician.”

MT: A lot of people worry about having the “perfect package” to apply to medical school, what do you think about this?

NW: “There are a lot of ways you can get the skills to be a good leader, a good communicator, and someone who wants to care for people. I have friends who have done undergrad [degrees] in kinesiology, French literature, or science. It’s really up to you. Some people have done a ton of research and published a ton, and some people have done none because they’re not interested. As long as you are not sitting at home and doing absolutely nothing—I’d say you need to do something—there is no formula for it.”

NW: “I did student council, because I liked being able to serve the community as a volunteer. I liked being able to discover new things as a researcher and I liked being able to lead a team. But if you’re interested in global health, outreach programs, or working with the homeless [you should get involved]. It does not have to be medically related, as long as it is something that you are passionate about and is driving you into medicine.”

MT: How important do you think your GPA is to the application?

NW: “[I know] I got a few interviews because I know my GPA is high. So it definitely helps, but I would not say it is necessary. If you have a lower GPA, but because you have been doing all of these things that you are really interested in, then I think that’s fine [.…] [A] 4.0 is kind of unrealistic—there aren’t many people that I know that have one. You don’t need to have a 4.0 to get in.”

MT: You’re in the first year of McGill’s new medical program—how do you like it?

NW: “I love the new curriculum, but I obviously don’t know the old one. Before, the program was like an undergrad 2.0, where there was a lot of material and information to know. What they have tried to do is make it more clinically relevant now, so we’ll work with a family doctor every two weeks. It’s kind of the best thing, because while we’re in the respiratory block, we’ll learn the respiratory exam, but then we’ll get to go work with patients and take their vitals, take their history, do the respiratory exam; we’ll do cardio and then do the cardio exam—it really helps the information stick and stay with you a bit longer.”

MT: Did you ever consider PhD MD programs?

NW: “I was actually going to apply to that, but in the end I decided against it. Although I kind of still want to be a physician scientist, personally it was a little bit difficult to decide this early. A lot of physician scientists will do 80 per cent of time in research but then one half day clinical. But that’s not what I really wanted. I want to be first and foremost a clinical physician who sees patients most of the time and then does some research. I think that might be more of an MD-MSC thing to do, or to grab a PhD afterwards, but it is very possible in your residency program to get [another degree].”

MT: What type of medicine do you want to pursue?

NW: “I am super interested in neuroscience. At the same time, I am just a medical student interested in everything I am learning. They say you change your mind a minimum of eight times, so I don’t really know yet.”

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue