Latest News

a, Men's Varsity, Sports

Basketball: McGill splits weekend series with Laval

The McGill Redmen (5-1) continued their quest for a second straight RSEQ Championship with a home-and-home series against the Laval Rouge et Or (2-4). In the first matchup of the weekend, McGill pummeled the visiting Rouge et Or with an 88-69 victory at home. A day later, the two teams headed  out to Quebec City, a trip that ended in a 78-68 loss as the Redmen suffered their first defeat of the season.

In the first game of the weekend, the Redmen offence was firing on all cylinders despite the absence of star point guard Simon Bibeau, who was away for personal reasons. The team topped its season scoring average by 13 points against an underrated Laval squad. With the game close in the early stages, Coach DeAverio made the decision to move third-year shooting guard Vincent Dufort to small forward, in the hopes of exploiting Laval’s man-to-man defence. The move paid off; the Rouge et Or had no answer for Dufort’s speed as he dropped a season high 27 points.

“I just had a mismatch,” said Dufort. “They had a bigger guy on me, and I was able to take him off the dribble.”

Freshman forward Francois Bourque continued his dominant season, posting his third career double-double with an efficient 23 points and 12 rebounds in just 21 minutes. With Dufort playing small forward, Nathan Joyal saw his minutes increase as he tallied double digits for the third time this season.

Point guards Ave Bross and Jenning Leung had big shoes to fill with Bibeau out of the lineup. Bross facilitated the offence and played strong defensively while the freshman Leung brought a youthful energy off the team’s bench.

“I thought [Bross] did a really good job in the second half,” said Coach DeAverio. “[Bross and Leung] worked well together and they both picked each other up at crucial times.”

(Laurie-Anne Benoit / McGill Tribune)
(Laurie-Anne Benoit / McGill Tribune)

The Rouge et Or jumped out to an early lead in the first frame, but McGill kept it close while coping with foul trouble. The Redmen tied it up late, before a Dufort jumper put them ahead in the final minute of the second quarter. The team came out of the break with newfound defensive intensity and increased their lead to 13 by the end of the third frame. The Redmen’s smothering second-half defence held Laval’s big men, Boris Hadzimuratovic and Antoine Beaumier, to a combined six points after both reached double digits in the first half.

“[Laval] played exceptionally well in the first half,” said DeAverio. “We didn’t protect the basket […], so our objective in the second half was to guard the paint […] I think they scored [just] 29 in the second half [….] Our defence was the big difference.”

Unfortunately, the team’s defensive intensity was not the same the following day in Quebec City, as the Redmen gave up a regular season-high 78 points. McGill dealt with foul trouble and turnover issues all game.

“Playing on the road is always a difficult task and [playing] back-to-back games adds a whole new component,” DeAverio said after the loss. “We are a young team that is still evolving, searching for consistency in our level of effort and concentration.”

The Redmen get a much-needed break before Bibeau rejoins the team and they head out for another home-and-home series with Concordia (2-3) on Jan. 23 and Jan. 25. Look for McGill to bounce back against a surging Stingers team that has won its last two contests.

a, Science & Technology

McGill joins ranks of universities teaching MOOCs

This semester, McGill joined the ranks of MIT, Harvard, and other leading universities with the opening of registration for its first ever Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Chem181x. The course, known as “Food for Thought,” will be offered by professors David Harpp, Joe Schwarcz, and Ariel Fenster starting this January and lasting 13 weeks.

MOOCs, founded by the company edX, were designed with the purpose of expanding access of high quality education online. The instalment of Chem181x brings a brand new approach to education within McGill’s learning sphere, as MOOCs are not offered for credit, but rather to foster knowledge for the sake of learning. They are free to anyone around the world who is interested in receiving an education from these prestigious universities.

While students cannot obtain a degree from enrolling in MOOCs, they may receive a certificate of completion depending on their participation in the course. This is measured via various methods, including online discussion boards. Students have the option to “audit a course,” meaning they have access to all the course material and online discussion forum without necessarily attending every lecture. For those who are interested in greater commitment, they can choose to complete the course in its entirety to achieve different types of honour code certificates. Either way, the flexibility of MOOCs remains one of their largest appeals—with a virtual classroom that is open night and day, students can study on their own schedule and at their own paces.

Harpp has been heavily invested in making this project happen at McGill. According to him, McGill chose to get involved in edX, “partly to see if we could work up a better version of existing visuals and presentations [of our courses in] a more engaging format.”

According to Harpp, professors were also interested in learning how people from around the world would respond to their approach to teaching.

Digital teaching is not new to McGill. “We were already fairly knowledgeable about how digitally recorded lectures were received, because we invented the McGill recording system with programmers way back in 2000,” said Harpp.

Today, McGill offers around 350 recorded courses each year. With experience and positive feedback received over the past 13 years, Harpp said he felt McGill was ready to enter the realm of virtual teaching on a global scale, as well as keeping [McGill’s] ‘brand’ alive by maintaining pace with other top-quality universities.

According to Harpp, the process of joining edX was filled with negotiation between high academic officials of McGill and edX management. He jokingly ascribed the process as similar to speed dating, where different representatives from Harvard and MIT came to meet with numerous members of McGill’s faculty, deans, and a variety of instructors, until McGill was asked to join edX. After cautious deliberation, Provost Anthony Masi and Laura Winer, head of the Teaching and Learning Services agreed that McGill would participate in the project.

Similar to the popular World of Chemistry series offered by the same professors on campus, CHEM181x is designed to offer a scientific framework for understanding food and its impact on health and society from past to present.

“One thing we hope to portray is that science can partially answer quite a few questions but that there is no magic menu for managing one’s life,” said Harpp. “We want to portray what the science is telling us and to hope that most of the viewers will be vigilant about charlatans and to develop some good level of critical thinking.”

Harpp foresees the virtual environment as one where different points of view will come into play due to the broad audience. This, he hopes, will help engage groups of students to do local research on food and food services and share those experiences among each other.

“This may not transpire but we are open to ideas as to how we might better deliver our course,” he said.

Given the nature of these online courses, a significant amount of preparation goes into the instalment of such a class. According to Harpp, it takes a full week of work to go into the production of an hour of this online class.

“Editors, our designer, helpers and the lecturer have collectively put in a total of [over 30 hours of work] for a one hour segment,” said Harpp. A focus group of about 20 people has also been involved in this project in order to provide constructive feedback.

Due to the resources required and the variety of people involved in the development of such a course, the costs for producing a MOOC are higher than those associated with a standard course.

“We have obtained a significant donation from interested parties [to help offset these costs],” Harpp said. Although funds are available to relieve professors involved in the MOOC of their usual teaching hours, the McGill professors participating in the MOOC project have chosen to continue teaching their usual courses without changes.

McGill hopes to offer more MOOC courses as time goes on. “Natural Disasters,” taught by Professors John Stix and John Gyakum, is poised to make an entrance to the world of edX later in 2014. Courses from other faculties, such as Management, have been proposed as well.

“This is the end product of our involvement with lecture-capture,” said Harpp. “It is a natural evolution and also [is] not easy. If [this] were easy to do and deliver in a simple but effective way, it would have happened years ago. It is a worthy challenge to see if we can make a course […] even better—not only for local consumption but for delivery to civilians in diverse locations”.

For more information or to register for edX courses, visit www.edx.org.

a, News, SSMU

SSMU votes to advocate non-compliance with Charter

SSMU advocates for a stance of non-compliance with Bill 60

The Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) will advocate that the university adopt a policy of non-compliance towards the Parti Québécois’ proposed Charter of Values, following a motion passed at the Dec. 5 Legislative Council meeting.

If implemented, the Charter would limit state personnel, including those working in state-funded education, from wearing conspicuous religious symbols. Both McGill’s Senate and the Board of Governors have passed motions condemning Bill 60 earlier this year, but neither motion mentions the possibility of non-compliance.

“There is a long step between saying that you are against something and taking action against it,” Councillor David Benrimoh said. “[Non-compliance] would be taking action against [the Charter] to make sure that our campus is safe for diversity.”

According to the motion, other Montreal institutions such as the Jewish General Hospital and the English Montreal School Board have adopted policies of non-compliance should the law pass.

Council’s motion also stipulates that university employees should have the right to wear full facial coverings as part of their freedom to wear religious symbols.

AELIÉS accuses SSMU of reneging on promised money

SSMU Vice-President External Samuel Harris spoke on a failed motion to censure SSMU at the Dec. 7 meeting of the Quebec Student Roundtable (TaCEQ).

The motion came from the graduate student association of Laval University (AELIÉS), which accused SSMU of not paying an allegedly promised share of $40,000 towards an ongoing court case. TaCEQ is participating as an intervener in the case, which involves a university student who is challenging the constitutionality of mandatory membership in student associations.

According to Harris, there is no documentation of such a promise.

“Unfortunately for AELIÉS, the minutes from this meeting in February are lost, so no proof in this respect exists,” Harris’ executive report reads. “SSMU has consistently said it will contribute $10,000 for the case, and TaCEQ board decisions have been passed many times reaffirming this.”

The motion at the TaCEQ meeting failed without support from TaCEQ’s other student associations.

a, Arts & Entertainment, Film and TV

Remakes vs. originals

For every cover like Jimi Hendrix’s rendition of Bob Dylan’s “All Along the Watch Tower” that gives a classic song a fresh and worthy interpretation, there are efforts like HIlary Duff’s take on The Who’s “My Generation” that should be banned from the airwaves. Here’s how some of 2013’s prominent song covers stack up against the original recordings they were inspired by. 

Rolling Stones (1976): When the Rolling Stones decide to take a break from their blues-heavy rock and roll to write a ballad, they usually do a pretty good job. Like Stones classics “Angie” or “Wild Horses,” “Fool To Cry” slows things down and brings out a ton of emotion. Its soulful combination of guitar and electric keyboards gives the music a Hall & Oates-type feel, but there’s no mistaking Mick Jagger’s distinctive vocals for those of Darryl Hall. On this track, Jagger does a lot of talk-singing, which matches the measured pace of the music. However, the final minute of the song features an edgier breakdown that feels a bit unnecessary given the earlier mood.

Tegan and Sara (2013): Before they were approached by Lena Dunham to do a commissioned cover of “Fool To Cry” for the hit television show Girls, the female Canadian duo had actually never heard of the song. Considering that, and the challenge of emulating a ballad in which Mick Jagger croons about the woman he goes to make love to in the poor part of town, Tegan and Sara do a fantastic job with their cover. They switch up the verse rhythm by making the only prominent instrument a soothing finger-picked electric guitar, and add more texture to the chorus by harmonizing together on the hook, “Ooh, Daddy you’re a fool to cry.” Also, the breakdown gets cut in this version.

Verdict: This is a matchup in which there’s really no wrong choice. The Stones’ original sets the bar extremely high, and brings more than its fair share of soul to the table. But Tegan and Sara hit the mark on every one of their stylistic changes, and it all comes together surprisingly well. By the slightest edge, this one goes to the girls. Thank you, Lena Dunham!

— Max Berger

 

The Bee Gees (1967): “To Love Somebody” was released during 1967’s “Summer of Love,” and has been loved by artists ever since, becoming a pop standard that has been covered by the likes of Janis Joplin, Leonard Cohen, and many others. The Bee Gees’ original opens with a signature riff before marching ahead into a verse that embodies the era’s psychedelic musical vibe. Things come to a flourish in the chorus with a horns section that complements the passion of the Gibb brothers crying out the refrain, “You don’t know what it’s like.”

 Michael Bublé (2013): Bublé keeps a lot of the song’s key elements the same. The tempo remains upbeat, and the instrumentation is pretty similar. It features a much more prominent bass line, however, and seems Motown-esque at times. There are a frequent number of fills in between bars, and it makes for an enjoyable variety of short licks and call-and-response vocals. However, the chorus underwhelms in comparison to its predecessor, and the voices of Bublé and his backing singers don’t mesh nearly as well as the Bee Gee harmonies do.

 Verdict: In this competition, it’s The Bee Gees that stay alive. Bublé doesn’t do a bad job, but there’s no exclamation mark that lifts the cover enough to surpass the original. The 1967 “To Love Somebody” is groovy, soulful, and absolutely lives up to its strong reputation.

— Max Berger

 

Michael Jackson (1982): Holding the 58th spot on Rolling Stone’s 500 Greatest Songs of All Time list, Michael Jackson’s angsty lament, “Billie Jean” is an R&B/dance-pop gem. Sung from the point of view of a man being harassed by a woman claiming to be pregnant with his baby, this track keeps listeners attentive with its engaging lyrics and driving bass line. The song has all Jackson’s trademarks, from the finger snap to his iconic vocal hiccup, and plenty of satisfying synthesizer, a staple of ‘80s pop.

The Civil Wars (2013): The darkly seductive harmonies of folk-pop-country duo Joy Williams and John Paul White of The Civil Wars are perfectly suited to the tone of “Billie Jean,” which they cover seamlessly. They have stripped the song down to its bone, with nothing but their haunting vocals and an acoustic guitar. The well-timed twangs of the guitar, captivating vocal dynamics, and palpable chemistry between Williams and White makes for a mesmerizing listen.

Verdict: The Civil Wars are just a band that says they’re the one. Their rendition of “Billie Jean” is a great listen, but you can’t beat the King of Pop.

— Kia Pouliot

 

The Beatles (1967): “All You Need Is Love” has become an anthem for Beatles fans, and its title, a slogan. As far as pop songs go it falls outside the box, but stays very much in line with the many artistic liberties The Beatles were taking at the time. The sound on this track feels like a cross between Pet Sounds-era Beach Boys and a royal symphony; there’s orchestral backing, lots of vocal harmonies—and a George Harrison guitar solo to remind you that you’re listening to a rock band. The Fab Four’s timeless message is delivered loud and clear over an equally timeless musical arrangement.

The Flaming Lips (2013): Never straying far from their signature psychedelic sound, the Flaming Lips have remade the Beatles classic “All You Need is Love” into something that can best be described as a revelatory slice into a post-apocalyptic world. The song opens on a bed of strings and harp, carrying listeners into the Flaming Lip’s fantastical vision of such a world. The whole concept of love being all that you need does in retrospect seem questionable, but is well played off in this contemporary rendition. The only thing that’s really missing is a sense of resolution. What comes off as the start of something new instead finds itself closing their latest album, left to finish prematurely and unexpectedly.

Verdict: Both concepts are so clearly opposite—any remnants of a Beatles influence have long been lost between the layers of distortion—yet work well on their own. But ultimately, the original would have to take the cake for its overall cohesiveness that makes it what it is—memorable enough to be remade now, and probably again in the future. 

— Leyang Yu

 

Amy Winehouse (2006): The title track of Amy Winehouse’s Grammy-award-winning album released in 2006, “Back to Black” is about Winehouse’s relapse into drinking and depression after the loss of a lover. The simple drums and keys play background to Winehouse’s powerful vocals, which intentionally stand out in the mix, even oncew strings make an entrance. The song itself is one of the biggest, most encompassing statements of Winehouse’s troubled career—which is perhaps why it resurfaced on the top 10 of the UK singles chart after her death in 2011. As a modern classic, does a cover for a movie soundtrack do it justice?

BeyoncÉ feat. Andre 3000 (2013): This cover brings covers full circle—it was done for Baz Luhrmann’s remake of The Great Gatsby (2013)—and, with performances from Andre 3000 and Beyonce, literally brings Amy Winehouse’s culturally-appropriated Motown style ‘back to black.’ Three Stacks deadpans “You with your head high, and your tears dry / get on without your…guy” over slow wobble bass. On certain lines, he shifts the octave of each couple words he sings, which is creative, but also slightly silly. After a twangy guitar bridge, Beyoncé sings a sultry second half, which is more of an attempt at imitating Winehouse.

Verdict: Listing to both versions of “Back to Black” back-to-back is pretty impressive—“Back to Black” is a vocals-centric song, and the voices of Winehouse, Beyoncé, and Andre 3000 are three of the most interesting in post-2000s popular music. However, the cover produced for The Great Gatsby lacks the signature tormented belting that Winehouse was famous for, and her passion makes the original the clear superior.

— Will Burgess

a, Science & Technology, Student Research

Delving into the laser lab

Enclosed within the Wong building is a laser lab—and in between homework and classes, this is where Luke Matus spends the majority of his time.

“I’m in chemical engineering, so I had no experience in lasers or surface engineering,” said Matus, a U2 engineering student. “I was just interested in getting into research in general, and I had talked to the professor about it.”

Matus became involved with the biomedical service-engineering lab through the Summer Undergraduate Research program for Engineers (SURE), where he works under the supervision of associate professor Anne Kietzig and the PhD student Jorge Lehr. After spending this past summer at the lab, Matus decided to continue his involvement the following year. Currently, he is finishing off parts of his summer project, and he will complete a research course at the lab next semester.

Matus explained that joining a team when he had no experience in the field was a challenging task.

“The first two weeks of the project were [focused on] reading all of the papers published about lasers and about their surfaces and wetting behaviour,” Matus said. “There was a huge learning curve, and continued as I went along.”

Despite the initial challenge, the experience pushed Matus to develop his problem solving skills.

“A lot of times, you have to learn on-the-go, and if you don’t know how to do something yourself, it takes way longer,” he said. “You [figure out] how to do things yourself, [which] speeds up your project as you learn how to solve the small issues that always arise in research.”

“If there is a problem with the laser, I don’t troubleshoot the laser,” Matus joked.

Matus’ project involved a infrared femtosecond-pulse laser set-up, which performs infrared labeling. By mounting titanium samples on a stage in front of the laser, he can use the laser to alter the surface of the sample. Then, Matus changes the properties of the samples and tests them to see how the laser affects these new surfaces. Matus explained that he is looking to design the samples to have specific wetting behaviour—the ability of a liquid to maintain contact with the surface—on the surfaces.

“There is a big box [in the lab], which is the laser,” Matus explained. “Then there are a ton of equipment and different boxes that run different programs within the laser—they have different functionalities [….] Once you have everything set up you open [the laser] and there are samples on the stage. The stage is controlled by a computer and you have a program that completes whatever pattern you want.”

While Matus enjoyed his time at the lab, he is thinking of applying to an industry job next summer. “I really like the research […] but I want to try something else.” He explained that research might be a possibility for his future, but is still eager to explore many fields of engineering to find out what fits best for his career path.

That said, Matus found his work at the lab highly rewarding—both in terms of how it pushed him as a student and the results he acquired.

“I guess one of the things that stuck out was that […] one of the conclusions that I came to sort of reflected on this paper [on which I had based my research], and I proved [an additional part of it] in my own research,” Matus said. “It was like ‘Oh, I looked at this PhD or grad student work and I actually contributed something, even if it’s not published.’ It was rewarding.”

a, Science & Technology

2013 Technology: a year in review

1. Wearable computing 

Between Google Glass and the smart watch—including the models Galaxy Gear and Pebble, wearable computing is a rising trend. Pebble was founded by Eric Migicovsky and released in 2013. Originally, Migicovsky wanted a device that would allow him to use his smartphone without crashing his bicycle; from this stemmed the idea that a watch could serve as a notification hub for the smartphone in his pocket. Pebble was designed keeping in mind that more complex tasks are left to a phone. Unlike Google Glass—a wearable computing head device that seeks to replace the smartphone—Pebble acts as a simple accessory for people to use to supplement the functionality of their phones.

2. Building intelligent machines 

Starting in 2011, Watson—IBM’s Jeopardy winning computer—wowed the world with its sharp answers that ousted Ken Jennings, the record holder for the longest winning streak on this question-answer game show. One of the reasons for Watson’s success was “deep learning”, the driving force behind machines able to recognize objects, translate speech, and do many other things that come naturally to the human mind. Google has become a hub for this field; one of Google’s deep learning systems was shown ten million images from YouTube videos, and it proved to be almost twice as good as any previous image-recognition systems. Furthermore, this October, Rick Rashid, Microsoft’s chief research officer, put on display a new system that Microsoft had been working on which could take speech, transcribe it into text, translate it into another language and then voice the text in the translated language, in a simulated voice. Deep learning is an increasingly interesting field that has immense scope for improvement and will definitely be something to watch out for in the coming year.

(redorbit.com)
(redorbit.com)

3. Ephemeral messaging 

The world’s attention was captured this year by Snapchat- an app that allows you to send an image or a video with a short text for a limited period of time to a friend. The novelty of this app is that people can send embarrassing photos or messages without having to worry about them being saved. With most people having used social networks for a few years now, there is a wealth of messages and posts from our digital pasts that we probably don’t want on the Internet. This ephemeral messaging and sharing concept is helping restore a sense of privacy in the way we communicate, as not everything we say is recorded. In other words, it is restoring candidness in conversations and our online interactions- just like in the real world.

4. 3D printing 

As 3D printing gradually becomes less expensive and more accessible, the potential for its use is rapidly increasing. Until recently, 3D printing was only used as a manufacturing technique to produce small-scale items for consumer use. However, the company General Electric (GE) is pushing to produce fuel nozzles for new aircrafts using this technique. This is the first endeavour into mass-producing a significant product through 3D printing. The benefit of using this technique over the traditional manufacturing methods is that it uses fewer raw materials to produce and is hence cheaper for the manufacturer. As a result, the parts are lighter, give greater fuel efficiency, and are more economical for the aircraft operators. If this turns out to be successful, we could see this methodology of using 3D printers to produce parts percolate into other industries as well.

a, Science & Technology

First malaria vaccine en route for 2015

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Malaria causes an estimated 660,000 deaths each year worldwide. Presently, there is no available vaccine for this mosquito-borne disease—only preventative measures, such as bed nets, insecticides, and anti-malarial pills, which have had a limited effect. However, in a considerable step forward, the British drug company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) announced that they were seeking regulatory approval for the world’s first malaria vaccine: RTS,S.

According to David Poland, senior communications officer at the Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) Malaria Vaccine Initiative, RTS,S is the scientific name given to this malaria vaccine candidate. The name represents its composition.  Poland explained that the aim of the RTS,S vaccine is to trigger the immune system to defend against the deadly malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum when it enters the bloodstream. It’s designed to prevent the parasite from infecting, maturing, and multiplying in the liver, after which the parasite re-enters the bloodstream and infects red blood cells, leading to the disease symptoms.

“Among the many components found in the RTS,S vaccine, the specific combination of a protein known as the Circumsporozoite protein (CSP) with the hepatitis B antigen is what appears to make it efficacious,” Poland said.

According to Poland, the RTS,S vaccine has been in development for more than 20 years. The vaccine was created in 1987 by scientists working at the GSK laboratories, and it wasn’t until 1995 that the first clinical tests for the vaccine began in the United States. In January 2001, GSK and the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative (MVI), with grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, entered into a public-private partnership to develop an RTS,S-based vaccine for infants and young children living in malaria-endemic regions in sub-Saharan Africa.

Before the vaccine is introduced, the candidate drug must be assessed for its safety and efficacy profile. This is accomplished through a clinical trial. Specifically, there are three trials (Phase I, II, and III) that evaluate the safety and efficacy by testing the vaccine on various sample sizes. The trials must be designed in consultation with appropriate regulatory authorities and the World Health Organization (WHO). Each phase can be thought of as a pole vault—when the vaccine clears one phase, the bar advances to a higher height, until either the vaccine fails to prove efficacy, or it clears all three phases. According to Poland, the company is at Phase III of the clinical trial.

The Phase III efficacy trial of RTS,S started in May 2009 and is still underway at 11 sites in seven African countries (Burkina Faso, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, and Tanzania) with 15,460 infants and young children participating. According to the MVI, this is the largest malaria vaccine trial in Africa to date. Outlined in the press release published last month by GSK and MVI, researchers enrolled two groups of participants: infants aged 6 to 12 weeks  and children aged 5 to 17 months. The participants initially received three doses of either RTS,S or a “control vaccine,” allowing researchers to evaluate the efficacy of the vaccine on a large scale, while continuing to monitor safety and potential side-effects during the 18 months of follow up.

“To date, this trial has indicated that the RTS,S vaccine candidate is safe to administer to young children and provides some protection against malaria disease,” Poland said.

Specifically, the trial has shown that the RTS,S vaccine candidate has an acceptable “safety and tolerability profile” and that based on 18 months of follow-up after their third injection, it reduces clinical malaria cases by 56 per cent in young children 5-17 months of age and by about 31 per cent in infants 6-12 weeks of age. “The potential public health impact is noteworthy,” Poland added.

“The next steps in RTS,S development come in 2014, when we expect to complete this trial and fully analyze the data” Poland explained. “In 2014, the pharmaceutical partner on RTS,S development, GSK, will also be filing for a regulatory opinion with the European Medicines Agency (EMA).”

“If the opinion is supportive, the World Health Organization has indicated that a policy recommendation for the RTS,S malaria vaccine candidate would be possible as early as 2015,” Poland said. “[This will] pave the way for decisions by African nations regarding large-scale implementation of the vaccine through their national immunization programs.”

a, News

Graduates criticize Leacock restructuring project

Graduate students expressed concerns about the People, Processes, and Partnerships (PPP) plan to restructure the administrative organization of Leacock Building at the Dec. 4 Council meeting of the Post-Graduate Students’ Society of McGill University (PGSS).

The project was introduced in Fall 2012, but has seen various revisions over the past year, with the latest version presented at AUS Council on Nov. 13. The restructuring aims to compensate for the loss of seven out of 48 Leacock support staff due to staff reductions from the voluntary retirement program and decreased funding from the Quebec government.

At the Dec. 4 meeting, PGSS members voted ‘yes’ to a motion that lays out plans to send a letter of concern to Dean of Arts Christopher Manfredi, and to inform PGSS members of the PPP project to encourage them to speak up during the consultation process. Members had the opportunity voice their concerns about the PPP project to Manfredi, who was present at the beginning of the meeting to answer questions but left before voting took place.

“There is a worrying lack of evidence presented to stakeholders to suggest the viability of this plan, whether in terms of documented cost-savings, demonstrable efficiencies, or student, staff, and faculty satisfaction with such arrangements at universities comparable to McGill,” the motion reads.

The motion cited previous expressions of opposition to the plan. In November, the Art History and Communication Studies Graduate Student Association published a letter in the McGill Daily, condemning the plan for going forward despite negative feedback and suggesting that the plan would not be as cost-effective as promised.

“This letter that appeared in the McGill Daily was aimed at a plan that hasn’t been the plan since about March […] and we’ve been working closely with all of you since we abandoned that first idea,” said Manfredi, who explained the purpose of the PPP before answering questions.

However, according to English Graduate Student Association (EGSA) representative Amalia Slobogian, the current state of the plan is still a cause for concern.

“Before I came today, I surveyed EGSA—the support staff and as much of the faculty as I could […] about the new [restructuring plan] that Manfredi was speaking about, and they’re still all completely opposed to it,” Slobogian said. “The faculty and support staff I talked to said they have expressed complaints many times to the Dean of Arts, that nothing has been done, and that they haven’t achieved any feedback about their complaints.”

In addition, East Asian Studies (EAS) representative Allen Chen said students in his department were not properly consulted prior to the recent relocation of the EAS department from McTavish to 688 Sherbrooke in a move that Chen described as “disastrous.”

“On the part of the students in EAS, we were just told this is happening,” Chen said. “A lot was not communicated to us and we were not involved. To this date, nothing has been done to address our concerns.”

Manfredi said he is open to suggestions and invited students to write to him with their concerns, but acknowledged that the Leacock restructuring process may not always run smoothly.

“We try to address the concerns and make sure this happens with as little disruption as possible, but there will be disruption,” Manfredi said. “Losing seven out of 48 people is disruptive.”

Lorenzo Daieff, a member of the McGill Graduate Association of Political Science Students, asked how support staff reacted to the fact that 41 staff will be doing the same amount of work previously done by 48.

“Everyone has reservations or concerns whenever they think their jobs are going to change,” Manfredi said. “[Support staff] have been working together to figure out how they’re going to spread the work. If I asked them specifically if they think this is a great idea, my guess is that they’d say, ‘We can see some positives but we have some concerns.’ ”

PGSS Secretary-General Jonathan Mooney asked whether the money-saving plan is necessary now that the provincial government has announced the possibility of an eight percent increase in funding to the university.

“You have to discount the possibility of this happening,” Manfredi said. “Also, there are lots of demands on those dollars—hiring professors, provid[ing] appropriate wage increases for faculty members and support staff [….] [The restructuring plan] will give us something that can sustain external shocks.”

 

CFS protest and court proceeding finances

PGSS Financial Affairs Officer Erik Larson presented an update on the financial situation of PGSS’ ongoing attempt to withdraw from the Canadian Federation of Students (CFS)—which involve a court case that has cost $50,000 in legal fees so far this year.

PGSS is currently in court proceedings in an effort to get CFS to recognize its 2010 vote to leave the national student federation. Larson said fees to finance the court case are withdrawn from the Special Project Fund, although the fund was initially intended for other projects.

“At the start of the budget for this year, we had hoped to do more projects aimed at making Thomson House more sustainable and more environmentally friendly, by updating windows and air conditioning, for instance,” Larson said. “Unfortunately, at the beginning of this fiscal year we had to change our legal team. This was completely unforeseen. That is where the majority of the Special Project Fund expenses have gone this year.”

Students from associations that belong to the federation—including PGSS, the Concordia Student Union, and Dawson College—protested outside the CFS Annual General Meeting in Ottawa on Nov. 23 to express dissatisfaction with the national organization and frustration with CFS’s refusal to recognize withdrawal from the federation.

“We said this litigious organization trying to trap people inside is a bad organization,” Mooney said. “We drew attention to the issue.”

a, McGill, News

Senate approves revision to university sexual harassment and discrimination policy

On Dec. 4, McGill’s Senate approved revisions to the university’s sexual harassment and discrimination policy, which aim to clarify the procedures that follow a submission of a complaint.

In addition, Provost Anthony Masi presented the university’s financial planning for the 2015 fiscal year, which considers the possibility of the provincial government’s reinvestment in the university.

Revision of sexual harassment policy

The motion passed Wednesday includes changes to the composition of the working group responsible for reviewing McGill’s sexual harassment and discrimination policy every three years. In future reviews, this working group will include a representative of the student-run Sexual Assault Centre of the McGill Students’ Society (SACOMSS).

The motion, presented by Senator Lydia White, features a number of other changes to McGill’s Policy on Harassment, Sexual Harassment, and Discrimination Prohibited by Lawthe policy outlining the process by which the university deals with situations of harassment and discrimination.

The revisions proposed at Senate were developed by a working group of students, faculty, and university employees over the course of the past year. White said the main revisions aim to make the current policy more comprehensible.

“One of the main objectives we’ve been trying to achieve with this reorganization is just to make the policy clearer,” White said. “The timeline and the steps in the original version—the harassment assessors themselves, complainants, and respondents all complained that it was quite hard to understand what exactly the procedures are.”

The scope of the policy has also been narrowed by adding an exception stating that the policy does not apply to affairs of corporations such as SSMU and PGSS, which are affiliated with, but independent from, the university and have their own policies and procedures in place for dealing with complaints.

Senator Christina Wolfson said such a disclaimer could cause confusion about when exactly this exemption is applicable.

“Is the exception [applicable] when it happens in an office of that association? With a person of that association? Between people of that association? If a conversation uses the [name of the association]?” Wolfson asked.

White acknowledged the possibility of confusion and clarified that the exemption applied to incidents between two members of an affiliated corporation in the context of their work for that corporation.

“We thought we’d add some guidelines to the webpage to give examples of what and would not be excluded,” White said.

Another revision pertains to the appointment of harassment assessors—academic and administrative staff responsible for investigating complaints and mediating disputes. Previously, exactly eight assessors were appointed by the provost, consulting with student and staff associations and unions, whereas now eight is merely the minimum number of assessors, but more can be added.

In addition, the revisions increase the term length of the harassment assessor from two years to three years, and subject the position to annual performance reviews.

“It’s a difficult job, and it turns out not everyone is suitable for doing it,” White said.

The motion passed unanimously.

Budget for 2015

Provost Anthony Masi presented a preliminary report on the university’s budget for the 2015 fiscal year, which is subject to further development and will be presented for approval in the spring.

The budget plan will take into consideration the possibility of a reinvestment of funding valued between $200 and $250 million by the provincial government between the 2015 and the 2019 fiscal year. Since the decision to refund is not concrete—the provincial government proposed but did not confirm a total investment of $1.7 billion for universities at the 2013 Higher Education Summit held in February— the budget will also consider the possibility of no reinvestment.

“We can’t count on that,” Masi said. “Economic downturn could impede investment, and there could be a shift in political priorities.”

According to Masi’s presentation, the administration will make budget proposals in anticipation of the reinvestment, but with safeguards as a precaution.

“We have to specify some additional controls that we would have to put in place on expenditures in the case in which the money didn’t come,” Masi said. “So we’d have a list of priority spending, and we would only be able to reach some of those priorities if the government’s actual reinvestments […] were to come through.”

a, News

Panelists debate effectiveness of voluntary ethics policy in mining industry

The policies and ethics of the Canadian mining industry were at the forefront of a Nov. 21 debate co-hosted by McGill’s Research Group Investigating Canadian Mining in Latin America (MICLA), McGill’s chapter of Journalists for Human Rights, and McGill’s chapter of Amnesty International.

Panelists debated Canada’s current policy of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)—an expectation that companies take their own measures to ensure ethical operations and maintain social and environmental sustainability—and its effectiveness as a form of voluntary regulation.

Panelist John McKay, a Liberal Member of Parliament, said he disapproved of the amibuity of current policy and argued that enforcement is the ideal method to ensure the CSR’s standards of responsibility are met.

“We don’t really have a national consensus as to how Canada should enforce compliance with these norms,” McKay said. “I think your optimum choice is actually legislation.”

McKay referenced his 2009 private members bill, C-300, which would have taken a step in legislating extractive industry standards for Canadian companies. The bill, which did not become law, would have mandated mining companies to adhere to human rights standards internationally.

Normand Champigny, president of Quebec-based Donner Metals, expressed a different view, saying that the policy has been effective in developing standards, including involvement of mining companies with local communities, creating job opportunities, and developing areas.

“Workers are trained, safety record is good, and you will find that it’s an opportunity for training and education,” Champigny said. “There are ripple effects in the economy which are significant that would not exist otherwise if you didn’t have this development.”

Grahame Russell, co-director of Rights Action, said the policy is not effective at getting mining corporations to take responsibility because companies favour profit over people.

“There’s no doubt that mining is good—mainly for the mining companies, for the investors, the shareholders, the developers,” said Russell. “What’s sustainable for these companies is their profits.”

Some attendees of the event also expressed their opinion on the policy. Steven Schnoor, activist and professor of communication studies at Concordia University, said he opposed the CSR policy as well.

“There’s no transparency in these [CSR] initiatives,” Schnoor said. “They’re totally discretionary, which means a company can apply them as best they see fit […] I quite believe that CSR is little more than a justification for business as usual, and in that regard, I think it’s actually a step backwards. It’s a dangerous tool of deception.”

Looking to the future of extractive industries

Panelists also discussed their views on the future of sustainable development, extraction, and Canada’s place in the mining industry.

Jamie Kneen, Communications and Outreach Coordinator of MiningWatch Canada, spoke in favour of sustainable development and about his concern for mining’s potentially harmful side effects.

“We need to be collectively looking at what happens beyond economic growth,” he said, “Because we live in a finite world, because we have used up an awful lot of our [resources].”

Jim Cooney, McGill professor at the Institute for International Development Studies, said a sustainable future of the mining industry is possible if preventative measures are taken now. These include “no-go zones,” which would be off limits to mine due to potential environmental or social risk, and the development of a sustainable human progress index, which would integrate economic, socio-cultural, and environmental dimensions of human life equally into governance and decision making.

“You take different dimensions of our human life on this planet—the economic dimensions, the sociocultural dimension, the environmental dimension, the dimension of governance and how we make decisions, and you give equal weight to them, and you engage in a process in which they are constantly integrated and harmonized,” Cooney said.

 “A key element is to use the resources of today with respect for the needs of future generations,” he said.  “Sustainable development is all about a process.”

Rachel Mulbry, U3 Arts and member of MICLA, said the goal of the event was to broaden the conversation around social responsibility in the mining industry.

“It is a pretty polarized issue,” Mulbry said. “It’s very rare that discussions [between NGOs and policy makers] take place in the same location at the same time, which gives a chance to hold people accountable—all of the people on the panel.”

Read the latest issue

Read the latest issue